Why is it selecting this file? - regex

I have the following statement:
Directory.GetFiles(filePath, "A*.pdf")
.Where(file => Regex.IsMatch(Path.GetFileName(file), "[Aa][i-lI-L].*"))
.Skip((pageNum - 1) * pageSize)
.Take(pageSize)
.Select(path => new FileInfo(path))
.ToArray()
My problems is that the above statement also finds the file "Adali.pdf" which it should not - but i cannot figure out why.
The above statement should only select files starting with a, and where the second letter is in the range i-l.

Because it matches Adali taking 3rd and 4th characters (al):
Adali
--
Try using ^ in your regex which allows looking for start of the string (regex cheatsheet):
Regex.IsMatch(..., "^[Aa][i-lI-L].*")
Also I doubt you need asterisk at all.
PS: As a sidenote let me notice that this question doesn't seem to be written that good. You should try debugging this code yourself and particularly you should try checking your regex against your cases without LINQ. I'm sure there is nothing to do here with LINQ (the tag you have in your question), but the issue is about regular expressions (which you didn't mention in tags at all).

You are not anchoring the string. This makes the regex match the al in Adali.pdf.
Change the regex to ^[Aa][i-lI-L].* You can do just ^[Aa][i-lI-L] if you don't need anything besides matching.

You should to do this
var f = Directory.GetFiles(tb_Path.Text, "A*.pdf").Where(file => Regex.IsMatch(Path.GetFileName(file), "[Aa][i-lI-L].pdf")).ToArray();
When you call ".*" Adali accept in Regex

Related

How to find "complicated" URLs in a text file

I'm using the following regex to find URLs in a text file:
/http[s]?://(?:[a-zA-Z]|[0-9]|[$-_#.&+]|[!*\(\),]|(?:%[0-9a-fA-F][0-9a-fA-F]))+/
It outputs the following:
http://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds117.0/.
http://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds111.1/.
http://www.discover-earth.org/index.html).
http://community.eosdis.nasa.gov/measures/).
Ideally they would print out this:
http://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds117.0/
http://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds111.1/
http://www.discover-earth.org/index.html
http://community.eosdis.nasa.gov/measures/
Any ideas on how I should tweak my regex?
Thank you in advance!
UPDATE - Example of the text would be:
this is a test http://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds117.0/. and I want this to be copied over http://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds111.1/. http://www.discover-earth.org/index.html). http://community.eosdis.nasa.gov/measures/).
This will trim your output containing trail characters, ) .
import re
regx= re.compile(r'(?m)[\.\)]+$')
print(regx.sub('', your_output))
And this regex seems workable to extract URL from your original sample text.
https?:[\S]*\/(?:\w+(?:\.\w+)?)?
Demo,,, ( edited from https?:[\S]*\/)
Python script may be something like this
ss=""" this is a test http://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds117.0/. and I want this to be copied over http://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds111.1/. http://www.discover-earth.org/index.html). http://community.eosdis.nasa.gov/measures/). """
regx= re.compile(r'https?:[\S]*\/(?:\w+(?:\.\w+)?)?')
for m in regx.findall(ss):
print(m)
So for the urls you have here:
https://regex101.com/r/uSlkcQ/4
Pattern explanation:
Protocols (e.g. https://)
^[A-Za-z]{3,9}:(?://)
Look for recurring .[-;:&=+\$,\w]+-class (www.sub.domain.com)
(?:[\-;:&=\+\$,\w]+\.?)+`
Look for recurring /[\-;:&=\+\$,\w\.]+ (/some.path/to/somewhere)
(?:\/[\-;:&=\+\$,\w\.]+)+
Now, for your special case: ensure that the last character is not a dot or a parenthesis, using negative lookahead
(?!\.|\)).
The full pattern is then
^[A-Za-z]{3,9}:(?://)(?:[\-;:&=\+\$,\w]+\.?)+(?:\/[\-;:&=\+\$,\w\.]+)+(?!\.|\)).
There are a few things to improve or change in your existing regex to allow this to work:
http[s]? can be changed to https?. They're identical. No use putting s in its own character class
[a-zA-Z]|[0-9]|[$-_#.&+]|[!*\(\),] You can shorten this entire thing and combine character classes instead of using | between them. This not only improves performance, but also allows you to combine certain ranges into existing character class tokens. Simplifying this, we get [a-zA-Z0-9$-_#.&+!*\(\),]
We can go one step further: a-zA-Z0-9_ is the same as \w. So we can replace those in the character class to get [\w$-#.&+!*\(\),]
In the original regex we have $-_. This creates a range so it actually inclues everything between $ and _ on the ASCII table. This will cause unwanted characters to be matched: $%&'()*+,-./0123456789:;<=>?#ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_. There are a few options to fix this:
[-\w$#.&+!*\(\),] Place - at the start of the character class
[\w$#.&+!*\(\),-] Place - at the end of the character class
[\w$\-#.&+!*\(\),] Escape - such that you have \- instead
You don't need to escape ( and ) in the character class: [\w$#.&+!*(),-]
[0-9a-fA-F][0-9a-fA-F] You don't need to specify [0-9a-fA-F] twice. Just use a quantifier like so: [0-9a-fA-F]{2}
(?:%[0-9a-fA-F][0-9a-fA-F]) The non-capture group isn't actually needed here, so we can drop it (it adds another step that the regex engine needs to perform, which is unnecessary)
So the result of just simplifying your existing regex is the following:
https?://(?:[$\w#.&+!*(),-]|%[0-9a-fA-F]{2})+
Now you'll notice it doesn't match / so we need to add that to the character class. Your regex was matching this originally because it has an improper range $-_.
https?://(?:[$\w#.&+!*(),/-]|%[0-9a-fA-F]{2})+
Unfortunately, even with this change, it'll still match ). at the end. That's because your regex isn't told to stop matching after /. Even implementing this will now cause it to not match file names like index.html. So a better solution is needed. If you give me a couple of days, I'm working on a fully functional RFC-compliant regex that matches URLs. I figured, in the meantime, I would at least explain why your regex isn't working as you'd expect it to.
Thanks all for the responses. A coworker ended up helping me with it. Here is the solution:
des_links = re.findall('http[s]?://(?:[a-zA-Z]|[0-9]|[$-_#.&+]|[!*\(\),]|(?:%[0-9a-fA-F][0-9a-fA-F]))+', des)
for i in des_links:
tmps = "/".join(i.split('/')[0:-1])
print(tmps)

Regex that matches a pattern only if string does not begin with 'N'

I need to put together a regex that matches a patter only if string does not begin with 'N'.
Here is my pattern so far [A-E]+[-+]?.
Now I want to make sure that it does not match something like:
N\A
NA
NB+
NB-
NCAB
This is for REGEXP_SUBSTR command in Oracle SQL DB
UPDATE
It looks like I should have been more specific, sorry
I want to extract from a string [A-E]+[-+]? but if the string also matches ^(N|n) then I want my regex to return nothing.
See examples below:
String Returns
N/A
F1/AAA AAA
NABC
FABC ABC
To match a character between A and E not preceded by N, you can use:
([^N]|^)[A-E]+
If you want to avoid fields that contains N[A-E] use a negation in your query using the pattern N[A-E] (in other words, use two predicates, this one to exclude NA and the first to find A)
To be more clear:
WHERE NOT REGEXP_LIKE(coln, 'N[A-E]') AND REGEXP_LIKE(coln, '[A-E]')
Ok I figured it out, I broadened the scope of the problem a little, I realized that I can also play with other parameters of REGEXP_SUBSTR in this case that I can have returned only second substring.
REGEXP_SUBSTR(field1, '^([^NA-D][^A-D]*)?([A-D]+[-+]?)',1,1,'i',2)
I still have to give you guys the credit, lot of good ideas that led me to here.
Just throw a [^N]? in front. That should do it.
OOPS...
That actually needs to include an " OR ^ "...
It should look like this:
([^N]|^)[A-E]+[-+]?
Sorry about that...It looks like the right answer already got posted anyway.

MATLAB 2012 regular expression

I have a set of strings that I'd like to parse in MATLAB 2012 that all have the following format:
string-int-int-int-int-string
I'd like to pluck out the third integer (the rest are 'don't cares'), but I haven't used MATLAB in ages and need to refresh on regular expressions. I tried using the regular expression '(.*)-(.*)-(.*)-\d-(.*)' but no dice. I did check out the MATLAB regexp page, but wasn't able to figure out how to apply that information to this case.
Anyone know how I might get the desired result? If so, could you explain what the expression you're using is doing to get that result so that others might be able to apply the answer to their unique situation?
Thanks in advance!
str = 'XyzStr-1-2-1000-56789-ILoveStackExchange.txt';
[tok] = regexp(str, '^.+?-.+?-.+?-(\d+?)-.+?-.+?', 'tokens');
tok{:}
ans =
'1000'
Update
Explanation, upon request.
^ - "Anchor", or match beginning of string.
.+? - Wildcard match, one or more, non-greedy.
- - Literal dash/hyphen.
(\d+?) - Digits match, one or more, non-greedy, captured into a token.
^.*?-.*?-.*?-(\d+)-.*?-.*?$
OR
^(?:[^-]*?-){3}(\d+)(?:.*?)$
Group1 now contains your required data

Ruby Puppet Regex string matching

I'm somewhat new to ruby and have done a ton of google searching but just can't seem to figure out how to match this particular pattern. I have used rubular.com and can't seem to find a simple way to match. Here is what I'm trying to do:
I have several types of hosts, they take this form:
Sample hostgroups
host-brd0000.localdomain
host-cat0000.localdomain
host-dog0000.localdomain
host-bug0000.localdomain
Next I have a case statement, I want to keep out the bugs (who doesn't right?). I want to do something like this to match the series of characters. However, it starts matching at host-b, host-c, host-d, and matches only a single character as if I did a [brdcatdog].
case $hostgroups { #variable takes the host string up to where the numbers begin
# animals to keep
/host-[["brd"],["cat"],["dog"]]/: {
file {"/usr/bin/petstore-friends.sh":
owner => petstore,
group => petstore,
mode => 755,
source => "puppet:///modules/petstore-friends.sh.$hostgroups",
}
}
I could do something like [bcd][rao][dtg] but it's not very clean looking and will match nonsense like "bad""cot""dat""crt" which I don't want.
Is there a slick way to use \A and [] that I'm missing?
Thanks for your help.
-wootini
How about using negative lookahead?
host-(?!bug).*
Here is the RUBULAR permalink matching everything except those pesky bugs!
Is this what you're looking for?
host-(brd|cat|dog)
(Following gtgaxiola's example, here's the Rubular permalink)

Regexp for finding tags without nested tags

I'm trying to write a regexp which will help to find non-translated texts in html code.
Translated texts means that they are going through special tag: or through construction: ${...}
Ex. non-translated:
<h1>Hello</h1>
Translated texts are:
<h1><fmt:message key="hello" /></h1>
<button>${expression}</button>
I've written the following expression:
\<(\w+[^>])(?:.*)\>([^\s]+?)\</\1\>
It finds correct strings like:
<p>text<p>
Correctly skips
<a><fmt:message key="common.delete" /></a>
But also catches:
<li><p><fmt:message key="common.delete" /></p></li>
And I can't figure out how to add exception for ${...} strings in this expression
Can anybody help me?
If I understand you properly, you want to ensure the data inside the "tag" doesn't contain fmt:messsage or ${....}
You might be able to use a negative-lookahead in conjuction with a . to assert that the characters captured by the . are not one of those cases:
/<(\w+)[^>]*>(?:(?!<fmt:message|\$\{|<\/\1>).)*<\/\1>/i
If you want to avoid capturing any "tags" inside the tag, you can ignore the <fmt:message portion, and just use [^<] instead of a . - to match only non <
/<(\w+)[^>]*>(?:(?!\$\{)[^<])*<\/\1>/i
Added from comment If you also want to exclude "empty" tags, add another negative-lookahead - this time (?!\s*<) - ensure that the stuff inside the tag is not empty or only containing whitespace:
/<(\w+)[^>]*>(?!\s*<)(?:(?!\$\{)[^<])*<\/\1>/i
If the format is simple as in your examples you can try this:
<(\w+)>(?:(?!<fmt:message).)+</\1>
Rewritten into a more formal question:
Can you match
aba
but not
aca
without catching
abcba ?
Yes.
FSM:
Start->A->B->A->Terminate
Insert abcba and run it
Start is ready for input.
a -> MATCH, transition to A
b -> MATCH, transition to B
c -> FAIL, return fail.
I've used a simple one like this with success,
<([^>]+)[^>]*>([^<]*)</\1>
of course if there is any CDATA with '<' in those it's not going to work so well. But should do fine for simple XML.
also see
https://blog.codinghorror.com/parsing-html-the-cthulhu-way/
for a discussion of using regex to parse html
executive summary: don't