I've tried searching for this answer as it doesn't seem too complicated, but I've had no success. I'm trying to work with some old FORTRAN code and bring it into Python so I can use it. In the process I've come across some issues with file I/O, and I'm trying to understand how this would be handled by f2py. I'm working on Ubuntu 11.10 with gfortran. For example, I was trying to use the following subroutine:
C FILE INOUT.F
SUBROUTINE INOUT
i (NAME, STUFF)
Cf2py Intent(in,out) NAME, STUFF
CHARACTER*6 NAME, STUFF
OPEN(unit=1,file=NAME)
WRITE(1,100) STUFF
100 FORMAT(A8)
RETURN
END
I then compile using gfortran and f2py:
f2py -c -m inout inout.f
Which creates the inout.so shared library. Then in Python, I try a simple test:
python
>>> import inout
>>> inout.inout('test','hello')
('test', 'hello ')
Then exit out of Python and open the newly created "test" file, and it's empty. I can print to the screen no problem, but printing to a file doesn't seem to work. Any guidance would be appreciated. The f2py documentation doesn't mention WRITE statements.
You can see here,
Python I/O will not catch I/O from Fortran.
Related
I have a rather dull Fortran program that are used by students for some heavy calculations and I thought the program might be a little more interesting if I could add some sounds here and there. Is there any utility to generate sounds that is callable from a Fortran program? I would like to call a routine with for example a selection of MP3 files.
I do not like programs which beeps and plings in general but this is a kind of last resort to keep the students alert ...
I'd go with C library (e.g. How to play MP3 files in C?).
I'd create shared lib with your routine (e.g. code playing some sort of mp3 list) and called it from Fortran code.
Question is, whether this is what you are looking for.
It may be interesting to try the system call together with a command-line tool, e.g.
program main
implicit none
integer i
character(100) :: message(3)
message(1) = "hi"
message(2) = "yo"
message(3) = "done!"
do i = 1, 3
call system( "say " // trim( message(i) ) )
enddo
end
which says any message via speech synthesis on Mac OSX. A similar thing may be achieved for MP3 files with some audio commands (on Windows, Mac, and Linux). This demo seems to be using such an approach (Note: music starts from the page!).
I'm having some trouble getting Matlab to run an executable file. Essentially, I have a C++ code that does some calculations and outputs these calculations to a text file; then, Matlab reads these text files and uses the calculations to makes plots and stuff.
I've been trying to get Matlab to run the C++ exe file so that, when it runs it, the output files are automatically generated and Matlab can start doing its stuff. This just allows the user to run the program quicker. I am using the system() command Like so:
system('MyCppProgram.exe');
However, when I run that, although everything compiles, nothing is outputted from CPP and I even get back something that says "ans = -1" and I have no idea what that means.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
Update: Result from test command.
[status, cmdout] = system('MyCppProgram.exe', '-echo');
status = -1
cmdout = ''
This one's going to take a bit of explaining. Please bear with me.
What I Have
I have in my possession some Fortran source code and some binaries that have been compiled from that code. I did not do the compilation, but there is a build script that suggests G77 was used to do it.
As well as the Fortran stuff, there is also some Java code that provides users with a GUI "wrapper" around the binaries. It passes information between itself and the binaries via their input/output/error pipes. The Java code is very messy, and this way of doing things adds a lot of boilerplate and redundancy, but it does the job and I know it works.
What I Need
Unfortunately, I'd like to make some changes:
I want to create a new Python wrapper for the binaries (or, more precisely, extend an existing Python program to become the new wrapper).
I want to be able to compile the Fortran code as part of this existing program's build process. I would like to use gfortran for this, since MinGW is used elsewhere in the build and so it will be readily available.
The Problem
When I compile the Fortran code myself using gfortran, I cannot get the resulting binaries to "talk" to either the current Java wrapper or my new Python wrapper.
Here are the various ways of printing to the console that I have tried in the Fortran code:
subroutine printA(message)
write(6,*) message
end
subroutine printB(message)
write(*,*) message
end
subroutine printC(message)
use iso_fortran_env
write(output_unit,*) message
end
There are also read commands as well, but the code doesn't even get a change to execute that part so I'm not worrying about it yet.
Extra Info
I have to call gfortran with the -ffixed-line-length-132 flag so that the code compiles, but apart from that I don't use anything else. I have tried using the -ff2c flag in the vague hope that it will make a difference. It doesn't.
This stackoverflow post is informative, but doesn't offer me anything that works.
The relavant manual page suggests that printA should work just fine.
I'm working on Windows, but will need this to be multi-platform.
Juse in case you're intested, the Java code uses Runtime.getRuntime().exec("prog.exe") to call the binaries and then the various "stream" methods of the resulting Process object to communicate with them. The Python code uses equivalents of this provided by the Popen object of the subprocess module.
I should also say that I am aware there are alternatives. Rewriting the code in Python (or something else like C++), or making amendments so that is it can be called via F2Py have been ruled out as options. Using g77 is also a no-go; we have enough dependencies as it is. I'd like to be able to write to / read from the console properly with gfortran, or know that it's just not possible.
Hard to say without seeing more details from your Fortran and Python codes. The following pair of code works for me (at least under Linux):
Fortran program repeating its input line by line prefixed with line number:
program test_communication
use iso_fortran_env, stdout => output_unit, stdin => input_unit
implicit none
character(100) :: buffer
integer :: ii
ii = 1
do while (.true.)
read(stdin, *) buffer
write(stdout, "(I0,A,A)") ii, "|", trim(buffer)
flush(stdout)
ii = ii + 1
end do
end program test_communication
Python program invoking the Fortran binary. You can feed it with arbitrary strings from the console.
import subprocess as sub
print "Starting child"
proc = sub.Popen("./a.out", stdin=sub.PIPE, stdout=sub.PIPE)
while True:
send = raw_input("Enter a string: ")
if not send:
print "Exiting loop"
break
proc.stdin.write(send)
proc.stdin.write("\n")
proc.stdin.flush()
print "Sent:", send
recv = proc.stdout.readline()
print "Received:", recv.rstrip()
print "Killing child"
proc.kill()
I have been having problems trying to run an external program from a python program that was generated from a trigger in a postgres 9.2 database. The trigger works. It writes to a file. I had tried just running the external program but the permissions would not allow it to run. I was able to create a folder (using os.system(“mkdir”) ). The owner of the folder is NETWORK SERVICE.
I need to run a program called sdktest. When I try to run it no response happens so I think that means that the python program does not have enough permissions (with an owner of NETWORK SERVICE) to run it.
I have been having my program copy files that it needs into that directory so they would have the correct permissions and that has worked to some degree but the program that I need to run is the last one and it is not running because it does not have enough permissions.
My python program runs a C++ program called PG_QB_Connector which calls sdktest.
Is there any way I can change the owner of the process to be a “normal” owner? Is there a better way to do this? Basically I just need to have this C++ program have eniough perms to run correctly.
BTW, when I run the C++ program by hand, the line that runs the sdktest program runs correctly, however, when I run it from the postgres/python it does not do anything...
I have Windows 7, python 3.2. The other 2 questions that I asked about this are located here and here
The python program:
CREATE or replace FUNCTION scalesmyone (thename text)
RETURNS int
AS $$
a=5
f = open('C:\\JUNK\\frompython.txt','w')
f.write(thename)
f.close()
import os
os.system('"mkdir C:\\TEMPWITHOWNER"')
os.system('"mkdir C:\\TEMPWITHOWNER\\addcustomer"')
os.system('"copy C:\\JUNK\\junk.txt C:\\TEMPWITHOWNER\\addcustomer"')
os.system('"copy C:\\BATfiles\\junk6.txt C:\\TEMPWITHOWNER\\addcustomer"')
os.system('"copy C:\\BATfiles\\run_addcust.bat C:\\TEMPWITHOWNER\\addcustomer"')
os.system('"copy C:\\Workfiles\\PG_QB_Connector.exe C:\\TEMPWITHOWNER\\addcustomer"')
os.system('"copy C:\\Workfiles\\sdktest.exe C:\\TEMPWITHOWNER\\addcustomer"')
import subprocess
return_code = subprocess.call(["C:\\TEMPWITHOWNER\\addcustomer\\PG_QB_Connector.exe", '"hello"'])
$$ LANGUAGE plpython3u;
The C++ program that is called from the python program and calls sdktest.exe is below
command = "copy C:\\Workfiles\\AddCustomerFROMWEB.xml C:\\TEMPWITHOWNER\\addcustomer\\AddCustomerFROMWEB.xml";
system(command.c_str());
//everything except for the qb file is in my local folder
command = "C:\\TEMPWITHOWNER\\addcustomer\\sdktest.exe \"C:\\Users\\Public\\Documents\\Intuit\\QuickBooks\\Company Files\\Shain Software.qbw\" C:\\TEMPWITHOWNER\\addcustomer\\AddCustomerFROMWEB.xml C:\\TEMPWITHOWNER\\addcustomer\\outputfromsdktestofaddcust.xml";
system(command.c_str());
It sounds like you want to invoke a command-line program from within a PostgreSQL trigger or function.
A usually-better alternative is to have the trigger send a NOTIFY and have a process with a PostgreSQL connection LISTENing for notifications. When a notification comes in, the process can start your program. This is the approach I would recommend; it's a lot cleaner and it means your program doesn't have to run under PostgreSQL's user ID. See NOTIFY and LISTEN.
If you really need to run commands from inside Pg:
You can use PL/Pythonu with os.system or subprocess.check_call; PL/Perlu with system(); etc. All these can run commands from inside Pg if you need to. You can't invoke programs directly from PostgreSQL, you need to use one of the 'untrusted' (meaning fully privileged, not sandboxed) procedural languages to invoke external executables. PL/TCL can probably do it too.
Update:
Your Python code as shown above has several problems:
Using os.system in Python to copy files is just wrong. Use the shutil library: http://docs.python.org/3/library/shutil.html to copy files, and the simple os.mkdir command to create directories.
The double-layered quoting looks wrong; didn't you mean to quote only each argument not the whole command? You should be using subprocess.call instead of os.system anyway.
Your final subprocess.call invocation appears OK, but fails to check the error code so you'll never know if it went wrong; you should use subprocess.check_call instead.
The C++ code also appears to fail to check for errors from the system() invocations so you'll never know if the command it runs fails.
Like the Python code, copying files in C++ by using the copy shell command is generally wrong. Microsoft Windows provides the CopyFile function for this; equivalents or alternatives exist on other platforms and you can use portable-but-less-efficient stream copying too.
i would like to pass values from python to a c++ program for an encryption from inside a python program and then return the value from there to the python program . how to do it?
If you want to use some existing Unix-style command line utility that reads from stdin and writes to stdout, you can use subprocess.Popen by using Popen.communicate():
import subprocess
p = subprocess.Popen(["/your/app"], stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
output = p.communicate(input)[0]
As said msw in the other post, the proper solution is using PyObject.
If you want to have a two-way communication between C++ & Python, Boost Python would be interesting for you. Take a look at website Boost Python,
This post would also be interesting:
How to expose a C++ class to Python without building a module