I have to build a small program to run on a set-top box, and for that I use a specific build toolchain: toolchain-final-mipsisa32r2el-timesys-linux-gnu
The build is composed of 2 parts: one lib static .a file and an executable that use the library.
The lib is correctly build with the following option:
mipsisa32r2el-timesys-linux-gnu-gcc -c --param max-inline-insns-single=2400
-o ../../../build/LinuxHost_STB_release/_outLib/STB.o -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing
-Winline -Wall -I../../../Modules -I../../../Source
-I/opt/toolchains/toolchain-final-mipsisa32r2el-timesys-linux-gnu/include
-I -fno-rtti ../../../Source/STBLib/STB.cpp
if I run nm on the libSTB.a, I saw the function define in STB.cpp as:
0000000000000124 T STB_Create
0000000000000460 T STB_Destroy
To compile and link the executable, I use the following command line:
mipsisa32r2el-timesys-linux-gnu-c++ -o ../../../build/LinuxHost_STB_release/STBExample
--sysroot=/opt/toolchains/toolchain-final-mipsisa32r2el-timesys-linux-gnu/
-I/opt/toolchains/toolchain-final-mipsisa32r2el-timesys-linux-gnu/include
-L../../../build/LinuxHost_STB_release
-lSTB ../../../Source/STBLib/STBExample.c
But I get the following linker error:
STBExample.c:(.text+0x488): undefined reference to `STB_Create'
Any idea of where I made a mistake or on how to investigate ?
As explained by #H2CO3 and #Joe Z, the problem was in the parameter ordering.
Additional static lib set with -lmust be place AFTER the .c file. As in the following example, a switch of the 2 last arguments solved the issue.
mipsisa32r2el-timesys-linux-gnu-c++ -o ../../../build/LinuxHost_STB_release/STBExample
--sysroot=/opt/toolchains/toolchain-final-mipsisa32r2el-timesys-linux-gnu/
-I/opt/toolchains/toolchain-final-mipsisa32r2el-timesys-linux-gnu/include
-L../../../build/LinuxHost_STB_release
../../../Source/STBLib/STBExample.c -lSTB
Related
Good Day Everyone,
N.B - This problem has been solved - I have provided my own solution in the answer section however the solution provided by Jonathan is much shorter. Nevertheless, this was the following question I originally posted:
I am basically trying to compile a serial library (for UART communication) on Linux however I am not really sure how to correctly compile (I have mentioned what I have done so far below), any suggestions would be highly valuable. I am using the serialib library - which is composed of 2 main files (serialib.h and serialib.cpp) , you may directly view the source code of these files here (scroll all the way to the bottom and view the files in new tabs): http://serialib.free.fr/html/classserialib.html
I transferred these files (serialib.h and serialib.cpp) to my BeagleBone Black micro-controller which is running Debian (Wheezy) , g++/gcc (Debian 4.6.3-14) 4.6.3. I wrote my own program (uart.cpp is my file name) to access the functions provided by this library, this is what I wrote:
#include <iostream>
#include "serialib.h"
#ifdef __linux__
#define DEVICE_PORT "/dev/ttyO1"
#endif
int main()
{
serialib LS;
return 0;
}
So as you can see I am trying to access the 'seriallib' class. serialib.h, serialib.cpp and uart.cpp are all in the home directory. I also manually added the iostream library in serialib.cpp as I did not see it being declared in the original source code.
Now I am really unsure of how to compile such external libraries but so far I tried the following steps:
g++ -c -Wall -Werror -fPIC serialib.c to convert to PIC which gives the following error:
distcc[3142] (dcc_parse_hosts) Warning: /home/debian/.distcc/zeroconf/hosts contained no hosts; can't distribute work
distcc[3142] (dcc_zeroconf_add_hosts) CRITICAL! failed to parse host file.
distcc[3142] (dcc_build_somewhere) Warning: failed to distribute, running locally instead
g++ serialib.cpp -L /home/debian/serialib.h which gives the following error:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/4.6/../../../arm-linux-gnueabihf/crt1.o: In function _start':
(.text+0x30): undefined reference tomain'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
distcc[3210] ERROR: compile serialib.cpp on localhost failed
As of now I am still finding out how to compile this and if I manage to work this out then I'll post my solution here too. Once again any suggestion will be highly valuable. Thank you all :) .
g++ -c -Wall -Werror -fPIC serialib.c to convert to PIC which gives the following error:
The "error" is not an error, it's a warning, telling you that your distcc setup is broken, but that it compiled locally.
That command doesn't "convert to PIC", it compiles the file serialib.c and produces a compiled object file, serialib.o
g++ serialib.cpp -L /home/debian/serialib.h
This is just nonsense. It tries to build a program from serialib.cpp and use the directory /home/debian/serialib.h (which isn't a directory!) to find libraries.
You don't need to "compile a library" you can just compile both the source files and link them together into a program. Either:
g++ -c serialib.cpp
g++ -c uart.cpp
g++ serialib.o uart.o -o uart
Or all in one command:
g++ serialib.cpp uart.cpp -o uart
You should read An Introduction to GCC to understand the commands, not just enter bogus commands without understanding them.
I have found a solution to this problem, hope this helps for all the future readers with similar problems. I have my own source code uart.cpp (Given in the question) which I want to compile, the external library is serialib that contains two main files (serialib.h and serialib.cpp), you will want to replace the following commands with respect to the files you have
Step 1: Compiling with position independent code
g++ -c -Wall -Werror -fpic serialib.cpp
Step 2: Creating a shared library
g++ -shared -o libserialib.so serialib.o , here the library is libserialib.so.
Step 3: Linking your source code with library
g++ -L /home/debian -lserialib uart.cpp -o uart
g++ -L /home/debian -Wall -o test uart.cpp -lserialib
You may save the library at a different path and you may have a different name of course. Suppose you have a library called libabc.so at the directory /home/user/myDir then the commands will be like:
g++ -L /home/user/myDir -labc your_code.cpp -o your_code
g++ -L /home/user/myDir -Wall -o test your_code.cpp -labc
test is out own program, lserialib is actually looking for libserialib.so and not serialib.o as gcc/g++ assumes all libraries start with lib and end with .so or .a and you can see the same goes for labc as it will look for libabc.so thus it is important to make sure your library name begins with lib and ends with .so or .a
Step 4: Making library available at run time
Here we provide the path where the library is actually stored, I saved it in the directory /home/debian which is why my command looks like:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/debian:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
if your library is saved at /path/to/file then the command will look like:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/file:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
This is to help the loader find the shared library and to view this path: echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH and to unset this: unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH
To execute the program type either ./test or ./uart and in case of any modification to the main source code (uart.cpp in this case) , simply repeat step 3. I found the following link very useful: http://www.cprogramming.com/tutorial/shared-libraries-linux-gcc.html . Thank you to all of you who took time to read this question and especially those who gave me suggestions. If anyone has more or better solutions, feel free to post them here to assist future readers :).
I use MinGW32 more specifically TDM-GCC-32. I have very simple project I link to one custom library but this error pops out:
>g++ -D_WIN32 -D_MINGW -lgdi32 -lgdiplus -Linterception/x86 -linterception main.cpp -o interceptor.exe
interception/x86/libinterception.a(dgnes00125.o):(.text+0x0): multiple definitio
n of `atexit'
C:/TDM-GCC-32/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/5.1.0/../../../crt2.o:crt1.c:(.text+0x2c0):
first defined here
interception/x86/libinterception.a(dgnes00109.o):(.text+0x0): multiple definitio
n of `_onexit'
C:/TDM-GCC-32/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/5.1.0/../../../crt2.o:crt1.c:(.text+0x2d0):
first defined here
C:/TDM-GCC-32/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/5.1.0/../../../../mingw32/bin/ld.exe: C:/TD
M-GCC-32/bin/../lib/gcc/mingw32/5.1.0/../../../crt2.o: bad reloc address 0x20 in
section `.eh_frame'
collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Commands I use to build the library:
gcc -DINTERCEPTION_EXPORT -D_WIN32 -D_MINGW -shared -o interception.dll interception.c
dlltool -z interception.def --export-all-symbol interception.dll
dlltool -d interception.def -l libinterception.a
I guess I have to use different options for compiling the library to avoid redefinitions..
The dlltool method I believe is currently deprecated. I can't fault you here though, as most of the available documentation still says to do it this way.
Gcc will link directly against .dll files, making .a files obsolete (at least for dealing with dll's - the only current reason to use a .a file is for static linking). You don't even have to specify the dll with the -l flag, although you have to specify the path of the dll if it's not in your current directory
C:\Users\burito>gcc main.o opengl32.dll -o main.exe
gcc: error: opengl32.dll: No such file or directory
C:\Users\burito>gcc main.o c:\Windows\system32\opengl32.dll -o main.exe
C:\Users\burito>
Ok, opengl32.dll is perhaps not a great example, but I hope I've given you the general idea.
I believe MSVC still needs its .lib files to use a .dll, for which there are several ways of making them if the library doesn't come with one.
In your specific case, the command that should work would be...
g++ -D_WIN32 -D_MINGW -lgdi32 -lgdiplus interception/x86/interception.dll main.cpp -o interceptor.exe
If for whatever reason you really do need to create a .a file from a .dll, the command that has worked for me is...
gendef interception.dll
dlltool -l interception.a -d interception.def -k -A
As the repository you linked does provide .dll files in its releases, you shouldn't have to build them yourself
I have some basic questions regarding linking against a C/C++ library. I am trying to understand the difference in using the two different usages -L/usr/local/lib -lm usage and /usr/local/lib/libm.a usage. E.g., when I compile and link an example from the [SUNDIALS] library, both of the following work
gcc -Wall cvRoberts_dns.c -o cvRoberts_dns.exe -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib/ -lsundials_cvode -lsundials_nvecserial -lm
OR
gcc -Wall cvRoberts_dns.c -o cvRoberts_dns.exe /usr/local/lib/libsundials_cvode.a /usr/local/lib/libsundials_nvecserial.a
However, to compile and link an example from the library [libsbml], the following works
g++ -Wall readSBML.cpp -o readSBML.exe -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib -lsbml
but the this does not
g++ -Wall readSBML.cpp -o readSBML.exe /usr/local/lib/libsbml.a
If required, I can post the complete error message I get, but the last line of the message is as follows
ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
My questions are as follows:
In the second style of linking (of the first example), there is no information regarding where to find the include files (header files), how does the compiler know the information supplied in -I/usr/local/include which is provided in the first style of the first example?
In the second style of first example there is no /usr/local/lib/libm.a (it actually gives an error message that libm.a cannot be found if I try to include it), then why -lm is required in the first style?
How do I compile the second example in the second style (i.e., using /usr/local/lib/libsbml.a)? I do see that there are files - libsbml.a and libsbml-static.a in the /usr/local/lib folder, but none of them work.
If it helps, I am on an OS X machine.
I would be very thankful if any one could help in this regard.
Just an update - I tried
g++ -Wall readSBML.cpp -o readSBML.exe /usr/local/lib/libsbml.5.dylib
and that compiled and linked just fine.
Thanks
SN
In general
The -L option is meant to find where the libraries themselves are. Each library is a collection of one or more object code (machine language) files. There is no need to find the include files.
The -I option has nothing to with linker, it helps the compiler resolve the header files used in your driver programme( eg Roberts_dns.c). This happens during the pre-processing stage.
In the second style of linking (of the first example), there is no
information regarding where to find the include files (header files),..
If the compilation worked as you expected,it may be because /usr/local/include is in the default include path for gcc. To check the default include path for gcc do gcc -xc -E -v -.
In the second style of first example there is no
/usr/local/lib/libm.a(it actually gives an error message that libm.a
cannot be found if I try to include it), then why -lm is required in
the first style?
In Linux, some libraries like libc.a are directly linked to your execultable by default while libm.a is not. In Mac (your environment), though, libm is directly link to the executable by default. So you don't have to explicitly link it. It is less likely that libm.a is located in /usr/local/lib/. So you got an error. But why link it in the first place?
I am trying to compile a project that depends on the Xerces XML Parser. The project compiles for Windows without any difficulty, but I'm having some trouble compiling it with g++ in Cygwin.
In order to use Xerces, I am trying to compile my code against the static library libxerces-c.a. But when I do so, I get errors that look like this:
/tmp/cc2QGvMh.o:test.cpp:(.text+0x3a): undefined reference to `xercesc_2_8::DOMImplementationRegistry::getDOMImplementation(unsigned short const*)'
I've inspected the static library using ar, and confirmed that it contains the DOMImplementationRegistry.o file that defines the function that I am calling.
ar -t libxerces-c.a
...
DOMImplementationImpl.o
DOMImplementationRegistry.o
DOMLocatorImpl.o
...
I've also extracted the object files from the library, and used 'nm' to make sure that the function I am calling actually exists:
ar -x libxerces-c.a
nm --demangle DOMImplementationRegistry.o
...
00000080 T xercesc_2_8::getDOMImplSrcVectorMutex()
00000300 T xercesc_2_8::DOMImplementationRegistry::getDOMImplementation(unsigned short const*)
000002a0 T xercesc_2_8::DOMImplementationRegistry::addSource(xercesc_2_8::DOMImplementationSource*)
...
Since I can compile everything for Windows but not with g++, I thought that the error could be in the linker order (similar to the problem described in this question). However, even after changing the linker order, I am still getting the same compiler error. I have tried both
g++ -o test.exe test.cpp -Llib -lxerces-c
and
g++ -o test.exe test.cpp lib/libxerces-c.a
Any ideas?
Your project uses method from xercesc_2_6 namespace as pointed by compiler error message but your library offers xercesc_2_8 version. Problem is probably caused by mismatch between headers you use and library object file.
You didn't say the source of the archive. If it isn't compiled with cygwin, it could be a name mangling problem. Compiling the library from source might well fix this.
It could also be that the archive is built incorrectly so that it has internal resolution problems. Try giving the library name twice.
g++ -o test.exe test.cpp lib/libxerces-c.a lib/libxerces-c.a
If this works, the archive is broken and you should look for or build a new one.
Try the linker option --enable-stdcall-fixup (see 'man ld'). It will care for name mangling and calling conventions:
g++ -o test.exe test.o -Wl,--enable-stdcall-fixup -Llib -lxerces-c
I am using Ubuntu and my IDE is Aptana 3.0
I am getting the following error when trying to build. The library libfcgi.a is located in /usr/local/lib/.
In the Library C++ Linker section of the project properties, I added /usr/local/lib/ to the search path and the file /usr/local/lib/libfcgi.a.
Why can I still not build?
**** Build of configuration Debug for project rtb ****
make all
Building target: rtb
Invoking: GCC C++ Linker
g++ -L/usr/local/lib -o"rtb" ./src/rtb.o -l/usr/local/lib/libfcgi.a
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -l/usr/local/lib/libfcgi.a
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [rtb] Error 1
I think this may be what you want;
g++ -L/usr/local/lib -o "rtb" ./src/rtb.o -lfcgi
-l<value> will automatically look in all folders listed with -L for a library named lib<value>.a or lib<value>.so, all you need is the '-lfcgi'.
Try "-lfcgi" instead
g++ -L/usr/local/lib -o"rtb" ./src/rtb.o -lfcgi
Your linker flag is wrong it needs to be -lfcgi and not the whole path with the "lib" prefix and the .a suffix.
You can change it by hand, or in Apatana. To do so you don't have to give him the full qualified path to your lib two times. ( You already gave him the search path, remember? ). Usually you define additional libraries just like this:
cfgi and your IDE does the rest to add it to the linker flags!
You should do
g++ -o "rtb" ./src/rtb.o -lfcgi
In the unlikely case that /usr/local/lib/ is not in your search path, you can either add that path in the command line like
g++ -L/usr/local/lib -o "rtb" ./src/rtb.o -lfcgi
or put it in the environment variable LIBRARY_PATH before calling your compile command, e.g. with bash:
if [ -z "$LIBRARY_PATH" ];
then export LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib;
else export LIBRARY_PATH="$LIBRARY_PATH":/usr/local/lib;
fi
If you insist in giving the explicit file name, omit the -l:
g++ -L/usr/local/lib -o "rtb" ./src/rtb.o /usr/local/lib/libfcgi.a
However I'd advise against that because it's inflexible. If the issue is that there's another, incompatible version of the library installed, it's better to make sure that the correct one comes first in the search path (or even better, make sure that the wrong one isn't in the search path at all ― maybe even by removing it from the system).
That's for the help all....really appreciate it.
Here is the solution. I had to use -lfcgi++ and I added the
g++ -L/usr/local/include/ -lfcgi++ -o"rtb" ./src/rtb.o
The above was the output from aptanta console. I tried -lfcgi and did not work. Google search lead to using -lfcgi++.