I have a page that has 3 sections... left top, left bottom and Right Column. It uses a masterpage from master template... how would I call three different page to fit in these three sections... For now I harcoded left-top section, but I should be able to edit all these three section from umbraco without having to change any code... basically I created three pages, so that I can insert them to respective sections, but I am not sure how to call them from the templates.
I tried this on all three sections... but it only allows me to edit one section
<umbraco:item id="Item1" runat="server" field="bodyText"></umbraco:item>
Is there a way, where I can call "mypage" using ?
I did this with a master macro which calls the razor scripts with a DynamicNode as param.
foreach(DynamicNode child in Model.GetChildrenAsList)
{
#RenderPage("script name here", new DynamicNode(child.id)) // this lets the next script us Model too
}
To get the script name I made a static class that compares the .NodeTypeAlias with a list of constants and returns the script path. This way when ever you change something in the tree it will call it differently on load.
You can add as many params as you want in order to play about with the css or structure for example.
Hope this helps.
Related
I am trying to develop a multistep webform in Drupal 8 using Webform 8.x-5.1. I have written a WebformHandler that extends Drupal\webform\Plugin\WebformHandlerBase and made it available to the webform.
In the first step of the webform, I collect a text-field. I would like to display the value of that text-field in an HTML element (Advanced HTML/Text or Basic HTML) on the second page after doing some computation.
I have overwritten submitForm() in the WebformHandler and in it assign the value I want to the HTML element as follows:
$form['elements']['page_name']
['advanced_html_element']['#text'] = '...my HTML...';
Using ksm() I can see that this assignment works, but the the HTML element is not rendered with my HTML: the element is either invisible or contains the initial value set up in the form editor.
Clearly I'm missing something. Should I be using something other than submitForm? Can anyone help me?
It's been a long haul, but I've finally worked out how to do what I want to. The following works for me.
Firstly, I discovered the method validateForm in WebformHandlerBase. On each page in a form with multiple pages, you will find that the following methods are called in the order given here:
submitForm (called once)
alterForm(called possibly more than once)
validateForm (called once)
The name validateForm leads me to believe I may be misusing this method, but that is where I set up the elements on the following page that I wish to programmatically initialise. It works, so what the hey!
In validateForm, I initialise the elements that appear on the following page as follows:
$form_state->setValue(<element name>, <data structure>);
The <element name> is the name you give the element in the form editor ("Build" tab). The <data structure> has to be correct, of course: I suggest you find the appropriate structure by first filling in the element on the next page manually and seeing what turns up in $form_state.
There is also a $form_state->getValue(<element name>), which seems to me to mean that $form_state can also be used for storing session data, say in hidden fields. I initially used Drupal::service('tempstore.private')->get('xxx') for storing data that had to be available across page boundaries, but $form_state might be a cleaner solution.
I hope this helps someone: I spent a horribly long time trying to get this to work.
In my home page I have the following snippet that fetches all blog posts:
var docs = CurrentPage.Children.Where("Visible")
What I don't understand is that Visible is controlled by a property in the document named umbracoNaviHide. Setting it to true on the document excludes the page from the list above.
How is umbracoNaviHide translated to Visible? I have no macros or XSLT (none actually) that is doing anything funny...
umbracoNaviHide is one of umbraco's internal property implementations.
We used to have to check the property explicitly in xslt but nowadays it is used as you are using it here.
Here is a more complete explanation from the Umbraco wiki
The "umbracoNaviHide" is an Umbraco convention for marking nodes which
should not show up in a navigational context. It is normally added (or
inherited) on every Document Type with a Data Type of "True/false".
NOTE: This property is not added by default on new installations,
meaning you need to add it manually
There are a number of other useful properties that everybody should know about:
umbracoSitemapHide
umbracoUrlAlias
umbracoUrlName
umbracoInternalRedirectId
umbracoRedirect
We always insert these properties on a master page doctype so that all other doc types that represent data on web page content nodes inherit them
Wing
i´m developing a theme and for some reason i need to move the default position for breadcrubms (also for many other things) over woocommerce themes. Then i realised to do something like this on my functions.php:
function woocommerce_remove_breadcrumb(){
remove_action( 'woocommerce_before_main_content', 'woocommerce_breadcrumb', 20);
}
add_action('woocommerce_before_main_content', 'woocommerce_remove_breadcrumb');
function woocommerce_custom_breadcrumb(){
woocommerce_breadcrumb();
}
add_action( 'woo_custom_breadcrumb', 'woocommerce_custom_breadcrumb' );
And then on any template file, output the breadcrumb just with:
<? do_action('woo_custom_breadcrumb'); ?>
And works. My question is more than that. Is this the correct approach for something like this? I mean for anything over woocommerce, not just breadcrumb, for any pice, ratings, titles, buttons, sidebar, and so on.
What i´m thinking on is why woocommerce templates don´t come with more deep code. I mean, why there´s no such a single-content-loop.php template where you can just change the order of things, title, category, content, images, etc. in an easy way rather that hooking into functions?
I think that is an acceptable way to call the breadcrumbs explicitly. Sometimes it is easier to call a specific function than remove everything around it!
As for changing the order of things and getting into advanced customization; there isn't a single file, but a number of files working together. Create a folder in your themes root called 'woocommerce' and copy the following files for a safe override:
woocommerce/woocommerce-hooks.php:
Here are your hooks, including the ones you are overriding in your themes functions.php. Here is where you can experiment with removing and repositioning certain elements on your product page. Search for 'Sidebar' and you will see where the 'woocommerce_sidebar' action is added with the function it references in...
woocommerce/woocommerce-template.php:
Here are the functions used in template files to output content based on conditional statements. For instance, search for the 'Single Product' series and you can see which template files are used for which functions. For instance 'woocommerce_template_single_title' uses 'single-product/title.php' - if you copy over this folder and file you can make very specific edits to just the title section
Between these two files and their accompanying references (like title.php) I believe you can do the things you described. Let me know how it works out! I'm new to woocommerce too!
I am coding a magento theme. I have enabled path hints but in
the header the call to $this->getChildHtml('topContainer');
does not reveal any path hints. How can I find out which
.phtml file is loaded when the above call is made, so
that I can create the appropriately named and located
.phtml custom file?
topContainer is a "page/html_wrapper" block.
It means there is no template file associated with it.
The role of this block is to render all it's children blocks inside an html element.
Take a look at the _toHtml() method in 'app/code/core/Mage/Page/Html/Wrapper.php'.
Sincerely,
Jonathan
--- More explanations:
You can take a look at a perfect exemple in:
layout/customer.xml (in base theme)
layout/sales.xml (in base theme)
You have a similar block:
<block type="page/html_wrapper" name="my.account.wrapper" translate="label">
It's the area where all other blocks of customer account will be rendered.
In order to put the blocks in this area, you have to create a "reference" node with attribute "name" set to the name of the "wrapper".
For exemple if you look (inside sales.xml) to the "sales_order_view" handle, you'll see <reference name="my.account.wrapper"> and inside this node, other blocks.
These other blocks are classics blocks (core/template) and they have templates files.
So you can compare a 'page/html_wrapper' block to a 'core/text_list' block.
The only difference is the first one will wrap the rendered child block into an html element.
Take a look to the 2 files mentionned above, they will help you a lot.
I want to create a hierarchy in my wiki like so:
General
FooPages
Foo1
Foo2
Foo3
ODP
Bar
Baz
I would like to create these pages, and use <<toc>> table of contents macros to organize them.
How can I do that? Do I need to clone and edit the wiki on my own machine, or can I do that exclusively through the web interface?
You can (partially) do this, using <<toc / >>.
This will create a TOC for all the headers in files in the root directory.
It will not list headers in file in the sub directories, though.
You can do the same for <<toc FooPages/ >> etc.
You can do this both through the web interface and locally on your machine.
I placed some TOC examples on this Bitbucket wiki page: http://bitbucket.org/marijnvanderzee/build-wiki/wiki/TocTests. You can view the markup there.
Make sure to balance the equal signs on you headers; e.g. use == H2 == instead of == H2.
Both are valid, but at this time, the latter is not recognized by the <<toc>> macro.
Regarding the hierarchy side of this question, it's worth clarifying:
You can create a hierarchical structure by using the Title field when you create or edit a wiki page.
Eg: If you want to create a new file Bar.md inside a new Foo directory, just create a new page and in the Title field write "Foo/Bar.md". It will create the directory and the file at the same time.
I'm not sure if there's a way to just create the directory without adding a file to it straight away.
Regarding the TOC half of this question, I found that I can use the # HeaderTitle syntax in Markdown pages, and Creole's TOC macro will recognise it.