I made a program with Microsoft Visual Studio 2010. It uses additional libraries (Allegro), and it runs perfectly from MSVC, but I can't run it from it's directory. (...\"project name"\Debug\"project name".exe) It writes that it can't find some kind of .dll files.
That's not good, because I want to make it work for everyone! What to do to make it work?
I know that I have to put the necesarry .dll files, but I don't know where?
When an executable is started, Windows searches the current directory, the PATH and then some other places. The exact description can be found here
You need to make sure either the PATH includes the library you need, or place it in the same directory (or in some other automatically searced directory, but that's typically not a good solution).
Related
To use C++ libraries we need to copy .dll files from bin folder, we are either instructed to paste them in the project directory OR in C:/windows32/.
Does it matter where we paste .dll files besides the scope of accessibility ?
It’s a very bad idea to write files to the system directory if you have an alternative. (And if you did need to, you’d check the environment variables instead of hardcoding.)
At best, no other program will install a library by the same name, so you’ll have a bit of extra junk in your system directory. It can’t be removed when you uninstall the program, because it was never registered and you have no way of knowing if some other application needs it.
At worst, two different programs will install different versions of FOO.DLL and one of them will break. This is affectionately known as “DLL Hell,” and the solution was for everyone to put their DLLs in the project directory. (Or sometimes, the vendor’s Common Files.)
I implemented the SFML library nightly build to my Visual Studio 2013, because the original one is not compatibile with this VS version. I done everything what is needed (added directory to include folder in both Debug and Release, added directory to .dll files), but it can't find the files in program. What else should be done to make this library work? Or should i consider changing Visual Studio to 2010?
You haven't given really to much information so I am just really guessing as to what the problem is.
added directory to .dll files
But that sounds like your problem right there. You don't add the directory that the .dll files are in to your project. The only directories you need to add to the project are the include directory and the library directory.
But anyways I am assuming you are using dynamic linking since otherwise you wouldn't be dealing with .dlls. Now different IDE's require that you place the .dlls in different spots but since you are dealing with VS2013 you need to copy whatever .dlls that you are using into the same folder where your program's compiled executable is (The .exe file).
Another option is to link statically instead of dynamically which I generally prefer to do on small projects but it is really up to the developer which he prefers.
When you link statically you don't need to include any .dlls. What you will need to do is recompile SFML's sources and make sure to build the library so it produces the static library files (They should be named something like sfml-graphics-s-d.lib for debug and sfml-graphics-s-d.lib for release).
Add that library directory which contains the static library files to your project and then link to them .lib files in VS's input window (Remember that -d is for the debug build).
Next you will need to add SFML_STATIC to your preprocessor options on both the release and debug build.
After that you are good to go and don't need to include the .dll files with your project. And again whether you choose to link dynamically or statically is really up to you and the project you are working on but for small projects I would suggest linking statically.
I read this guide that walks you through the steps necessary to create a "visual" application with Cairo and Visual C++. The guide suggests you download certain dll files and store them in the directory in which your executable is created (debug).
Here is the list of the files Nil is referring to in his tutorial:
cairo Binaries (yes you need the binaries package too, as the Dev one doesn't contain the DLL) -> libcairo-2.dll
zlib Binaries -> zlib1.dll
libpng Binaries -> libpng12-0.dll
Freetype Binaries -> freetype6.dll
FontConfig Binaries -> libfontconfig-1.dll
expat Binaries -> libexpat-1.dll
As you can see, it's quite a lot of files. I've been wondering if this the "correct" way of doing this? Is there an alternative way that is considered "best-practice" in this case?
There's nothing wrong with this approach, and it's probably the quickest way to get your application up and running. Your application needs these libraries, so putting them in the same folder allows it to find them.
There are of course always alternatives!
Static linking
To avoid having a bunch of dlls that have to exist with your application, you could use static linking. You link the .lib files at link-time rather than linking to the .dll files at run-time. Makes your .exe larger, but means you may be able to distribute a single file.
Placing Dlls in a different folder
The dlls do not have to be in the same folder as the .exe, though that normally makes the most sense. Windows will search several folders when looking for a .dll at run-time, so you could put the dlls in the current directory, a system directory (definitely not recommended), or another directory in your PATH environment variable. Actually none of those locations are recommended! Putting them in the same folder as the .exe is the safest, because generally you have control of that folder.
The specific rules for how Windows searches for a .dll are outlined here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-ca/library/windows/desktop/ms682586(v=vs.85).aspx
Custom Build Step
I don't like manually putting files in my debug or release folders. I like to think of the debug folder as something I can blow away and rebuild at any time, and I like to have a one-step build process that puts everything where it needs to be so I can easily build on any machine. So I will usually create a custom build step that copies the required .dlls from a "source" folder (in source control) into my output folder.
I am creating an application by using opencv2.3 IN VC++2010 express addition. The build is successful but while compiling it says that 'opencv_highgui230.dll was not found.Reinstalling the application may fix the problem.' Though I have added all the necessary include and lib files.
It's likely that this DLL can be found in bin or similarly named directory under where you installed the OpenCV library. For Windows binary distributions of various libraries, the DLL is usually included.
For your program to load it, it either has to be in the same directory as the executable, in your system directory, usually C:\Windows\system32\, or I think that it is possible to specify the location programmatically, in your code. This MSDN article can tell you more.
Quick and, more likely then not, correct solution would be to copy the DLL into your executable's directory.
Because your application relies upon the library, you have to build the library first before you build your application. The error message is telling you that it can't find the binary file corresponding to your library, opencv_highgui230.dll, not one of the code files.
You can either configure Visual Studio to automatically build the projects in the correct order by setting up the appropriate project dependencies, or you can do it manually.
Need quick help from win developers. Please correct me where I got it wrong. Thank you!
I built a C++ library from the source code and got the following files:
*.dll. These go into a folder listed in the PATH environment variable.
*.lib. These go into a folder where Visual Studio searches for libraries.
*.pdb. These are needed for debugging. Copy them alongside DLL files or
LIB files?
*.exp. No clue what do to with these ones.
If you're going to debug the library on the same computer where you built it, you don't need to move .pdb files at all. Otherwise put them along with the .dll. You might also need to strip the full paths to pdb from the dll using the /PDBALTPATH option.
You probably won't need the .exp files at all, since you're using a third-party library that probably does not import from your project.