EmberJs: component template - ember.js

I try to wrap a colorPicker component from http://www.eyecon.ro/bootstrap-colorpicker/
I need to fill the "background-color css attribute" of the template with the "value" attribute of the view...
I have tried to set {{value}} but it does not work...
Any advice ?
JavaScript:
App.ColorPicker = Em.View.extend({
classNames: 'input-append color',
attributeBindings: ['name', 'value'],
value: '',
template: Ember.Handlebars.compile('{{view Ember.TextField valueBinding="this.value"}}<span class="add-on"><i style="background-color: {{value}}"></i></span>'),
didInsertElement: function() {
$('#backgroundColor').colorpicker({format: "rgb"});
}
})
;
html:
{{view App.ColorPicker placeholder="Background color" name="backgroundColor" valueBinding="App.controller" classNames="input-large" id="backgroundColor"}}

You need to look into the {{bindAttr}} helper. There is an old but good post on it here
Basically, you can't just drop bound values into HTML tags as it then inserts the wrapper script tags and breaks everything.
What you're looking for is:
App.ColorPicker = Em.View.extend({
classNames: 'input-append color',
attributeBindings: ['name', 'value'],
value: '',
template: Ember.Handlebars.compile('{{view Ember.TextField valueBinding="this.value"}}<span class="add-on"><i {{bindAttr style="view.iStyle"}}></i></span>'),
iStyle: function() {
return "background-color:" + this.get('value');
}.property('value'),
didInsertElement: function() {
$('#backgroundColor').colorpicker({format: "rgb"});
}
});

Related

itemControllers and custom Views

I am working on a small app that animates different iframes in and out of view. Right now I am just trying to start simple with two iframes for my data.
App = Ember.Application.create();
App.IndexRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
model: function() {
return [
{current: true, url:'http://www.flickr.com'},
{url:'http://bing.com'}
];
}
});
App.IndexController = Ember.ArrayController.extend({
itemController: 'iframe',
now: function() {
return this.filterBy('isCurrent').get('firstObject');
}.property('#each.isCurrent')
});
App.IframeController = Ember.ObjectController.extend({
isCurrent: Ember.computed.alias('current')
});
App.IframeView = Ember.View.extend({
classNameBindings: [':slide', 'isCurrent'],
templateName: 'iframe'
});
And my templates:
<script type="text/x-handlebars" data-template-name="index">
<button {{action "next"}}>Next</button>
{{#each}}
{{view "iframe"}}
{{/each}}
</script>
<script type="text/x-handlebars" data-template-name="iframe">
<iframe {{bind-attr src=url}}></iframe>
</script>
Why can't my IframeView access my isCurrent property of my itemController? I am also unsure if this is the right way to do this, or if there is an easier way to have my each use my IframeView
Here is a jsbin: http://emberjs.jsbin.com/vagewavu/4/edit
isCurrent lives on the controller. The controller property will be in scope in the view, but the properties under the controller aren't in scope of the view. You just need to reference controller first.
App.IframeView = Ember.View.extend({
classNameBindings: [':slide', 'controller.isCurrent'],
templateName: 'iframe'
});
Additionally your next action isn't doing anything, just creating some local variables, maybe you weren't finished implementing it. Either way I tossed together an implementation.
next: function() {
var now = this.get('now'),
nowIdx = this.indexOf(now),
nextIdx = (nowIdx + 1) % this.get('length'),
next = this.objectAt(nextIdx);
now.toggleProperty('current');
next.toggleProperty('current');
}
http://emberjs.jsbin.com/vagewavu/10/edit

Ember.js persist classNameBindings on transition to different routes

I'm fairly new to ember and I've been trying to tackle this problem for a couple of days but I can't seem to find a solution anywhere online.
I have a page with a list of all posts, each post has one tag (like a hashtag), either 'Fitness', 'Knowledge' or 'Social'. At the top of the page I have 3 view helpers and each view helper represents a tag (fitness, knowledge or social). These will be used to filter out the posts with that particular tag name.
My problem is that when I click on a view helper I toggle the "isSelected" property to true, which adds the "isSelected" class via classNameBindings. But when I transition to a different route on the site and come back, the "isSelected" property is reset back to false and the "isSelected" class has been removed. How do I keep these values persistent and in-tact for when I revisit the route?
Here's my code:
<script type="text/x-handlebars" data-template-name="global">
<ul class="categories">
<li>{{view App.Tag class="label fitness" text="fitness"}}</li>
<li>{{view App.Tag class="label knowledge" text="knowledge"}}</li>
<li>{{view App.Tag class="label social" text="social"}}</li>
</ul>
</script>
View:
"use strict";
App.Tag = Ember.View.extend({
tagName: 'span',
template: Ember.Handlebars.compile('{{view.text}}'),
classNames: ['label'],
classNameBindings: ['isSelected'],
isSelected: false,
click: function () {
this.toggleProperty('isSelected');
}
});
I have also tried using a controller with actions but that way persisted the "isSelected" property but didn't preserve the addition of the class when I revisited the route.
This may not be ideal, but to save the state of the application, you can put the state in the controller. You probably had a simple implementation, but maybe did not specify the isSelected as a property. The below works and you can view the jsbin here
App = Ember.Application.create();
App.Router.map(function() {
this.route('global');
});
App.IndexRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
model: function() {
return ['red', 'yellow', 'blue'];
}
});
App.GlobalController = Ember.Controller.extend({
activeTags: Ember.A()
})
App.Tag = Ember.View.extend({
tagName: 'span',
template: Ember.Handlebars.compile('{{view.text}}'),
classNames: ['label'],
classNameBindings: ['isSelected'],
isSelected: function () {
console.log("ON CHANGE", this.get('controller.activeTags'));
return this.get('controller.activeTags').contains(this.text);
}.property('controller.activeTags.#each'),
click: function () {
var tagArray = this.get('controller.activeTags');
if (tagArray.contains(this.text))
this.set('controller.activeTags', tagArray.without(this.text))
else
tagArray.pushObject(this.text);
}
});

Sibling attribute binding in Ember.js

I am a relative Ember newbie, so I may be missing something obvious here. I'm trying to build a custom view for a Bootstrap accordion. I'm using relative views for this, and while it is working, I'd like to understand if I can simplify a little bit. Specifically, I'd like to know if it's possible to make the href computed property of the embedded toggleView dependent on the elementId of the embedded bodyView. Here's the top level view, which is a collection:
App.AccordionView = Em.CollectionView.extend({
headingTemplateName: 'accordion-heading',
innerTemplateName: 'accordion-inner',
tagName: 'div',
classNames: ['accordion'],
contentBinding: 'controller.content',
The item view corresponds to the DOM element with the accordion-group css class.
itemViewClass: Em.View.extend({
tagName: 'div',
classNames: ['accordion-group'],
target: null,
template: Em.Handlebars.compile("{{view view.headingView contentBinding='view.content'}}{{view view.bodyView viewName='bodyViewInstance' contentBinding='view.content'}}"),
headingView: Em.View.extend({
tagName: 'div',
template: Em.Handlebars.compile("{{view view.toggleView contentBinding='view.content'}}"),
classNames: ['accordion-heading'],
toggleView: Em.View.extend({
tagName: 'div', // Can be an 'a'
templateNameBinding: 'parentView.parentView.parentView.headingTemplateName',
classNames: ['accordion-toggle'],
attributeBindings: ['dataToggle:data-toggle', 'dataParent:data-parent', 'href'],
dataToggle: 'collapse',
dataParent: function() {
return this.get('parentView.parentView.parentView.elementId');
}.property(),
Note that I've made the href property dependent on the target field in the item view.
href: function() {
return "#" + this.get('parentView.parentView.target');
}.property('parentView.parentView.target')
})
}),
bodyView: Em.View.extend({
tagName: 'div',
template: Em.Handlebars.compile("{{view view.innerView contentBinding='view.content'}}"),
classNames: ['accordion-body', 'collapse'],
This field is set when the bodyView embedded view instance is inserted into the DOM.
didInsertElement: function() {
this.get('parentView').set('target', this.get('elementId'));
},
innerView: Em.View.extend({
tagName: 'div',
classNames: ['accordion-inner'],
templateNameBinding: "parentView.parentView.parentView.innerTemplateName"
})
})
})
});
That all works. However, I'd like to do something like this in the toggleView:
href: function() {
return "#" + this.get('parentView.parentView.bodyViewInstance.elementId');
}.property('parentView.parentView.bodyViewInstance.elementId')
When I do, I get the following error, and I'm not sure I understand why:
Error: Something you did caused a view to re-render after it rendered but before it was inserted into the DOM.
Is there any way to accomplish what I'm looking to do?

createRecord called w/o params does not add object to collection

Using:
ember-1.0.0-pre.4.js
ember-data.js REVISION:11
handlebars-1.0.rc.2.js
Please have a look at this jsFiddle illustrating the described problem.
I have a list of items that are displayed in a template. The template contain a linkTo helper that let's the controller add an item to the collection and is shown as a text input on the page.
Adding the item to the collection is done by the controller:
App.TodoItem = DS.Model.extend({
title: DS.attr('string', { defaultValue: "unknown" })
});
App.Router.map(function () {
this.resource('todo_items')
});
App.TodoItemsRoute = Em.Route.extend({
model: function () {
return App.TodoItem.find();
}
});
App.TodoItemsController = Em.ArrayController.extend({
addTodoItem: function () {
App.TodoItem.createRecord();
}
});
If I want the new item to be shown is the list, I have to pass params to createRecord, otherwise the item is not visible. The same behaviour can be reproduced by using Chrome's inspector and then the item can be made visible as follows:
// Open the jsFiddle http://jsfiddle.net/bazzel/BkFYd/ and select 'result(fiddle.jshell.net) in the inspector, then:
var item = App.TodoItem.createRecord();
// Nothing visible yet.
item.set('title', 'Whatever');
// Now the text input appear with the title as its value.
Is this expected behaviour and if so, what am I missing here?
I took time to redo your example the way i feel things should be done properly with Emberjs. You should rather make sure of transaction and properly define your views and then all your issues get taken care of. So here's how i think you should do this
Define a view for the textfield to capture the value being entered or
just bind it to the model property.
Listing items and adding a new item to the list should be done in two different views and should not be mixed together
<script type="text/x-handlebars">
{{outlet}}
<div>
{{outlet 'addItem'}}
</div>
</script>
<script type="text/x-handlebars" data-template-name="todo_items">
{{#linkTo 'todo_items.new'}}Add Todo Item{{/linkTo}}
<ul>
{{#each item in controller}}
<li>
{{#unless item.isNew}}
{{item.title}}
{{/unless}}
</li>
{{/each}}
</ul>
</script>
Define different states for listing items and adding a new one
To benefit from automatic binding of your text field value to the
model property, you need to associate an ObjectController to the TodoItemsNew route
Finally, make use of transaction to create and commit records to the store
window.App = Em.Application.create();
App.TodoItem = DS.Model.extend({
title: DS.attr('string')
});
App.TodoItem.FIXTURES = [{
id: 1,
title: 'Lorem'
}, {
id: 2,
title: 'Ipsum'
}];
App.store = DS.Store.create({
revision: 11,
adapter: DS.FixtureAdapter.create()
});
App.Router.map(function () {
this.resource('todo_items',function(){
this.route('new');
})
});
App.IndexRoute = Em.Route.extend({
redirect: function () {
this.transitionTo('todo_items');
}
});
App.TodoItemsRoute = Em.Route.extend({
model: function () {
return App.TodoItem.find();
}
});
App.TodoItemsNewRoute = Em.Route.extend({
transaction: App.store.transaction(),
setupController:function(controller) {
console.info(controller.toString());
controller.set('content',this.transaction.createRecord(App.TodoItem));
},
renderTemplate: function() {
this.render('addItem',{
into:'application',
outlet:'addItem',
})
},
events: {
addItem: function() {
this.transaction.commit();
this.transitionTo('todo_items');
}
}
});
App.TodoItemsController = Em.ArrayController.extend();
App.TodoItemsNewController = Em.ObjectController.extend();
App.TextField = Ember.TextField.extend({
insertNewline: function () {
this.get('controller').send('addItem')
}
});
Here' is a working version of the example on jsfiddle. Hopefully, i helped with this example clarify some of your issues.
Thank you Ken for answering my question. It indeed feels like a more proper of way of doing this in Ember. However, I still think it's difficult to get the hang of which objects are accessible from where...
Your example inspired me to do a rewrite of my code. I also made some changes to your approach:
I'm not sure if it's the best practice, my I don't create a store instance. Instead I define a Store class.
The content for the TodoItemsNewController is set by calling the model property on the corresponding route.
renderTemplate in the TodoItemsNewRoute only needs the outlet key.
<script type="text/x-handlebars">
{{outlet}}
</script>
<script type="text/x-handlebars" data-template-name="todo_items">
{{#linkTo 'todo_items.new'}}Add Todo Item{{/linkTo}}
<ul>
{{outlet "addItem"}}
{{#each controller}}
<li>
{{#unless isNew}}
{{title}}
{{/unless}}
</li>
{{/each}}
</ul>
</script>
<script type="text/x-handlebars" data-template-name="todo_items/new">
{{view Ember.TextField valueBinding="title" placeholder="Enter title"}}
window.App = Em.Application.create();
App.TodoItem = DS.Model.extend({
title: DS.attr('string', {
defaultValue: "unknown"
})
});
App.TodoItem.FIXTURES = [{
id: 1,
title: 'Lorem'
}, {
id: 2,
title: 'Ipsum'
}];
App.Store = DS.Store.extend({
revision: 11,
adapter: DS.FixtureAdapter.create()
});
App.Router.map(function() {
this.resource('todo_items', function() {
this.route('new');
});
});
App.IndexRoute = Em.Route.extend({
redirect: function() {
this.transitionTo('todo_items');
}
});
App.TodoItemsRoute = Em.Route.extend({
model: function() {
return App.TodoItem.find();
}
});
App.TodoItemsNewRoute = Em.Route.extend({
model: function() {
return App.TodoItem.createRecord();
},
renderTemplate: function() {
this.render({
outlet: 'addItem'
});
}
});
App.TodoItemsNewView = Em.View.extend({
tagName: 'li'
});
The updated example is on jsFiddle.
Any reviews are welcome.

Set a Ember.CollectionView's selected item

I have a collection view like this (CoffeeScript):
App.SearchSuggestionsList = Ember.CollectionView.extend
tagName: 'ul'
contentBinding: 'controller.controllers.searchSuggestionsController.content'
itemViewClass: Ember.View.extend
template: Ember.Handlebars.compile('{{view.content.title}}')
isSelected: (->
/* This is where I don't know what to do */
this.index == controller's selected index
).property('controller.controllers.searchSuggestionsController.selectedIndex')
emptyView: Ember.View.extend
template: Ember.Handlerbars.compile('<em>No results</em>')
As you can see there's some pseudo-code inside the isSelected method. My goal is to define the concept of the currently selected item via this yet-to-be-implemented isSelected property. This will allow me to apply a conditional className to the item that is currently selected.
Is this the way to go? If it is, then how can this isSelected method be implemented? If not, what's another way around this to achieve the same thing?
I think it solves the case that you are looking for, with a changing list.
What we do is similar to the solution above, but the selected flag is based on the collection's controller, not the selected flag. That lets us change the "selected" piece via click, url, keypress etc as it only cares about what is in the itemController.
So the SearchListController references the items and item controllers (remember to call connectController in the router)
App.SearchListController = Em.ObjectController.extend
itemsController: null
itemController: null
App.SearchListView = Em.View.extend
templateName: "templates/search_list"
The individual items need their own view. They get selected added as a class if their context (which is an item) matches the item in the itemController.
App.SearchListItemView = Em.View.extend
classNameBindings: ['selected']
tagName: 'li'
template: Ember.Handlebars.compile('<a {{action showItem this href="true" }}>{{name}}</a>')
selected:(->
true if #get('context.id') is #get('controller.itemController.id')
).property('controller.itemController.id')
the SearchList template then just loops through all the items in the itemsController and as them be the context for the single item view.
<ul>
{{each itemsController itemViewClass="App.SearchListItemView"}}
</ul>
Is that close to what you're looking for?
The trivial (or the most known) way to do this is to have your child view (navbar item) observe a "selected" property in the parent view (navbar) which is bound to a controller, so in your route you tell the controller which item is selected. Check this fiddle for the whole thing.
Example:
Handlebars template of the navbar
<script type="text/x-handlebars" data-template-name="navbar">
<ul class="nav nav-list">
<li class="nav-header">MENU</li>
{{#each item in controller}}
{{#view view.NavItemView
itemBinding="item"}}
<a {{action goto item target="view"}}>
<i {{bindAttr class="item.className"}}></i>
{{item.displayText}}
</a>
{{/view}}
{{/each}}
</ul>
</script>
your navbar controller should have a "selected" property which you'll also bind in your view
App.NavbarController = Em.ArrayController.extend({
content: [
App.NavModel.create({
displayText: 'Home',
className: 'icon-home',
routeName: 'home',
routePath: 'root.index.index'
}),
App.NavModel.create({
displayText: 'Tasks',
className: 'icon-list',
routeName: 'tasks',
routePath: 'root.index.tasks'
})
],
selected: 'home'
});
Then you have a view structure similar to this, where the child view checks if the parent view "selected" has the same name of the child
App.NavbarView = Em.View.extend({
controllerBinding: 'controller.controllers.navbarController',
selectedBinding: 'controller.selected',
templateName: 'navbar',
NavItemView: Em.View.extend({
tagName: 'li',
// this will add the "active" css class to this particular child
// view based on the result of "isActive"
classNameBindings: 'isActive:active',
isActive: function() {
// the "routeName" comes from the nav item model, which I'm filling the
// controller's content with. The "item" is being bound through the
// handlebars template above
return this.get('item.routeName') === this.get('parentView.selected');
}.property('item', 'parentView.selected'),
goto: function(e) {
App.router.transitionTo(this.get('item.routePath'), e.context.get('routeName'));
}
})
});
Then, you set it in your route like this:
App.Router = Em.Router.extend({
enableLogging: true,
location: 'hash',
root: Em.Route.extend({
index: Em.Route.extend({
route: '/',
connectOutlets: function(r, c) {
r.get('applicationController').connectOutlet('navbar', 'navbar');
},
index: Em.Route.extend({
route: '/',
connectOutlets: function (r, c) {
// Here I tell my navigation controller which
// item is selected
r.set('navbarController.selected', 'home');
r.get('applicationController').connectOutlet('home');
}
}),
// other routes....
})
})
})
Hope this helps