I have a CTreeListCtrl in my MFC application.What I need to do is add a button in a particular column of a node when a particular condition is satisfied(type is changed to reference).
In the image I have edited and added a blue rounded oval to mark the place of desired button.What I want to do is to invoke a dialog on clicking it.But I don't have any clue whether it is possible or not.If yes then pls give me some suggesions.
This is no normal tree control. It is already customized to use multiple columns and I am sure it uses some kid of owner draw. For me it seams more like a list control with tree Features... I know some similar code from Codepproject..
Creating a "real" button (window) isn't wise/good. because it is another window inside the list control...
Change your code to "Draw a button. You can use DrawFrameControl.
Just intercept the left mouse click. Check the range if this area is cliecked. Fire a user defined message to the parent window.
Related
the situation is as follows:
I have the handle for a window (which i got with the function FindWindowEx() ) and that window has 3 buttons. I would like to know how I can get the handle for 1 of the 3 buttons. I mean I know ppl can use spy++, but I am sure there have to be functions that can do it for me, so my questions are:
Question::
What function or functions can I use to get the handle of a button of a window (already knowing the handle for the window)?
Question2::
How do I get the Button's ID???
You can loop through children of that window with EnumChildWindow.
It lets you define a callback function to be called for every child of the window.
In the callback, you can check if the current child is the button you need.
For example, if you dinamically want to press an OK button, you can check if the window text equals OK. You can get the window text with GetWindowText.
If you know the position in the parent window you can use ChildWindowFromPoint.
For this to work you will probably have to check the windows status first (maximazed or current width-height) to be sure the button is right where you want.
An easy way may also be getting his position relative to another child of the window that's easier to retrieve. For example, if the button is always to the right of a text-box control, you can get coordinates of the text-box and use ChildWindowFromPoint passing those coordinates with something added in the x direction.
Using C++, I am making a Tic-Tac-Toe game using the Win32 API. To mark a square (X or O) I want the player to click the square which then changes to an X or O.
What I am doing right now is having a button click event which turns a static text box to X or O. However, when I place the button on top of the text box and make it not visible, I can't click it.
What I really need is an invisible button that still functions. So it's not set WS_VISIBLE, but you can still click it.
Is this possible or is there another way around this problem?
I can see a couple of reasonable possibilities here.
The first and most obvious would be to skip using a button at all, and just have the underlying window process the WM_LBUTTONDOWN message, and set the "X" or "O" in the correct location. For this, you don't even need static controls -- you can just detect the mouse clicks directly on the parent window, and draw your "X" or "O" in the corresponding square.
Another possibility would be a button that's marked as "visible", but happens to be transparent. IMO, this is a fairly poor choice though. To do it, you'd need to either create a transparent button control on your own, or subclass a button control to disable its drawing.
At least IMO, the obvious route would be to skip using the static control at all. Instead, just use the buttons directly -- a button normally has a caption. Start with that caption as an empty string. When the button is clicked, change its caption to "X" or "O" as appropriate. It should probably also disable itself in response to the button click, so clicking it again won't have any further effect.
There's no way to make an invisible button that still functions. Imagine all of the ways that could be abused if it were possible! Not to mention how confusing to have invisible, yet functional, UI.
What Mark Ransom posted is exactly right: you need to get your existing control to respond to mouse click events, just like a button does. Then you can do whatever you want in response to clicks. You don't need a button just to be clickable.
You say that you have a "static text box", but I'm not really sure what that is. There are text boxes (which are not static), and then there are static controls (which can display text). I'm going to assume that you have the latter.
In that case, you don't need to handle the WM_LBUTTONDOWN and WM_LBUTTONUP messages directly, which would require that you subclass the control. Although that's probably the best approach design-wise (separation of responsibilities and all that), it's also a lot more trouble.
Instead, you can handle the click events from the parent's window procedure by setting the SS_NOTIFY style for your static control (you can do this either in the Dialog Editor or in your call to CreateWindow, depending on how you create the control). This causes the control to notify its parent in four cases: when it is clicked (STN_CLICKED), when it is double-clicked (STN_DBLCLK), when it is enabled (STN_ENABLE), and when it is disabled (STN_DISABLE).
So at the parent, you need to process WM_COMMAND messages. The message you're looking for will have a HIWORD(wParam) of STN_CLICKED (indicating that a static control with the SS_NOTIFY style has been clicked), a LOWORD(wParam) corresponding to your static control's ID (set either in the Dialog Editor or specified as the hMenu parameter in your call to CreateWindow), and an lParam containing a handle to your static control.
If you use SW_HIDE, it doesn't just make the window invisible but makes it behave like that too. What you really wanted is probably just make the button transparent. I never did that, you may find this or this helpful.
You may just scrap the textbox just use the button, i mean a button-looking checkbox with ownerdraw or bitmaps. Or scrapping the button and handle the mouse events Like Mark suggests.
My application uses stacked dialogs to select between options in several places. For example, the dialog box below uses two stacked dialogs:
To choose between "shooting methods", the user selects from the drop-down list in the bottom right. This changes a child dialog box above it.
The "advanced options" box (located in the child dialog box) selects between a simplified interface and a more complete one.
In each case, the stacked dialog box is implemented using a picture object as a placeholder in the parent dialog. When a page is selected, SetWindowPos is called to move/resize the child dialog (pNewPage) to fit the placeholder.
// Show the newly selected page
pNewPage->ShowWindow (SW_SHOW) ;
pNewPage->SetFocus () ;
// Position the newly selected page
CRect rcDlgArea ;
GetDlgItem (IDC_DLG_AREA)->GetWindowRect (&rcDlgArea) ;
ScreenToClient (&rcDlgArea) ;
pNewPage->SetWindowPos (this,
rcDlgArea.left, rcDlgArea.top, rcDlgArea.Width (), rcDlgArea.Height (),
SWP_NOACTIVATE) ;
This has worked very well up until now, but one of my users in Germany is having a problem I can't explain. When he opens the tool, the stacked page comes up looking like this:
Note that the child dialogs are stretched so that the text in the child dialog appears larger than the text in the parent.
Other than the visual layout issues, the child dialog also seems to "cover" the selection drop-down in the bottom right (located in the parent dialog). Although the drop-down is still visible, CBN_SELCHANGE messages are not received when the drop-down list is clicked.
I am at a loss to explain why the child dialog boxes are being rescaled. As you can see above, I've tried to be very explicit about the resizing of the dialog box, but this doesn't seem to work.
Can anyone think of a reason why the child dialog might be rescaled on some systems but not on others? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Michael
Seems like this user has larger fonts selected than what is used in the first screenshot. Note that dialog sizes are specified in DLU's, which scale with the size the user has selected for the font. You can either scale your dialog explicitly, in pixels (bad solution, this will make your app look even worse on some configurations), or do your calculations in DLU's everywhere. Your second screenshot also seems to show that the child dialogs use a different font than those of the wizard. I'm not sure why that is, I guess it's something in the window styles you pass to the wizard when you create it.
Please have a look at this screenshot:
The circles are custom controls. When I click a control, I need to bring the widget to the front. Ex. if I click the second circle it should look like this:
When the control is clicked I am able to get the sender (i.e. the control). Only thing is how to bring the object to the front.
Please help me fix this issue.
Have you tried QWidget::raise()?
Raises this widget to the top of the parent widget's stack. After this call the widget will be visually in front of any overlapping sibling widgets.
Note: When using activateWindow(), you can call this function to ensure that the window is stacked on top.
So the pattern I usually use that will ensure a window is shown, brought to the front of sibling widgets and brought in front of other applications is:
widget->show();
widget->activateWindow();
widget->raise();
I'm trying to create a custom dropdown for a derivative of CComboBox. The dropdown will be a calendar control plus some 'hotspots', e.g.
So I figure the best way to achieve this is to have a simple CWnd-derived class which acts as the parent to the calendar control, and have it paint the hotspots itself.
The window needs to be a popup window - I think - rather than a child window so that it isn't clipped. But doing this causes the dialog (on which the combobox control is placed) to stop being the topmost (foreground?) window, leading to its frame being drawn differently:
alt text http://img693.imageshack.us/img693/3474/35148785.png
This spoils the illusion that the dropdown is part of the combobox since its acting more like a modal dialog at this point. Any suggestions on how I make the custom dropdown behave like the regular dropdown?
Are there any other pitfalls I need to watch out for, e.g. focus and mouse capture issues?
When you create your popup window, you need to specify its owner. Owned popup windows will activate their owner when you activate them. Not specifying an owner will cause your window to get activated, which causes the change in the owner you're seeing.
Yeah I had this problem once. A quick google makes me suspect I solved this by using CreateWindowEx() and specifying WS_EX_NOACTIVATE. I have some other code that achieves the same effect by making the window with WS_EX_TOOLWINDOW rather than as a popup window, but I'm not sure of why that was done that way, my intuition would say that making it a popup window would be the way to go.
You can find in the following links two sample project that put in the CComboBox dropdown window a CTreeCtrl or a CListCtrl controls ... similar, you can put whatever you need there. Here is the links:
Tree ComboBox Control
and
List ComboBox Control
I hope this help you.