On OSX 10.6.4 with i686-apple-darwin10-g++-4.2.1 compiling using TextMate and a Makefile which in the first place has been made für a Linux and I am trying to translate for OSX.
When compiling a c++ project I get the "can't link with a main executable" error:
g++ -Wall -g -I ~/svnX-Repository/axp-Projekte/xrlfupa/trunk/src/ -I ~/svnX-Repository/boost_1_44_0 -I /opt/local/var/macports/software/boost/1.44.0_0/opt/local/lib/ -I /opt/local/var/macports/software/gsl/1.14_0/opt/local/include/ -o xrfLibTest xrfLibTest.o excitFunctions.o xrfFunctions.o filterFunctions.o detectorFunctions.o -L/opt/local/var/macports/software/boost/1.44.0_0/opt/local/lib/ -L/opt/local/var/macports/software/gsl/1.14_0/opt/local/lib/ -lm -lxrlTUB -lboost_serialization -lgsl -lgslcblas # Debug 1
ld: in /usr/local/lib/libxrlTUB.so, can't link with a main executable
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [prog] Error 1
The library that is mentioned (libxrlTUB.so) is in its place (/usr/local/lib/libxrlTUB.so) but, possibly that is where the problem came from, the libxrlTUB.so has been compiled by myself beforehand as well.
The compile process went through, it was generated by swig, though there was a warning:
g++ -arch x86_64 -m32 -g -fpic -I /usr/include/python2.6 -c PyXrl_wrap.cxx
In function 'void SWIG_Python_AddErrorMsg(const char*)':
warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments
which, as far as I could find out, shouldnt be a problem. (Or is it?)
Unfortunately this whole thing is part of a project from the university. Actually I am supposed to write an X-ray-analysis script in python, which would be fine, if... well if I wouldn't be expected to use the librarys that are meant to result from this c++ project.
(Afterwards they should be used via import in python.)
I am not really experienced with c++, neither with compiling on OSX systems. So far I have been bothering with scipting (python, bash, etc). So Maybe I am just missing something simple. Hopefully someone can give me an hint where I can continue reading in order to deal with the above "can't link with a main executable" error...
Thanx in advance,
Liam
The error message is telling you the problem—it is that /usr/local/lib/libxrlTUB.so is not a shared library; it's an executable. You can't link against an executable. Probably whatever build process you used for libxrlTUB.so didn't understand how to build shared libraries on the Mac (it's more suspect because .dylib is the correct extension to use.)
Take a look at Apple's documentation on compiling dynamic libraries. You can use file to make sure your output is of the correct type, for example:
% gcc -c foo.c
% gcc -dynamiclib foo.o -o foo.dylib
% file foo.dylib
foo.dylib: Mach-O 64-bit dynamically linked shared library x86_64
Without -dynamiclib you end up with an executable, which may be the problem you've run into.
Related
I am trying to compile for a gd32v chip using gcc(the riscv version on the arch community repo).
Compiling seems to work fine, however when trying to link the objects into an elf file, I get the error:
Linking ELF target: main.elf
riscv64-linux-gnu-g++ #_linker_flags -o main.elf ../../bmptk-RISC-V/targets/risc_v/gd32v/gd32vf103xb_boot.o hwlib.o main.o ../../bmptk-RISC-V/targets/risc_v/GD32VF103_standard_peripheral/Source/gd32vf103_rcu.o ../../bmptk-RISC-V/targets/risc_v/GD32VF103_standard_peripheral/Source/gd32vf103_gpio.o ../../bmptk-RISC-V/targets/risc_v/GD32VF103_standard_peripheral/system_gd32vf103.o bmptk_heap_none.o bmptk_fixed_size_stack.o -Os -Tmain.ld
/usr/lib/gcc/riscv64-linux-gnu/10.2.0/../../../../riscv64-linux-gnu/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/riscv64-linux-gnu/10.2.0/../../../../riscv64-linux-gnu/lib/libstdc++.so: error adding symbols: file in wrong format
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [../../bmptk-RISC-V/Makefile.inc:1498: main.elf] Error 1
In this make rule, I am using a file '_linker_flags' for my linker flags, to keep the terminal clean during compilation. The contents of this file are as follows:
-march=rv32imac -mabi=ilp32 -Os -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections -I../../bmptk-RISC-V/targets/risc_v/ -I../../bmptk-RISC-V/targets/risc_v/GD32VF103_standard_peripheral -I../../bmptk-RISC-V/targets/risc_v/GD32VF103_standard_peripheral/Include -I../../bmptk-RISC-V/targets/risc_v/RISCV/drivers -I../../bmptk-RISC-V/targets/risc_v -I/usr/include -I/usr/include -I../../hwlib-RISC-V/library -I../../Catch2/single_include -I../../Catch2/single_include/catch2 -I../../boost_1_69_0 -I../../bmptk-RISC-V -I../../bmptk-RISC-V/targets -I../../bmptk-RISC-V/targets/risc_v -I../../bmptk-RISC-V/targets/risc_v/RISCV -I../../bmptk-RISC-V/targets/risc_v/RISCV/drivers -DHWCPP_FAKE_OSTREAM -DBMPTK_TARGET=gd32vf103v -DBMPTK_TARGET_gd32vf103v -DHWLIB_TARGET_gd32vf103v -DHWCPP_TARGET_gd32vf103v -DGF_TARGET_gd32vf103v -DBMPTK_CHIP=gd32vf103v -DBMPTK_CHIP_gd32vf103v -DBMPTK_XTAL= -DBMPTK_BAUDRATE=38400 -DHWLIB_BAUDRATE=38400 -DGODAFOSS_BAUDRATE=38400 -DGF_BAUDRATE=38400 -DBMPTK_VERSION=V04_00_work_in_progress_2020_05_23 -DBMPTK_EMBEDDED -lgcc -Wl,-Map,main.map -Wl,--gc-sections -Wl,-fatal-warnings
I'm not familiar with this error, does anyone know what I would have to look into to fix this?
EDIT:
I asked a teacher at school and they told me that the problem most likely arised from using a mismatching linker and compiler, or that some object files weren't cleaned when calling make. I made sure all objects were deleted before compiling and made sure the compiler and linker were the same.
They should be the same. I am running riscv64-linux-gnu-ld version 2.35 and riscv64-linux-gnu-g++ version 10.2.0. Both are from the arch community repository.
To see exactly the mapping/switches of the libraries supported by your compiler you can use : riscv64-linux-gnu-g++ -print-multi-lib. If you compiler was compiled with multilib enabled you can choose an rv32 libs without hard float otherwise it will not link also since you are compiler for rv32imac.
If your compiler was build without the multlib option you have two option:
Compile with -nostdlib and provide the needed file to the linker crt, libc libgcc ... or you can get a compiler which was build with multilib enabled.
UPDATE
I've sorted this by explicitly adding the appropriate -I and -L options, but I'm curious as to why this is necessary now when it wasn't before? On the plus side those annoying library out-of-sync warnings are gone.
UPDATE ENDS
I've broken my OSX OpenGL build environment. I'm building from terminal (using make) with g++, for example:
g++ -o myprog main.o -lglfw -lglew -framework OpenGL
and getting errors:
ld: library not found for -lglfw clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
These are in addition to compiler errors such as:
g++ -c main.cpp main.cpp:3:10: fatal error: 'GL/glew.h' file not found
So it seems the OpenGL libraries and includes have been lost. Everything was working fine until I executed the command:
export SDKROOT="$(xcode-select -p)/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk"
Which I did to try and fix warning messages like:
ld: warning: text-based stub file /System/Library/Frameworks//OpenGL.framework/OpenGL.tbd and library file /System/Library/Frameworks//OpenGL.framework/OpenGL are out of sync. Falling back to library file for linking.
I got that 'fix' from here: macOS framework lib problem
I realise it was reckless running commands that I don't fully understand but nonetheless... now I can't compile/link any OpenGL code and after scouring the internet for help I've come up with nothing, so here I am.
I'm running OSX 10.13.6 on a 2013 MacBook Pro.
First post BTW so please forgive me if I've not provided enough detail.
I am using the command:
g++ --std=c++11 -fPIC -Iincludes parser.cpp lib/main-parser.o lib/lib.a
To compile a C++ program on Debian 9. But I am getting the below error message:
/usr/bin/ld: lib/lib.a(csdocument.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against '.rodata' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
I have already seen the thread:
Compilation fails with "relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.8' can not be used when making a shared object"
However, I have tried adding the -fPIC argument however it strangely gives the same error message, along with "recompile with -fPIC"
Any ideas would be appreciated. I have tried compiling this on my University's RedHat systems and it works fine there. I'm thinking it could be a missing dependency, but I've been unable to find any answers.
Thanks in advance
As it seems gcc is trying to produce a position-independent executable ("shared object" is the hint), tell it not to:
g++ --std=c++11 -no-pie -Iincludes parser.cpp lib/main-parser.o lib/lib.a
It seems that g++ produces position-independent executables by default on your system. Other systems would require -pie to do so. Using -no-pie should create a "regular" (position dependent) executable.
(The error is a result of trying to link an object file that was compiled as non-position-independent into an executable that is supposed to be position-independent).
/usr/bin/ld: lib/lib.a(csdocument.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against '.rodata' \
can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
This linker error is telling you that the object file csdocument.o in the
static library lib/lib.a is not Position Independent Code and hence
cannot be linked with your PIE program. So you need to recompile the source
files of lib/lib.a with -fPIC, then rebuild the static library, then link
it with your PIE program. If you don't have control of the libary sources
then request a PIC build from its supplier.
(Others have questioned why you should need to build a PIE target at all
since it's not a shared library. In Debian 9, GCC produces PIE executables
by default,
whether programs or shared libraries. The same goes for Ubuntu as of 17.04. )
Adding this worked for me.
g++ --std=c++11 -no-pie
I also added the -fPIC to compile flag.
Good Day Everyone,
N.B - This problem has been solved - I have provided my own solution in the answer section however the solution provided by Jonathan is much shorter. Nevertheless, this was the following question I originally posted:
I am basically trying to compile a serial library (for UART communication) on Linux however I am not really sure how to correctly compile (I have mentioned what I have done so far below), any suggestions would be highly valuable. I am using the serialib library - which is composed of 2 main files (serialib.h and serialib.cpp) , you may directly view the source code of these files here (scroll all the way to the bottom and view the files in new tabs): http://serialib.free.fr/html/classserialib.html
I transferred these files (serialib.h and serialib.cpp) to my BeagleBone Black micro-controller which is running Debian (Wheezy) , g++/gcc (Debian 4.6.3-14) 4.6.3. I wrote my own program (uart.cpp is my file name) to access the functions provided by this library, this is what I wrote:
#include <iostream>
#include "serialib.h"
#ifdef __linux__
#define DEVICE_PORT "/dev/ttyO1"
#endif
int main()
{
serialib LS;
return 0;
}
So as you can see I am trying to access the 'seriallib' class. serialib.h, serialib.cpp and uart.cpp are all in the home directory. I also manually added the iostream library in serialib.cpp as I did not see it being declared in the original source code.
Now I am really unsure of how to compile such external libraries but so far I tried the following steps:
g++ -c -Wall -Werror -fPIC serialib.c to convert to PIC which gives the following error:
distcc[3142] (dcc_parse_hosts) Warning: /home/debian/.distcc/zeroconf/hosts contained no hosts; can't distribute work
distcc[3142] (dcc_zeroconf_add_hosts) CRITICAL! failed to parse host file.
distcc[3142] (dcc_build_somewhere) Warning: failed to distribute, running locally instead
g++ serialib.cpp -L /home/debian/serialib.h which gives the following error:
/usr/lib/gcc/arm-linux-gnueabihf/4.6/../../../arm-linux-gnueabihf/crt1.o: In function _start':
(.text+0x30): undefined reference tomain'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
distcc[3210] ERROR: compile serialib.cpp on localhost failed
As of now I am still finding out how to compile this and if I manage to work this out then I'll post my solution here too. Once again any suggestion will be highly valuable. Thank you all :) .
g++ -c -Wall -Werror -fPIC serialib.c to convert to PIC which gives the following error:
The "error" is not an error, it's a warning, telling you that your distcc setup is broken, but that it compiled locally.
That command doesn't "convert to PIC", it compiles the file serialib.c and produces a compiled object file, serialib.o
g++ serialib.cpp -L /home/debian/serialib.h
This is just nonsense. It tries to build a program from serialib.cpp and use the directory /home/debian/serialib.h (which isn't a directory!) to find libraries.
You don't need to "compile a library" you can just compile both the source files and link them together into a program. Either:
g++ -c serialib.cpp
g++ -c uart.cpp
g++ serialib.o uart.o -o uart
Or all in one command:
g++ serialib.cpp uart.cpp -o uart
You should read An Introduction to GCC to understand the commands, not just enter bogus commands without understanding them.
I have found a solution to this problem, hope this helps for all the future readers with similar problems. I have my own source code uart.cpp (Given in the question) which I want to compile, the external library is serialib that contains two main files (serialib.h and serialib.cpp), you will want to replace the following commands with respect to the files you have
Step 1: Compiling with position independent code
g++ -c -Wall -Werror -fpic serialib.cpp
Step 2: Creating a shared library
g++ -shared -o libserialib.so serialib.o , here the library is libserialib.so.
Step 3: Linking your source code with library
g++ -L /home/debian -lserialib uart.cpp -o uart
g++ -L /home/debian -Wall -o test uart.cpp -lserialib
You may save the library at a different path and you may have a different name of course. Suppose you have a library called libabc.so at the directory /home/user/myDir then the commands will be like:
g++ -L /home/user/myDir -labc your_code.cpp -o your_code
g++ -L /home/user/myDir -Wall -o test your_code.cpp -labc
test is out own program, lserialib is actually looking for libserialib.so and not serialib.o as gcc/g++ assumes all libraries start with lib and end with .so or .a and you can see the same goes for labc as it will look for libabc.so thus it is important to make sure your library name begins with lib and ends with .so or .a
Step 4: Making library available at run time
Here we provide the path where the library is actually stored, I saved it in the directory /home/debian which is why my command looks like:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/debian:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
if your library is saved at /path/to/file then the command will look like:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/file:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
This is to help the loader find the shared library and to view this path: echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH and to unset this: unset LD_LIBRARY_PATH
To execute the program type either ./test or ./uart and in case of any modification to the main source code (uart.cpp in this case) , simply repeat step 3. I found the following link very useful: http://www.cprogramming.com/tutorial/shared-libraries-linux-gcc.html . Thank you to all of you who took time to read this question and especially those who gave me suggestions. If anyone has more or better solutions, feel free to post them here to assist future readers :).
I have some basic questions regarding linking against a C/C++ library. I am trying to understand the difference in using the two different usages -L/usr/local/lib -lm usage and /usr/local/lib/libm.a usage. E.g., when I compile and link an example from the [SUNDIALS] library, both of the following work
gcc -Wall cvRoberts_dns.c -o cvRoberts_dns.exe -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib/ -lsundials_cvode -lsundials_nvecserial -lm
OR
gcc -Wall cvRoberts_dns.c -o cvRoberts_dns.exe /usr/local/lib/libsundials_cvode.a /usr/local/lib/libsundials_nvecserial.a
However, to compile and link an example from the library [libsbml], the following works
g++ -Wall readSBML.cpp -o readSBML.exe -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib -lsbml
but the this does not
g++ -Wall readSBML.cpp -o readSBML.exe /usr/local/lib/libsbml.a
If required, I can post the complete error message I get, but the last line of the message is as follows
ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
My questions are as follows:
In the second style of linking (of the first example), there is no information regarding where to find the include files (header files), how does the compiler know the information supplied in -I/usr/local/include which is provided in the first style of the first example?
In the second style of first example there is no /usr/local/lib/libm.a (it actually gives an error message that libm.a cannot be found if I try to include it), then why -lm is required in the first style?
How do I compile the second example in the second style (i.e., using /usr/local/lib/libsbml.a)? I do see that there are files - libsbml.a and libsbml-static.a in the /usr/local/lib folder, but none of them work.
If it helps, I am on an OS X machine.
I would be very thankful if any one could help in this regard.
Just an update - I tried
g++ -Wall readSBML.cpp -o readSBML.exe /usr/local/lib/libsbml.5.dylib
and that compiled and linked just fine.
Thanks
SN
In general
The -L option is meant to find where the libraries themselves are. Each library is a collection of one or more object code (machine language) files. There is no need to find the include files.
The -I option has nothing to with linker, it helps the compiler resolve the header files used in your driver programme( eg Roberts_dns.c). This happens during the pre-processing stage.
In the second style of linking (of the first example), there is no
information regarding where to find the include files (header files),..
If the compilation worked as you expected,it may be because /usr/local/include is in the default include path for gcc. To check the default include path for gcc do gcc -xc -E -v -.
In the second style of first example there is no
/usr/local/lib/libm.a(it actually gives an error message that libm.a
cannot be found if I try to include it), then why -lm is required in
the first style?
In Linux, some libraries like libc.a are directly linked to your execultable by default while libm.a is not. In Mac (your environment), though, libm is directly link to the executable by default. So you don't have to explicitly link it. It is less likely that libm.a is located in /usr/local/lib/. So you got an error. But why link it in the first place?