For school we are creating a roulette webapplication in Clojure with the webnoir framework. Everything seems realizable in Clojure, but the problem is: how do we define the board in our domain in Clojure? It must be possible to place corner bets etc.
And if we modelled this in our domain how do we send the information of the view to our domain/board?
Does anyone has ideas or suggestions?
Since there are infinite ways to define a board, many of them good, I'll avoid that question and primarily address the second: communicating between your board view and model.
One solution using webnoir is to have your board view contain form[s] to perform actions. Submitting that form updates your board model and redirects to the same route, resulting in an updated view. I'm sure you've been leafing through Chris Granger's excellent documentation.
Another route, albeit one that might be outside the scope of your project, is to have client side code dynamically communicate with the model and update your view, the end result being a single page webapp. This could be done with ClojureScript. If you are considering this, take a look at Chris Granger's libraries formerly known as pinot. They provide a wonderful complement to webnoir.
Related
Our Application has components which consume components with consume components of varying complexity. So i just want the input on the page, to validate when an object is set that the text is correct. The issue is that it is one of these subcomponents.
My colleague told me that there is 2 ways to do this, The first is to use Page Objects, and Chaining annotation to find it on my page, and then find the next id etc until my input is found. It requires me to look through another teams' Component Markup to narrow it down to the input i want to leverage. I dont believe I should have to go into another component definition, or a definition of a definition to get the appropriate chain to get this arbitrary input. It starts to create issues where if a lateral team creates changes unbeknownst to me, my PO will be broken.
The other option my friend asked was to use fixture.query to find the component. This would be as simple as:
fixture.query((el)=> el.attribute["id"] == "description",
(comp){
expect(comp.value, value);
});`
Using Query looks at the markup but then will automatically componentize it as the appropriate SubComponent. In this case, comp.value is the value stored in the HTML. So, if i did something like:
fixture.update((MainComponent comp) {
comp.myinput.value = new Foo();
});
Then I am setting and getting this programmatically, so i am a bit unsure if it properly would reflect what is on the screen.
Whats the best course of action? It seems PO would be better, but im not sure if there is a way around having to deep query for input boxes outside of the component i am testing.
Thanks
I don't think I have a definitive answer for you but I can tell you how we do it at Google. For pretty much any component we provide the page object alongside the component. This is twofold it is for testing that widget, and also so we can have this as a shareable resource for other tests.
For leaf widgets the page objects are a little less fleshed out and are really just there for the local test. For components that are shared heavily the page object is a bit more flushed out for reusability. Without this much of the API for the widget (html, css, etc) we would need to consider public and changes to them would be very hard (person responsible for making the public breaking change needs to fix all associated code.) With it we can have a contract to only support the page object API and html structure changes are not considered breaking changes. At times we have even gone so far as to have two page objects for a widget. One for the local test, and one to share. Sometimes the API you want to expose for a local test is much more than you want people to use themselves.
We can then compose these page objects into higher level page objects that represent the widget. Good page objects support a higher level of abstraction for that widget. For example a calendar widget would let you go to the next/previous month, get the current selected date, etc. rather than directly exposing the buttons/inputs that accomplish those actions.
We plan to expose these page objects for angular_components eventually, but we are currently working on how to expose these. Our internal package structure is different than what we have externally. We have many packages per individual widget (page_objects, examples, widget itself) and we need to reconcile this externally before we expose them.
Here is an example:
import 'package:pageloader/objects.dart';
import 'material_button_po.dart';
/// Webdriver page object for `material-yes-no-buttons` component.
#EnsureTag('material-yes-no-buttons')
class MaterialYesNoButtonsPO {
#ByClass('btn-yes')
#optional
MaterialButtonPO yesButton;
#ByClass('btn-no')
#optional
MaterialButtonPO noButton;
}
I'm an advanced beginner at django and python. I'm writing an app to handle registration and abstract submission for a conference, and I'm trying to use class-based views. Users get an emailed link that includes their registration code in the url. Starting at this url, users move through a series of views that collect all the necessary info.
The complication comes from the fact that users often stop half way through, and then want to complete the process several days or weeks later. This means that they might continue from the current page, or they might just click that original link. In addition, after several weeks they might have missed certain deadlines, so, e.g., they can no longer submit an abstract (but they can still register). Along the way, they have checked or unchecked various options that also influence the path they should take through the app.
My question is: where is the best place to put the logic that determines if the user is currently allowed to view that page, and if not, the best url to redirect them too? I thought I would create a custom view class that, e.g., overrides the dispatch method to include global checks (e.g., is conference registration open?), and then subclasses could add additional checks (e.g., has the user entered all the necessary info for her abstract?). The problem I ran into was that the checks were run in the wrong order (I want base class checks run first). I then started investigating custom view decorators or custom middleware. At this point I realized I could use some expert advice about which approach to take. (If it matters, I am not using the django authentication system.) Thanks in advance.
Maybe the form wizard could help you managing the viewing sequence.
In general django greybeards advocate keeping row-wise logic in Models, and table-wise logic in Managers, so it seems appropriate to keep complex view logic in a master view class.
The wizard class can help maintain the order of the views, but to resume an out-dated session you may need to do some model saves (which could get too complex very quickly) or some cookie handling.
In the past, when presented with a similar situation, I took the simplest route and separated user registration and the task that the user wants to perform (event registration). The user registers once but if they fluff up the event registration, they just have to log back in at a later date and do it again (their hassle - not yours!).
I've found absolutely nothing on Google with regard to A/B testing with a client-side framework such as ember.js.
The goal is to serve up adjusted content (different nav items, header phrasing etc.) in order to A/B test our UI/UX. I should note that nothing significant (i.e. sitemap) is changing, just some minor presentational aspects.
There are several possible approaches, namely using different view templates / helper snippets, or serving up a different stylesheet. Both have advantages and challenges, and ideally the same visitor would always be served the same version. Results would be fed through a service like Mixpanel.
I fear I may have to roll my own solution here, but would love to hear any suggestions / pointers.
At their root, most A/B javascript testing frameworks cookie a user as being in the "A" or "B" group, give you a way to ask if a user is "A" or "B" and report "results" back to a service to measure. This can plug into Ember or other client-side frameworks in a way that is fairly orthogonal to the framework.
I would recommend exposing the "A"- or "B"-ness of the user as a property on your user (in Ember, probably your UserController). Then you can use your framework's standard branching or conditionals to render the "A" UI or the "B" UI.
I have actually built a pretty robust A/B Testing tool using Ember for my startup. We are actually thinking of open sourcing it if there was a demand for it. I can let you know the basic idea of how it works for now though.
I have landingPage objects, that can then have a bunch of A/B tests associated with the, When a user comes to the landing page, they are assigned a cookie, and for each A/B test that are assigned either A or B.
I have used two different approaches within jade to handle A/B testing.
For styling type things, I use something like this
and set the .css property in the view to either test-a or test-b
or if it is for text I will do something like this
{{view view.landingPageText}}
and the landingPageText would be set to either the text for A or the test for B.
This thing also dynamically sets up mixpanel, mailchimp, and uses parse.com and node. You can see the code in action here.
http://golf.nextstudioapps.com/
I am running ColdFusion MX, so I don't have the possibility of using the built-in cfimage Captcha functionality in my application, before form submitting.
But the problem is without captcha the bots submit the forms.
What will be best way to prevent automatic submitting?
Captchas don't have to be images!
Try one of the following solutions:
Most bots don't understand CSS. Create two submit buttons, the first with a value that will be rejected by the server, the second with a value that will be accepted by the server. Hide the first one using CSS.
Ask the user to answer a simple math problem. This will require you to create the math problem and store the expected solution somewhere (like the user's session), then compare the user's submitted answer with the stored answer. For extra protection, you can create simple addition, subtraction and multiplication questions. Avoid division, remainders are a pain for some users.
Bots read the names of form elements, and tend to ignore text labels. Try creating a checkbox named "optout" (like a newsletter), checked by default. Next to the checkbox, ask the user to uncheck the checkbox if they are a human. The opposite technique also works (unchecked checkbox that you ask the user to check).
All of these solutions can be done without third party code or API calls.
That being said, reCAPTCHA is pretty good and easy to integrate into almost any environment.
Take a look at cfformprotect - it will work with CFMX 6 and all later engines.
It aims to be fully accessible - and invisible to most users - with an assortment of methods to stop bots and spammers.
Also you might want to look at a CF wrapper for reCaptcha, which is compatible with CFMX 7.
A technique I used with a different technology was to use image buttons. Your POST handler gets the x,y co-ordinates where the images were clicked. I found the bots (which are just generating post requests) were passing 0,0 and by dropping those requests on the floor I brought the spam posts down to less than the real ones. Sorry that I don't know how to do that in CF but I hope the technique is useful to you.
Its always a good idea to do data validation on the server side before processing no matter which solution you use.
This post may help: http://www.bennadel.com/blog/405-Fully-Accessible-Spam-Form-Submission-Blocking-Using-ColdFusion-And-X-HTML-Version-III-.htm
How about using calculation method? Just like 8 + 5 = ?
OR
how about using ColdFusion.Ajax.submitForm?
I have created an article site, where articles are published in several languages. I am using transmeta (http://code.google.com/p/django-transmeta/) to support multiple languages in one model.
Also I am using generic comments framework, to make articles commentable. I wonder what will happen if the same article will be commented in one language and then in another. Looks like all comments will be displayed on both variants....
The question actually is:
Is there a possibility to display only comments submitted with current language of the article?
I tried the approach of transmeta for translation of dynamic texts and I had the following experience:
You want another language, you need to change the database model which is generally undesirable
You need every item in both languages, which is not flexible
You have problems linking with other objects (as you point out in your question)
If you take the way of transmeta you will need two solutions:
The transmeta solution for translating fields in a model
For objects connected to a model using transmeta you will need an additional field to determine the language, say CharField with "en", "de", "ru" etc.
These were major drawbacks that made me rethink the approach and switch to another solution: django.contrib.sites. Every model that needs internationalization inherits from a SiteModel:
class SiteModel(models.Model):
site = models.ForeignKey(Site)
Every object that would need transmeta translation is connected to a site. Every connected object can determine its language from the parent object's site attribute.
I basically ran the wikipedia approach and had a Site object for every language on a subdomain (en., de., ru.). For every site I started a server instance that had a custom settings file which would set the SITE_ID and the language of the site. I used django.contrib.sites.managers.CurrentSiteManagerto display only the items in the language of the current site. I also had a manager that would give you objects of every language. I constructed a model that connects objects of the same model from different languages denoting that they are semantically the same (think languages left column on wikipedia). The sites all use the same database and share the same untranslated User model, so users can switch between languages without any problem.
Advantages:
Your database schema doesn't need to change for additional languages
You are flexible: add languages easily, have objects in one language only etc.
Works with (generic) foreign keys, they connect to an object and know what language it is. You can display the comments of an object and they will be in one language. This solves your problem.
Disadvantages:
It's a greater deal to setup: you need a django server instance for every site and some more glue code
If you need e.g an article in different languages, you need another model to connect them
You may not need the django Site model and could implement something that does the same without the need of multiple django server instances.
I don't know what you are trying to build and what I described might not fit to your case, but it worked out perfectly for my project (internationalized community platform built upon pinax: http://www.bpmn-community.org/ ). So if you disclose some more about your project, I might be able to advise an approach.
To finally answer your question: No, the generic comments will not work out of the box with transmeta. As you realised you will have to display comments in both languages for the article that is displayed in one language. Or you will have to hack into the comments and change the model and do other dirty stuff (not recommended). The approach I described works with comments and any other pluggable app.
To answer your questions:
Two Django instances can share one database, no problem there.
If you don't want two Django instances, but one, you will have to do the following: A middleware checks the incoming request, extracts desired language from URL (en.example.com or example.com/en/ etc.) and saves the language preference in the request object. The view will have to take the request object with the language and take care of the filtering of objects accordingly. Since there is no dedicated server for the language (like in the sites approach where the language is stored in the settings.py file), you can only get the language from the request and you will have to pass attributes from the request object to Model managers to filter objects.
You could try to fake a global language state in the django application with an approach like threadlocals middleware, however I don't know if this plays out nicely with django I18N engine (which is also does some thread magic).
If you want to go big with your site in multiple languages, I recommend going for the sites-approach.