I have a class that inherits from QFileDialog. In the constructor, I call setDirectory and pass in the last directory visited (which the class keeps track of; see code below). On Windows, this works fine. And if I show the dialog multiple times, it is internally smart enough to resume at the last location (e.g. where the user saved a file before). This is the desired behavior.
On Ubuntu 12.04 (GCC 4.8 compiler), on the other hand, the system does not automatically resume where last left off if I call showFileDialog multiple times. So I tried adding the setDirectory call within that function as commented below, but that didn't change anything. Furthermore, if I take out setDirectory from the constructor so it is only called in showFileDialog, the file dialog opens to the folder from which the program was run. (i.e. setDirectory didn't work.) Subsequent calls to showFileDialog will open a file dialog starting in the directory requested.
So it seems like the call has a delayed effectiveness. Is this a Qt bug, or mine? Either way, how can I get the setDirectory call to be effective?
Example code:
QString FileDialog::defaultDir = QDir::homePath();
FileDialog::FileDialog(QWidget *parentWindow /*, ...*/)
: QFileDialog(parentWindow)
{
setDirectory(defaultDir);
//...
}
QString FileDialog::showFileDialog()
{
// Adding setDirectory(defaultDir) here doesn't help.
if(!exec())
{
return QString::null;
}
defaultDir = directory().path();
//...
}
It is not clear from the code above how you know that the path was changed. I'm not sure that directory() is responsible for that.
Consider using void QFileDialog::directoryEntered(const QString & directory) signal.
Workaround found:
I happen to set the dialog title (setWindowTitle()) every time I open a FileDialog. If I connect to the QFileDialog::windowTitleChanged signal and call setDirectory within the slot, it is effective.
This is an unintuitive workaround though, so I am open to better answers.
Related
Problem
I'm trying to open an MFC program that reads a Microsoft Access database (.mdb) and allows the user to view or modify the data. This is an existing program (and source code) given to me by a group in another lab where the program opens and works just fine.
In our lab, I have yet to see it load properly. When run, it pops up a dialog box that says, "Attempted an unsupported operation". Windows then offers me a chance to debug and such before it crashes.
Environment
In the other lab, they use Windows 7 and Microsoft Office 2010, and it works.
In our lab, I've tried Windows 7 with Office 2013 and Windows XP with Office 2010. The latter crashes without giving me the dialog box. I don't know if we have a Win7/MSO2010 machine.
The Function
I have the source code for the program. The solution file implies it was last developed in VS2010, which the computers I tested on had installed as well. Running it out of Visual Studio 2010 or straight from the executable yields the same results.
I have added additional debug dialog boxes to the code that narrow down the problem to this function call, which the code never gets past:
CwinApp:OpenDocumentFile(LPCTSTR lpszPathName)
The single string passed into the function is a path and filename for the MS Access database to be opened. It exists in a temporary directory created by another program. This is on a drive other than C, though I've tested some there, as well. Problems with programs related to this one often stem from files with "read only" status, but I continually check the temporary files created, and they are write-able.
Documentation
I found this information titled "Breaking Changes in Visual C++" for VS2010 through another SO question:
A new virtual function was added to the CDocTemplate class. This new virtual function is CDocTemplate::OpenDocumentFile. The previous version of OpenDocumentFile had two parameters. The new version has three parameters. To support the restart manager, any class derived from CDocTemplate must implement the version that has three parameters. For more information about the function, see CDocTemplate::OpenDocumentFile. The new parameter is bAddToMRU.
Code
I feel this might be the answer! But I don't have a strong idea of exactly what to change to get this to work. Here's where I stopped:
Program.cpp
CDocument* ProgramApp::OpenDocumentFile(LPCTSTR lpszFileName, BOOL bAddToLRU, BOOL bMakeVisible)
{
// Add specialized code here and/or call base class
// Debug messages added
CDocument* tempDoc;
AfxMessageBox(lpszFileName);
tempDoc = CWinApp::OpenDocumentFile(lpszFileName, bAddToMRU);
AfxMessageBox("Opened database!");
return tempDoc;
}
Program.h
class ProgramApp : public CWinApp
{
public:
...
virtual CDocument* OpenDocumentFile(LPCTSTR lpszFileName, BOOL bAddToMRU, BOOL bMakeVisible);
afxwin.h
class CWinApp : public CWinThread
{
...
virtual CDocument* OpenDocumentFile(LPCTSTR lpszFileName);
virtual CDocument* OpenDocumentFile(LPCTSTR lpszFileName, BOOL bAddToMRU);
Changing the Program.cpp call to be from a "Template" class caused errors, but I wouldn't be surprised if that's towards the answer. This solution looks similar, but I'm not sure exactly what to do.
My hope is that this problem has a simple solution that someone more knowledgeable can give me. I would be much appreciative, and additional context would help a lot.
Edit: Debugging
I drilled down into the Windows code to see what was precisely going wrong. It seemed too dense to understand, but a coworker and I may have clues based on it. The failure message happens here:
dlgdata.cpp
// Could be a windowless OCX
pSite = m_pDlgWnd->GetOldControlSite(nIDC);
if (pSite == NULL)
{
TRACE(traceAppMsg, 0, "Error: no data exchange control with ID 0x%04x.\n", nIDC);
ASSERT(FALSE);
AfxThrowNotSupportedException();
}
...Although we are seeing debugger issues here:
occcont.cpp
COleControlSiteOrWnd *pemp = new COleControlSiteOrWnd(hwndCtrl, pOccDlgInfo->m_pItemInfo[i].bAutoRadioButton);
ASSERT(IsWindow(pTemp->m_hWnd));
if (IsWindow(pTemp->m_hWnd))
{
hwndStart = pTemp->m_hWnd;
...
My coworker believes this could have little to do with the opening of this document as I suspected and more to do with objects/controls we don't have on our lab computers trying to be used for the program.
I have faced the same problem in opendocumentfile(), there was a control in CFormView class which i was not using so i commented it out but forget to delete from .rc file. Once i remove the control entry from .rc file the problem disappear.
there should be no control variable uninitialize , please check that also
just started using qt,
looked through docs, google, examples, etc.. trying to find simple examples(working mind you)
that showed how to do (imho) simple things, by themselves.
well i stumbled upon my answer and i was wondering if this approach would cause an issue later as the code becomes more complex.
there are more includes than needed for this example, but this is direct from working code.
mainwindow.h:
i added
private slots:
void vpkButton_clicked();
and after
Ui::MainWindow *ui;
i added
QLineEdit *vpkPathTxt;
in mainwindow.cpp:
after
ui->setupUi(this);
i added
connect( this->ui->vpkButton, SIGNAL( clicked() ), this, SLOT(vpkButton_clicked()) );
to connect my ui button to the proper slot, the issue was getting the string from vpkButton_clicked() to display in the line edit i made in the designer,
what ended up working for me was adding this next:
vpkPathTxt = this->ui->vpkPathTxt;
the function in my main.cpp became very easy:
(QString declarations at top outside voids)
void MainWindow::vpkButton_clicked()
{
vpkName = QFileDialog::getOpenFileName(this,
tr("Open VPK File"), "~/", tr("VPK Files (*_dir.vpk)"));
vpkPathTxt->setText(vpkName);
qDebug() << vpkName;
}
the reason i am ask is because it seems a little too easy to be reliable, and the fact that i havent seen it done like this,
any input welcome
thankyou
One problem with your slot is that you don't consider the case where the user discards the "open file" dialog. In this case, the function QFileDialog::getOpenFileName returns a null QString, so you should only proceed with your logic if the return value was not a null string:
if (!vpkName.isNull()) {
...
}
The second problem is as follows and I made some assumptions since I don't see your full code:
I guess you want to load a file using the file name the user has chosen in the dialog. But you set the file name in the line edit too, which the user can edit by hand. I also guess that the actual file loading happens in a different step (i.e. after clicking another button), so after the user has edited the file name by hand in the line edit it won't be the same than in your local variable vpkName.
When loading the file I'd read the contents of the line edit instead of the variable vpkName so the edit made by hand will be respected.
A different method is to also watch for editing of the line edit and reflect the changes in your variable too. Then it will be ok to read the variable instead of the line edit when loading the file later on.
I'm developing an app on windows with Qt and I need to detect changes in a specific folder.
So I used a QFileSystemWatcher, and I connect the directoryChanged signal to a function that will send a message in case of changes.
The problem is that the "slot" function connected to directoryChanged is not called if I modify a file's content, but only when a file or directory is removed or added.
However, the documentation says that this signal is emitted when "the directory at a specified path, is modified (e.g., when a file is added, modified or deleted) or removed from disk."
Does anyone have an explanation?
Thanks in advance =)
According to Qt source code version 4.8.2, as following:
void QFileSystemWatcherPrivate::_q_directoryChanged(const QString &path, bool removed)
{
Q_Q(QFileSystemWatcher);
if (!directories.contains(path)) {
// perhaps the path was removed after a change was detected, but before we delivered the signal
return;
}
if (removed)
directories.removeAll(path);
emit q->directoryChanged(path);
}
It seems that directoryChanged emit when a file removed, added(for the new added file not contains in directories), and renamed. The implementation does not guarantee to detect a modification of a file's content. Hope that helps :P
I'm having a strange problem with wxWidgets. I have the following code
MyFrame::OnDoSomeLongThing(...) {
progScreen = new wxProgressDialog(text,text,number,this,wxPD_AUTO_HIDE); // wxProgressDialog *progScreen is class member
doPartOfThing() // calls the update method at the end of it
....
doLastPartOfThing() // again calls update method that pushes value to 100/100
progScreen->Destroy();
}
MyFrame::update() {
progScreen->Update(newValue);
}
Now here's the thing. I can literally comment out the lines relating to progScreen, just let the process go without using a progress dialog, after all is said and done, my apps exits gracefully when I close the main window.
However, just the use of the progress dialog is somehow extending the life of the application. I've tried Destroy(), I've tried simply 'delete progScreen', and both, every time: I'll close the main frame, the process keeps running, and at some point exits with some astronomical number. The only thing I could think might be relevant, is that the doPartsOfThings methods may call boost::this_thread::sleep, because it involves waiting and whatnot down in my model class. But this shouldn't have anything to do with my problem. Or maybe it does... EDIT: I do want to emphasize that progScreen->Update() IS being called from the main (GUI) thread.
So I ask, am I using a wxProgressDialog correctly? If not, how should it be used?
Thanks for your help!
EDIT:
Well... it turns out that removing wxPD_AUTO_HIDE fixed the problem. I'm still not quite sure what the problem is, but the dialog even still behaves as before. App closes as expected.
I think that you need to override the wxApp method that closes the application so that it closes the wxProgressDialog object before it quits.
wxApp::OnExit
virtual int OnExit()
Override this member function for any processing which needs to be
done as the application is about to exit. OnExit is called after
destroying all application windows and controls, but before wxWidgets
cleanup. Note that it is not called at all if OnInit failed.
The return value of this function is currently ignored, return the
same value as returned by the base class method if you override it.
You will need something like, assuming progScreen is a public attribute of your frame
int myApp::OnExit()
{
(MyFrame*)(GetTopWindow())->progScreen->Destroy()
return wxApp::OnExit();
}
My friend and I have each created parts of a GUI using Qt 4. They both work independently and I am trying to integrate his form with the my main window. As of now this is the code I am using to try and load his form:
//connect buttons and such
connect(exitbtn, SIGNAL(triggered()),this,SLOT(terminated()));
connect(add, SIGNAL(triggered()),this,SLOT(add_rec()));
void MainWindowImpl::add_rec()
{
//form quits as soon as it loads...?
DialogImpl dia;//name of his form
dia.show();
}
I have included his header file. The program compiles but when I hit the trigger his form loads up for maybe half a second and then closes. Does anyone know what I am doing wrong?
You have almost get it right. This is because the RAII of C++. If you allocate the Dialog on stack, it would be destructed as soon as the function return.
Assuming MainWindowImpl inherits publically from QWidget, you're looking for this:
void MainWindowImpl::add_rec()
{
// passing "this" to the constructor makes sure dialog will be cleaned up.
// Note that DialogImpl will need a constructor that takes a
// QObject* parent parameter.
DialogImpl* dialog = new DialogImpl(this);
dialog->show();
}
Look at the Qt documentation for examples of how the constructors should look.
Apparently QT4 only allows one instance of an object at a time, however pointers are another matter. Change both the main.cpp and what ever your main window to look something like this:
DialogImpl *dia=new DialogImpl;
dia->show();