I am trying to make a basic app using Marmalade and am currently looking into using regular expressions to retrieve a very specific piece of information from within a web page. Is there an easier way to do this? I literally want the contents of a single p tag, which annoyingly doesn't have a unique id hence my thought to use regex.
I am completely new to c++ and Marmalade, hence my asking.
Sorry if this is a stupid question but I can find anything helpful on the internet.
Don't know about regex, but if your webservice supports GET/POST, that's what you need -
CIwHttp* m_Http = new CIwHTTP;
m_Http->SetFormData("user", user);
m_Http->SetFormData("pass", password);
//Gotheader is the callback function which will get called when header information is received from webservice
m_Http->Post(LOGIN_PATH, NULL, 0, GotHeaders, NULL);
More info in this IWHTTP example.
There are C++ functions for finding things inside strings, so it might be better to write C++ logic to find it, unless you are better at regexes. It sounds like you are not in control of the target page's content, though, so it will only work as long as the page's format remains something where your code can find the text you want.
Related
I am attempting to create Word documents with ColdFusion, but it does not seem there is any way to do it with only ColdFusion. The best solution seems to be docx4j. However, I can't seem to find any in-depth docx4j and ColdFusion examples (Aside from this question). Where can I get some doc4jx and ColdFusion examples?
pulling the data from a database.
https://stackoverflow.com/a/10845077/1031689 shows one approach to doing this. There are other ways, as to which see http://www.slideshare.net/plutext/document-generation-2012osdcsydney
The document needs page numbers and to
Typically you'd add these via a header or footer. You might find it easier to start with an almost empty docx structured appropriately, rather than creating the necessary structures via ColdFusion calling docx4j. You could still do it this way in conjunction with the final paragraph of this answer below.
create a table of contents.
Search the docx4j forums for how to do this.
In general, it looks like the easiest approach would be to create a Java class file which does everything you want (by invoking docx4j), and for your ColdFusion to just invoke that Java class. In other words, do a bit of Java programming first, get that working, then hook it up to your ColdFusion stuff.
I am not sure what exactly you mean with creating word document, which in my opinion is pretty simple. Manipulating yes, a bit tricky with docx4j or so.
<cfsavecontent variable="variables.mydoc">
Your content here
</cfsavecontent>
<cffile action="write" file="#yourFile.doc#" output="#variables.mydoc#">
Also see this post
Creating a Word document in Coldfusion - how to have pagenumbering?
Warning: C++ noob
I've read multiple posts on StackOverflow about string encryption. By the way, they don't answer my doubts.
I must insert one or two hardcoded strings in my code but I would like to make it difficult to read in plain text when debugging/reverse engineering. That's not all: my strings are URLs, so a simple packet analyzer (Wireshark) can read it.
I've said difficult because I know that, when the code runs, the string is somewhere (in RAM?) decrypted as plain text and somebody can read it. So, assuming that is not possible to completely secure my string, what is the best way of encrypting/decrypting it in C++?
I was thinking of something like this:
//I've omitted all the #include and main stuff of course...
string encryptedUrl = "Ajdu67gGHhbh34590Hb6vfu6gu" //Encrypted url with some known algorithm
URLDownloadToFile(NULL, encryptedUrl.decrypt(), C:\temp.txt, 0, NULL);
What about packet analyzing? I'm sure there's no way to hide the URL but maybe I'm missing something? Thank you and sorry for my worst english!
Edit 1: What my application does?
It's a simple login script. My application downloads a text file from an URL. This file contains an encrypted string that is read using fstream library. The string is then decrypted and used to login on another site. It is very weak, because there's no database, no salt, no hashing. My achievement is to ensure that neither the url nor the login string are "easy" to read from a static analisys of the binary, and possibly as hard as possible with a dynamic analysis (debugging, revers engineering, etc).
If you want to stymie packet inspectors, the bare minimum requirement is to use https with a hard-coded server certificate baked into your app.
There is no panacea for encrypting in-app content. A determined hacker with the right skills will get at the plain url, no matter what you do. The best you can hope for is to make it difficult enough that most people will just give up. The way to achieve this is to implement multiple diverse obfuscation and tripwire techniques. Including, but not limited to:
Store parts of the encrypted url and the password (preferably a one-time key) in different locations and bring them together in code.
Hide the encrypted parts in large strings of randomness that looks indistinguishable from the parts.
Bring the parts together piecemeal. E.g., Concatenate the first and second third of the encrypted url into a single buffer from one initialisation function, concatenate this buffer with the last third in a different unrelated init function, and use the final concatenation in yet another function, all called from different random places in your code.
Detect when the app is running under a debugger and have different functions trash the encrypted contents at different times.
Detection should be done at various call sites using different techniques, not by calling a single "DetectDebug" function or testing a global bool, both of which create a single point of attack.
Don't use obvious names, like, "DecryptUrl" for the relevant functions.
Harvest parts of the key from seemingly unrelated, but consistent sources. E.g., read the clock and only use a few of the high bits (high enough that that they won't change for the foreseeable future, but low enough that they're not all zero), or use a random sampling of non-volatile results from initialisation code.
This is just the tip of the iceberg and will only throw novices off the scent. None of it is going to stop, or even significantly slow down, a skillful attacker, who will simply intercept calls to the SSL library using a stealth debugger. You therefore have to ask yourself:
How much is it worth to me to protect this url, and from what kind of attacker?
Can I somehow change the system design so that I don't need to secure the url?
Try XorSTR [1, 2]. It's what I used to use when trying to hamper static analysis. Most results will come from game cheat forums, there is an html generator too.
However as others have mentioned, getting the strings is still easy for anyone who puts a breakpoint on URLDownloadToFile. However, you will have made their life a bit harder if they are trying to do static analysis.
I am not sure what your URL's do, and what your goal is in all this, but XorStr + anti-debug + packing the binary will stop most amateurs from reverse engineering your application.
For educational purposes, I would like to build an IDE for PHP coding.
I made a form app and added OpenFileDialog ..(my c# knowledge was useful, because it was easy ... even though without intelisense!)
Loading a file and reading lines from it is basically the same in every language (even PERL).
But my goal is to write homemade intelisense. I don't need info on the richtextBox and the events it generates, endline, EOF, etc, etc.
The problem I have is, how do I handle the data? line for line?
a struct for each line of text file?
looping all the structs in a linked list? ...
while updating the richtextBox?
searching for opening and closing brackets, variables, etc, etc
I think Microsoft stores a SQL type of database in the app project folders.
But how would you keep track of the variables and simulate them in some sort of form?
I would like to know how to handle this efficiently on dynamic text.
Having never thought this through before, it sounds like an interesting challenge.
Personally, I think you'll have to implement a lexical scanner, tokenizing the entire source file into a source tree, with each token also having information about it mapping the token to a line/character inside of the source file.
From there you can see how far you want to go with it - when someone hovers over a token, it can use the context of the code around it to be more intelligent about the "intellisense" you are providing.
Hovering over something would map back to your source tree, which (as you are building it) you would load up with any information that you want to display.
Maybe it's overkill, but it sounds like a fun project.
This sounds to be related to this question:
https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/189471/how-do-ide-s-provide-auto-completion-instant-error-checking-and-debugging
The accepted answer of that question recommends this link which I found very interesting:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163781.aspx
In a nutshell, most IDEs generate the parse tree from the code and that is what they stores and manage.
Okay SO. I need some guidance. I apologize for the length of this post, but I need to provide some details:
I've got someone who is interested in me to do a small project for them. The application in general is a fairly straightforward employee record keeping / documentation app, but it makes pretty heavy use templated Word and Lotus documents. The idea is you select the employee “event” such as commendation, promotion, discipline, etc., and it loads the appropriate template doc and you fill it in from there, and later you can select an employee, view all the “events,” and view the individual documents associated with each one.
Thus, the app must know where the .docs are saved when the user is done.
The client actually has a v1 of this app (it doesn’t do any management of the files or anything, just launches Word/Lotus with the document you wanted to view in a new instance, presumably via a system() call.) We’ve not gotten into a detailed requirements phase, but the client and I agree that for this to really work, some kind of control over where the user saves the .doc’s to is going to be critical , because otherwise the app provides them with the new copy of the template doc, they "Save as" somewhere else, and the app is pointing to the blank copy it provided them with.
Obviously, I can’t think of a way to achieve “Save as” restriction/control in any way via just launching a new instance of Word. The client has the idea of an embedded Word/Lotus instance in the app with the template doc when you choose one, but I’ve few reservations with that:
I’ve dug around online and I’ve read that whichever version of Word I borrow MSWORD.OLB from will be the one the end user would require?
I’ve tried to do the MSDN example of embedding a Word doc from here, but as I’ve come to get used to, the MSDN example doesn’t even compile.
Even if I CAN figure out how to embed a .doc file into their application, I don’t know that I could control the use of “Save as…”
All of this STILL hasn’t touched on Lotus (!)
So… instinctively, I feel the embedded Word/Lotus thing has to be more work than it’s worth in the end.
So I’ve had a few other ideas brewing around.
One is looking into using Office XML (and if there’s a lotus equivalent), and get the user’s “inputs” separately and generate the document on the fly each time. I’m not particularly thrilled with that idea, but I think it COULD work, provided I just use old features to try and stay far backwards compatible.
Get user’s “inputs” separately and generate a document in HTML. Meh. Works, very cross platform and easily parsed and understood, but not good if you want to be able to email it to someone (who emails a .html? Works, yes, very unconventional which to the average user will throw them off) and even worse if you need to email it to someone for revisions…
Perhaps some kind of editable PDF? I know there are PDF libraries out there, and the more I stew on it, the more this sounds like the best option, though I’ve not done much work with PDFs and I don’t know how easily embeddable they are / what options one has when creating them. I know they can be save-disabled, I’ve had that with my bloody state taxes before.
I need some input here. Here’s the TLDR questions:
Is launching a new instance of Word for each .doc as bad as I feel, given user can “Save as” document wherever and then application is left pointing to a blank document?
Is trying to support embedded Word as big of a trouble as I feel like it is / more work than it’s worth / likely to cause problems with supporting multiple versions of Word? (Forward compatibility as well as currently released versions?)
What are thoughts on the PDF plan?
Any other good ideas?
Word does allow for programming some "Save" and "Save As" control via its object model. Any subroutines coded in VBA and placed into your Word template will be copied into all documents generated from that template. Additionally, most menu and Ribbon commands can be intercepted by creating a module containing subroutines named for the intercepted commands. So, for example, if a module contains a sub named FileSaveAs(), any code in that sub will be executed instead of the standard File|Save As command. Lastly, this code will replace Save As commands executed via keystroke, toolbar, menu, or Ribbon.
The code below will launch a dialog box to a predetermined path whenever a "Save" or "Save As" command is executed:
Sub FileSave()
ControlSaveLocation
End Sub
Sub FileSaveAs()
ControlSaveLocation
End Sub
Sub ControlSaveLocation()
Dim Directory As String
Directory = "C:\Documents\"
With Application.Dialogs(wdDialogFileSaveAs)
.Name = Directory
.Show
End With
End Sub
Hope this helps.
Currently I'm working on a Server-Client system which will be the backbone of my application.
I have to find the best way to send requests and handle them on the server-side.
The server-side should be able to handle requests like this one:
getPortfolio -i 2 -d all
In an old project I decided to send such a request as string and the server application had to look up the first part of the string ("getPortfolio"). Afterwards the server application had to find the correct method in a map which linked the methods with the the first part of the string ("getPortfolio"). The second part ("-i 2 -d all") got passed as parameter and the method itself had to handle this string/parameter.
I doubt that this is the best solution in order to handle many different requests.
Rgds
Layne
To me it seems you're having two different questions.
For the socket part, I suggest you use Beej's guide to socket programming if you want to have full control about what you do. If you don't want to/don't have the time to treat this part yourself, you can just use a C++ socket library as well. There are plenty of them; I only used this one so far, but others might be as just good (or even better).
Regarding your parsing algorithm, you may first write down everything about the message format, so you'll have a strict guideline to follow. Then process step by step:
First, extract the "first word" and just keep the following parameters in some list. Check if the first word is valid and if it is known. If the "first word" does not match with any of the predefined existing functions, just ignore the message (and eventually report the error to the client application).
Once you have the matching function, simply call it passing the others parameters.
This way, each function will do a specific task and your code will be splitted in an elegant way.
Unfortunately, it is difficult for me to be any more explicit since we somehow lack of details here.