Setting a regex optional group to None in Scala - regex

I have the following regular expression pattern that matches fully qualified Microsoft SQL Server table names ([dbName].[schemaName].[tableName]), where the schema name is optional:
val tableNamePattern = """\[(\w+)\](?:\.\[(\w+)\])?\.\[(\w+)\]""".r
I am using it like this:
val tableNamePattern(database, schema, tableName) = fullyQualifiedTableName
When the schema name is missing (e.g.: [dbName].[tableName]), the schema value gets set to null.
Is there a Scala idiomatic way to set it to None instead, and to Some(schema) when the schemaName is provided?
Some people, when confronted with a problem, think
“I know, I'll use regular expressions.” Now they have two problems.
-- Jamie Zawinski

I'm going to copy the code from the accepted answer on the linked question, and without giving credit too. Here it is:
object Optional {
def unapply[T](a: T) = if (null == a) Some(None) else Some(Some(a))
}
val tableNamePattern(database, Optional(schema), tablename) = fullyQualifiedTableName
PS: I just today wondered on twitter whether creating special-case extractors was as common as they were suggested. :)

Related

How to get the most accurate term in regex?

I have an angular app using the mongodb sdk for js.
I would like to suggest some words on a input field for the user from my words collection, so I did:
getSuggestions(term: string) {
var regex = new stitch.BSON.BSONRegExp('^' +term , 'i');
return from(this.words.find({ 'Noun': { $regex: regex } }).execute());
}
The problem is that if the user type for example Bie, the query returns a lot of documents but the most accurated are the last ones, for example Bier, first it returns the bigger words, like Bieberbach'sche Vermutung. How can I deal to return the closests documents first?
A regular-expression is probably not enough to do what you are intending to do here. They can only do what they're meant to do – match a string. They might be used to give you a candidate entry to present to the user, but can't judge or weigh them. You're going to have to devise that logic yourself.

sqlite valid email input [duplicate]

I'd like to use a regular expression in sqlite, but I don't know how.
My table has got a column with strings like this: "3,12,13,14,19,28,32"
Now if I type "where x LIKE '3'" I also get the rows which contain values like 13 or 32,
but I'd like to get only the rows which have exactly the value 3 in that string.
Does anyone know how to solve this?
As others pointed out already, REGEXP calls a user defined function which must first be defined and loaded into the the database. Maybe some sqlite distributions or GUI tools include it by default, but my Ubuntu install did not. The solution was
sudo apt-get install sqlite3-pcre
which implements Perl regular expressions in a loadable module in /usr/lib/sqlite3/pcre.so
To be able to use it, you have to load it each time you open the database:
.load /usr/lib/sqlite3/pcre.so
Or you could put that line into your ~/.sqliterc.
Now you can query like this:
SELECT fld FROM tbl WHERE fld REGEXP '\b3\b';
If you want to query directly from the command-line, you can use the -cmd switch to load the library before your SQL:
sqlite3 "$filename" -cmd ".load /usr/lib/sqlite3/pcre.so" "SELECT fld FROM tbl WHERE fld REGEXP '\b3\b';"
If you are on Windows, I guess a similar .dll file should be available somewhere.
SQLite3 supports the REGEXP operator:
WHERE x REGEXP <regex>
http://www.sqlite.org/lang_expr.html#regexp
A hacky way to solve it without regex is where ',' || x || ',' like '%,3,%'
SQLite does not contain regular expression functionality by default.
It defines a REGEXP operator, but this will fail with an error message unless you or your framework define a user function called regexp(). How you do this will depend on your platform.
If you have a regexp() function defined, you can match an arbitrary integer from a comma-separated list like so:
... WHERE your_column REGEXP "\b" || your_integer || "\b";
But really, it looks like you would find things a whole lot easier if you normalised your database structure by replacing those groups within a single column with a separate row for each number in the comma-separated list. Then you could not only use the = operator instead of a regular expression, but also use more powerful relational tools like joins that SQL provides for you.
A SQLite UDF in PHP/PDO for the REGEXP keyword that mimics the behavior in MySQL:
$pdo->sqliteCreateFunction('regexp',
function ($pattern, $data, $delimiter = '~', $modifiers = 'isuS')
{
if (isset($pattern, $data) === true)
{
return (preg_match(sprintf('%1$s%2$s%1$s%3$s', $delimiter, $pattern, $modifiers), $data) > 0);
}
return null;
}
);
The u modifier is not implemented in MySQL, but I find it useful to have it by default. Examples:
SELECT * FROM "table" WHERE "name" REGEXP 'sql(ite)*';
SELECT * FROM "table" WHERE regexp('sql(ite)*', "name", '#', 's');
If either $data or $pattern is NULL, the result is NULL - just like in MySQL.
My solution in Python with sqlite3:
import sqlite3
import re
def match(expr, item):
return re.match(expr, item) is not None
conn = sqlite3.connect(':memory:')
conn.create_function("MATCHES", 2, match)
cursor = conn.cursor()
cursor.execute("SELECT MATCHES('^b', 'busy');")
print cursor.fetchone()[0]
cursor.close()
conn.close()
If regex matches, the output would be 1, otherwise 0.
With python, assuming con is the connection to SQLite, you can define the required UDF by writing:
con.create_function('regexp', 2, lambda x, y: 1 if re.search(x,y) else 0)
Here is a more complete example:
import re
import sqlite3
with sqlite3.connect(":memory:") as con:
con.create_function('regexp', 2, lambda x, y: 1 if re.search(x,y) else 0)
cursor = con.cursor()
# ...
cursor.execute("SELECT * from person WHERE surname REGEXP '^A' ")
I don't it is good to answer a question which was posted almost an year ago. But I am writing this for those who think that Sqlite itself provide the function REGEXP.
One basic requirement to invoke the function REGEXP in sqlite is
"You should create your own function in the application and then provide the callback link to the sqlite driver".
For that you have to use sqlite_create_function (C interface). You can find the detail from here and here
An exhaustive or'ed where clause can do it without string concatenation:
WHERE ( x == '3' OR
x LIKE '%,3' OR
x LIKE '3,%' OR
x LIKE '%,3,%');
Includes the four cases exact match, end of list, beginning of list, and mid list.
This is more verbose, doesn't require the regex extension.
UPDATE TableName
SET YourField = ''
WHERE YourField REGEXP 'YOUR REGEX'
And :
SELECT * from TableName
WHERE YourField REGEXP 'YOUR REGEX'
SQLite version 3.36.0 released 2021-06-18 now has the REGEXP command builtin.
For CLI build only.
Consider using this
WHERE x REGEXP '(^|,)(3)(,|$)'
This will match exactly 3 when x is in:
3
3,12,13
12,13,3
12,3,13
Other examples:
WHERE x REGEXP '(^|,)(3|13)(,|$)'
This will match on 3 or 13
You may consider also
WHERE x REGEXP '(^|\D{1})3(\D{1}|$)'
This will allow find number 3 in any string at any position
You could use a regular expression with REGEXP, but that is a silly way to do an exact match.
You should just say WHERE x = '3'.
If you are using php you can add any function to your sql statement by using: SQLite3::createFunction.
In PDO you can use PDO::sqliteCreateFunction and implement the preg_match function within your statement:
See how its done by Havalite (RegExp in SqLite using Php)
In case if someone looking non-regex condition for Android Sqlite, like this string [1,2,3,4,5] then don't forget to add bracket([]) same for other special characters like parenthesis({}) in #phyatt condition
WHERE ( x == '[3]' OR
x LIKE '%,3]' OR
x LIKE '[3,%' OR
x LIKE '%,3,%');
You can use the sqlean-regexp extension, which provides regexp search and replace functions.
Based on the PCRE2 engine, this extension supports all major regular expression features. It also supports Unicode. The extension is available for Windows, Linux, and macOS.
Some usage examples:
-- select messages containing number 3
select * from messages
where msg_text regexp '\b3\b';
-- count messages containing digits
select count(*) from messages
where msg_text regexp '\d+';
-- 42
select regexp_like('Meet me at 10:30', '\d+:\d+');
-- 1
select regexp_substr('Meet me at 10:30', '\d+:\d+');
-- 10:30
select regexp_replace('password = "123456"', '"[^"]+"', '***');
-- password = ***
In Julia, the model to follow can be illustrated as follows:
using SQLite
using DataFrames
db = SQLite.DB("<name>.db")
register(db, SQLite.regexp, nargs=2, name="regexp")
SQLite.Query(db, "SELECT * FROM test WHERE name REGEXP '^h';") |> DataFrame
for rails
db = ActiveRecord::Base.connection.raw_connection
db.create_function('regexp', 2) do |func, pattern, expression|
func.result = expression.to_s.match(Regexp.new(pattern.to_s, Regexp::IGNORECASE)) ? 1 : 0
end

What's the best way to match strings in a file to case class in Scala?

We have a file that contains data that we want to match to a case class. I know enough to brute force it but looking for an idiomatic way in scala.
Given File:
#record
name:John Doe
age: 34
#record
name: Smith Holy
age: 33
# some comment
#record
# another comment
name: Martin Fowler
age: 99
(field values on two lines are INVALID, e.g. name:John\n Smith should error)
And the case class
case class Record(name:String, age:Int)
I Want to return a Seq type such as Stream:
val records: Stream records
The couple of ideas i'm working with but so far haven't implemented is:
Remove all new lines and treat the whole file as one long string. Then grep match on the string "((?!name).)+((?!age).)+age:([\s\d]+)" and create a new object of my case class for each match but so far my regex foo is low and can't match around comments.
Recursive idea: Iterate through each line to find the first line that matches record, then recursively call the function to match name, then age. Tail recursively return Some(new Record(cumulativeMap.get(name), cumulativeMap.get(age)) or None when hitting the next record after name (i.e. age was never encountered)
?? Better Idea?
Thanks for reading! The file is more complicated than above but all rules are equal. For the curious: i'm trying to parse a custom M3U playlist file format.
I'd use kantan.regex for a fairly trivial regex based solution.
Without fancy shapeless derivation, you can write the following:
import kantan.regex._
import kantan.regex.implicits._
case class Record(name:String, age:Int)
implicit val decoder = MatchDecoder.ordered(Record.apply _)
input.evalRegex[Record](rx"(?:name:\s*([^\n]+))\n(?:age:\s*([0-9]+))").toList
This yields:
List(Success(Record(John Doe,34)), Success(Record(Smith Holy,33)), Success(Record(Martin Fowler,99)))
Note that this solution requires you to hand-write decoder, but it can often be automatically derived. If you don't mind a shapeless dependency, you could simply write:
import kantan.regex._
import kantan.regex.implicits._
import kantan.regex.generic._
case class Record(name:String, age:Int)
input.evalRegex[Record](rx"(?:name:\s*([^\n]+))\n(?:age:\s*([0-9]+))").toList
And get the exact same result.
Disclaimer: I'm the library's author.
You could use Parser Combinators.
If you have the file format specification in BNF or can write one, then Scala can create a parser for you from those rules. This may be more robust than hand-made regex based parsers. It's certainly more "Scala".
I don't have much experience in Scala, but could these regexes work:
You could use (?<=name:).* to match name value, and (?<=age:).* to match the age value. If you use this, remove spaces in found matches, otherwise name: bob will match bob with a space before, you might not want that.
If name: or any other tag is in comment, or comment is after value, something will be matched. Please leave a comment if you want to avoid that.
You could try this:
Path file = Paths.get("file.txt");
val lines = Files.readAllLines(file, Charset.defaultCharset());
val records = lines.filter(s => s.startsWith("age:") || s.startsWith("name:"))
.grouped(2).toList.map {
case List(a, b) => Record(a.replaceAll("name:", "").trim,
b.replaceAll("age:", "").trim.toInt)
}

How do I use regex in a SQLite query?

I'd like to use a regular expression in sqlite, but I don't know how.
My table has got a column with strings like this: "3,12,13,14,19,28,32"
Now if I type "where x LIKE '3'" I also get the rows which contain values like 13 or 32,
but I'd like to get only the rows which have exactly the value 3 in that string.
Does anyone know how to solve this?
As others pointed out already, REGEXP calls a user defined function which must first be defined and loaded into the the database. Maybe some sqlite distributions or GUI tools include it by default, but my Ubuntu install did not. The solution was
sudo apt-get install sqlite3-pcre
which implements Perl regular expressions in a loadable module in /usr/lib/sqlite3/pcre.so
To be able to use it, you have to load it each time you open the database:
.load /usr/lib/sqlite3/pcre.so
Or you could put that line into your ~/.sqliterc.
Now you can query like this:
SELECT fld FROM tbl WHERE fld REGEXP '\b3\b';
If you want to query directly from the command-line, you can use the -cmd switch to load the library before your SQL:
sqlite3 "$filename" -cmd ".load /usr/lib/sqlite3/pcre.so" "SELECT fld FROM tbl WHERE fld REGEXP '\b3\b';"
If you are on Windows, I guess a similar .dll file should be available somewhere.
SQLite3 supports the REGEXP operator:
WHERE x REGEXP <regex>
http://www.sqlite.org/lang_expr.html#regexp
A hacky way to solve it without regex is where ',' || x || ',' like '%,3,%'
SQLite does not contain regular expression functionality by default.
It defines a REGEXP operator, but this will fail with an error message unless you or your framework define a user function called regexp(). How you do this will depend on your platform.
If you have a regexp() function defined, you can match an arbitrary integer from a comma-separated list like so:
... WHERE your_column REGEXP "\b" || your_integer || "\b";
But really, it looks like you would find things a whole lot easier if you normalised your database structure by replacing those groups within a single column with a separate row for each number in the comma-separated list. Then you could not only use the = operator instead of a regular expression, but also use more powerful relational tools like joins that SQL provides for you.
A SQLite UDF in PHP/PDO for the REGEXP keyword that mimics the behavior in MySQL:
$pdo->sqliteCreateFunction('regexp',
function ($pattern, $data, $delimiter = '~', $modifiers = 'isuS')
{
if (isset($pattern, $data) === true)
{
return (preg_match(sprintf('%1$s%2$s%1$s%3$s', $delimiter, $pattern, $modifiers), $data) > 0);
}
return null;
}
);
The u modifier is not implemented in MySQL, but I find it useful to have it by default. Examples:
SELECT * FROM "table" WHERE "name" REGEXP 'sql(ite)*';
SELECT * FROM "table" WHERE regexp('sql(ite)*', "name", '#', 's');
If either $data or $pattern is NULL, the result is NULL - just like in MySQL.
My solution in Python with sqlite3:
import sqlite3
import re
def match(expr, item):
return re.match(expr, item) is not None
conn = sqlite3.connect(':memory:')
conn.create_function("MATCHES", 2, match)
cursor = conn.cursor()
cursor.execute("SELECT MATCHES('^b', 'busy');")
print cursor.fetchone()[0]
cursor.close()
conn.close()
If regex matches, the output would be 1, otherwise 0.
With python, assuming con is the connection to SQLite, you can define the required UDF by writing:
con.create_function('regexp', 2, lambda x, y: 1 if re.search(x,y) else 0)
Here is a more complete example:
import re
import sqlite3
with sqlite3.connect(":memory:") as con:
con.create_function('regexp', 2, lambda x, y: 1 if re.search(x,y) else 0)
cursor = con.cursor()
# ...
cursor.execute("SELECT * from person WHERE surname REGEXP '^A' ")
I don't it is good to answer a question which was posted almost an year ago. But I am writing this for those who think that Sqlite itself provide the function REGEXP.
One basic requirement to invoke the function REGEXP in sqlite is
"You should create your own function in the application and then provide the callback link to the sqlite driver".
For that you have to use sqlite_create_function (C interface). You can find the detail from here and here
An exhaustive or'ed where clause can do it without string concatenation:
WHERE ( x == '3' OR
x LIKE '%,3' OR
x LIKE '3,%' OR
x LIKE '%,3,%');
Includes the four cases exact match, end of list, beginning of list, and mid list.
This is more verbose, doesn't require the regex extension.
UPDATE TableName
SET YourField = ''
WHERE YourField REGEXP 'YOUR REGEX'
And :
SELECT * from TableName
WHERE YourField REGEXP 'YOUR REGEX'
SQLite version 3.36.0 released 2021-06-18 now has the REGEXP command builtin.
For CLI build only.
Consider using this
WHERE x REGEXP '(^|,)(3)(,|$)'
This will match exactly 3 when x is in:
3
3,12,13
12,13,3
12,3,13
Other examples:
WHERE x REGEXP '(^|,)(3|13)(,|$)'
This will match on 3 or 13
You may consider also
WHERE x REGEXP '(^|\D{1})3(\D{1}|$)'
This will allow find number 3 in any string at any position
You could use a regular expression with REGEXP, but that is a silly way to do an exact match.
You should just say WHERE x = '3'.
If you are using php you can add any function to your sql statement by using: SQLite3::createFunction.
In PDO you can use PDO::sqliteCreateFunction and implement the preg_match function within your statement:
See how its done by Havalite (RegExp in SqLite using Php)
In case if someone looking non-regex condition for Android Sqlite, like this string [1,2,3,4,5] then don't forget to add bracket([]) same for other special characters like parenthesis({}) in #phyatt condition
WHERE ( x == '[3]' OR
x LIKE '%,3]' OR
x LIKE '[3,%' OR
x LIKE '%,3,%');
You can use the sqlean-regexp extension, which provides regexp search and replace functions.
Based on the PCRE2 engine, this extension supports all major regular expression features. It also supports Unicode. The extension is available for Windows, Linux, and macOS.
Some usage examples:
-- select messages containing number 3
select * from messages
where msg_text regexp '\b3\b';
-- count messages containing digits
select count(*) from messages
where msg_text regexp '\d+';
-- 42
select regexp_like('Meet me at 10:30', '\d+:\d+');
-- 1
select regexp_substr('Meet me at 10:30', '\d+:\d+');
-- 10:30
select regexp_replace('password = "123456"', '"[^"]+"', '***');
-- password = ***
In Julia, the model to follow can be illustrated as follows:
using SQLite
using DataFrames
db = SQLite.DB("<name>.db")
register(db, SQLite.regexp, nargs=2, name="regexp")
SQLite.Query(db, "SELECT * FROM test WHERE name REGEXP '^h';") |> DataFrame
for rails
db = ActiveRecord::Base.connection.raw_connection
db.create_function('regexp', 2) do |func, pattern, expression|
func.result = expression.to_s.match(Regexp.new(pattern.to_s, Regexp::IGNORECASE)) ? 1 : 0
end

doctrine2 dql, use setParameter with % wildcard when doing a like comparison

I want to use the parameter place holder - e.g. ?1 - with the % wild cards. that is, something like: "u.name LIKE %?1%" (though this throws an error). The docs have the following two examples:
1.
// Example - $qb->expr()->like('u.firstname', $qb->expr()->literal('Gui%'))
public function like($x, $y); // Returns Expr\Comparison instance
I do not like this as there is no protection against code injection.
2.
// $qb instanceof QueryBuilder
// example8: QueryBuilder port of: "SELECT u FROM User u WHERE u.id = ?1 OR u.nickname LIKE ?2 ORDER BY u.surname DESC" using QueryBuilder helper methods
$qb->select(array('u')) // string 'u' is converted to array internally
->from('User', 'u')
->where($qb->expr()->orx(
$qb->expr()->eq('u.id', '?1'),
$qb->expr()->like('u.nickname', '?2')
))
->orderBy('u.surname', 'ASC'));
I do not like this because I need to search for terms within the object's properties - that is, I need the wild cards on either side.
When binding parameters to queries, DQL pretty much works exactly like PDO (which is what Doctrine2 uses under the hood).
So when using the LIKE statement, PDO treats both the keyword and the % wildcards as a single token. You cannot add the wildcards next to the placeholder. You must append them to the string when you bind the params.
$qb->expr()->like('u.nickname', '?2')
$qb->getQuery()->setParameter(2, '%' . $value . '%');
See this comment in the PHP manual.
The selected answer is wrong. It works, but it is not secure.
You should escape the term that you insert between the percentage signs:
->setParameter(2, '%'.addcslashes($value, '%_').'%')
The percentage sign '%' and the symbol underscore '_' are interpreted as wildcards by LIKE. If they're not escaped properly, an attacker might construct arbirtarily complex queries that can cause a denial of service attack. Also, it might be possible for the attacker to get search results he is not supposed to get. A more detailed description of attack scenarios can be found here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/7893670/623685