Non-const variable initialization before constant objects of class are created - c++

Question

I have a vector:
std::vector<uint16_t> free_ids;
I need for it operator== of my class GameObject. When an object is created, it will receive free id from vector, thus it will be "moved" from it to object. It will get values simply like this:
void init(void)
{
for(uint64_t i=0; i<30; ++i)
free_ids.push_back(i);
}
So I have class that uses that succesfully.
class GameObject
{
public:
static std::vector<GameObject*> created_objects; // all objects created ever
static constexpr auto& CO = created_objects;
GameObject()
{
id = free_ids.front(); // get id from vector
free_ids.erase(free_ids.begin()); // delete it from vector
CO.push_back(this); // add address to all object created ever
}
GameObject(const GameObject& other)
{
// copy attributes I didn't include in this code
id = free_ids.front();
free_ids.erase(free_ids.begin());
CO.push_back(this);
}
~GameObject()
{
free_ids.push_back(id); // return id to vector
CO.erase(std::remove(CO.begin(), CO.end(), this), CO.end());
// remove object by address
}
bool operator==(const GameObject& other)
{
return id==other.id; // check if id is the same (if it's the same object)
}
const uint64_t& get_id(void) const
{
return id;
}
private:
uint64_t id;
};
std::vector<GameObject*> GameObject::created_objects;
I'd love to have global constant of type GameObject, but it will cause segmentation fault, because init() was never called before main() call
//const GameObject Progenitor; //segmentation fault, free_ids not initialized yet
And a sample program:
int main()
{
srand(time(NULL));
init();
const GameObject Progenitor; // It's temporary replacement for my global
std::vector<GameObject> clone_army;
clone_army.reserve(20); // GameObjects can't be reallocated bacause
// their addresses are stored in class static vector
auto& CA = clone_army;
for(uint64_t i=0; i<20; ++i)
CA.push_back(Progenitor);
std::cout << "Storage used. Unoccupied ids: " << std::endl;
for(auto& x : free_ids)
std::cout << x << std::endl;
auto& victim = clone_army[rand()%20]; // it's much more compilated
std::cout << "\nOne will die. Victim is... clone no. " << victim.get_id() << std::endl;
CA.erase(std::remove(CA.begin(), CA.end(), victim), CA.end());
// need to remove victim by value, operator== involved
std::cout << "\nProgenitor id: ";
for(auto& x : GameObject::CO)
std::cout << x->get_id() << std::endl;
}
Responsible headers:
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <ctime>
My question is, how to initialize std::vector<uint16_t> free_ids; - which can't be const, before any object of GameObject class is ever created?
(There will be many progenitors of different inherited classes, template-like objects that I will use (already am but want to rearrange code) to create real-time clones)

Answer 1

While it is easy to create a static object which will initialize the vector in it's constructor, you can never guarantee that this static object will be initialized before all other static objects in different translation units.
Instead, what you might do is to employ a singleton-type thing. Within this singleton, you can expose get_id and release_id functions. Judging by the code provided, I do not think you need me to sketch out this singleton for you, but if you do, feel free to request.

Answer 2

To be honest, you could just do this.
class GameObject
{
private:
using InstanceId = unsigned long long;
static InstanceId _OBJECT_ID = 0;
protected:
const InstanceId mId;
public:
GameObject()
: mId(_OBJECT_ID++)
{}
};
Of course you could get conflicts if your game spawns more than 18446744073709551615 objects during a run.

Answer 3

Easy option:
You could define a helper class, that make sure that your vecotr is initialized only once:
class GameObjectHelper {
static bool done;
public:
GameObjectHelper() {
if (!done) {
init();
done = false;
}
}
};
bool GameObjectHelper::done = false;
Then you can make sure that the constructor of this object is called before the constructor of GameObject by taking benefit of the fact that a base class is constructed before its derived:
class GameObject : private GameObjectHelper {
...
} ;
Important edit: If your GameObjects are multithreaded, done will be initialized to false only once in a thread safe fashion. Unfortunately, several threads could enter the if statement and lead to a race condition. I didn't address this topic in first place, because your remaining code doesn't show evidence of multithreading: your access to the global vector is not thread safe and might lead to adverse race conditions. If you really need multithreading, and if you can't apply the second option, then you should use atomic done with compare_exchange_strong() to test its value.
Cleaner variant:
If you want to avoid your vector being global, you could as well define a helper class such as:
class GameObjectHelper {
vector<uint16_t> free_ids;
public:
GameObjectHelper() {
for(uint64_t i=0; i<30; ++i)
free_ids.push_back(i);
}
}
};
and create a static member obect in the GameObject class:
class GameObject {
protected:
static GameObjectHelper goh;
...
} ;
Of course this works if and only if your vector is solely used by GameObject and its derivates.
But this one is threadsafe, as there the static object is guaranteed to be initialized only once.