I am working with C++ in eclipse CDT and I am trying to convert string to uint64_t by using strtoull but everytime I get below error message -
..\src\HelloTest.cpp:39:42: error: strtoull was not declared in this scope
Below is my C++ example
#include <iostream>
#include <cstring>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
int main() {
string str = "1234567";
uint64_t hashing = strtoull(str, 0, 0);
cout << hashing << endl;
}
return 0;
}
Is there anything wrong I am doing?
Why your solution doesn't work has already been pointed out by others. But there hasn't been a good alternative suggested yet.
Try this for C++03 strtoull usage instead:
#include <string>
#include <cstdlib>
int main()
{
std::string str = "1234";
// Using NULL for second parameter makes the call easier,
// but reduces your chances to recover from error. Check
// the docs for details.
unsigned long long ul = std::strtoull( str.c_str(), NULL, 0 );
}
Or, since C++11, do it directly from std::string via stoull (which is just a wrapper for the above, but saves on one include and one function call in your code):
#include <string>
int main()
{
std::string str = "1234";
// See comment above.
unsigned long long ul = std::stoull( str, nullptr, 0 );
}
Never use char[] or pointers if you have a working alternative. The dark side of C++, they are. Quicker, easier, more seductive. If once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny, consume you it will. ;-)
the structure for strtoull is: strtoull(const char *, char * *, int)
You have given it a std::string as pointed out by #juanchopanza
This is the solution I came up with is
#include <iostream>
#include <cstring>
#include <string>
#include <cstdlib>
using namespace std;
int main() {
char str[] = "1234567";
unsigned long long ul;
char* new_pos;
charDoublePointer = 0;
ul = strtoull(str, &new_pos, 0);
cout << ul << endl;
return 0;
}
The output I got was: 1234567
Straight from the eclipse console.
Also at the end of your program you have return 0 out of scope with an extra curly brace.
Related
i keep getting this error. i know this is a c++ 11 function but it still isnt working with code blocks c++ compiler. am i using this function correctly of is it a problem with the codeblocks compiler. i tried changing the compiler. using the "have g++ follow the c++11 iso standard" i still keep getting this error. or getting the "stoi() does not exist in the current scope" error
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
int test = 34;
cout << stoi(test);
}
stoi means "String To Int". It will read an int from a std::string (or std::wstring). See also the reference.
You were probably looking for the reverse std::to_string (reference). But you don't need either, there is no need to convert to string before printing:
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
int test = 34;
std::cout << test;
}
stoi means string to int. So it takes a string as an input.
This should work:
string test = "34"; cout << stoi(test);
So I recently discovered the use of map and vectors, however, I'm having trouble of trying to figure a way to loop through a vector containing strings.
Here's what I've tried:
#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include <stdio>
using namespace std;
void main() {
vector<string> data={"Hello World!","Goodbye World!"};
for (vector<string>::iterator t=data.begin(); t!=data.end(); ++t) {
cout<<*t<<endl;
}
}
and when I try to compile it, I get this error:
cd C:\Users\Jason\Desktop\EXB\Win32
wmake -f C:\Users\Jason\Desktop\EXB\Win32\exbint.mk -h -e
wpp386 ..\Source\exbint.cpp -i="C:\WATCOM/h;C:\WATCOM/h/nt" -w4 -e25 -zq -od -d2 -6r -bt=nt -fo=.obj -mf -xs -xr
..\Source\exbint.cpp(59): Error! E157: col(21) left expression must be integral
..\Source\exbint.cpp(59): Note! N717: col(21) left operand type is 'std::ostream watcall (lvalue)'
..\Source\exbint.cpp(59): Note! N718: col(21) right operand type is 'std::basic_string<char,std::char_traits<char>,std::allocator<char>> (lvalue)'
Error(E42): Last command making (C:\Users\Jason\Desktop\EXB\Win32\exbint.obj) returned a bad status
Error(E02): Make execution terminated
Execution complete
I tried the same method using map and it worked. The only difference was I changed the cout line to:
cout<<t->first<<" => "<<t->last<<endl;
Add iostream header file and change stdio to cstdio.
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include <cstdio>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
vector<string> data={"Hello World!","Goodbye World!"};
for (vector<string>::iterator t=data.begin(); t!=data.end(); ++t)
{
cout<<*t<<endl;
}
return 0;
}
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <string>
int main()
{
std::vector<std::string> data = {"Hello World!", "Goodbye World!"};
for (std::vector<std::string>::iterator t = data.begin(); t != data.end(); t++) {
std::cout << *t << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
Or with C++11 (or higher):
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <string>
typedef std::vector<std::string> STRVEC;
int main()
{
STRVEC data = {"Hello World!", "Goodbye World!"};
for (auto &s: data) {
std::cout << s << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
From the Open Watcom V2 Fork-Wiki on the C++ Library Status page:
<string>
Mostly complete. Although there are no I/O operators, all other member functions and string operations are available.
A workaround (besides implementing the << operator) would be asking the string instances for the C string:
for (vector<string>::iterator t = data.begin(); t != data.end(); ++t) {
cout << t->c_str() << endl;
}
This of course only works as long as the strings don't contain zero byte values.
When I compile your code, I get:
40234801.cpp:3:17: fatal error: stdio: No such file or directory
#include <stdio>
^
You clearly have a header called "stdio" in your include path that you haven't shown us.
If you change that line to the standard #include <iostream>, then the only reported error is that you wrote void main() instead of int main(). Fix that, and it will build and run.
In passing, note also that using namespace should be avoided.
I found a solution to my own issue. Instead of using a c_str, I used std::string and switched to using the G++ compiler instead of Open Watcom
Instead of having:
char *someString="Blah blah blah";
I instead replaced it with:
string someString="Blah blah blah";
This way is much more efficient and easier.
When I use a dereference in a function as an argument, the preprocessor spits out an error.
I believe the * right before the parentheses causes ambiguity with the compiler.
Is there any way to get around this?
#include <iostream>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
using namespace std;
int main ()
{
char *in = NULL;
char *out = NULL;
getline(cin,in*);//error
out=system(in*);//error
printf(out);
return 0;
}
The errors are on marked lines.
Thank you!
Dereferencing in is written *in, not in*. (Also, even with that fixed, your program still won't work, as you're trying to dereference NULL, and the second argument to getline will have the wrong type. char* strings do not work the way you think they work.)
getline only works with C++ strings (not C-style strings). C++ strings can allocate memory as they go, in response to how much data is read.
There are other functions for reading into C strings, but you must pre-allocate the amount of memory you want, and also specify to the function how much memory you have allocated. In general there is no reason to do this, as the C++ string version is much simpler and less prone to error.
Also, avoid including C-style standard headers (i.e. ending in .h) and avoid using pointers. And system returns an int, not a string.
Example:
#include <iostream> // cin, cout
#include <string> // string
#include <cstdlib> // system
int main()
{
std::string s;
std::getline( std::cin, s );
int system_result = std::system( s.c_str() );
std::cout << system_result << "\n";
}
I was trying to play around with Strings in a Hangman program that I'm writing and couldn't get them to work so tried working with them on a simpler basis and I'm still having no luck.
As far as I've read online in the references and what other people have said this code should work:
#include <cstdio>
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cstring>
using namespace std;
int main (int argc, char** argv){
string word = {"Hello"};
int length = strlen(word);
}
But I get this compiler error:
'string' was not declared in this scope
and consequently, 'word' is also not declared in scope.
Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong? I'm using the g++ compiler on Ubuntu if that makes a difference, no idea which version though.
You are confusing C and C++.
You included only C libraries, whereas std::string comes from the C++ header string. You'd have to write:
#include <string>
to use it. However, you'd then have to make other changes, such as not using strlen.
You should learn from your C++ book, not random posts on the internet (#lolirony)
C version
#include <string.h>
int main(void)
{
const char* word = "Hello";
const size_t length = strlen(word); // `size_t` is more appropriate than `int`
return 0;
}
C-like C++ version
#include <cstring>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
const char* word = "Hello";
const size_t length = strlen(word);
}
Idiomatic C++ version (recommended)
#include <string>
int main()
{
const std::string word = "Hello";
const std::size_t length = word.size();
}
'string' was not declared in this scope
You need to include the header <string> and refer to it as std::string. Also, strlen does not understand std::string or any user defined types, but you can use the size() method instead:
#include <string>
int main()
{
std::string word = "Hello";
size_t length = word.size();
}
<cstring> is the header for C++ support of C-style null-terminated strings. You should include <string>.
You haven't included the C++ string header in your project.
#include <string>
The libraries that you've included are all plain-C headers.
Additionally, strlen() doesn't work with a c++ string; you should use word.size() instead.
string is a specialization of standard class std::basic_string . It is declared in header <string>
So if you want "to play around with standard class std::string:" you need to include directive
#include <string>
Header <cstring> is not the same as header <string> and contains declarations of standard C functions such as strlen.
However there is no any sense to apply function strlen to an object of type std::string The compiler in this case will issue an error.
I advice you to play with the following code that to see the difference
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <cstring>
int main (int argc, char** argv)
{
std::string word = "Hello";
std::string::size_type length = word.length();
std::cout << "Object word of type std::string has value "
<< word << " with length of " << length
<< std::endl;
std::cout << "The size of the object itself is " << sizeof( word ) << std::endl;
char another_word[] = "Hello";
size_t another_length = std::strlen( another_word );
std::cout << "Object another_word of type char [6] has value "
<< another_word << " with length of " << another_length
<< std::endl;
std::cout << "The size of the object itself is " << sizeof( another_word ) << std::endl;
}
I am working in c++. I have a string that contains the following number
std::string s= "8133522648";
I want to convert this number in
long long int nr;
I did: nr=atoll(s.c_str()). The result is: -456410944. How to solve this error? Thanks
Edit:
In fact I have:
const char* str="8133523648";
I have to convert it into long long int nr=8133523648
Thanks for help! Appreciate!
use int64_t instead of long long. which is defined in stdint.h
If you rely on boost you can use
std::string s= "8133522648";
int64_t nr = boost::lexical_cast<int64_t, std::string>(s);
It can be done in better way as follows:
#include <sstream>
stringstream sstr;
sstr << "8133522648";
long long nr;
sstr >> nr;
Don't use atoll() as it is not defined by C++ standard. Some compiler may implement it while others don't. Also,
std::string s = 8133522648;
doesn't mean
std::string s = "8133522648";
which was probably what you wanted.
Below code is working fine:
#include <iostream>
#include <cstdio>
#include <cstdlib>
using namespace std;
int main() {
std::string s= "8133522648";
long long int nr = atoll(s.c_str());
cout << nr;
}