I am setting a custom session in the catalog/controller/checkout/cart.php controller. All it does, it checks if a value is set or not.
if (isset($this->request->post['no_tax']) && $this->request->post['no_tax'] == '1')
{
$this->session->data['no_tax'] = true;
}
elseif (isset($this->request->post['no_tax']) && $this->request->post['no_tax'] === '0')
{
unset($this->session->data['no_tax']);
}
I can then access this in the catalog/model/shipping/totalbased.php model file,
isset($this->session->data['no_tax'])
The problem is, I need to send additioanl information in the order to the admin, which is done in the catalog/model/checkout/order.php
I've done a check in there:
if(isset($this->session->data['no_tax']) )
{
//do something
}
$mail->send();
The do something, simply adds a PDF. The problem is, the PDF isn't attached.
In the error.txt, I get: 2012-05-14 14:42:11 - PHP Notice: Undefined index: no_tax in /var/www/vhosts/site.com/httpdocs/catalog/order.php
Can I access the session this way?
Thanks
The code looks fine from what I can see, and yes you can access the data like you've shown. The error you've had looks like you have tried to access the session data directly at some point without checking it's set, causing the notice
Related
var a = $v('P1995_LUMBER');
if ((a = '1')) {
apex.submit({
request: "CREATE",
set: {
LUMBER: "P1995_LUMBER",
LST_NME: "P1995_LST_NME",
FST_NME: "P1995_FST_NME",
},
});
} else if (a != '1') {
apex.submit({
request: "Update",
set: {
LUMBER: "P1995_LUMBER",
LST_NME: "P1995_LST_NME",
FST_NME: "P1995_FST_NME",
},
});
} else {
alert("bang bang");
}
Couple of things:
JavaScript's equality check is either == or === (more details here). (a = '1') assign '1' to the variable.
It seems like you're not using the apex.submit process correctly. Typically, you would set the item's value
e.g.:
apex.page.submit({
request: "SAVE",
set: {
"P1_DEPTNO": 10,
"P1_EMPNO": 5433
}
} );
Although, by looking at your JavaScript code, I would say you don't even need to use JavaScript.
Whenever you submit a page, all items on it are automatically sent to the server-side. You can then reference them using bind variables. You could then simply have two process, one for the Create and one for the Update, each having the corresponding insert/update statement using the different items on your page.
Usually what you will see is a page with two buttons for Create/Edit. They will have a server-side condition so that only the correct one is displayed.
Try creating a Form type page (form with report) using the wizard, and you'll see how everything is done.
Without seeing the page and the code you're using it's hard to tell what your issue really is, more details would be required.
That code does not have any sql in it so it is impossible to diagnose why you are encountering a TOO_MANY_ROWS exception. Run the page in debug mode and check the debug data - it should show you what statement is throwing the exception. If you need more help, post a proper reproducible case, not a single snipped of code without any context.
So I have a set of results in Postman from a runner on a collection using some data file for iterations - I have the stored data from the runner in the Postman app on Linux, but I want to know how I can get hold of the data. There seems to be a database hidden away in the ~/.config directory (/Desktop/file__0.indexeddb.leveldb) - that looks like it has the data from the results there.
Is there anyway that I can get hold of the raw data - I want to be able to save the results from the database and not faff around with running newman or hacking a server to post the results and then save, I already have 20000 results in a collection. I want to be able to get the responseData from each post and save it to a file - I will not execute the posts again, I need to just work out a way
I've tried KeyLord, FastNoSQL (this crashes), levelDBViewer(Jar), but not having any luck here.
Any suggestions?
inline 25024 of runner.js a simple yet hack for small numbers of results I can do the following
RunnerResultsRequestListItem = __WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_2_pure_render_decorator___default()(_class = class RunnerResultsRequestListItem extends __WEBPACK_IMPORTED_MODULE_0_react__["Component"] {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
var text = props.request.response.body,
blob = new Blob([text], { type: 'text/plain' }),
anchor = document.createElement('a');
anchor.download = props.request.ref + ".txt";
anchor.href = (window.webkitURL || window.URL).createObjectURL(blob);
anchor.dataset.downloadurl = ['text/plain', anchor.download, anchor.href].join(':');
anchor.click();
it allows me to save but obviously I have to click save for now, anyone know how to automate the saving part - please add something here!
I want to be able to retrieve a certain conversation when its id is entered in the URL. If the conversation does not exist, I want to display an alert message with a record not found.
here is my model hook :
model: function(params){
return this.store.filter('conversation', { status : params.status}, function(rec){
if(params.status == 'all'){
return ((rec.get('status') === 'opened' || rec.get('status') === 'closed'));
}
else{
return (rec.get('status') === params.status); <--- Problem is here
}
});
}
For example, if I want to access a certain conversation directly, I could do :
dev.rails.local:3000/conversations/email.l#email.com#/convid
The problem is when I enter a conversation id which doesn't exist (like asdfasdf), ember makes call to an inexisting backend route.
It makes a call to GET conversation/asdfasdf. I'm about sure that it is only due to the record not existing. I have nested resources in my router so I'm also about sure that it tries to retrieve the conversation with a non existing id.
Basically, I want to verify the existence of the conversation before returning something from my hook. Keep in mind that my model hook is pretty much set and won't change, except for adding a validation on the existence of the conversation with the id in the url. The reason behind this is that the project is almost complete and everything is based on this hook.
Here is my router (some people are going to tell me you can't use nested resources, but I'm doing it and it is gonna stay like that so I have to work with it because I'm working on a project and I have to integrate ember in this section only and I have to use this setup) :
App.Router.map(function(){
// Routing list to raw namespace path
this.resource('conversations', { path : '/' }, function() {
this.resource('conversation', { path : '/:conversation_id'});
});
});
This also happens when I dont specify any id and I use the hashtag in my url like this :
dev.rails.local:3000/conversations/email.l#email.com#/ would make a call to conversation/
I know it is because of my nested resource. How can I do it?
By passing a query to filter (your { status : params.status}) you are asking Ember Data to do a server query. Try removing it.
From the docs at http://emberjs.com/api/data/classes/DS.Store.html#method_filter:
Optionally you can pass a query, which is the equivalent of calling find with that same query, to fetch additional records from the server. The results returned by the server could then appear in the filter if they match the filter function.
So, remove the query:
model: function(params){
return this.store.filter('conversation', function(rec) {
if (params.status == 'all') {
return rec.get('status') === 'opened' || rec.get('status') === 'closed';
} else {
return rec.get('status') === params.status;
}
});
}
Ok so here is what I did. I removed my nested resource because I realised I wasn't using it for any good reason other than redirecting my url. I decided to manually redirect my url using javascript window.location.
This removed the unwanted call (which was caused by the nested resource).
Thanks to torazaburo, you opened my eyes on many things.
I have set a cookie that I want to use to populate a form, so that users don't need to keep filling out the same form (it's submitting an inquiry to owners of holiday villas).
I've got it working fine if the cookie is already set, but it errors out if there is no cookie set.
I'm guessing I'll need to use an "if" statement, but don't quite know how to write the code.
Here is the code that sets the cookie...
Response.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["ReqName"] = Request["BookingReqName"];
Response.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["ReqEmail"] = Request["BookingReqEmail"];
Response.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["ReqPhone"] = Request["BookingReqPhone"];
Response.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["NumAdults"] = Request["BookingNumAdults"];
Response.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["NumChildren"] = Request["BookingNumChildren"];
Response.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["ReqMessage"] = Request["BookingReqMessage"];
Response.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"].Expires = DateTime.Now.AddHours(4);
}
Here are the variables that collect info from the cookie...
var reqname = Request.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["ReqName"];
var reqemail = Request.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["ReqEmail"];
var reqphone = Request.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["ReqPhone"];
var numadults = Request.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["NumAdults"];
var numchildren = Request.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["NumChildren"];
var reqmessage = Request.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["ReqMessage"];
and here is a sample input from the form...
<label>Name</label>
<input type="text" name="BookingReqName" id="BookingReqName" placeholder="full name…" value="#reqname">
In WebMatrix C#.net, I think you are looking for something like this:
if(Request["BookingReqName"] != null)
{
Response.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["ReqName"] = Request["BookingReqName"];
}
else
{
Response.Cookies["BookingReqName"] = ""; //<--Whatever default value you want (I've used an empty string here, so you, at least, won't get a null reference error).
}
Or you can use the same code as a one liner (to not clutter up your code, however this will decrease readability, obv.).
if(Request["BookingReqName"] != null){Response.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"]["ReqName"] = Request["BookingReqName"];}else{Response.Cookies["BookingReqName"] = ""; //<--Whatever default value you want (I've used an empty string here, so you, at least, won't get a null reference error).}
You'll just have to do that for all of your lines requesting cookie values.
The point is, though, that anything can go in the "else" block that helps you handle what to do when the cookie values have been cleared/expired (which you must always expect). You could redirect to a page that requests information from the user to reset any "forgotten" configurations, or, if you want to persist the data no matter what, consider storing these values in a database, instead, as those values won't clear/expire.
One last thing, if this doesn't help:
If you find yourself wondering what value to store in the cookie (the default value you wish to specify), because you need to know, right then and there, what it was supposed to have remembered, then I am afraid it is time to reconsider how you have structured the flow of data.
Sorry, but I have done that, once upon a time, only with Session variables, and it wasn't pretty :)
If you need any help with the best way(s) to transfer data between web pages, check this very helpful, concise link from Mike Brind's website: http://www.mikesdotnetting.com/Article/192/Transferring-Data-Between-ASP.NET-Web-Pages
It should just be the following
if(Request.Cookies["BookingEnquiry"] == null)
{
return; // <- if BookingEnquiry is null we end this routine
}
// Normal code flow here...
or something similar
Im building a prestashop catalog, but it needs to be visible to logged in customers only. Is this possible. It would be nice if the built in prestashop login is used for this.. any help is appreciated.
I have a suggestion. You can use the Customer Groups feature in PrestaShop 1.5 and only allow logged in customers to see the prices. For every Customer that is grouped in Visitor, they would see your website in Catalog Mode.
Prestashop 1.5 solution:
Simply upload the original file:
classes\controller\FrontController.php
into:
override/classes/controller/FrontController.php
Next, rename the class. Final code should look like this:
class FrontController extends FrontControllerCore
{
public function init()
{
parent::init();
if (!$this->context->customer->isLogged() && $this->php_self != 'authentication' && $this->php_self != 'password')
{
Tools::redirect('index.php?controller=authentication?back=my-account');
}
}
}
The last step is to manually delete the following file so prestashop is aware of the overriden class (It will be re-generated automatically):
cache/class_index.php
And voilà, functionality achieved without overwriting core files.
It'll be easy.
Use this code:
if(!self::$cookie->isLogged(true) AND in_array($this->step, array(1, 2, 3)))
Tools::redirect('authentication.php');
In the preprocess of your indexController
Here’s my solution, it works like a charm and is a very easy fix!
In classes\Configuration.php (around line 114) it looks like this
static public function get($key, $id_lang = NULL)
{
if ($id_lang AND isset(self::$_CONF_LANG[(int)$id_lang][$key]))
return self::$_CONF_LANG[(int)$id_lang][$key];
elseif (is_array(self::$_CONF) AND key_exists($key, self::$_CONF))
return self::$_CONF[$key];
return false;
}
change it to this:
static public function get($key, $id_lang = NULL)
{
//Grab access to the $cookie which is already loaded in the FrontController as global $cookie;
global $cookie;
if ($id_lang AND isset(self::$_CONF_LANG[(int)$id_lang][$key]))
return self::$_CONF_LANG[(int)$id_lang][$key];
elseif (is_array(self::$_CONF) AND key_exists($key, self::$_CONF))
//If the system is trying to find out if Catalog Mode is ON, then return the configuration setting,
//but override it with the user logon status
if($key == 'PS_CATALOG_MODE')
{
return !$cookie->logged || self::$_CONF[$key];
}
else
{
return self::$_CONF[$key];
}
return false;
}
Essentially, I wanted to force the system to display the “Catalog Mode” when the user is not logged in, and to turn this off when he is logged in.
I can guarantee this works for v1.4.3.0 and the code for the current version 1.4.8.2 (at the time of this post) has not changed, so it should work there.