Code compiles until CreateWnd() is thrown in - c++

I am using XE3 and trying to construct a DLL with my third party component. Since it is a rather large project I will describe it then detail the question at hand.
I have multiple cpp files and multiple header files(classes in header files, functions in cpp files). I have everything linking and compiling fine UNTIL I put a CreateWnd() function into one of my classes
void __fastcall TICSByteEntry::CreateWnd(void)
{
TCustomControl::CreateWnd();
SetWindowLong(Handle, GWL_STYLE, GetWindowLong(Handle, GWL_STYLE) | WS_CLIPSIBLINGS);
}
Now it will compile with this code in it but when I put my component on a form and try to run THAT project it will give me an error
'[ilink32 error] Error: Unresolved external '__fastcall TICSByteEntry::CreateWnd() referenced from 'path'unit1.obj'
No other linking issues just that one and as soon as I comment it out everything works nicely as expected. When I was researching this online someone said it is having problems finding the entry point http://edn.embarcadero.com/article/27343. I tried what was recommended and no luck. Any one want to take a guess on what is wrong?

Instead of overriding CreateWnd() you should override CreateParams(). That way the window is created with the style you want and does not need to be changed after creation.

Related

Call a method or function from Objective-c in AppleScript

I'm trying to use LestMove to be more precise
the second implementation method where it says:
Option 2:
Copy the following files into your project:
PFMoveApplication.h
PFMoveApplication.m
If your project has ARC enabled, you'll want to disable ARC on the above files. You can do so by adding -fno-objc-arc compiler flag to your PFMoveApplication.m source file. See How can I disable ARC for a single file in a project?
If your application is localized, also copy the 'MoveApplication.string' files into your project.
Link your application against Security.framework.
In your app delegate's "-[applicationWillFinishLaunching:]" method, call the PFMoveToApplicationsFolderIfNecessary function at the very top.
but I'm not able to call the method / Class, could someone help me with this issue? Thanks in advance!
In general, there are a couple of ways to set up an Objective-C class in your AppleScriptObjC project:
Add the file(s) to the project - the Objective-C class name will be
the one used in the #interface/#implementation declarations
Add an outlet property in the AppleScript class/script you are using, e.g. property someProperty : missing value
Instantiate the class programmatically:
set someProperty to current application's ClassName's alloc's init()
or
Connect stuff up with the Interface Builder:
Add an NSObject (blue cube) from the library to your project
Set the class of the object/cube to the class name of the Objective-C file(s) in the Identity Inspector
Connect the AppDelegate IB Outlet to the object/cube in the Connections Inspector
After setting up the outlet property, the Objective-C methods can be used like any other script/class:
someProperty's handler()
That LetsMove project wasn't really set up for AppleScriptObjC, but I was able to tweak it a bit to get it running. I'm not that great at writing Objective-C, but the following worked for me using a new default AppleScript project with Xcode 10 in Mojave (the original file is over 500 lines long, so I'm just highlighting the changes):
Add PFMoveApplication.h and PFMoveApplication.m files to the project (the class name is LetsMove)
Add Security.framework to Link Binary With Libraries in Build Phases
As described in the original project README, add the compiler flag -fno-objc-arc to the Objective-C file in Compile Sources of the Build Phases
-- Now to alter the Objective-C files a bit:
Move the #interface declaration to the .h file and include the redefined method signatures below in it:
The PFMoveToApplicationsFolderIfNecessary and PFMoveIsInProgress methods are redefined as instance methods:
- (void)PFMoveToApplicationsFolderIfNecessary;
- (BOOL)PFMoveIsInProgress;
Redefine the above method signatures in the .m file, and include those methods in the #implementation section - to do this, move the #end to just before the helper methods (after the PFMoveIsInProgress method)
Remove the isMainThread statement at the beginning of the PFMoveToApplicationsFolderIfNecessary method - this is not not needed (AppleScript normally runs on the main thread), and fixes another issue
There is still a little stuff in there from the original app such as NSUserDefaults, so for your own project, give it a look to see if anything else needs changing (dialog text, etc)
And finally, in the AppDelegate.applescipt file, the following was added to applicationWillFinishLaunching:
current application's LetsMove's alloc's init()'s PFMoveToApplicationsFolderIfNecessary()

How to solve a function acting differently based on callsite?

Not sure how to word the title so feel free to rename, but the issue I'm having is that I've got a function that works in one project, but fails in another. Below is rough pseudocode to show that one call in LibraryProject works, whereas the call in GameProject doesn't.
In ChildClass::do_stuff, the win32_window HWND is valid, whereas the second one, failed_win32_window is null and glfw throws an error saying it isn't initialized, despite it already having been initialized (since the first glfw call was successful and I've manually stepped through to verify it was):
GLFWError #65537 Happen, The GLFW library is not initialized
Here's pseudocode showing the two projects, and the files. GLFW is set initialized properly since if I do all my glfw logic within LibraryProject, the window shows up as normal.
//LibraryProject
////library_header.h
class ParentClass {
GLFW* _mainWindow; //filled in elsewhere in the real code
HWND getWin32Window() { return glfwGetWin32Window(_mainWindow); }
}
//GameProject
////game_header.h
#include "library_header.h" //from other Project
class ChildClass : public ParentClass {
void do_stuff() {
HWND win32_window = this->getWin32Window(); //this works because it goes down into LibraryProject.dll's module
HWND failed_win32_window = glfwGetWin32Window(_mainWindow); //but literally the same call here doesn't because it happens within GameProject.exe
}
}
////game_body.cpp
void function_called_elsewhere_in_game() {
//called from GameProject.exe
auto child = ChildClass();
child.do_stuff();
}
I'm not sure if this is an issue with glfw and my setup, or just my misunderstanding how projects and dependencies work.
Things I've tried:
Downloading the latest glfw3
Rebuilding the entire solution
Toggling with References and Linking Dependency Inputs
Things to note:
This is happening in the main thread, nothing else is using glfw at the same time. Its 100% reproducible too.
glfw3.lib is always being created in my GameProject output folder, based on the one inside LibraryProject
Stepping through the disassembly for each of the two glfwGetWin32Window calls has different addresses in disassembly, leading me to believe they're two different copies of the same library, but I'm not sure.
This is not an issue with cocos2d, the game engine I'm using as starting a blank project and calling glfwGetWin32Window(..) returns a valid pointer, even in GameProject, so there's something that I'm doing wrong, but I don't know what.
Images showing off the actual behaviour. magnolia_cocos_proj is GameProject and is the exe I'm running, and libcocos2d is LibraryProject I'm using as a DLL (I'm unfamiliar with the details of how linking and dlls work).
win32_window has valid value
definition of getWin32Window() to be 100% sure. Notice the module is in libcocos2d.dll now.
after going over the second line, the error throws and the second window is null
As I understood from "glfw3.lib is always being created" you use static linking. Static linking of a lib to different dll and exe lead to duplicating of all static memory of the lib. You should use a dynamic library for GLFW in the case. It's glfw3dll.lib.
There are two main cases why this error could appear:
GLFWError #65537 Happen, The GLFW library is not initialised
Case One :
The mentioned error occurs if a GLFW function was called that mustn't be called unless the library is initialised. So, you need to initialise GLFW before calling any function that requires initialisation.
Read an API introduction for reference. Use if-else statement for handling glfwInit() and errors.
Reading Moving from GLFW 2 to 3 is also useful.
Case Two :
This error quite often occurs in the case you have previous versions of GLFW installed on your machine. GLFW3 doesn't like running along with previous version installed. So, delete all the GLFW libraries and linkers and reinstall the latest GLFW 3 from scratch.
Hope this helps.

In Unity3d test scripts, how do I call a static function from another class?

I have two files in a Unity3d project. One is a test script that runs in edit mode. The other is a single class with static functions that I'd like to call from the test scripts.
here's my test script:
using UnityEngine;
using UnityEngine.TestTools;
using NUnit.Framework;
using System.Collections;
public class NewTestScript
{
[Test]
public void TestAnotherStaticFunction()
{
int a = NewBehaviourScript.FunctionUnderTest(1);
int b = 1;
// Use the Assert class to test conditions.
Assert.IsTrue(a == b);
}
}
here's my function under test:
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using UnityEngine;
public class NewBehaviourScript : MonoBehaviour
{
/// <summary>
/// the stupidest function in the world,
/// used to verify tests.
/// </summary>
public static int FunctionUnderTest(int a)
{
return a;
}
}
This gives me the error from the Unity compiler (I'm not building outside of Unity):
Assets/TestS/NewTestScript.cs(12,17): error CS0103: The name `NewBehaviourScript' does not exist in the current context
These are running in edit-mode.
I've tried adding and removing the SuperTestNameSpace namespace from the function under test and the calling code.
I've attempted adding/removing files from the .asmdef file that was autogenerated by unity, although this usually leads to other compile errors.
My previous unit test experience is largely in Visual Studio or VSCode, and I'm trying to get my unity3d test experience to match my prior test environment experiences.
Is there a fundamentally limited functionality in the edit-mode tests, or am I missing something stupid?
Further elaboration on the assemblies involved. It looks like there are two assemblies at play here: Assembly-CSharp.dll contains my code under test and TestS.dll contains my testing code. I believe my questions boils down to: how do I add a reference from the TestS.dll assembly to the Assembly-CSharp.dll. I'd know how to do this in Visual Studio (either via the context menu in VS or directly editing the csproj file), however I don't see how to do it in Unity3d. Any edit I make to the csproj file is frequently overwritten by unity, and while there is a 'references' section in the inspector (see picture) I can't add Assembly-CSharp.dll as a reference.
These are the inspector settings for TestS.asmdef. While there's an option to add references, I can't add a reference to Assembly-CSharp.dll, which is where my code-under-test lives.
Ok, I figured this out. There were two things going on:
Editor tests need to be underneath a folder called editor. It's really annoying that the unity editor doesn't do this for you.
You need to have an assembly definition for the code under test and add a reference from the test code to the newly created assembly definition. This must be done in the Unity editor UI.
by default, unity adds your script code to an assembly called Assembly-CSharp.dll, and, for reasons unknown, this assembly isn't referenced by my edit mode test code. I'm not sure if this is a bug in Unity or if it's by design, but explicitly creating and referencing the assembly definition has cleared things up.
The main issue is currently you are trying to call the
NewBehaviourScript(1);
constructor which does not exist...
instead of the method
using SuperTestNameSpace;
//...
NewBehaviourScript.FunctionUnderTest(1);
or alternatively with the namespace in the call directly
SuperTestNameSpace.NewBehaviourScript.FunctionUnderTest(1);
Also make sure the filename matches exactly the class name. So in your case it should be
NewBehaviourScript.cs
Note that the .cs is not printed by Unity in the Project view so there it should say NewBehaviourScript.
Why does it not compile with the using SuperTestNameSpace;? What is the error?
If that exception
Assets/TestS/NewTestScript.cs(14,17): error CS0103: The name `NewBehaviourScript' does not exist in the current context
is only shown in VisualStudio but the script compiling fine in Unity especially after adding a new script it helps to simply close and restart VS.
In some cases it also helps to close Unity and VS, remove all files and folders except Assets and ProjectSettings (and if you are under version control anything that belongs to it like e.g. .git, .gitignore, .gitattributes etc) in particular delete the Library, .vs folder and all .csproj and .sln files.
Than open Unity again and let it recompile everything.
Make sure the file that contains your NewBehaviourScript class IS NOT inside an Editor folder.
Move both the scripts in the Assets (root) folder and try again.

Include Alien in portable app, C++

Ok, I've searched quite a bit, but seem unable to find an answer or example for how to achieve this.
Basically, I have an app that is designed to be portable (built using VC++ in VS2010, but no MFC or managed components, raw WinAPI). I have Lua 5.2 built into it and allow the user to write scripts inside the application. I have multiple glued functions which are exposed to the Lua scripts which handle various WinAPI calls.
However, what I'd like to be able to do is allow the user to write a script in which looks something like this:
require[[Alien/alien]]
local mb = alien.User32.MessageBoxA
mb:types{ 'long', 'long', 'string', 'string', 'long' }
print(mb(0, "Hello World!", "Test", 64))
I simply cannot seem to find a way to do this. I do not want to require the user to install Lua for Windows and, ideally, there be no core.dll and struct.dll from alien; when I tried to do something with those DLLs in ./alien/, it was crashing in Lua5.1.dll because I had LuaForWindows installed, I uninstalled LFW, and then it just states that Lua5.1.dll is missing. I have Lua 5.2 built into my app, so obviously the core/struct DLLs from the Alien rock are expecting Lua5.1.dll to be in the path.
I made a worthless attempt to try to including the Alien src into the project, but doesn't seem to work that way either.
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. I'd prefer it all be contained in my app, but I'll settle for a solution which involves including the libraries in my project to build and bundle in the distribution if that's the only alternative.
Thanks!
UPDATE:
Ok, thank you Ben Voigt! I think I'm almost there. I've pulled in core.c and struct.c and made sure all the paths are there for libffi. Everything compiles without issue, until I try to call luaopen_alien_core in core.c (the alien.core src file), claiming the identifier is undeclared. I've tried to declare the function signature in my separate source file that's trying to make the call, the compile gets further, but fails complaining of an unresolved external.
Clearly this is likely now a general C++ issue (as I'm only a novice in this area). Here's the general idea of what I have:
//core.c (from Alien project)
(...)
int luaopen_alien_core(lua_State *L) {
alien_register_library_meta(L);
alien_register_callback_meta(L);
alien_register_function_meta(L);
alien_register_buffer_meta(L);
lua_getglobal(L, "alien");
if(lua_isnil(L, -1)) {
lua_newtable(L);
lua_pushvalue(L, -1);
lua_setglobal(L, "alien");
}
lua_newtable(L);
lua_pushvalue(L, -1);
lua_setfield(L, -3, "core");
alien_register_main(L);
return 1;
}
//mysource.c (the file attempting to call luaopen_alien_core(L))
void initLua()
{
L = luaL_newstate();
luaL_openlibs(L);
luaopen_alien_core(L);
(...)
}
This fails to start compiling, issuing the error:
error C3861: 'luaopen_alien_core': identifier not found
Which makes sense, so I add the following line to myheader.h:
int luaopen_alien_core(lua_State *L);
This compiles, but fails to link with:
error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "int __cdecl luaopen_alien_core(struct lua_State *)" (?luaopen_alien_core##YAHPEAUlua_State###Z)
I've tried several things I can think of, with my limited experience, but nothing will satisfy this error. I even tried to move the contents of core.c into mysource.c, but that creates a whole different mess and seemed to be the wrong way to go as it is.
I'm hoping, and imagining, this is something really stupid, but I'm just not sure how to get it to call luaopen_alien_core, which seems to be the final piece I need.
Thanks again!
}
I imagine that the require directive both loads a dynamic library and adds its contents to the active Lua engine.
By linking alien directly into your code, you obviate the need for the dynamic library. But the content enumeration code won't have run, and you can't use require to run it, or else it'll go looking for a DLL file (along with all the DLL dependencies).
So, you should find out what functions that require directive calls after loading the DLL, and call those when creating a Lua engine. Then it will neither be necessary nor allowed for the script to start with require [[Alien/alien]], but Alien objects will be available.

Visual C++ - Throwing unhandled exception from setting forms icon?

I can compile the solution with no errors, but when I'll try to run it, I get a crash window:
An unhandled exception of type
'System.Resources.MissingManifestResourceException' occurred in mscorlib.dll
Additional information: Could not find any resources appropriate for the specified culture or the neutral culture. Make sure "<myformname>.resources" was corerctly embedded or linked into assembly "<myprojectname>" at compile time, or that all the satellite assemblies required are loaded and fully signed.
And after I press Break it throws me to the line:
this->Icon = (cli::safe_cast<System::Drawing::Icon^ >(resources->GetObject(L"$this.Icon")));
If I comment this line out, everything works just fine, but my program doesn't have icon.
Anyone else had this problem? Found a solution? I couldn't find anything clear enough for me to understand, problem is really annoying me, only solution I found was to declare my form class before any other classes, but I don't even have any other classes in my solution?
I also have only one project in this solution, ms support said something about having multiple projects, which I don't have, so it was no use either.
Take a look here :
http://www.mztools.com/articles/2005/MZ2005007.aspx
The exception is thrown because your icon cannot be located. You will probably need to compiles your resources under one .dll and put this under en-US subfolder on your project output. It did the trick for me at least. There are probably other solutions to your problem too.
Do not panic like I did. The root cause of the problem is that the compiled resource file is different from the one that is asked to load at runtime. This happens because the underlying build-script cannot detect the filename or namespace changes made after the form is created.
For example, At first we started a project named x . And our $(RootNamespace) becomes x. And we created a form named y. So our XML resource file y.resx gets compiled into x.y.resource . At this point the icon change works.
Now somehow we changed the project name or the namespace to z. But our $(RootNamespace) remains the x. While at compile-time it wrongly generates old x.y.resource, but at links-time it links z.y.resource. And at this point the icon change does not work.
It can also happen if the form is under some nested namespace which is not known in the project file.
It can be fixed by changing the compilation output of the y.resx file . It can be done by right-clicking the resource and changing the Resource Logical Name to $(RootNamespace).%(Filename).resources .
I will also make sure that ProjectName,AssemblyName and RootNamespace are the same in the .vcxproj file. Somehow if the form is declared under a nested namespace like RootNamespace.gui , then the output file of the resource should be $(RootNamespace).gui.%(Filename).resources .