if a file is checked out in ClearCase; it would use the earlier version and still would build, is this correct? I'm thinking they had a checkout that was to fix a build issue and the build failed because of the checkout
as far as I know, clearcase using the current file, so if file is checked out in a view and you build this view it will take the checked out file
However, note that if you do uncheckout and you are not using cmake, it might miss this change, since the timestamp of the file after the uncheckout operation is older
The config spec of a view usually starts with:
element * CHECKEDOUT
That means that, yes, your view will select the current file, whatever the other selection rules are.
I recommend checking for files in checkout, but also hijacked files (modified locally without having been checked out, for snapshot view, or even eclipsed files for dynamic views) before starting a build.
Check also for any other "private" files (not initially present and selected in the view), because they also can influence a build by their presence.
Related
How I can build local sources and dependancies with flatpak-builder?
I can build local sources
flatpak build ../dictionary ./configure --prefix=/app
I can extract and build application with dependancies with a .json
flatpak-builder --repo=repo dictionary2 org.gnome.Dictionary.json
But no way to build dependancies and local sources? I don't find sources type
like dir or other, only archive, git (no hg?) ...
flatpak-builder is meant to automate the whole build process, with a single entry-point: the JSON manifest.
Everything else it obtains from Git, Bazaar or tarballs. Note that for these the "url" property may be a local URL starting with file://.
(There is indeed no support for Hg. If that's important for you, feel free to request it.)
In addition to that, there are a few more source types (see the flatpak-manifest(5) manpage), which can be used to modify the extracted sources:
file which point to a local file to copy somewhere in the extracted sources;
patch which point to a local patch file to apply to the extracted sources;
script which creates a script in the extracted sources, from an array of commands;
shell which modifies the extracted sources by running an array of commands;
Adding a dir source type might be useful.
However (and I only flatpaked a few apps, and contributed 2 or 3 patches to the code, so I might be completely wrong) care must be taken as this would easily make builds completely unreproducible, which is one thing flatpak-builder tries very hard to enable.
For example, when using a local file source, flatpak-builder will base64-econde the content of that file and use it as a data:text/plain;charset=utf8;base64,<content> URL for the file which it stores in the manifest included inside the final build.
Something similar might be needed for a dir source (tar the folder then base64-encode the content of the tar?), otherwise it would be impossible to reproduce the build. I've just been told (after submitting this answer) that this changed in Git master, in favour of a new flatpak-builder --bundle-sources option. This would probably make it easier to support reproducible builds with a dir source type.
In any case, feel free to start the conversation around a new dir source type in the upstream bug tracker. :)
There's a expermental cli tool if you want to use it https://gitlab.com/csoriano/flatpak-dev-cli
You can read the docs
http://docs.flatpak.org/en/latest/building-simple-apps.html
http://docs.flatpak.org/en/latest/flatpak-builder.html
In a nutshell this is what you need to use flatpak as develop workbench
https://github.com/albfan/gnome-builder/wiki/flatpak
When creating a vNext build on TFS 2015 you can define variables, which are then used in build steps, and can also be used as environment variables in scripts the build runs.
The build I am working on runs scripts that pulls files from mapped locations, so it would be great if I could define a variable and use it in a mapping so that for example, if I update a reference in the project the build is building, I can simply update the variable with the new location and have the repository mappings and scripts all pull correctly from the new location without having to make the change in multiple places.
I have tried doing this by setting up the variable and mapping as follows,
But this generates an error when you try to save the build complaining that there are two '$' characters in the mapping. Is there way to do this or is this not currently possible?
This has been causing me havok for quite a while as well.
For starters, there is a uservoice request for this feature. You can add your votes and input here to get Microsoft to allow this feature: https://visualstudio.uservoice.com/forums/330519-team-services/suggestions/14131002-allow-variables-in-repository-variables-and-trigg
Second, we've developed a workaround that gets us most of the way there. It's not perfect, but it might be useful to you if you're comfortable with the tradeoffs or can work around the deficiencies.
Start by turning off the "Label Sources" option of the build and mapping the Server Path field to you base build. You'll want to add a custom variable to the Build Definition to tell the build instance what TFS location to pull from. For example, we have a base project and then multiple branches from the project, so our source is structured like this
$\Team Project\Project1
$\Team Project\Project1Branch1
$\Team Project\Project1Branch2
$\Team Project\Project1Branch3
and we create a variable named "Branch" that we can set to "Branch1", "Branch2", and so forth.
When we want to build the base project, we leave the Branch variable blank when launching the build. For branch builds, we set it to the name of the branch we want to build.
Then our build steps look like this
Remap Workspace Folder to Branch Folder
Get Files for Specified Branch - We have to do this manually after
remapping our workspace
Compile the Source in the Specified Branch
Publish Build Artifacts from the Specified Branch
Label the Code of the Specified Branch Manually
The Remap task runs the command
tf workfold "$/Team Project/Project1$(Branch)" "$(build.sourcesDirectory)\$(Build.DefinitionName)$(Branch)"
The Manual Get task runs the following command
get /recursive /noprompt "$/Team Project/Project1$(Branch)"
The build uses the Branch variable to point to the correct location of the solution file for the specified branch
$(build.sourcesDirectory)\$(Build.DefinitionName)$(Branch)\SolutionFile.sln
The Publish Artifacts task uses the Branch variable in both the Contents field and the Path field
Example in Contents
**\$(Build.DefinitionName)$(Branch)\bin
The Label Code task uses the following command
tf label "$(build.buildNumber)" "$/Team Project/Project1$(Branch)" /recursive
The downside of this setup is that you don't capture Associated Changes and Work Items to your subsidiary branches as the Server Path field is always set to the main location. This may not be an issue if you always merge from your branches to your main location prior to launching a build meant to go to production. What you can do to compensate for this really depends on your use case.
With some tweaking, you could use this same format to specify full paths as well if you needed to.
It's impossible. Just as the error message mentioned: there are two '$' characters in the mapping. Which means your application's path shouldn't vary from build to build.
Mappings on the Repository page are used to specify source control
folder which contains projects that need to be built in the build
definition. You can set it via clicking the Ellipsis (...) button,
however, you can't include variables in the mapping path.
There is a similar question: Variables in TFS Mappings on Visual Studio Online Team Builds
So I am running into an issue when I go to build my projects using tfs build controller using the Output location "AsConfigred" it will not detect my unit tests. Let me give a little info on my setup.
TFS 2013 Update 2, Default Process Template
Here is a few screenshots that can hopefully help fill in what I can't in typing. I am copying my build out to a file share on our network so that we can use other utilities use the output. I don't want to use "PerProject" or "SingleFolder" because they mess up the file structure we have configured (These both will run the tests). So i have the files copy to folder names "SingleOutputFolder" which is a child of the DropLocation. I would like to be able to run from the drop folder or run from the bin folder for each of my tests (I don't care which). However it doesn't seem to detect/run ANY of the tests. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Please let me know if you need any additional information.
I have tried using ***test*.dll, Install\SingleFolderOutput**.test.dll, and $(TF_BUILD_DROPLOCATION)\Install\SingleFolderOutput*test*.dll
But I am not sure what variables are available and understand where the scope of its execution is.
Given that you're using Build Output location set to AsConfigured you have to change the default values of the Test sources spec setting to allow build to find the test libraries in the bin folders. Here's an example.
If the full path to the unit test libraries is:
E:\Builds\7\<TFS Team Project>\<Build Definition>\src\<Unit Test Project>\bin\Release\*test*.dll
use
..\src\*UnitTest*\bin\*\*test*.dll;
This question was asked on MSDN forums here.
MSDN Forums Suggested Workaround
The suggested workaround in the accepted answer (as of 8 a.m. on June 20) is to specify the full path to the test projects' binary folders: For example:
C:\Builds\{agentId}\{teamProjectName}\{buildDefinitionName}\src\{solutionName}\{testProjectName}\bin*\Debug\*test*.dll*
which really should have been shown as
{agentWorkingFolder}\src\{relativePathToTestProjectBinariesFolder}\*test*.dll
However this approach is very brittle, for the following reasons:
Any new test projects you add to the solution will not be executed until you add them to the build definition's list of test sources:
It will break under any of the following circumstances:
the build definition is renamed
the working folder in build agent properties is modified
you have multiple build agents, and a different agent than the one you specified in {id} runs the build
Improved Workaround
My workaround mitigates the issues listed in #2 (can't do anything about #1).
In the path specified above, replace the initial part:
{agentWorkingFolder}
with
..
so you have
..\src\{relativePathToTestProjectBinariesFolder}\*test*.dll
This works because the internal working directory is apparently the \binaries\ folder that is a sibling of the \src\ folder. Navigating up to the parent folder (whatever it is named, we don't care) and back in to \src\ before specifying the path to the test projects binaries does the trick.
Note: If you have multiple test projects, you add additional entries, separated with semicolons:
..\src\{relativePathToTestProjectONEBinariesFolder}\*test*.dll;..\src\{relativePathToTestProjectTWOBinariesFolder}\*test*.dll;..\src\{relativePathToTestProjectTHREEBinariesFolder}\*test*.dll;
What I ended up doing was adding a post build event to copy all of the test.dll into the staging location folder in the specific build that is basically equivalent to where it would go on a SingleFolder build and do that on each test project.
if "$(TeamBuildOutDir)" == "" (
echo "Building Interactively not in TFS"
) else (
echo "Building in TFS"
xcopy "$(TargetDir)*.*" "$(TeamBuildBinaries)\" /Y /E /S
)
MSBUILD parameter in the build def that told it to basically drop in the folder that TFS looks for them.
/p:TeamBuildBinaries="$(TF_BUILD_BINARIESDIRECTORY)"
Kept the default Test assembly file specification:
**\*test*.dll
View this link for the information on the variable that I used and what relative path it exists at.
Another solution is to do the reverse.
Leave all of the files in the root so that all of the built in functionality works. There is more than just test execution in there. What about static code analysis, impact analysis..among others. You would have to do something custom for them all.
Instead use a pre-drop powershell script to create your Install arrangement from the root files.
If it is an application then you can use the _ApplicationFolder Nuget package to create an _PublishApplications folder same as you get for web applications.
LLVM can create graphs in Graphviz's "dot" format, and automatically invoke a viewer to display them. By default it uses dotty to display those graphs. I know that I can change it to use a different viewer, but I was not able to find precise instructions on how to do so.
How can I make it open the graphs with a different viewer?
I'm running on Linux but would be interested in an answer for Windows as well.
I found out I'm supposed to change the CMakeCache.txt file in my build folder. For instance, to use XDot instead of dotty, I edited the LLVM_PATH_XDOT_P property in that file to point to the full path of my xdot.py file.
It now opens the alternative viewer successfully, after rebuilding the project.
I just needed to do this.
I managed to do this with a workaround: made a backup of dotty (just in case) and created a link from dotty to XDot.
cp /usr/bin/dotty /usr/bin/dotty_copy
ln -s /usr/bin/dotty /usr/bin/xdot
I believe you could also set some variable during configuration step (possibly LLVM_PATH_DOTTY), but I never tried this as I didn't want to recompile LLVM.
You may try hacking the DisplayGraph function or fidging with the makefiles until you manage to enable one of the #ifdefs in DisplayGraph.
I have a django project that I have been working on as a solo developer, and have been using TortoiseSVN to keep the code managed in a repository on a work server. I work on this on a local installation of django etc.
There is now a second person who will be working on this project, and the possibility of working on some other PCs.
Now, there should, for the time being, only be one development version (branch?) of this project, but the configuration file (settings.py) will need to be different on each computer that is being used. I want to create one local version of this file on each PC which should not need to be changed again.
How can I set the repository (preferably within TortoiseSVN) to exclude this one file? E.g. the repository should not include settings.py. When a checkout occurs, it should update all files in the local folder but not change/remove the local copy of settings.py. When a commit occurs, settings.py should be ignored and not uploaded.
At the moment settings.py is overwritten/updated as per any other file in the project folder/repository.
Any nudges in the right direction would be useful - I'm new to SVN generally and would like to know if this is something that's going to need detailed understanding of branching or if there is a simpler way.
Thanks
In TortoiseSVN, when you try to commit your files, in the file list dialog, right click the file and look for the Ignore option. You can ignore by complete filename or extension.
If the file is already in the repository, and you want to remove it from there and ignore it, you can simply right-click the file and in the TortoiseSVN menu look for the 'Delete and add to ignore list' option.
You'll be looking for the svn:ignore property, which tells subversion to not version files matching a pattern or patterns you specify.
There's some guidance on using it with TortoiseSVN at:
http://arcware.net/tortoisesvn-global-ignore-pattern-vs-svn-ignore/
These should help:
I have a file in my project that every developer must change, but I don't want those local mods to ever be committed. How can I make 'svn commit' ignore the file?
Excluding Items from the Commit List
The typical solution is to do what bgever said and ignore the settings file itself, and then commit a file with example values, something like settings.py.example. That file should only be updated when you add or remove settings. When deploying, you'd copy that to settings.py and edit the values.