I want to use the parameter place holder - e.g. ?1 - with the % wild cards. that is, something like: "u.name LIKE %?1%" (though this throws an error). The docs have the following two examples:
1.
// Example - $qb->expr()->like('u.firstname', $qb->expr()->literal('Gui%'))
public function like($x, $y); // Returns Expr\Comparison instance
I do not like this as there is no protection against code injection.
2.
// $qb instanceof QueryBuilder
// example8: QueryBuilder port of: "SELECT u FROM User u WHERE u.id = ?1 OR u.nickname LIKE ?2 ORDER BY u.surname DESC" using QueryBuilder helper methods
$qb->select(array('u')) // string 'u' is converted to array internally
->from('User', 'u')
->where($qb->expr()->orx(
$qb->expr()->eq('u.id', '?1'),
$qb->expr()->like('u.nickname', '?2')
))
->orderBy('u.surname', 'ASC'));
I do not like this because I need to search for terms within the object's properties - that is, I need the wild cards on either side.
When binding parameters to queries, DQL pretty much works exactly like PDO (which is what Doctrine2 uses under the hood).
So when using the LIKE statement, PDO treats both the keyword and the % wildcards as a single token. You cannot add the wildcards next to the placeholder. You must append them to the string when you bind the params.
$qb->expr()->like('u.nickname', '?2')
$qb->getQuery()->setParameter(2, '%' . $value . '%');
See this comment in the PHP manual.
The selected answer is wrong. It works, but it is not secure.
You should escape the term that you insert between the percentage signs:
->setParameter(2, '%'.addcslashes($value, '%_').'%')
The percentage sign '%' and the symbol underscore '_' are interpreted as wildcards by LIKE. If they're not escaped properly, an attacker might construct arbirtarily complex queries that can cause a denial of service attack. Also, it might be possible for the attacker to get search results he is not supposed to get. A more detailed description of attack scenarios can be found here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/7893670/623685
Related
IDENTIFIER
31-03-2022_13636075
01-04-2022_13650262
04-04-2022_13663174
05-04-2022_13672025
20220099001
11614491_R
10781198
00000000000
11283627_P
11614491_R
-1
how can i remove (only) the "XX-XX-XXXXX_" Part in certain values of a column in SSIS but WITHOUT affecting values that doesn't have this format? For example "21-05-2022_12345678" = "12345678" but the other values i don't want them affected. This are just examples of many rows from this column so i want only the ones that have this format to be affected.
SELECT REVERSE(substring(REVERSE('09-03-2022_13481330'),0,CHARINDEX('_',REVERSE('09-03-2022_13481330'),0)))
result
13481330
but this also affects others values.Also this is in ssms not ssis because i am not sure how to transform this expression in ssis code.
Update : Corrected code in SSIS goes as following:
(FINDSTRING(IDENTIFIER,"__-__-____[_]",1) == 1) ? SUBSTRING(IIDENTIFIER,12,LEN(IDENTIFIER) - 11) : IDENTIFIER
Do you have access to the SQL source? You can do this on the sql by using a LIKE and crafting a match pattern using the single char wildcard _ please see below example
DECLARE #Value VARCHAR(50) = '09-03-2022_13481330'
SELECT CASE WHEN #Value LIKE '__-__-____[_]%' THEN
SUBSTRING(#Value,12,LEN(#Value)-11) ELSE #Value END
Please see the Microsoft Documentation on LIKE and using single char wildcards
If you don't have access to the source SQL it gets a bit more tricky as you might need to use regex in a script task or maybe there is a expression you can apply
I am querying the adwords api via the following AWQL-Query (which works fine):
SELECT AccountDescriptiveName, CampaignId, CampaignName, AdGroupId, AdGroupName, KeywordText, KeywordMatchType, MaxCpc, Impressions, Clicks, Cost, Conversions, ConversionsManyPerClick, ConversionValue
FROM KEYWORDS_PERFORMANCE_REPORT
WHERE CampaignStatus IN ['ACTIVE', 'PAUSED']
AND AdGroupStatus IN ['ENABLED', 'PAUSED']
AND Status IN ['ACTIVE', 'PAUSED']
AND AdNetworkType1 IN ['SEARCH'] AND Impressions > 0
DURING 20140501,20140531
Now i want to exclude some campaigns:
we have a convention for our new campaigns that the campaign name begins with three numbers followed by an underscore, eg. "100_brand_all"
So i want to get only these new campaigns..
I tried lots of different variations for STARTS_WITH but only exact strings are working - but i need a pattern to match!
I already read https://developers.google.com/adwords/api/docs/guides/awql?hl=en and following its content it should be possible to use a WHERE expression like this:
CampaignName STARTS_WITH ['0','1','2','3']
But that doesn't work!
Any other ideas how i can achieve this?
Well, why don't you run a campaign performance report first, then process that ( get the campaign ids you want or don't want) the use those in the "CampaignId IN [campaign ids here] . or CampaignID NOT_IN [campaign ids]
I want to filter my SPARQL query for specific keywords while at the same time excluding other keywords. I thought this may be easily accomplished with FILTER (regex(str(?var),"includedKeyword","i") && !regex(str(?var),"excludedKeyword","i")). It works without the "!" condition, but not with. I also separated the FILTER statements, but no use.
I used this query on http://europeana.ontotext.com/ :
PREFIX dc: <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/>
PREFIX edm: <http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/>
PREFIX ore: <http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/>
SELECT DISTINCT ?CHO
WHERE {
?proxy dc:subject ?subject .
FILTER ( regex(str(?subject),"gemälde","i") && !regex(str(?subject),"Fotografie","i") )
?proxy edm:type "IMAGE" .
?proxy ore:proxyFor ?CHO.
?agg edm:aggregatedCHO ?CHO; edm:country "germany".
}
But I always get the result on the first row with the title "Gemäldegalerie", which has a dc:subject of "Fotografie" (the one I want excluded). I think the problem lies in the fact that one object from the Europeana database can have more than one dc:subject property, so maybe it looks only for one of these properties while ignoring the other ones.
Any ideas? Would be very thankful!
The problem is that your combined filter checks for the same binding of ?subject. So it succeeds if at least one value of ?subject matches both conditions (which is almost always true, because the string "Gemäldegalerie", for example, matches your first regex and does not match the second).
So for the negative condition, you need to formulate something that checks for all possible values, rather than just one particular value. You can do this using SPARQL's NOT EXISTS function, for example like this:
PREFIX dc: <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/>
PREFIX edm: <http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/>
PREFIX ore: <http://www.openarchives.org/ore/terms/>
SELECT DISTINCT ?CHO
WHERE {
?proxy edm:type "IMAGE" .
?proxy ore:proxyFor ?CHO.
?agg edm:aggregatedCHO ?CHO; edm:country "germany".
?proxy dc:subject ?subject .
FILTER(regex(str(?subject),"gemälde","i"))
FILTER NOT EXISTS {
?proxy dc:subject ?otherSubject.
FILTER(regex(str(?otherSubject),"Fotografie","i"))
}
}
As an aside: since you are doing regular expression checks, and now combining them with an NOT EXISTS operator, this is likely to become very expensive for the query processor quite quickly. You may want to think about alternative ways to formulate your query (for example, using the exact subject string to include or exclude to eliminate the regex), or even having a look at some non-standard extensions that the SPARQL endpoint might provide (OWLIM, for example, the store on which the Europeana endpoint runs, supports various full-text-search extensions, though I am not sure they are enabled in the Europeana endpoint).
I've defined my ContactDao as follows:
public interface ContactDao extends JpaRepository<Contact, Long> {
/**
* Finds all contacts that the given user has entered where the contact's full name matches {#code name}.
* #param userId The current user's LDAP id.
* #param name The name to search for.
* #return A list of contacts matching the specified criteria.
*/
#Query(" select c from Form as f" +
" inner join f.contacts as c" +
" where f.requestorUserId = :userId" +
" and lower(c.fullName) like lower(:name)" +
" order by lower(c.fullName)")
List<Contact> findUserContactsByUserIdAndName(#Param("userId") String userId, #Param("name") String name);
}
The above is working perfectly, and the SQL generated is what I'd write myself. The problem is that I'd like to add surrounding wild-cards to the :name parameter. Is there any nice way to do this? I've had a look at the Spring Data JPA reference document and I can't find anything regarding wildards and #query.
The following hack works, but is a bit ugly:
and lower(c.fullName) like '%' || lower(:name) || '%'
Does anyone have a better solution?
Thanks,
Muel.
I would also not call it a hack - it's the way JPQL syntax is defined for exactly these problems.
However, there is an alternative using a CriteriaBuilder/CriteriaQuery, but maybe you find it even more complex (but you get compile-time type safety in return).
I have a database filled with some codes like
EE789323
990
78000
These numbers are ALWAYS endings of a larger code. Now I have a function that needs to check if the larger code contains the subcode.
So if I have codes 90 and 990 and my full code is EX888990, it should match both of them.
However I need to do it in the following way:
SELECT * FROM tableWithRecordsWithSubcode
WHERE subcode MATCHES [reg exp with full code];
Is a regular expression like this this even possible?
EDIT:
To clarify the issue I'm having, I'm not using SQL here. I just used that to give an example of the type of query I'm using.
In fact I'm using iOS with CoreData, and I need a predicate to fetch me only the records that match.
In the way that is mentioned below.
Given the observations from a comment:
Do you have two tables, one called tableWithRecordsWithSubcode and another that might be tableWithFullCodeColumn? So the matching condition is in part a join - you need to know which subcodes match any of the full codes in the second table? But you're only interested in the information in the tableWithRecordsWithSubcode table, not in which rows it matches in the other table?
and the laconic "you're correct" response, then we have to rewrite the query somewhat.
SELECT DISTINCT S.*
FROM tableWithRecordsWithSubcode AS S
JOIN tableWithFullCodeColumn AS F
ON F.Fullcode ...ends-with... S.Subcode
or maybe using an EXISTS sub-query:
SELECT S.*
FROM tableWithRecordsWithSubcode AS S
WHERE EXISTS(SELECT * FROM tableWithFullCodeColumn AS F
WHERE F.Fullcode ...ends-with... S.Subcode)
This uses a correlated sub-query but avoids the DISTINCT operation; it may mean the optimizer can work more efficiently.
That just leaves the magical 'X ...ends-with... T' operator to be defined. One possible way to do that is with LENGTH and SUBSTR. However, SUBSTR does not behave the same way in all DBMS, so you may have to tinker with this (possibly adding a third argument, LENGTH(s.subcode)):
LENGTH(f.fullcode) >= LENGTH(s.subcode) AND
SUBSTR(f.fullcode, LENGTH(f.fullcode) - LENGTH(s.subcode)) = s.subcode
This leads to two possible formulations:
SELECT DISTINCT S.*
FROM tableWithRecordsWithSubcode AS S
JOIN tableWithFullCodeColumn AS F
ON LENGTH(F.Fullcode) >= LENGTH(S.Subcode)
AND SUBSTR(F.Fullcode, LENGTH(F.Fullcode) - LENGTH(S.Subcode)) = S.Subcode;
and
SELECT S.*
FROM tableWithRecordsWithSubcode AS S
WHERE EXISTS(
SELECT * FROM tableWithFullCodeColumn AS F
WHERE LENGTH(F.Fullcode) >= LENGTH(S.Subcode)
AND SUBSTR(F.Fullcode, LENGTH(F.Fullcode) - LENGTH(S.Subcode)) = S.Subcode);
This is not going to be a fast operation; joins on computed results such as required by this query seldom are.
I'm not sure why you think that you need a regular expression... Just use the charindex function:
select something
from table
where charindex(code, subcode) <> 0
Edit:
To find strings at the end, you can create a pattern with the % wildcard from the subcode:
select something
from table
where '%' + subcode like code