UPDATE 2
*I've added some code (and explanation) I wrote myself at the end of this question, this is however a suboptimal solution (both in coding efficiency as resulting output) but kind of manages to make a selection of items that adhere to the constraints. If you have any ideas on how to improve it (again both in efficiency as resulting output) please let me know.
1. Updated Post
Please look below for the initial question and sample code. Thx to alexis_laz his answer the problem was solved for a small number of items. However when the number of items becomes to large the combn function in R cannot calculate it anymore because of the invalid 'ncol' value (too large or NA) error. Since my dataset has indeed a lot of items, I was wondering whether replacing some of his code (shown after this) with C++ provides a solution to this, and if this is the case what code I should use for this? Tnx!
This is the code as provided by alexis_laz;
ff = function(x, No_items, No_persons)
{
do.call(rbind,
lapply(No_items:ncol(x),
function(n) {
col_combs = combn(seq_len(ncol(x)), n, simplify = F)
persons = lapply(col_combs, function(j) rownames(x)[rowSums(x[, j, drop = F]) == n])
keep = unlist(lapply(persons, function(z) length(z) >= No_persons))
data.frame(persons = unlist(lapply(persons[keep], paste, collapse = ", ")),
items = unlist(lapply(col_combs[keep], function(z) paste(colnames(x)[z], collapse = ", "))))
}))
}
2. Initial Post
Currently I'm working on a set of data coming from adaptive measurement, which means that not all persons have made all of the same items. For my analysis however I need a dataset that contains only items that have been made by all persons (or a subset of these persons).
I have a matrix object in R with rows = persons (100000), and columns = items(220), and a 1 in a cell if the person has made the item and a 0 if the person has not made the item.
How can I use R to determine which combination of at least 15 items, is made by the highest amount of persons?
Hopefully the question is clear (if not please ask me for more details and I will gladly provide those).
Tnx in advance.
Joost
Edit:
Below is a sample matrix with the items (A:E) as columns and persons (1:5) as rows.
mat <- matrix(c(1,1,1,0,0,1,1,0,1,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,1,1,0,0,1,1,1,1,0),5,5,byrow=T)
colnames(mat) <- c("A","B","C","D","E")
rownames(mat) <- 1:5
> mat
A B C D E
"1" 1 1 1 0 0
"2" 1 1 0 1 1
"3" 1 1 1 0 1
"4" 0 1 1 0 0
"5" 1 1 1 1 0
mat[1,1] = 1 means that person 1 has given a response to item 1.
Now (in this example) I'm interested in finding out which set of at least 3 items is made by at least 3 people. So here I can just go through all possible combinations of 3, 4 and 5 items to check how many people have a 1 in the matrix for each item in a combination.
This will result in me choosing the item combination A, B and C, since it is the only combination of items that has been made by 3 people (namely persons 1, 3 and 5).
Now for my real dataset I want to do this but then for a combination of at least 10 items that a group of at least 75 people all responded to. And since I have a lot of data preferably not by hand as in the example data.
I'm thus looking for a function/code in R, that will let me select the minimal amount of items, and questions, and than gives me all combinations of items and persons that adhere to these constraints or have a greater number of items/persons than the constrained.
Thus for the example matrix it would be something like;
f <- function(data,no.items,no.persons){
#code
}
> f(mat,3,3)
no.item no.pers items persons
1 3 3 A, B, C 1, 3, 5
Or in case of at least 2 items that are made by at least 3 persons;
> f(mat,2,3)
no.item no.pers items persons
1 2 4 A, B 1, 2, 3, 5
2 2 3 A, C 1, 3, 5
3 2 4 B, C 1, 3, 4, 5
4 3 3 A, B, C 1, 3, 5
Hopefully this clears up what my question actually is about. Tnx for the quick replies that I already received!
3. Written Code
Below is the code I've written today. It takes each item once as a starting point and then looks to the item that has been answered most by people who also responded to the start item. It the takes these two items and looks to a third item, and repeats this until the number of people that responded to all selected questions drops below the given limit. One drawback of the code is that it takes some time to run, (it goes up somewhat exponentially when the number of items grows). The second drawback is that this still does not evaluate all possible combinations of items, in the sense that the start item, and the subsequently chosen item may have a lot of persons that answered to these items in common, however if the chosen item has almost no similarities with the other (not yet chosen) items, the sample might shrink very fast. While if an item was chosen with somewhat less persons in common with the start item, and this item has a lot of connections to other items, the final collection of selected items might be much bigger than the one based on the code used below. So again suggestions and improvements in both directions are welcome!
set.seed(512)
mat <- matrix(rbinom(1000000, 1, .6), 10000, 100)
colnames(mat) <- 1:100
fff <- function(data,persons,items){
xx <- list()
for(j in 1:ncol(data)){
d <- matrix(c(j,length(which(data[,j]==1))),1,2)
colnames(d) <- c("item","n")
t = persons+1
a <- j
while(t >= persons){
b <- numeric(0)
for(i in 1:ncol(data)){
z <- c(a,i)
if(i %in% a){
b[i] = 0
} else {
b[i] <- length(which(rowSums(data[,z])==length(z)))
}
}
c <- c(which.max(b),max(b))
d <- rbind(d,c)
a <- c(a,c[1])
t <- max(b)
}
print(j)
xx[[j]] = d
}
x <- y <- z <- numeric(0)
zz <- matrix(c(0,0,rep(NA,ncol(data))),length(xx),ncol(data)+2,byrow=T)
colnames(zz) <- c("n.pers", "n.item", rep("I",ncol(data)))
for(i in 1:length(xx)){
zz[i,1] <- xx[[i]][nrow(xx[[i]])-1,2]
zz[i,2] <- length(unname(xx[[i]][1:nrow(xx[[i]])-1,1]))
zz[i,3:(zz[i,2]+2)] <- unname(xx[[i]][1:nrow(xx[[i]])-1,1])
}
zz <- zz[,colSums(is.na(zz))<nrow(zz)]
zz <- zz[which((rowSums(zz,na.rm=T)/rowMeans(zz,na.rm=T))-2>=items),]
zz <- as.data.frame(zz)
return(zz)
}
fff(mat,110,8)
> head(zz)
n.pers n.item I I I I I I I I I I
1 156 9 1 41 13 80 58 15 91 12 39 NA
2 160 9 2 27 59 13 81 16 15 6 92 NA
3 158 9 3 59 83 32 25 80 14 41 16 NA
4 160 9 4 24 27 71 32 10 63 42 51 NA
5 114 10 5 59 66 27 47 13 44 63 30 52
6 158 9 6 13 56 61 12 59 8 45 81 NA
#col 1 = number of persons in sample
#col 2 = number of items in sample
#col 3:12 = which items create this sample (NA if n.item is less than 10)
to follow up on my comment, something like:
set.seed(1618)
mat <- matrix(rbinom(1000, 1, .6), 100, 10)
colnames(mat) <- sample(LETTERS, 10)
rownames(mat) <- sprintf('person%s', 1:100)
mat1 <- mat[rowSums(mat) > 5, ]
head(mat1)
# A S X D R E Z K P C
# person1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1
# person3 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1
# person4 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
# person5 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0
# person6 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0
# person7 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
table(rowSums(mat1))
# 6 7 8 9
# 24 23 21 5
tab <- table(sapply(1:nrow(mat1), function(x)
paste(names(mat1[x, ][mat1[x, ] == 1]), collapse = ',')))
data.frame(tab[tab > 1])
# tab.tab...1.
# A,S,X,D,R,E,P,C 2
# A,S,X,D,R,E,Z,P,C 2
# A,S,X,R,E,Z,K,C 3
# A,S,X,R,E,Z,P,C 2
# A,S,X,Z,K,P,C 2
Here is another idea that matches your output:
ff = function(x, No_items, No_persons)
{
do.call(rbind,
lapply(No_items:ncol(x),
function(n) {
col_combs = combn(seq_len(ncol(x)), n, simplify = F)
persons = lapply(col_combs, function(j) rownames(x)[rowSums(x[, j, drop = F]) == n])
keep = unlist(lapply(persons, function(z) length(z) >= No_persons))
data.frame(persons = unlist(lapply(persons[keep], paste, collapse = ", ")),
items = unlist(lapply(col_combs[keep], function(z) paste(colnames(x)[z], collapse = ", "))))
}))
}
ff(mat, 3, 3)
# persons items
#1 1, 3, 5 A, B, C
ff(mat, 2, 3)
# persons items
#1 1, 2, 3, 5 A, B
#2 1, 3, 5 A, C
#3 1, 3, 4, 5 B, C
#4 1, 3, 5 A, B, C
Related
I have a function that takes all, non-distinct, MatchId and (xG_Team1 vs xG_Team2, paired) and gives an output of as an array. which then summed up to be sse constant.
The problem with the function is it iterates through each row, duplicating MatchId. I want to stop this.
For each distinct MatchId I need the corresponding home and away goals as a list. I.e. Home_Goal and Away_Goal to be used in each iteration. from Home_Goal_time and Away_Goal_time columns of the dataframe. The list below doesn't seem to work.
MatchId Event_Id EventCode Team1 Team2 Team1_Goals
0 842079 2053 Goal Away Huachipato Cobresal 0
1 842079 2053 Goal Away Huachipato Cobresal 0
2 842080 1029 Goal Home Slovan lava 3
3 842080 1029 Goal Home Slovan lava 3
4 842080 2053 Goal Away Slovan lava 3
5 842080 1029 Goal Home Slovan lava 3
6 842634 2053 Goal Away Rosario Boca Juniors 0
7 842634 2053 Goal Away Rosario Boca Juniors 0
8 842634 2053 Goal Away Rosario Boca Juniors 0
9 842634 2054 Cancel Goal Away Rosario Boca Juniors 0
Team2_Goals xG_Team1 xG_Team2 CurrentPlaytime Home_Goal_Time Away_Goal_Time
0 2 1.79907 1.19893 2616183 0 87
1 2 1.79907 1.19893 3436780 0 115
2 1 1.70662 1.1995 3630545 121 0
3 1 1.70662 1.1995 4769519 159 0
4 1 1.70662 1.1995 5057143 0 169
5 1 1.70662 1.1995 5236213 175 0
6 2 0.82058 1.3465 2102264 0 70
7 2 0.82058 1.3465 4255871 0 142
8 2 0.82058 1.3465 5266652 0 176
9 2 0.82058 1.3465 5273611 0 0
For example MatchId = 842079, Home_goal =[], Away_Goal = [87, 115]
x1 = [1,0,0]
x2 = [0,1,0]
x3 = [0,0,1]
m = 1 ,arbitrary constant used to optimise sse.
k = 196
total_timeslot = 196
Home_Goal = [] # No Goal
Away_Goal = [] # No Goal
def sum_squared_diff(x1, x2, x3, y):
ssd = []
for k in range(total_timeslot): # k will take multiple values
if k in Home_Goal:
ssd.append(sum((x2 - y) ** 2))
elif k in Away_Goal:
ssd.append(sum((x3 - y) ** 2))
else:
ssd.append(sum((x1 - y) ** 2))
return ssd
def my_function(row):
xG_Team1 = row.xG_Team1
xG_Team2 = row.xG_Team2
return np.array([1-(xG_Team1*m + xG_Team2*m)/k, xG_Team1*m/k, xG_Team2*m/k])
results = df.apply(lambda row: sum_squared_diff(x1, x2, x3, my_function(row)), axis=1)
results
sum(results.sum())
For the three matches above the desire outcome should look like the following.
If I need an individual sse, sum(sum_squared_diff(x1, x2, x3, y)) gives me the following.
MatchId = 842079 = 3.984053038520635
MatchId = 842080 = 7.882189570700502
MatchId = 842080 = 5.929085973050213
Given the size of the original data, realistically I am after the total sum of the sse. For the above sample data, simply adding up the values give total sse=17.79532858227135.` Once I achieve this, then I will try to optimise the sse based on this figure by updating the arbitrary value m.
Here are the lists i hoped the function will iterate over.
Home_scored = s.groupby('MatchId')['Home_Goal_time'].apply(list)
Away_scored = s.groupby('MatchId')['Away_Goal_Time'].apply(list)
type(HomeGoal)
pandas.core.series.Series
Then convert it to lists.
Home_Goal = Home_scored.tolist()
Away_Goal = Away_scored.tolist()
type(Home_Goal)
list
Home_Goal
Out[303]: [[0, 0], [121, 159, 0, 175], [0, 0, 0, 0]]
Away_Goal
Out[304]: [[87, 115], [0, 0, 169, 0], [70, 142, 176, 0]]
But the function still takes Home_Goal and Away_Goal as empty list.
If you only want to consider one MatchId at a time you should .groupby('MatchID') first
df.groupby('MatchID').apply(...)
I want to count areas of interest in my dataframe column 'which_AOI' (ranging from 0 -9). I would like to have a new column with the results added to a dataframe depending on a variable 'marker' (ranging from 0 - x) which tells me when one 'picture' is done and the next begins (one marker can go on for a variable length of rows). This is my code so far but it seems to be stuck and runs on without giving output. I tried reconstructing it from the beginning once but as soon as i get to 'if df.marker == num' it doesn't stop. What am I missing?
(example dataframe below)
## AOI count of spec. type function (in progress):
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
path_i = "/Users/Desktop/Pilot/results/gazedata_filename.csv"
df = pd.read_csv(path_i, sep =",")
#create a new dataframe for AOIs:
d = {'marker': []}
df_aoi = pd.DataFrame(data=d)
### Creating an Aoi list
item = df.which_AOI
aoi = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] #list for search
aoi_array = [0, 0 , 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] #list for filling
num = 0
for i in range (0, len (df.marker)): #loop through the dataframe
if df.marker == num: ## if marker = num its one picture
for index, item in enumerate(aoi): #look for item (being a number in which_AOI) in aoi list
if (item == aoi[index]):
aoi_array[index] += 1
print (aoi)
print (aoi_array)
se = pd.Series(aoi_array) # make list into a series to attach to dataframe
df_aoi['new_col'] = se.values #add list to dataframe
aoi_array.clear() #clears list before next picture
else:
num +=1
index pos_time pos_x pos_y pup_time pup_diameter marker which_AOI fixation Picname shock
1 16300 168.608779907227 -136.360855102539 16300 2.935715675354 0 7 18 5 save
2 16318 144.97673034668 -157.495513916016 16318 3.08838820457459 0 8 33 5 save
3 16351 152.92560577392598 -156.64172363281298 16351 3.0895299911499 0 7 17 5 save
4 16368 152.132453918457 -157.989685058594 16368 3.111008644104 0 7 18 5 save
5 16386 151.59835815429702 -157.55587768554702 16386 3.09514689445496 0 7 18 5 save
6 16404 150.88092803955098 -152.69479370117202 16404 3.10009074211121 1 7 37 5 save
7 16441 152.76554107666 -142.06188964843798 16441 3.0821495056152304 1 7 33 5 save
Not 100% clear based on your question but it sounds like you want to count the number of rows for each which_AOI value in each marker.
You can accomplish this using groupby
df_aoi = df.groupby(['marker','which_AOI']).size().unstack('which_AOI',fill_value=0)
In:
pos_time pos_x pos_y pup_time pup_diameter marker \
0 16300 168.608780 -136.360855 16300 2.935716 0
1 16318 144.976730 -157.495514 16318 3.088388 0
2 16351 152.925606 -156.641724 16351 3.089530 0
3 16368 152.132454 -157.989685 16368 3.111009 0
4 16386 151.598358 -157.555878 16386 3.095147 0
5 16404 150.880928 -152.694794 16404 3.100091 1
6 16441 152.765541 -142.061890 16441 3.082150 1
which_AOI fixation Picname shock
0 7 18 5 save
1 8 33 5 save
2 7 17 5 save
3 7 18 5 save
4 7 18 5 save
5 7 37 5 save
6 7 33 5 save
Out:
which_AOI 7 8
marker
0 4 1
1 2 0
Here is my minimal working example:
list1 = [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] #len = 21
list2 = [1,1,1,0,1,0,0,1,0,1,1,0,1,0,1,0,0,0,1,1,0] #len = 21
list3 = [0,0,1,0,1,1,0,1,0,1,0,1,1,1,0,1,0,1,1,1,1] #len = 21
list4 = [1,0,0,1,1,0,0,0,0,1,0,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,1,0,1] #len = 21
I have four lists and I want to "clean" my list 1 using the following rule: "if any of list2[i] or list3[i] or list4[i] are equal to zero, then I want to eliminate the item I from list1. SO basically I only keep those elements of list1 such that the other lists all have ones there.
here is the function I wrote to solve this
def clean(list1, list2,list3,list4):
for i in range(len(list2)):
if (list2[i]==0 or list3[i]==0 or list4[i]==0):
list1.pop(i)
return list1
however it doesn't work. If you apply it, it give the error
Traceback (most recent call last):line 68, in clean list1.pop(I)
IndexError: pop index out of range
What am I doing wrong? Also, I was told Pandas is really good in dealing with data. Is there a way I can do it with Pandas? Each of these lists are actually columns (after removing the heading) of a csv file.
EDIT
For example at the end I would like to get: list1 = [4,9,11,15]
I think the main problem is that at each iteration, when I pop out the elements, the index of all the successor of that element change! And also, the overall length of the list changes, and so the index in pop() is too large. So hopefully there is another strategy or function that I can use
This is definitely a job for pandas:
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame({
'l1':list1,
'l2':list2,
'l3':list3,
'l4':list4
})
no_zeroes = df.loc[(df['l2'] != 0) & (df['l3'] != 0) & (df['l4'] != 0)]
Where df.loc[...] takes the full dataframe, then filters it by the criteria provided. In this example, your criteria are that you only keep the items where l2, l3, and l3 are not zero (!= 0).
Gives you a pandas dataframe:
l1 l2 l3 l4
4 4 1 1 1
9 9 1 1 1
12 12 1 1 1
18 18 1 1 1
or if you need just list1:
list1 = df['l1'].tolist()
if you want the criteria to be where all other columns are 1, then use:
all_ones = df.loc[(df['l2'] == 1) & (df['l3'] == 1) & (df['l4'] == 1)]
Note that I'm creating new dataframes for no_zeroes and all_ones and that the original dataframe stays intact if you want to further manipulate the data.
Update:
Per Divakar's answer (far more elegant than my original answer), much the same can be done in pandas:
df = pd.DataFrame([list1, list2, list3, list4])
list1 = df.loc[0, (df[1:] != 0).all()].astype(int).tolist()
Here's one approach with NumPy -
import numpy as np
mask = (np.asarray(list2)==1) & (np.asarray(list3)==1) & (np.asarray(list4)==1)
out = np.asarray(list1)[mask].tolist()
Here's another way with NumPy that stacks those lists into rows to form a 2D array and thus simplifies things quite a bit -
arr = np.vstack((list1, list2, list3, list4))
out = arr[0,(arr[1:] == 1).all(0)].tolist()
Sample run -
In [165]: arr = np.vstack((list1, list2, list3, list4))
In [166]: print arr
[[ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20]
[ 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0]
[ 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1]
[ 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1]]
In [167]: arr[0,(arr[1:] == 1).all(0)].tolist()
Out[167]: [4, 9, 12, 18]
my data as follows:
>df2
id calmonth product
1 101 01 apple
2 102 01 apple&nokia&htc
3 103 01 htc
4 104 01 apple&htc
5 104 02 nokia
Now i wanna calculate the number of ids whose products contain both 'apple' and 'htc' when calmonth='01'. Because what i need is not only 'apple' and 'htc', also i need 'apple' and 'nokia',etc.
So i want to realize this by a function like this:
xandy=function(a,b) data.frame(product=paste(a,b,sep='&'),
csum=length(grep('a.*b',x=df2$product))
)
also, i make a parameters list like this:
para=c('apple','htc','nokia')
but the problem is here. When i pass parameters like
xandy(para[1],para[2])
the results is as follows:
product csum
1 apple&htc 0
What my expecting result should be
product csum calmonth
1 apple&htc 2 01
2 apple&htc 0 02
So where is wrong about the parameters passing?
and, how can i add the calmonth in to the function() xandy correctly?
FYI.This question stems from my another question before
What's the R statement responding to SQL's 'in' statement
EDIT AFTER COMMENT
My predictive result will be:
product csum calmonth
1 apple&htc 2 01
2 apple&htc 0 02
May answer is another way how to tackle your problem.
library(stringr)
The function contains will split up the elements of a string vector according to the split character and evaluate if all target words are contained.
contains <- function(x, target, split="&") {
l <- str_split(x, split)
sapply(l, function(x, y) all(y %in% x), y=target)
}
contains(d$product, c("apple", "htc"))
[1] FALSE TRUE FALSE TRUE FALSE
The rest is just subsetting and summarizing
get_data <- function(a, b) {
e <- subset(d, contains(product, c(a, b)))
e$product2 <- paste(a, b, sep="&")
ddply(e, .(calmonth, product2), summarise, csum=length(id))
}
Using the data below, order does not play a role now anymore (see comment below).
get_data("apple", "htc")
calmonth product2 csum
1 1 apple&htc 1
2 2 apple&htc 2
get_data("htc", "apple")
calmonth product2 csum
1 1 htc&apple 1
2 2 htc&apple 2
I know this is not a direct answer to your question but I find this approach quite clean.
EDIT AFTER COMMENT
The reason that you get csum=0 is simply that you are searching for the wrong regex pattern, i.e. a something in between b not for apple ... htc. You need to construct the correct regex pattern,i.e. paste0(a, ".*", b).
Here a complete solution. I would not call it beautiful code, but anyway (note that I change the data to show that it generalizes for months).
library(plyr)
df2 <- read.table(text="
id calmonth product
101 01 apple
102 01 apple&nokia&htc
103 01 htc
104 02 apple&htc
104 02 apple&htc", header=T)
xandy <- function(a, b) {
pattern <- paste0(a, ".*", b)
d1 <- df2[grep(pattern, df2$product), ]
d1$product <- paste0(a,"&", b)
ddply(d1, .(calmonth), summarise,
csum=length(calmonth),
product=unique(product))
}
xandy("apple", "htc")
calmonth csum product
1 1 1 apple&htc
2 2 2 apple&htc
Dear StackOverFlowers (flowers in short),
I have a list of data.frames (walk.sample) that I would like to collapse into a single (giant) data.frame. While collapsing, I would like to mark (adding another column) which rows have came from which element of the list. This is what I've got so far.
This is the data.frame that needs to be collapsed/stacked.
> walk.sample
[[1]]
walker x y
1073 3 228.8756 -726.9198
1086 3 226.7393 -722.5561
1081 3 219.8005 -728.3990
1089 3 225.2239 -727.7422
1032 3 233.1753 -731.5526
[[2]]
walker x y
1008 3 205.9104 -775.7488
1022 3 208.3638 -723.8616
1072 3 233.8807 -718.0974
1064 3 217.0028 -689.7917
1026 3 234.1824 -723.7423
[[3]]
[1] 3
[[4]]
walker x y
546 2 629.9041 831.0852
524 2 627.8698 873.3774
578 2 572.3312 838.7587
513 2 633.0598 871.7559
538 2 636.3088 836.6325
1079 3 206.3683 -729.6257
1095 3 239.9884 -748.2637
1005 3 197.2960 -780.4704
1045 3 245.1900 -694.3566
1026 3 234.1824 -723.7423
I have written a function to add a column that denote from which element the rows came followed by appending it to an existing data.frame.
collapseToDataFrame <- function(x) { # collapse list to a dataframe with a twist
walk.df <- data.frame()
for (i in 1:length(x)) {
n.rows <- nrow(x[[i]])
if (length(x[[i]])>1) {
temp.df <- cbind(x[[i]], rep(i, n.rows))
names(temp.df) <- c("walker", "x", "y", "session")
walk.df <- rbind(walk.df, temp.df)
} else {
cat("Empty list", "\n")
}
}
return(walk.df)
}
> collapseToDataFrame(walk.sample)
Empty list
Empty list
walker x y session
3 1 -604.5055 -123.18759 1
60 1 -562.0078 -61.24912 1
84 1 -594.4661 -57.20730 1
9 1 -604.2893 -110.09168 1
43 1 -632.2491 -54.52548 1
1028 3 240.3905 -724.67284 1
1040 3 232.5545 -681.61225 1
1073 3 228.8756 -726.91980 1
1091 3 209.0373 -740.96173 1
1036 3 248.7123 -694.47380 1
I'm curious whether this can be done more elegantly, with perhaps do.call() or some other more generic function?
I think this will work...
lengths <- sapply(walk.sample, function(x) if (is.null(nrow(x))) 0 else nrow(x))
cbind(do.call(rbind, walk.sample[lengths > 1]),
session = rep(1:length(lengths), ifelse(lengths > 1, lengths, 0)))
I'm not claiming this to be the most elegant approach, but I think it is working
library(plyr)
ldply(sapply(1:length(walk.sample), function(i)
if (length(walk.sample[[i]]) > 1)
cbind(walk.sample[[i]],session=rep(i,nrow(walk.sample[[i]])))
),rbind)
EDIT
After applying Marek's apt remarks
do.call(rbind,lapply(1:length(walk.sample), function(i)
if (length(walk.sample[[i]]) > 1)
cbind(walk.sample[[i]],session=i) ))