I have an Qt5 c++ app with 2 threads, thread A is started when the main program starts up. The start method of thread A runs successfully.
So far so good. Next, in the main program I send a signal to Thread A to start a QTimer, which it does - but that timer never expires!
Thread B handles tcp connections. When I initiate a telnet connection to my app, thread B fires up and suddenly I see my Qtimer from thread A expiring at normal intervals.
Why is the QTimer from thread A not expiring until thread B starts?
I suspect my threads are getting messed up. note the last section of code below products this:
thread of this: QThread(0x200fe00)
thread of timer: QThread(0x1fff470)
Which suggest my worker object (this), is in a different thread from my timer object. This timer thread address is actually the MAIN thread. Why? I'm confused.
Suggestions?
In my main app I create and start my thread like this:
QThread * MyControllerThread = new QThread(this);
if (MyControllerThread) {
TheController *worker = new TheController(MyControllerThread);
if (worker) {
connect(MyControllerThread, SIGNAL(started()), worker, SLOT(start()));
connect(MyControllerThread, SIGNAL(finished()), worker, SLOT(deleteLater()));
connect(MyControllerThread, SIGNAL(finished()), MyControllerThread, SLOT(deleteLater()));
worker->moveToThread(MyControllerThread);
MyControllerThread->start();
}
and in my main app I emit a signal to the new thread:
emit sig_startlocalpeer(Types::EActionLocalServiceStart); // Move the local peer to standby mode to start remote tests
which runs a slot in my thread (TheController object):
connect(&m_remotetestintervaltimer,SIGNAL(timeout()),this,SLOT(expiredRemoteTestIntervalTimer()));
m_remotetestintervaltimer.setTimerType(Qt::VeryCoarseTimer);
m_remotetestintervaltimer.start(REMOTETEST_TIMER_INTERVAL); // Wait between ticks
qDebug() << "thread of this: " << this->thread();
qDebug() << "thread of timer: " << m_remotetestintervaltimer.thread();
Well, it's not a Qt5 bug, it's more an inaccurate understanding of Qt's thread spirit.
In Qt, you have two ways to implement a thread which are using or not an even loop. Here is just a small visual example.
No event loop
myMethodCalledInANewThread
{
do{ ... }while(...);
}
With an event loop
myMethodCalledInANewThread
{
[...]
exec();
}
(Of course you can mix a do/while with an even loop but stay simple).
In QTimer's doc, you can read:
In multithreaded applications, you can use QTimer in any thread that
has an event loop. [...] Qt uses the timer's thread affinity to
determine which thread will emit the timeout() signal. Because of
this, you must start and stop the timer in its thread; it is not
possible to start a timer from another thread.
So I'm pretty sure you don't have a second event loop in your second thread and that's why you have the behaviour you described.
To give you some tips to be totally clear with thread using Qt, I suggest you to read:
QThread doc: https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qthread.html
QTimer doc: https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtimer.html
and a very good article about how QThread implementation is misunderstood by a lot of users:
You're doing it wrong: https://www.qt.io/blog/2010/06/17/youre-doing-it-wrong
I hope it will help ;)
The best answer seems to be a combination of RobbieE and Kuba:
You have to explicitly set the parent of the member variable in constructor. The parent-child feature is a Qt thing that exists among classes derived from QObject, it is not a feature of C++.
I never knew this - I assumed that when an object was created, its members variables automatically had their parent set to the object. Good to know!!
Related
I'm using QThread's event loop to communicate with worker threads.
I noticed that I can't use the thread's event loop just after a start.
The following code does not work, as threadEventDispatcher appears to be NULL.
QThread *thread = new QThread;
thread->start();
auto* threadEventDispatcher = thread->eventDispatcher();
Q_ASSERT(threadEventDispatcher != nullptr);
QMetaObject::invokeMethod(threadEventDispatcher, [] { printf("Hello world\n");
According to Qt doc,
An event dispatcher is automatically created for the main thread when QCoreApplication is instantiated and on start() for auxiliary threads.
By browsing the QThread source code, I'm under the impression that the eventDispatcher is created in the running thread, which may not yet be ready when start exits.
I managed to access the eventDispatcher by using a sleep after the start, but I could not find an API that would allow me to properly wait for the thread to actually run.
How can I wait for the thread to actually run, and access eventDispatcher ?
Simply connect to QThread::started() signal.
I have two functions which has to be executed after specific interval of time. So I create two threads and each function is executed in separate threads. One of the function "checkForEvent()" has a Event which is waiting for an event to happen.
When the "checkForEvent()" function is waiting for an event the other function "checkServer()" is not being executed even though it is run in a separate thread.
dongleThread = new QThread(this);
checkDongle = new QTimer();
checkDongle->setInterval(DONGLE_CHECK_TIMER);
checkDongle->moveToThread(dongleThread);
connect(checkDongle, SIGNAL(timeout()), this, SLOT(checkForEvent()));
connect(dongleThread, SIGNAL(started()), checkDongle, SLOT(start()));
dongleThread->start();
serverThread = new QThread(this);
checkServer = new QTimer();
checkServer->setInterval(SERVER_CHECK_TIMER);
checkServer->moveToThread(serverThread);
connect(checkServer, SIGNAL(timeout()), this, SLOT(checkServer()));
connect(serverThread, SIGNAL(started()), checkServer, SLOT(start()));
serverThread->start();
checkForEvent() //This function is waiting for an Event
checkServer()
How can I execute both the functions in separate threads ?
Thank you!!
Your connect call uses the default connection type: Qt::AutoConnection. Here is what this means:
Qt::AutoConnection: If the receiver lives in the thread that emits the signal, Qt::DirectConnection is used. Otherwise, Qt::QueuedConnection is used. The connection type is determined when the signal is emitted.
Here your QTimer and this are in a different thread. It means Qt::QueuedConnection will be used.
Qt::QueuedConnection: The slot is invoked when control returns to the event loop of the receiver's thread. The slot is executed in the receiver's thread.
So your two slots are called in the thread of this. If one is blocking, the other one will never run.
One way of fixing the problem is having a worker object moved to its own thread. The worker object would call checkForEvent and emit a signal after the wait is over. This signal can be connected to checkServer in this. With this, you need only one thread. You can look at the documentation of QThread for more information about worker objects.
I have a Qt GUI application which contains some classes and a main. For one of the computationally heavy writing operation i created a a QThreadas a class member. Something like this:
//class members
std::unique_ptr<QThread> m_savingThread;
std::unique_ptr<DiffClass> m_controller;
connect(this, &SomeClass::saveAll, m_controller.get(), &DiffClass::saveToAll, Qt::QueuedConnection);
connect(m_controller.get(), &DiffClass::done, m_savingThread.get(), &QThread::quit);
void SomeClass::saveToFile()
{
//Saving thread
qDebug() << "From main thread:" << QThread::currentThreadId();
m_controller->moveToThread(m_savingThread.get());
m_savingThread->start();
qRegisterMetaType<std::string>("std::string");
emit saveAll(someString);
}
The above code works fine. But i need the m_controller object back to the main GUI thread once the saving operation is finished. I could find something similar
here. Briefly, it states that since QThread can only "push" the object into a thread, i need to push it again into the main thread from the current worker thread.
void DiffClass::saveToAll(someString)
{
qDebug() << "From worker thread:" << QThread::currentThreadId();
/*saving operation*/
moveToThread(QApplication::instance()->thread()); //Error QCoreApplication has no member thread()
emit done();
}
Is there a way to change the affinity of the object back to the main thread?
EDIT 1: My connect to saveToAll is a QueuedConnection.
First and foremost, why would you want to switch thread affinity back and forth? There doesn't seem to be a practical side to this.
Other than that, it should be possible to change it to another threat, the condition is that the object has no parent and the moveToThread() is invoked from the current affinity thread.
You can use QMetaObject::invokeMethod() with Qt::QueuedConnection specified from any thread to schedule a slot execution from the current affinity thread, which will change affinity from the right thread to whatever thread you pass as a parameter.
But seeing how you try to change it from inside the class, that should work as expected, as long as saveToAll() is invoked via the signal/slot mechanism (rather than directly from just about any thread).
//Error QCoreApplication has no member thread()
It most certainly does according to the documentation.
I have a class derived from QThread: class MyClass : public QThread
This class is connected with a slot of another object. Originally this was connected as Qt::AutoConnection. But then - as soon as the thread is started (MyClass::run()) - the signal is no longer "reaching the slot" (why?).
// connected before myObject->run()
s = QObject::connect(
_myObject, SIGNAL(signalLogMessage(const QString&, QtMsgType)),
this, SLOT(slotLogMessage(const QString&, QtMsgType)), Qt::DirectConnection);
My first idea was that I need to force Qt::QueuedConnection (this / _myObject will be cross threaded). In this case it does not work at all. Only Qt::DirectConnection works. After the thread is started, IMHO Qt::QueuedConnection is the correct choice (cross thread).
Any idea what is going wrong? The connection itself seems to be correct, otherwise it was not working at (mean even not with Qt::DirectConnection).
Edit 1: -- As of hyde's answer / Nikos' comment
As of right now I think hyde's answer / Nikos' comment are pointing out the root cause. My QThread is running it's own message loop for another application. This is the reason why it is running in its own thread and is basically an infinite loop
run() {
// exec(); // while not reached
while (_runMessageLoop && ...) {
hr = CallDispatch(.....);
if (hr== 0) QThread::msleep(100);
// QCoreApplication::processEvents();
}
}
Guess due to this infinite loop the Qt message loop is not running and no signal / slots are processed (is this correct?) When forcing Qt::DirectConnection the methods are called directly with no Qt message loop required, this might be the reason why this is the only connection type working.
The question is now, how can I combine the Qt and my own message loop (if this is feasible)? Cannot call exec() before the loop (because then it is in the Qt loop), and just the QCoreApplication::processEvents(); in "my loop" is still not working.
=> see new Question here: How to combine own message loop and Qt event loop?
Hard to say without seeing all the code, but it may be because of this:
QThread object itself is not the thread, it's the thread controller. Most importantly, QThread object's thread affinity should not be the thread it controls. If your thread runs Qt event loop, then it's best to avoid subclassing QThread. Instead, have your logic (inter-thread slots etc) in another QObject, which you move to the thread you created with moveToThread after creating it. Only real reason to subclass QThread is to override run() method with one which does not call exec().
Related reading:
https://www.qt.io/blog/2010/06/17/youre-doing-it-wrong
Addition:
If you override QThread::run(), you have to call QThread::exec() there or event loop won't be running and no non-direct signal gets delivered to any QObject with that thread affinity. If you want to have your own event loop, that is possible, you just have to call QCoreApplication::processEvents() to process Qt events.
I want to inform an object when a thread has finished running. However, I cannot get the thread to exit properly. I have the following code:
Processor.cpp
thread = new QThread;
tw = new ThreadWorker;
connect(tw, SIGNAL(updateStatus(QString)), this, SLOT(statusUpdate(QString)));
tw->doSetup(thread, strDic);
tw->moveToThread(thread);
thread->start();
while(thread->isRunning())
{
}
qDebug() << "Thread Finished";
ThreadWorker.cpp
void ThreadWorker::doSetup(QThread *thread, const string &path)
{
_strPath = path;
connect(thread, SIGNAL(started()), this, SLOT(run()));
connect(this, SIGNAL(finished()), thread, SLOT(quit())); //tried terminate() also
}
void ThreadWorker::run()
{
DirectorySearch dicSearch;
vector<string> vecFileList = dicSearch.getFileList(_strPath);
emit updateStatus("Directory Fetched");
emit finished();
}
The quit() slot does not seem to stop the thread (QThread::isFinished never returns true). Can someone guide me in the right direction?
(Note: ThreadWorker does not inherit from QThread)
Assuming that Processor.cpp is running in your main thread, the while(thread->isRunning()) loop has your main thread completely tied up. This means that your application's event loop cannot do any processing so the signalupdateStatus() for example, will never get processed. As mentioned in the comments, since the QThread object is created by the main thread, its signals won't work either since they will also require the main event loop to be doing its thing. Besides, if you are waiting in your main thread for your worker thread to do something, why use a worker thread at all? :)
Try removing the while loop, add a slot workDone() (or whatever you want to call it) to Processor.cpp and connect that to your Threadworker's finished() signal.
I had the same problem and found the answer. Here is my question:
What is the use of QThread.wait() function?
To solve your problem, you don't need to run the QCoreApplication::instance()->processEvents() in your while loop, what you need to do is, instead of invoking the quit() which tries to send a signal to your creating thread's event loop (which is now blocked by the while loop), you have to call it directly.
So for your code, drop the line:
connect(this, SIGNAL(finished()), thread, SLOT(quit())); //tried terminate() also
And instead of:
emit finished();
Use:
this->thread()->quit();
Tada... problem solved. Lesson learned: don't try to exit a worker thread by the qt signal-slot mechanism from within it, because your signals do not end up where they are supposed to (your worker thread's event loop), but they end up in the creating thread instead. You never know what that thread is doing, and if its event loop is running or not, and this shouldn't be of business to your worker thread anyways... Instead, call the quit directly.
You can use Qt::DirectConnection:
connect(this, SIGNAL(finished()), thread, SLOT(quit()), Qt::DirectConnection);
This stops the thread.
Instead of doing your 'doSetup' function... before you moveToThread, setup connections between SINGALS on tw's parent and SLOTS in tw.
I would do 4 connections.
First is to the run method in ThreadWorker. Thats simple and self explainatory enough.
Second is from your finished signal to the third SIGNAL connection below. A SIGNAL that quits the thread
Third to a SIGNAL that should call the terminate() slot of the thread. This will effectively close the event loop setup when you connect to the run method (exec is auto called when you do a start()) and since your run method isn't a loop of some sort, will close the thread without issue.
Forth is from the thread's terminated() SIGNAL to a SLOT in tw's parent. This will show you when the thread is dead if you want to do something at that point.
You do the above connections (if you need to pass in the string, add a variable to the run method and corresponding SIGNAL connection and you'll have the data), move to thread, thread start, then do the SIGNAL attached to the run method. Let it do its thing. When its finished, it will do a finished signal that gets tied to another signal that gets tied to the threads terminated slot. This will kill the event loop and exit the thread, pushing a terminated signal out so you can then do something.