I have a class derived from QThread: class MyClass : public QThread
This class is connected with a slot of another object. Originally this was connected as Qt::AutoConnection. But then - as soon as the thread is started (MyClass::run()) - the signal is no longer "reaching the slot" (why?).
// connected before myObject->run()
s = QObject::connect(
_myObject, SIGNAL(signalLogMessage(const QString&, QtMsgType)),
this, SLOT(slotLogMessage(const QString&, QtMsgType)), Qt::DirectConnection);
My first idea was that I need to force Qt::QueuedConnection (this / _myObject will be cross threaded). In this case it does not work at all. Only Qt::DirectConnection works. After the thread is started, IMHO Qt::QueuedConnection is the correct choice (cross thread).
Any idea what is going wrong? The connection itself seems to be correct, otherwise it was not working at (mean even not with Qt::DirectConnection).
Edit 1: -- As of hyde's answer / Nikos' comment
As of right now I think hyde's answer / Nikos' comment are pointing out the root cause. My QThread is running it's own message loop for another application. This is the reason why it is running in its own thread and is basically an infinite loop
run() {
// exec(); // while not reached
while (_runMessageLoop && ...) {
hr = CallDispatch(.....);
if (hr== 0) QThread::msleep(100);
// QCoreApplication::processEvents();
}
}
Guess due to this infinite loop the Qt message loop is not running and no signal / slots are processed (is this correct?) When forcing Qt::DirectConnection the methods are called directly with no Qt message loop required, this might be the reason why this is the only connection type working.
The question is now, how can I combine the Qt and my own message loop (if this is feasible)? Cannot call exec() before the loop (because then it is in the Qt loop), and just the QCoreApplication::processEvents(); in "my loop" is still not working.
=> see new Question here: How to combine own message loop and Qt event loop?
Hard to say without seeing all the code, but it may be because of this:
QThread object itself is not the thread, it's the thread controller. Most importantly, QThread object's thread affinity should not be the thread it controls. If your thread runs Qt event loop, then it's best to avoid subclassing QThread. Instead, have your logic (inter-thread slots etc) in another QObject, which you move to the thread you created with moveToThread after creating it. Only real reason to subclass QThread is to override run() method with one which does not call exec().
Related reading:
https://www.qt.io/blog/2010/06/17/youre-doing-it-wrong
Addition:
If you override QThread::run(), you have to call QThread::exec() there or event loop won't be running and no non-direct signal gets delivered to any QObject with that thread affinity. If you want to have your own event loop, that is possible, you just have to call QCoreApplication::processEvents() to process Qt events.
Related
I am wondering how to tell a QObject to process all signals and call the slots associated with them. Here's the concrete problem I am having, for a better description of the question:
My program consists of three Qthreads : Main, Communication and Input.
The communication thread handles communication via the network, the Input thread handles user input, and both have several signal-slot connections to the main thread. Whenever a network event occurs, or whenever the user inputs a commandline command, a signal from the respective thread is called, which then activates the appropriate connected slot in the main thread. The main thread's role is to process these events. My code looks as follows:
QApplication a(argc, argv);
CommObj co; //inherits from QThread
co.start(); //Starts the thread
InputObj io; //inherits from QThread
io.start(); //Starts the thread
MainObj u(&co,&io);
return a.exec();
Now, what I want to achieve is for the main thread to not reach the last line.
My intentions are to call a method run() within the constructor of MainObj which is going to do something along the lines of this:
void run ()
{
forever
{
//process all signals..
}
}
However, I do not know how to implement the process all signals part. Any advice on how this could be done (including workarounds) would be very welcome.
This is completely unnecessary. a.exec() runs an event loop that will receive and process the events sent by other threads.
When a slot is invoked due to a signal being emitted in a different thread, Qt is posting a QMetaCallEvent to the receiver object. The QObject::event method is able to re-synthesize the slot call based on the data in the event.
Thus, you need to do nothing. a.exec() does what you want. Feel free to invoke it from MainObj's constructor, as qApp->exec() or as QEventLoop loop; loop.exec(), but that's rather bad design.
The real questions are:
Why do you need MainObj's constructor to spin an event loop?
What sort of "user input" are you processing in the io? You can't access any GUI objects from that thread.
Why are you deriving from QThread if you're using Qt's networking? You definitely don't want to do that - it won't work unless you spin an event loop, so you might as well just use a QThread without changes. Well, to be safe, you need just to make the thread destructible, so:
class Thread {
using QThread::run; // make it final
public:
Thread(QObject * parent = 0) : QThread(parent) {}
~Thread() { requestInterruption(); quit(); wait(); }
};
Anyway, by not using standard QThread that spins an event loop, the communication will be one way. Nothing in such threads will be able to react to signals from other threads.
You need to rearchitect as follows:
Use the Thread class as above. It's safe to be destructed at any time.
Have worker objects that run asynchronously using signals/slots/timers.
Move constructed workers to their threads.
What you need is the processEvents function. For example, if you don't want the user to be able to interact with widgets, but you want the graphics to update, use
processEvents(QEventLoop::ExcludeUserInputEvents);
See the documentation for details.
I have an Qt5 c++ app with 2 threads, thread A is started when the main program starts up. The start method of thread A runs successfully.
So far so good. Next, in the main program I send a signal to Thread A to start a QTimer, which it does - but that timer never expires!
Thread B handles tcp connections. When I initiate a telnet connection to my app, thread B fires up and suddenly I see my Qtimer from thread A expiring at normal intervals.
Why is the QTimer from thread A not expiring until thread B starts?
I suspect my threads are getting messed up. note the last section of code below products this:
thread of this: QThread(0x200fe00)
thread of timer: QThread(0x1fff470)
Which suggest my worker object (this), is in a different thread from my timer object. This timer thread address is actually the MAIN thread. Why? I'm confused.
Suggestions?
In my main app I create and start my thread like this:
QThread * MyControllerThread = new QThread(this);
if (MyControllerThread) {
TheController *worker = new TheController(MyControllerThread);
if (worker) {
connect(MyControllerThread, SIGNAL(started()), worker, SLOT(start()));
connect(MyControllerThread, SIGNAL(finished()), worker, SLOT(deleteLater()));
connect(MyControllerThread, SIGNAL(finished()), MyControllerThread, SLOT(deleteLater()));
worker->moveToThread(MyControllerThread);
MyControllerThread->start();
}
and in my main app I emit a signal to the new thread:
emit sig_startlocalpeer(Types::EActionLocalServiceStart); // Move the local peer to standby mode to start remote tests
which runs a slot in my thread (TheController object):
connect(&m_remotetestintervaltimer,SIGNAL(timeout()),this,SLOT(expiredRemoteTestIntervalTimer()));
m_remotetestintervaltimer.setTimerType(Qt::VeryCoarseTimer);
m_remotetestintervaltimer.start(REMOTETEST_TIMER_INTERVAL); // Wait between ticks
qDebug() << "thread of this: " << this->thread();
qDebug() << "thread of timer: " << m_remotetestintervaltimer.thread();
Well, it's not a Qt5 bug, it's more an inaccurate understanding of Qt's thread spirit.
In Qt, you have two ways to implement a thread which are using or not an even loop. Here is just a small visual example.
No event loop
myMethodCalledInANewThread
{
do{ ... }while(...);
}
With an event loop
myMethodCalledInANewThread
{
[...]
exec();
}
(Of course you can mix a do/while with an even loop but stay simple).
In QTimer's doc, you can read:
In multithreaded applications, you can use QTimer in any thread that
has an event loop. [...] Qt uses the timer's thread affinity to
determine which thread will emit the timeout() signal. Because of
this, you must start and stop the timer in its thread; it is not
possible to start a timer from another thread.
So I'm pretty sure you don't have a second event loop in your second thread and that's why you have the behaviour you described.
To give you some tips to be totally clear with thread using Qt, I suggest you to read:
QThread doc: https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qthread.html
QTimer doc: https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qtimer.html
and a very good article about how QThread implementation is misunderstood by a lot of users:
You're doing it wrong: https://www.qt.io/blog/2010/06/17/youre-doing-it-wrong
I hope it will help ;)
The best answer seems to be a combination of RobbieE and Kuba:
You have to explicitly set the parent of the member variable in constructor. The parent-child feature is a Qt thing that exists among classes derived from QObject, it is not a feature of C++.
I never knew this - I assumed that when an object was created, its members variables automatically had their parent set to the object. Good to know!!
i using qt5 and opencv to create an application that give a user inteface using qt and does the image processing part in opencv.....
so far my design is:
i am displaying a video and some standard controls like buttons and checkboxes using qt main gui thread
for capturing image and processing it, i have created a worker class derived from QObject and moved it to a thread....
the function that is executed in the worker class(Worker::process) has a blocking while loop.....that constantly:
captures a frame from a video or a camera
does some processing on it
converts from cv::Mat to QImage
emit a signal to the main thread to display the QImage
also in order to recieve user input i was using emitting signal from the main thread to the worker slots
the problem i faced was that the signal from the main thread never got picked off by the worker because of the event loop blocking while loop.
after much searching i came up with the solution to use Qt::DirectConnection argument while connecting the signal from the main thread to the worker slots. that solved the problem at that time.
now i need to add a qtimer or qbasictimer inside the blocking while loop....and guess what, the timer slot(in the case of qtimer) and the protected timerEvent handler (in the case of the qbasictimer) never get called. my hunch is that again the blocking while loop is the culprit
after much searching and reading on forums i have come to the conclusion that somehow my over all design maybe incorrect.....and as i keep adding more functionality to my application these problems will keep showing up.
I have two options now:
somehow call the threads exec() function inside the blocking while loop. so the question to the gurus out there is:
"how do i call the thread::exec() method inside a worker QObject class, i need the reference to the thread running the worker to call exec()" (short term solution)
change the whole implementation.....and here the questions is:
"what are my options....." (long term)
please feel free to ask for details in case my wording or english has made the problem unclear in any way.....thanks...
Inside your worker's blocking loop, call qApp->processEvents(); periodically.
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.1/qtcore/qcoreapplication.html#processEvents
#include <QApplication>
// ...
void Worker::doWork()
{
while(true)
{
someLongImageProcessingFunction();
qApp->processEvents();
}
}
This should allow for the slots to get processed, and for the timers to update.
Using a direct connection may let you access and change values local to your worker, but you should be careful about thread safety. If you put a QMutexLocker right before your values that get modified by your GUI and right before your worker thread uses them, you should be good.
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.1/qtcore/qmutexlocker.html
Also if you wanted any of those slots to run on the worker thread, you need to use the QueuedConnection.
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.1/qtcore/threads.html
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.1/qtcore/qthread.html#details
In some parts of the Qt docs it describes subclassing the QThread class. Other parts recommend the Worker/Producer model, and just use connections to setup how you use your threads. Usually there are fewer gotchas with the Worker/Producer model.
Hope that helps.
I want to inform an object when a thread has finished running. However, I cannot get the thread to exit properly. I have the following code:
Processor.cpp
thread = new QThread;
tw = new ThreadWorker;
connect(tw, SIGNAL(updateStatus(QString)), this, SLOT(statusUpdate(QString)));
tw->doSetup(thread, strDic);
tw->moveToThread(thread);
thread->start();
while(thread->isRunning())
{
}
qDebug() << "Thread Finished";
ThreadWorker.cpp
void ThreadWorker::doSetup(QThread *thread, const string &path)
{
_strPath = path;
connect(thread, SIGNAL(started()), this, SLOT(run()));
connect(this, SIGNAL(finished()), thread, SLOT(quit())); //tried terminate() also
}
void ThreadWorker::run()
{
DirectorySearch dicSearch;
vector<string> vecFileList = dicSearch.getFileList(_strPath);
emit updateStatus("Directory Fetched");
emit finished();
}
The quit() slot does not seem to stop the thread (QThread::isFinished never returns true). Can someone guide me in the right direction?
(Note: ThreadWorker does not inherit from QThread)
Assuming that Processor.cpp is running in your main thread, the while(thread->isRunning()) loop has your main thread completely tied up. This means that your application's event loop cannot do any processing so the signalupdateStatus() for example, will never get processed. As mentioned in the comments, since the QThread object is created by the main thread, its signals won't work either since they will also require the main event loop to be doing its thing. Besides, if you are waiting in your main thread for your worker thread to do something, why use a worker thread at all? :)
Try removing the while loop, add a slot workDone() (or whatever you want to call it) to Processor.cpp and connect that to your Threadworker's finished() signal.
I had the same problem and found the answer. Here is my question:
What is the use of QThread.wait() function?
To solve your problem, you don't need to run the QCoreApplication::instance()->processEvents() in your while loop, what you need to do is, instead of invoking the quit() which tries to send a signal to your creating thread's event loop (which is now blocked by the while loop), you have to call it directly.
So for your code, drop the line:
connect(this, SIGNAL(finished()), thread, SLOT(quit())); //tried terminate() also
And instead of:
emit finished();
Use:
this->thread()->quit();
Tada... problem solved. Lesson learned: don't try to exit a worker thread by the qt signal-slot mechanism from within it, because your signals do not end up where they are supposed to (your worker thread's event loop), but they end up in the creating thread instead. You never know what that thread is doing, and if its event loop is running or not, and this shouldn't be of business to your worker thread anyways... Instead, call the quit directly.
You can use Qt::DirectConnection:
connect(this, SIGNAL(finished()), thread, SLOT(quit()), Qt::DirectConnection);
This stops the thread.
Instead of doing your 'doSetup' function... before you moveToThread, setup connections between SINGALS on tw's parent and SLOTS in tw.
I would do 4 connections.
First is to the run method in ThreadWorker. Thats simple and self explainatory enough.
Second is from your finished signal to the third SIGNAL connection below. A SIGNAL that quits the thread
Third to a SIGNAL that should call the terminate() slot of the thread. This will effectively close the event loop setup when you connect to the run method (exec is auto called when you do a start()) and since your run method isn't a loop of some sort, will close the thread without issue.
Forth is from the thread's terminated() SIGNAL to a SLOT in tw's parent. This will show you when the thread is dead if you want to do something at that point.
You do the above connections (if you need to pass in the string, add a variable to the run method and corresponding SIGNAL connection and you'll have the data), move to thread, thread start, then do the SIGNAL attached to the run method. Let it do its thing. When its finished, it will do a finished signal that gets tied to another signal that gets tied to the threads terminated slot. This will kill the event loop and exit the thread, pushing a terminated signal out so you can then do something.
I am signaling my Qt GUI thread from a boost::thread, and I am using a Qt::QueuedConnection,
connect(src, SIGNAL(signal-signature), dest, SLOT(slot-signature), Qt::QueuedConnection);
and still, when I emit the signal my slot does not get called.
edit: I found the problem, it seems that I was connecting the signal later then my call, but I was sure of the otherwise since breakpoints stopped first on the GUI thread at the connect call and then on the dispatch thread that does the emit
ty everybody for the help and ideas :D
Check whether the slot name and signal name are correct. Usually, if there is a problem (incorrect name), this is signaled in the console (an error message). Also, you could check the result of the connect function call. It should return false in case of connection unsuccessful.
I would assume both threads need to be QThread with a QEventLoop to have that work.