What are good options for accessing Webservices that are defined with WSDL from Groovy? I've looked at groovyws and while it appears to work ok for basic stuff I've run into issues with complex WSDL in the passed. It also appears to no longer be under active development. Are there any other good Groovy options for accessing webservices or should I just pick a Java API and call it through Groovy?
I'm currently using GroovyWS, and haven't found an alternative. If GroovyWS manages to parse the WSDL, it seems to work nicely enough. In the case where it wouldn't parse the WSDL, I switched service APIs completely.
Related
I am currently looking at redeveloping a web service that is currently written in .Net. I would like to port it across to Java using a CXF, Spring, Hibernate and Maven stack.
The WSDL for the service is already available and is well formed so I would like to reuse rather than redeveloping the interface. This will also mean that the clients will not require significant changes in order to use the new service.
I would like to use a JAX-WS type approach to developing the web service, similar to the Java-first approach at http://cxf.apache.org/docs/writing-a-service-with-spring.html. The only difference being that I would like to follow a contract-first approach and ensure that the exact WSDL is used.
Has anyone attempted this before? Are there any good guides online that I can refer to?
I am actually not seeing in your question what is stopping you from developing it with WSDL first approach.
Check my answer here, for the tutorials you need.
I guess its pretty straight forward (The WS stack part)
1.Create the Implementation stubs using WSDL (contract)
2.Create Client using WSDL
* implement methods using your own logic and syntax
both 1&2 is supported by CXF.
good guides here
and here
What is the reason why hitting, for example, http:///_vti_bin/UserGroup.asmx?wsdl gives me a not full wsdl specification (if compared with http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd965659%28v=office.12%29.aspx)?
What I mean about not full: it does not contain some of complex types definition, e.g. User (unlike the full one), so this types are no generated by the wsdl.exe.
I have a question in regard of this: is it safe to generate c# web service stub basing on specification from MSDN or this approach is dangerous due to possible changes in contract?
For your first question as to the WSDL not being the same: it really should be equivalent and contain all the types! Whenever you append /_vti_bin/UserGroup.asmx?wsdl to your site's URL, SharePoint should definitely display the FULL WSDL, including the complex type definitions, etc. I just tried it now against my own SharePoint instance and the WSDL returned from http:// mysite.com/ ...snip... /pierre/_vti_bin/UserGroup.asmx?wsdl is pretty much the same size as the one from http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd965659%28v=office.12%29.aspx and a quick check to make sure complex types are in both places confirm that.
To answer your second question: I think you should NOT create your Web Service stubs and skeletons based on the WSDL in the documentation. Instead use the WSDL returned from your site. If you're not getting all the complex types in the WSDL returned from SharePoint, you should fix that issue first.
First thing I would try: download SOAPui (free) and simply plugin the URL that ends with ?wsdl and create sample requests. Maybe you'll run into access issues (UAG or other) but at least you'll know that the WSDL is well formed. If SOAPui can generate the client code based on the WSDL, you can too (using wsdl2java or the wsdl2dotnet equivalent; I can't remember the name of the .net version).
And yes, it's dangerous to copy the WSDL from the docs but I'd be more worried about some things being abbreviated or documentation going stale, etc.
As for the contract changing, I'm using the UserGroup.asmx?wsdl endpoint since 2009 and it still works on newer versions of SharePoint (even after the upgrade to SP2010). And I'm using java as the client code. Microsoft really nailed the Web Services in SharePoint, it was surprisingly easy to integrate our java stack and make calls to/from the SharePoint web services. And it was also very inter-operable with the other tools we use to test Web Services like SOAPui, etc.
We have a wsdl for which we need to create a server implementation. In previous projects we used wsdl2java from Apache CXF, but now we want to keep it all in Groovy. Is there a way in which we can create a server implementation and keep it all in Groovy? Or are there any other ways we can achieve this?
The ultimate goal would be that we can hook this implementation into a Grails application that will serve as the server for clients.
Yes. You can either use the plugin or use cxf directly.
If you follow that tutorial, you can always use wsdl2java and just rename the generated files to be .groovy files and update the syntax to be more groovified. They will still work like normal. Also, as you may or may not know, you don't have to copy the jars directly to your lib directory as it says in the tutorial, you can just use normal Grails dependency management.
I think a better fit for you would be Groovy WS Lite. Spring-ws is also an option, it is a powerful library and reasonably well documented, since grails is spring at the end of day, this may integrate very well with grails. Shameless plug: This is web service integration testing tool I created which uses groovy and spring-ws. You can see the code to get a "working example".
It was very easy to use Apache CXF to develop a client for a SOAP web service. All I had to do was call wsdl2java and all the required classes were present. Is there such a client for lisp? If not, what can I do to write a soap client for lisp? The only restriction is that I don't have access to commercial implementations such as franz/lispworks or macs.
There's CL-SOAP which I tried earlier this year. The nice thing about it is that it can read a WSDL file and use that to generate the client proxy. I couldn't get it to work against my SOAP service, and gave up that attempt at some point (I used SBCL). CL-SOAP itself feels a little abandoned, with the last update dated 2005. It might work for you out of the box. If not, the code is straightforward and may do what you need with some modification.
CL-XML is said to have a "SOAP module", which I didn't try out.
The question appears to be asked periodically on comp.lang.lisp, with more-or-less similar answers. You may find more pointers there.
Allegro Common Lisp has both a SOAP server and a SOAP client. I've used both with success, and they're currently maintained and supported (unlike CL-SOAP).
My SOAP server easily handles a few hundred requests a second (from both Java and .NET clients), so I'm happy with the performance.
I am a novice in web services. I am totally new to testing web services.
A new project demands that I test the web services, and the customer is in favor of any open source tool.
What is the approach to testing web services?
Also Please suggest a tool(with minimal scripting) to test web services?
Check out SoapUI - one of the best web service test tools - plus it's free!!
They also have a "Pro" version which costs - you can do more stuff, like load testing etc., but the free version is quite good enough for most of your testing, I'd say!
Given a WSDL (online or stored as file), it'll create stubs for each method, which you can then use to create requests (as XML), fill in the blanks (the parameter values), and then you can send off your request to the web service and see what comes back as a response.
SoapUI also allows you to write scripted tests than can be run over and over again.
Excellent tool - can't praise it enough!
Marc
Additionally you could use Firefox Poster in order to test your web service by passing XML-packets manually.
Check it here:
FF Poster
SoapUI is a great tool to test SOAP webservices. It allows you to test a SOAP client or a SOAP server.
Another very useful tool is Fiddler. Fiddler isn't necessarily aimed at testing webservices (it's a HTTP debugger), but since SOAP webservices run over HTTP, you can use it to testing. Another very important advantage of using Fiddler is the fact that you can test REST webservices also.
You might want to consider robot framework. It is a generic, keyword-driven testing framework. There are libraries for testing REST and SOAP based web services. It can also be used to test web pages (via a selenium library), databases, and a whole lot more.
robotframework has a ton of built-in keywords, and there are additional libraries that do much more. You are also able to develop your own keywords in python, java, .NET languages, or any other language.