I am using jetty version 7.5.1 .
My webservice works fine with a "http://..." endpoint, but when I change it to "https://..." things go wrong.
Endpoint e = Endpoint.create(webservice);
e.publish("https://localhost:" + serverPort + "/ws/mywebservice);
I get the following error message:
"https protocol based address is not supported".
I've tried using an SslChannelConnector, a SelectChannelConnector and the combination of both.
Connector connector = new SelectChannelConnector();
connector.setPort(59180);
SslContextFactory factory = new SslContextFactory();
factory.setKeyStore("keystore");
factory.setKeyStorePassword("password");
factory.setKeyManagerPassword("password");
factory.setTrustStore("keystore");
factory.setTrustStorePassword("password");
SslSelectChannelConnector sslConnector = new SslSelectChannelConnector(factory);
sslConnector.setPort(443);
sslConnector.setMaxIdleTime(30000);
server.setConnectors(new Connector[]{connector, sslConnector});
I also tried modifying the port in the publish path. But without success.
Could it be that something went wrong with the creation of my keystore file?
Even I put the wrong password though, it does show a different error message, explaining that my password is wrong.
My options are running out. Any ideas?
EDIT: More information:
Servlets work fine with HTTPS now. But the webservices are not. Am I maybe publishing it the wrong way ?
I found several threads on various forums with similar problems. But never found a solution. I would like to write down my solution for future victims:
The publish method only accepts the http protocol. Even if you are publishing for https, this should still be "http://...". On the other hand, you should use the port of your SSL connector.
Endpoint e = Endpoint.create(webservice);
e.publish("http://localhost:443/ws/mywebservice);
Use any other protocol and you will always get the "xxx protocol based address is not supported" exception. See source code.
Note 1: The webservice already works fine at this point. However there is a point of discussion: The generated wsdl file (at https://localhost:443/ws/mywebservice?wsdl) will reference the http://... path. You could argue if the wsdl file is a requirement or just documentation.
Correcting a hostname in a WSDL file is not that hard, but replacing the protocol is harder. The easiest solution is probably to just edit the wsdl file and host the file, which is not very "dynamic" of course.
Alternatively, I solved it by creating a WsdlServlet which replaces the address. On the other hand, it does feel bad to create an entire class just to fix 1 character. :)
Note 2: Another bug in this jetty release, is the authentication. It's impossible to offer the webservice without any authentication. The best thing you can get, after turning off all possible authentication: you will still have to use 'preemptive authentication' and enter a random username and password.
Related
I am trying to set up WSO2 Identity Server behind a reverse proxy for SSL offloading. For example, let's say if WSO2 IS is available at say https://<some-ip>:9443/, I am trying to put it behind reverse proxy with address such as https://<domain name>/is/. Note the context path /is and SSL port 443. I thought that this will be trivial enough but sadly I am unable to find any conclusive documentation for achieving the same.
My applications are using OIDC to connect to WSO2 IS and using Azure Application Gateway as reverse proxy - typically all API calls works well but neither of UI (or flows involving redirections) works due to context. I can also fix redirects by URL rewriting at reverse proxy but that still doesn't solve problems. For example, login page will appear but XHR call from the same will go to /logincontext instead of /is/logincontext. Where can I set up the proxy context path in WSO2 IS? I already tried setting the same in .toml file (equivalent of setting it in carbon.xml) but it seems to be affecting only Management Portal.
WSo2 IS documentation talks about setting it up behind ngnix but that documentation is not using any path context. I could find reverse proxy documentation for other WSO2 product such as WSO2 API Manager but it only involves updating carbon.xml and that doesn't work for WSO2 IS. I am not a java person and hence, finding it difficult to figure out web app organization of WSO2.
Any help/link to documentation/guide to set up with proxy context will be useful.
I know that this answer comes a little bit late but recently I had a similar issue and here it is how I made it work, maybe it could be helpful for someone. I was using WSO2 IS 5.11.0.
Note:
I checked similar questions on stackoverflow and found a few but none was enough by itself for my case.
Maybe the solution I came up with is not the best or the most correct but it is the only one I could make work.
Here's how I did, assuming the context path is is:
Open Carbon Management Console and go to Identity Providers -> Resident. Then, go to Inbound Authentication Configuration -> OAuth2/OpenID Connect Configuration. Here, change the hostname under Identity Provider Entity ID to https://domain_name:443/is/<remaining path>.
Make sure that the port number is present or absent both here and in the client application. If there is a mismatch between the two, for some reason, it won't work (or at least it didn't for me).
Open the file deployment.toml and modify it as follows:
under the [server] section, add your proxy context at the end of the base_path url, e.g. base_path = "https://$ref{server.hostname}:${carbon.management.port}/is";
of course, also add proxy_context_path = "is" (actually, this last line should be enough but for some reason in my case it wasn't, so I had to modify the base path too);
under [transport.https.properties] add proxyPort="443".
For the record, I also turned off compression, by adding:
[transport.http.properties]
compression="off"
[transport.https.properties]
...
compression="off"
and set the token issuer URL equal to the entity id set up in Carbon, with:
[oauth]
use_entityid_as_issuer_in_oidc_discovery = true
but found out that these last two steps (turning off compression and setting the entity id as issuer) weren't needed.
Disable the csrf guard by setting org.owasp.csrfguard.Enabled = false
in the file /repository/resources/conf/templates/repository/conf/security/Owasp.CsrfGuard.Carbon.properties.j2.
This step was necessary for me to avoid the 403 Error after logging in on the Carbon Console (turning off compression didn't work).
Lastly, if you use nginx as reverse proxy (as I did), add these two lines in the location used for wso2:
proxy_redirect https://domain_name/oauth2/ https://domain_name/is/oauth2/;
proxy_redirect https://domain_name/carbon/ https://domain_name/is/carbon/;
These are needed (or at least were for me) because some URLs are not under the context path. In particular, the last one allows you to open the Carbon Console at https://domain_name/is/carbon/.
References:
wso2 api manger carbon page gives 403 Forbidden
WSO2 Identity Server login returns a 403
WSO2 Identity Server port configuration
To understand the template-based configuration model adopted from version 5.9.0 onwards, see:
https://apim.docs.wso2.com/en/latest/reference/understanding-the-new-configuration-model/
https://mcvidanagama.medium.com/understand-wso2-api-managers-new-configuration-model-6425a2710faa
Here are some useful configuration mappings from the old xml to the new toml based model:
https://github.com/ayshsandu/samples/tree/master/config-mapping
I have tried everything but I cant seem to fix this issue that is happening for only one client behind a corporate proxy/firewall. Our Silverlight application connects to Amazon S3 for downloading/Uploading some documents. On one client and one client only it returns a 407 error and after that the application fails to save anything.
Inner Exception:
System.ServiceModel.ProtocolException: [UnexpectedHttpResponseCode]
Arguments: 407,Proxy Authentication Required
We had something similar at a different client but there was more of a CORS issue. to resolve this I used cloud-front to fake a sub-domain that then accesses the S3 bucket and it solved the issue. I was hoping it would fix it with this client as well but it didnt.
I have tried adding this code to web.config as suggested by a lot of answers
<system.net>
<defaultProxy useDefaultCredentials="true" >
</defaultProxy>
</system.net>
I have read articles about passing a proxy headers with basis authentication using username and password but I am not sure how this would help us. The Proxy server is used by client and any authentication it requires is outside our domain.
**Additional Information**
The Silverlight code references 2 services. One is our wcf service that retrieves all the data for the application. One is The Amazon S3 service that uses the amazon Soap api, the endpoint for which is at http://s3.amazonaws.com/doc/2006-03-01/AmazonS3.wsdl?
If I go into our app and only use part of the system that dont make any calls to the Amazon S3 api the application works fine. As soon as I go to a part of the system that makes a call to the S3, the problem starts. funny enough the call to S3 goes fine and I can retrieve the doc fine but then any calls to our wcf service return 407.
Any ideas?
**Update 2**
Based on comments from Elliot Nelson I check the stack we were using for making http requests in our application. Turns out we are using client http for both http and https requests by default. Here is the code we have in the App.xaml constructor
public App()
{
Startup += Application_Startup;
UnhandledException += Application_UnhandledException;
InitializeComponent();
WebRequest.RegisterPrefix("http://", WebRequestCreator.ClientHttp);
WebRequest.RegisterPrefix("https://", WebRequestCreator.ClientHttp);
}
Now, to understand the differences between clienthttp and browserhttp and when to use them. Also, the potential impacts/issues of switching to browserhttp.
**Update 3**
Is there a way to request browsers to run your in-browser Silverlight application in trusted mode and would it help bypass this issue?
(Answer #2)
So, most likely (for corporate environments like this network), almost nothing can be done without whatever custom proxy settings are set in IE, usually pushed by corporate policy. To take advantage of these proxy settings, you want to use WebRequestCreator.BrowserHttp, which automatically uses the browser's default settings when making requests.
There's a table of the differences between these two clients available in the Microsoft docs. I'm guessing you were using something (maybe setting custom headers or reading the raw response body) that wasn't supported in BrowserHttp.
For security reasons, you can't "ask" the browser what its proxy settings are and use them, so this is a tricky situation. You can specify Browser vs Client handling by domain, or even for a specific request (the same page above describes how); you may be able in this case to get away with just using ClientHttp for your service calls and BrowserHttp for your S3 calls, and avoid the problem altogether!
For next steps, I'd try that approach; if it doesn't work, I'd try switching wholesale to BrowserHttp just to see if it bypasses the proxy issue (there's almost no chance the application will actually work, since you're probably using ClientHttp-only options).
Long term, you may want to consider making changes to your services so they are usable by a BrowserHttp-only application (this would require you to be pretty basic in your requests/responses, but using only BrowserHttp would be a guarantee you'd work in pretty much any corp network).
Running in trusted mode is probably a group policy thing which would require their AD admins to approve / whitelist your app.
I think the underlying issue you are facing is that the proxy requires NTLM authentication and for whatever reason the browser declines to provide your app with that context.
One way to prove that it's an NTLM auth issue is to test with curl - get it to make a req through the proxy, then it should be a bit easier to code to. EG the following curl will get you through 99% of Windows corporate proxies (assuming the proxy is at proxy-host.corp:3128):
C:\> curl.exe -v --proxy proxy-host:3128 --proxy-user : --proxy-ntlm https://www.google.com
NOTE The --proxy-user : tells curl to use the current user session to perform the NTLM challenge.
So if you can get the client to run that, you can at least identify that NTLM works, then it's a just a matter of getting the app to perform the NTLM challenge using the default credentials (which may or may not be provided by the browser session)
Since you described this as a silverlight application, I'm going to assume you can't use classic browser-proxy troubleshooting like "move browser to public network" or "try a different browser", to isolate the problem.
You should try to isolate the proxy server, and have the customer use the required proxy-auth.
The application is making request, but it might be intercepted by a transparent proxy, or the result might be coming from what you consider a web server.
In the early days, the 401 error was pretty strictly associated with web-auth, and 407 was for proxy-auth.
Architecturally, the separation is a convenience, a web server can have both web server, proxy, and reverse-proxy behaviors.
What happens is your customer's environment is making a web connection to the destination, but it receives a HTTP 407 status from some host, probably their network, or sometimes the provider. Almost certainly the request is received not forwarded. The HTTP client your application lives in needs to provide the credentials that host requires. Companies have environments that are complex enough where often your customer will say this is the first time they have heard of this (some proxy-auth is also dynamic or destination specific).
Also, in some corporate environments, the operator will allow temporary or permanent white-listing from the proxy-auth service. You should see if they can do this, even temporarily, to confirm there aren't going to be other problems.
In the end, it sounds like your application might not robustly support proxy-auth, or the proxy-auth type they use in their environment.
I have an application that calls a Https web service (as it seems created with java, not sure though). I get an error as response:
"Error on verifying message against security policy Error code:1000"
Now I don't exactly understand the error code and currently cannot find any responsible to answer me correctly. I don't ask for the error ofcourse cause this could be something about certificates, security from server etc.
Though I would like to catch the request client call I make, and see the whole envelope message to compare with a couple of samples I have so I might catch something.
How can I do this....I remember there is a tool that u can do such things when debugging a WCF service call, can this tool be used in this situation? Can someone rember me the name of the tool :)
I created the client using Add Service Reference, from VS 2010 and it created some custom bindings. On these bindings it created this a tag with an attribute decompressionEnabled="true" but I deleted because VS was complaining attribute is not allowed!!!
The documentation I have for these services says about authentication credential inside the message transport object that serialized in the request (requestObject) but refers to another couple of password and username properties I cannot seem to find them. Tried to add the in client.ClientCredentials.UserName.UserName and Password properties, but I get a read only error there (strange not always).
They also mention in the specifications about Connect with SOAP Security Extensions (WS-Security) which I don't understand if me, the client, has to do something from it's side, aren't these supposed to extract in the config file when generated?
Any hints and tips are welcome.
Thank you.
I'm trying to implement Facebook Connect on a website with .NET MVC using C#.
I've followed the instructions here: http://wiki.developers.facebook.com/index.php/Trying_Out_Facebook_Connect step by step. I can make the login work as in that when I log in through the site I'm also logged into Facebook.
In order to work with this in the server I think I need to access the cookies Facebook is supposed to leave like:
APIKEY_user
APIKEY_session_key
...
as mentioned here http://wiki.developers.facebook.com/index.php/Verifying_The_Signature.
The thing is I'm not getting any of these cookies. I've googled and it seems like I'm the only person with this problem. Any ideas as to what I could be doing wrong ? Has this happened to anyone else ?
The issue was that I was developing locally using localhost.
I resolved the problem by changing the settings for the application to point to a certain web address instead of localhost and changing my hosts file lo point that same web address to 127.0.0.1
from the UI/client-side perspective, always insure you have the correct path indicated for the xd_receiver file in your FB.init() method.
Firecookie is very useful for seeing what Cookies are/aren't being set.
I am getting an error when trying to connect to an Exchange server using the cfexchangeconnection tag. First some code:
<cfexchangeconnection action="open"
server="****"
username="****"
password="****"
connection="myEX"
protocol="https"
port="443">
I know its the right server because it fails when not processing via https. I have tried:
Following all the instructions here http://help.adobe.com/en_US/ColdFusion/9.0/Developing/WSc3ff6d0ea77859461172e0811cbec14f31-7fed.html
Prefixing username with a domain name, adding #domain name, etc and no luck.
The error I get is:
**Access to the Exchange server denied.**
Ensure that the user name and password are correct.
Any ideas
Here's an idea - this is what I needed to do to make my cfexchange connection work. Not entirely sure if it's the same problem. I think I had a 440 error, rather than your 401 error.
I'm using:
https
webdav
forms based auth
Exchange 2007
Coldfusion 8
Windows 2003 servers
Here's the connection string that worked for me. What was keeping my connection from working was the need for the formBasedAuthenticationURL. This is a poorly documented attribute by both Adobe and Microsoft.
<cfexchangeconnection action="open"
username="first.last"
password="mypassword"
mailboxname="myAcctName"
server="my.mail.server"
protocol="https"
connection="sample"
formBasedAuthentication="true"
formBasedAuthenticationURL="https://my.mail.server/owa/auth/owaauth.dll">
<cfexchangecalendar action="get" name="mycal" connection="sample">
<cfexchangefilter name="startTime" from="#theDate#" to="#theEndDate#">
</cfexchangecalendar>
<cfexchangeConnection action="close" connection="sample">
Additional notes:
IIS and WebDAV are enabled on the target Exchange server.
The username and password you're using has the appropriate permissions for
a WebDAV connection. (I'm not the Exchange admin, so I'm not sure what they
are, but I think the account needs to be allowed to connect to OWA. - Please
correct me if I am wrong.)
Optional: (don't use if you don't have to)
IF HTTPS is required, use the appropriate argument.
IF Forms Based Authentication is on in Exchange 2007 (as was my case),
you'll have to work around it using the formBasedAuthenticationURL argument.
Not sure if that's it, but I hope it is!