Im building a prestashop catalog, but it needs to be visible to logged in customers only. Is this possible. It would be nice if the built in prestashop login is used for this.. any help is appreciated.
I have a suggestion. You can use the Customer Groups feature in PrestaShop 1.5 and only allow logged in customers to see the prices. For every Customer that is grouped in Visitor, they would see your website in Catalog Mode.
Prestashop 1.5 solution:
Simply upload the original file:
classes\controller\FrontController.php
into:
override/classes/controller/FrontController.php
Next, rename the class. Final code should look like this:
class FrontController extends FrontControllerCore
{
public function init()
{
parent::init();
if (!$this->context->customer->isLogged() && $this->php_self != 'authentication' && $this->php_self != 'password')
{
Tools::redirect('index.php?controller=authentication?back=my-account');
}
}
}
The last step is to manually delete the following file so prestashop is aware of the overriden class (It will be re-generated automatically):
cache/class_index.php
And voilà, functionality achieved without overwriting core files.
It'll be easy.
Use this code:
if(!self::$cookie->isLogged(true) AND in_array($this->step, array(1, 2, 3)))
Tools::redirect('authentication.php');
In the preprocess of your indexController
Here’s my solution, it works like a charm and is a very easy fix!
In classes\Configuration.php (around line 114) it looks like this
static public function get($key, $id_lang = NULL)
{
if ($id_lang AND isset(self::$_CONF_LANG[(int)$id_lang][$key]))
return self::$_CONF_LANG[(int)$id_lang][$key];
elseif (is_array(self::$_CONF) AND key_exists($key, self::$_CONF))
return self::$_CONF[$key];
return false;
}
change it to this:
static public function get($key, $id_lang = NULL)
{
//Grab access to the $cookie which is already loaded in the FrontController as global $cookie;
global $cookie;
if ($id_lang AND isset(self::$_CONF_LANG[(int)$id_lang][$key]))
return self::$_CONF_LANG[(int)$id_lang][$key];
elseif (is_array(self::$_CONF) AND key_exists($key, self::$_CONF))
//If the system is trying to find out if Catalog Mode is ON, then return the configuration setting,
//but override it with the user logon status
if($key == 'PS_CATALOG_MODE')
{
return !$cookie->logged || self::$_CONF[$key];
}
else
{
return self::$_CONF[$key];
}
return false;
}
Essentially, I wanted to force the system to display the “Catalog Mode” when the user is not logged in, and to turn this off when he is logged in.
I can guarantee this works for v1.4.3.0 and the code for the current version 1.4.8.2 (at the time of this post) has not changed, so it should work there.
Related
I want to be able to retrieve a certain conversation when its id is entered in the URL. If the conversation does not exist, I want to display an alert message with a record not found.
here is my model hook :
model: function(params){
return this.store.filter('conversation', { status : params.status}, function(rec){
if(params.status == 'all'){
return ((rec.get('status') === 'opened' || rec.get('status') === 'closed'));
}
else{
return (rec.get('status') === params.status); <--- Problem is here
}
});
}
For example, if I want to access a certain conversation directly, I could do :
dev.rails.local:3000/conversations/email.l#email.com#/convid
The problem is when I enter a conversation id which doesn't exist (like asdfasdf), ember makes call to an inexisting backend route.
It makes a call to GET conversation/asdfasdf. I'm about sure that it is only due to the record not existing. I have nested resources in my router so I'm also about sure that it tries to retrieve the conversation with a non existing id.
Basically, I want to verify the existence of the conversation before returning something from my hook. Keep in mind that my model hook is pretty much set and won't change, except for adding a validation on the existence of the conversation with the id in the url. The reason behind this is that the project is almost complete and everything is based on this hook.
Here is my router (some people are going to tell me you can't use nested resources, but I'm doing it and it is gonna stay like that so I have to work with it because I'm working on a project and I have to integrate ember in this section only and I have to use this setup) :
App.Router.map(function(){
// Routing list to raw namespace path
this.resource('conversations', { path : '/' }, function() {
this.resource('conversation', { path : '/:conversation_id'});
});
});
This also happens when I dont specify any id and I use the hashtag in my url like this :
dev.rails.local:3000/conversations/email.l#email.com#/ would make a call to conversation/
I know it is because of my nested resource. How can I do it?
By passing a query to filter (your { status : params.status}) you are asking Ember Data to do a server query. Try removing it.
From the docs at http://emberjs.com/api/data/classes/DS.Store.html#method_filter:
Optionally you can pass a query, which is the equivalent of calling find with that same query, to fetch additional records from the server. The results returned by the server could then appear in the filter if they match the filter function.
So, remove the query:
model: function(params){
return this.store.filter('conversation', function(rec) {
if (params.status == 'all') {
return rec.get('status') === 'opened' || rec.get('status') === 'closed';
} else {
return rec.get('status') === params.status;
}
});
}
Ok so here is what I did. I removed my nested resource because I realised I wasn't using it for any good reason other than redirecting my url. I decided to manually redirect my url using javascript window.location.
This removed the unwanted call (which was caused by the nested resource).
Thanks to torazaburo, you opened my eyes on many things.
If you customize an autoroute part you have the option to recreate the url on each save.
The help text under this option says:
"Automatically regenerate when editing content
This option will cause the Url to automatically be regenerated when you edit existing content and publish it again, otherwise it will always keep the old route, or you have to perform bulk update in the Autoroute admin."
I have digged all around but I cannot find anywhere an "Autoroute admin".
Is it really there?
It was a proposed feature never implemented?
Any idea to do a bulk update even without an Admin page?
Thanks
EDIT after #joshb suggestion...
I have tried to implement a bulk operation in my controller.
var MyContents = _contentManager.Query<MyContentPart, MyContentPartRecord>().List().ToList();
foreach (var MyContent in MyContents) {
var autoroutePart = recipe.ContentItem.As<AutoroutePart>();
autoroutePart.UseCustomPattern = false;
autoroutePart.DisplayAlias = _autorouteService.GenerateAlias(autoroutePart);
_contentManager.Publish(autoroutePart.ContentItem);
}
In this way it recreates all aliases for the types that contain the given part MyContentPart.
With some more work this code can be encapsulated in a command or in a new tab in Alias UI.
After finished the current project I'm doing I will try that...
You could create a module and implement a command that does a bulk update. Shouldn't be too much work if you're comfortable creating modules. You'll need to implement DefaultOrchardCommandHandler and inject IContentManager to get all the parts you're interested in.
Enable Alias UI in the modules section will give you the admin section for managing routes, however I'm not sure what kind of bulk updates it offers
Publishing the ContentItem will do nothing if it is already Published (as it was in my case).
Instead, one could call the PublishAlias method on the AutorouteService. I ended up with a Controller, something like this:
using Orchard;
using Orchard.Autoroute.Models;
using Orchard.Autoroute.Services;
using Orchard.ContentManagement;
using Orchard.Localization;
using Orchard.Security;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Web.Mvc;
namespace MyNamespace.MyModule.Controllers {
public class AutorouteBulkUpdateController : Controller {
private readonly IOrchardServices _orchardServices;
private readonly IAutorouteService _autorouteService;
private Localizer T { get; set; }
public AutorouteBulkUpdateController(IOrchardServices orchardServices, IAutorouteService autorouteService) {
_orchardServices = orchardServices;
_autorouteService = autorouteService;
T = NullLocalizer.Instance;
}
public ActionResult Index() {
if (!_orchardServices.Authorizer.Authorize(StandardPermissions.SiteOwner, T("Not authorized to manage settings"))) {
return new HttpUnauthorizedResult();
}
int count = 0;
IEnumerable<AutoroutePart> contents;
do {
//contents = _orchardServices.ContentManager.Query<AutoroutePart>(VersionOptions.Latest, new string[] { "Page" }).Slice(count * 100, 100).ToList();
contents = _orchardServices.ContentManager.Query<AutoroutePart>(VersionOptions.Latest).Slice(count * 100, 100).ToList();
foreach (var autoroutePart in contents) {
var alias = _autorouteService.GenerateAlias(autoroutePart);
if (autoroutePart.DisplayAlias != alias) {
autoroutePart.UseCustomPattern = false;
autoroutePart.DisplayAlias = alias;
_autorouteService.PublishAlias(autoroutePart);
}
}
_orchardServices.TransactionManager.RequireNew();
_orchardServices.ContentManager.Clear();
count += 1;
} while (contents.Any());
return null;
}
}
}
We just updated our project to use Glass.Mapper V3. We LOVE it. But we've encountered an issue. It doesn't seem to respect language fallback.
We have our site set up so that if a user picks a non-default language, they will see the item of that language if it exists. If not, they will see the default ("fallback") language version. We have also set this up at the field level, so that if there is a non-default version of an item but not all the fields are changed, any unchanged fields will fall back to the default language version's value for that field.
Is there anything we can do to enable Glass to use language fallback?
I am updating this with a bit of background on why we do the check. If you ask for a Sitecore item that doesn't exist you get a null value, so that is simple to handle. However if you ask for a Sitecore item that doesn't exist in that particular language returns an item with no versions. This means we have to do this check because otherwise Glass would end up returning empty class which I don't think makes much sense.
This answer will get a little experimental.
First in the the Spherical.cs file you need to disable the check:
protected void Application_BeginRequest()
{
Sitecore.Context.Items["Disable"] = new VersionCountDisabler();
}
We can then move the check to later on to the Object Construction pipeline. First create a task:
public class FallbackCheckTask : IObjectConstructionTask
{
public void Execute(ObjectConstructionArgs args)
{
if (args.Result == null)
{
var scContext = args.AbstractTypeCreationContext as SitecoreTypeCreationContext;
if (scContext.Item == null)
{
args.AbortPipeline();
return;
}
//this checks to see if the item was created by the fallback module
if (scContext.Item is Sitecore.Data.Managers.StubItem)
{
return;
}
// we could be trying to convert rendering parameters to a glass model, and if so, just return.
if (String.Compare(scContext.Item.Paths.FullPath, "[orphan]/renderingParameters", true) == 0)
{
return;
}
if (scContext.Item.Versions.Count == 0)
{
args.AbortPipeline();
return;
}
}
}
}
Then finally register this task in the GlassMapperScCustom class:
public static void CastleConfig(IWindsorContainer container){
var config = new Config();
container.Register(
Component.For<IObjectConstructionTask>().ImplementedBy<FallbackCheckTask>().LifestyleTransient()
);
container.Install(new SitecoreInstaller(config));
}
I haven't tested this but it should in theory work <- disclaimer ;-)
There are few potential issues with provided solution when sitecore 7 (7.2) + IoC + solr + mvc is used.
When using IoC ex Winsdor please make sure that your Global.asax looks like this one <%# Application Codebehind="Global.asax.cs" Inherits="Sitecore.ContentSearch.SolrProvider.CastleWindsorIntegration.WindsorApplication" Language="C#" %>. Once, by mistake this file has been changed to <%# Application Codebehind="Global.asax.cs" Inherits="Merck.Manuals.Web.Global" Language="C#" %> and language fallback was not working. Also the errors we were getting wasn't descriptive as we thought that solr schema is incorrect.
Code Sitecore.Context.Items["Disable"] = new VersionCountDisabler(); can be added to PreprocessRequestProcessor and it works fine which is better solution that modifying global.asax.
I am setting a custom session in the catalog/controller/checkout/cart.php controller. All it does, it checks if a value is set or not.
if (isset($this->request->post['no_tax']) && $this->request->post['no_tax'] == '1')
{
$this->session->data['no_tax'] = true;
}
elseif (isset($this->request->post['no_tax']) && $this->request->post['no_tax'] === '0')
{
unset($this->session->data['no_tax']);
}
I can then access this in the catalog/model/shipping/totalbased.php model file,
isset($this->session->data['no_tax'])
The problem is, I need to send additioanl information in the order to the admin, which is done in the catalog/model/checkout/order.php
I've done a check in there:
if(isset($this->session->data['no_tax']) )
{
//do something
}
$mail->send();
The do something, simply adds a PDF. The problem is, the PDF isn't attached.
In the error.txt, I get: 2012-05-14 14:42:11 - PHP Notice: Undefined index: no_tax in /var/www/vhosts/site.com/httpdocs/catalog/order.php
Can I access the session this way?
Thanks
The code looks fine from what I can see, and yes you can access the data like you've shown. The error you've had looks like you have tried to access the session data directly at some point without checking it's set, causing the notice
I installed and configured the Poll Module to work fine. The website I am working on will have a Poll instance on a page either as a left rail or a right rail item. The Polls would be setup in a separate folder. On the page item there will be a multilist field which will point to the Polls folder and the user can select whichever poll they choose to. The folder will also contain different sublayouts which will could be selected to be displayed on the rail. I have some custom code which will look at the above mentioned multilist field and show these rail items.
I don't know how to display a Poll programmatically. I haven't found any code samples and also not sure where to set the sublayout. Should I set it on the Poll template itself and then let use code to display it? How can I achieve this in code? Any code samples would be helpful.
Hoping that you will this time accept the answer, I wrote the following for you (based on the OMS Poll module:
Read out the field on your item:
Sitecore.Data.Fields.ReferenceField selectedPoll = (Sitecore.Data.Fields.ReferenceField)Sitecore.Context.Item.Fields["Poll"];
Get the pollItem:
if (selectedPoll.TargetItem != null)
{
Item pollItem = selectedPoll.TargetItem;
if (pollItem != null)
{
Check if the poll is opened or closed and place:
Sitecore.Data.Fields.CheckboxField pollClosed = (Sitecore.Data.Fields.CheckboxField)pollItem.Fields["Closed"];
if (pollClosed.Checked == false)
{
// Set the header of the snippetBlock
ltPollHeader.Text = pollItem.Name;
PollVotingSublayout pollSublayout = (PollVotingSublayout)LoadControl("/sitecore modules/Shell/Poll Module/Controls/PollVotingSublayout.ascx");
pollSublayout.Attributes.Add("sc_parameters", "PollPath=" + pollItem.Paths.FullPath);
pollSublayout.CurrentPoll = (PollItem)pollItem;
this.pollRegion.Controls.Add(pollSublayout);
phPollSnippet.Visible = true;
int blockPos = 0;
if (snippetField != null)
{
if (snippetField.GetItems().Any())
{
blockPos = 1;
}
}
string cssClass = String.Empty;
if (blockPos == 0)
{
cssClass = "snippetColHomeFirst";
}
this.SetClass("snippetColHome", cssClass);
}
Hope that you can make up something using this snippets. Good luck!
There should be a user account called "poll" on the sitecore domain. This account is normally used internal by the poll. In the comment of this account is stated: "Please do not remove this account". the account should have the Sitecore Minimal Page Editor role. I don't know the poll user credentials, but you might find that by either using reflector or opening cs files that you can get by downloading the source.