Appending a vector to a vector [duplicate] - c++

This question already has answers here:
Concatenating two std::vectors
(27 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
Assuming I have 2 standard vectors:
vector<int> a;
vector<int> b;
Let's also say the both have around 30 elements.
How do I add the vector b to the end of vector a?
The dirty way would be iterating through b and adding each element via vector<int>::push_back(), though I wouldn't like to do that!

a.insert(a.end(), b.begin(), b.end());
or
a.insert(std::end(a), std::begin(b), std::end(b));
The second variant is a more generically applicable solution, as b could also be an array. However, it requires C++11. If you want to work with user-defined types, use ADL:
using std::begin, std::end;
a.insert(end(a), begin(b), end(b));

std::copy (b.begin(), b.end(), std::back_inserter(a));
This can be used in case the items in vector a have no assignment operator (e.g. const member).
In all other cases this solution is ineffiecent compared to the above insert solution.

While saying "the compiler can reserve", why rely on it? And what about automatic detection of move semantics? And what about all that repeating of the container name with the begins and ends?
Wouldn't you want something, you know, simpler?
(Scroll down to main for the punchline)
#include <type_traits>
#include <vector>
#include <iterator>
#include <iostream>
template<typename C,typename=void> struct can_reserve: std::false_type {};
template<typename T, typename A>
struct can_reserve<std::vector<T,A>,void>:
std::true_type
{};
template<int n> struct secret_enum { enum class type {}; };
template<int n>
using SecretEnum = typename secret_enum<n>::type;
template<bool b, int override_num=1>
using EnableFuncIf = typename std::enable_if< b, SecretEnum<override_num> >::type;
template<bool b, int override_num=1>
using DisableFuncIf = EnableFuncIf< !b, -override_num >;
template<typename C, EnableFuncIf< can_reserve<C>::value >... >
void try_reserve( C& c, std::size_t n ) {
c.reserve(n);
}
template<typename C, DisableFuncIf< can_reserve<C>::value >... >
void try_reserve( C& c, std::size_t ) { } // do nothing
template<typename C,typename=void>
struct has_size_method:std::false_type {};
template<typename C>
struct has_size_method<C, typename std::enable_if<std::is_same<
decltype( std::declval<C>().size() ),
decltype( std::declval<C>().size() )
>::value>::type>:std::true_type {};
namespace adl_aux {
using std::begin; using std::end;
template<typename C>
auto adl_begin(C&&c)->decltype( begin(std::forward<C>(c)) );
template<typename C>
auto adl_end(C&&c)->decltype( end(std::forward<C>(c)) );
}
template<typename C>
struct iterable_traits {
typedef decltype( adl_aux::adl_begin(std::declval<C&>()) ) iterator;
typedef decltype( adl_aux::adl_begin(std::declval<C const&>()) ) const_iterator;
};
template<typename C> using Iterator = typename iterable_traits<C>::iterator;
template<typename C> using ConstIterator = typename iterable_traits<C>::const_iterator;
template<typename I> using IteratorCategory = typename std::iterator_traits<I>::iterator_category;
template<typename C, EnableFuncIf< has_size_method<C>::value, 1>... >
std::size_t size_at_least( C&& c ) {
return c.size();
}
template<typename C, EnableFuncIf< !has_size_method<C>::value &&
std::is_base_of< std::random_access_iterator_tag, IteratorCategory<Iterator<C>> >::value, 2>... >
std::size_t size_at_least( C&& c ) {
using std::begin; using std::end;
return end(c)-begin(c);
};
template<typename C, EnableFuncIf< !has_size_method<C>::value &&
!std::is_base_of< std::random_access_iterator_tag, IteratorCategory<Iterator<C>> >::value, 3>... >
std::size_t size_at_least( C&& c ) {
return 0;
};
template < typename It >
auto try_make_move_iterator(It i, std::true_type)
-> decltype(make_move_iterator(i))
{
return make_move_iterator(i);
}
template < typename It >
It try_make_move_iterator(It i, ...)
{
return i;
}
#include <iostream>
template<typename C1, typename C2>
C1&& append_containers( C1&& c1, C2&& c2 )
{
using std::begin; using std::end;
try_reserve( c1, size_at_least(c1) + size_at_least(c2) );
using is_rvref = std::is_rvalue_reference<C2&&>;
c1.insert( end(c1),
try_make_move_iterator(begin(c2), is_rvref{}),
try_make_move_iterator(end(c2), is_rvref{}) );
return std::forward<C1>(c1);
}
struct append_infix_op {} append;
template<typename LHS>
struct append_on_right_op {
LHS lhs;
template<typename RHS>
LHS&& operator=( RHS&& rhs ) {
return append_containers( std::forward<LHS>(lhs), std::forward<RHS>(rhs) );
}
};
template<typename LHS>
append_on_right_op<LHS> operator+( LHS&& lhs, append_infix_op ) {
return { std::forward<LHS>(lhs) };
}
template<typename LHS,typename RHS>
typename std::remove_reference<LHS>::type operator+( append_on_right_op<LHS>&& lhs, RHS&& rhs ) {
typename std::decay<LHS>::type retval = std::forward<LHS>(lhs.lhs);
return append_containers( std::move(retval), std::forward<RHS>(rhs) );
}
template<typename C>
void print_container( C&& c ) {
for( auto&& x:c )
std::cout << x << ",";
std::cout << "\n";
};
int main() {
std::vector<int> a = {0,1,2};
std::vector<int> b = {3,4,5};
print_container(a);
print_container(b);
a +append= b;
const int arr[] = {6,7,8};
a +append= arr;
print_container(a);
print_container(b);
std::vector<double> d = ( std::vector<double>{-3.14, -2, -1} +append= a );
print_container(d);
std::vector<double> c = std::move(d) +append+ a;
print_container(c);
print_container(d);
std::vector<double> e = c +append+ std::move(a);
print_container(e);
print_container(a);
}
hehe.
Now with move-data-from-rhs, append-array-to-container, append forward_list-to-container, move-container-from-lhs, thanks to #DyP's help.
Note that the above does not compile in clang thanks to the EnableFunctionIf<>... technique. In clang this workaround works.

If you would like to add vector to itself both popular solutions will fail:
std::vector<std::string> v, orig;
orig.push_back("first");
orig.push_back("second");
// BAD:
v = orig;
v.insert(v.end(), v.begin(), v.end());
// Now v contains: { "first", "second", "", "" }
// BAD:
v = orig;
std::copy(v.begin(), v.end(), std::back_inserter(v));
// std::bad_alloc exception is generated
// GOOD, but I can't guarantee it will work with any STL:
v = orig;
v.reserve(v.size()*2);
v.insert(v.end(), v.begin(), v.end());
// Now v contains: { "first", "second", "first", "second" }
// GOOD, but I can't guarantee it will work with any STL:
v = orig;
v.reserve(v.size()*2);
std::copy(v.begin(), v.end(), std::back_inserter(v));
// Now v contains: { "first", "second", "first", "second" }
// GOOD (best):
v = orig;
v.insert(v.end(), orig.begin(), orig.end()); // note: we use different vectors here
// Now v contains: { "first", "second", "first", "second" }

Related

Dispatching r-values and l-values differently and using sfinae to disable one option

I would like to implement a function drop_if. Given a unary predicate and a sequential container, it returns a container of the same type holding only the elements from the original one not fulfilling the predicate.
If the input container is an r-value it should work in-place otherwise create a copy. This is achieved by dispatching to the appropriate version in namespace internal. The r-value version should be disabled if the value_type of the container can not be overwritten - like std::pair<const int, int> for example - even if the container is an r-value.
The following code works as expected with clang and current versions of gcc (>=6.3).
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <iterator>
#include <type_traits>
#include <utility>
#include <vector>
namespace internal
{
template <typename Pred, typename Container,
typename = typename std::enable_if<
std::is_assignable<
typename Container::value_type&,
typename Container::value_type>::value>::type>
Container drop_if( Pred pred, Container&& xs )
{
std::cout << "r-value" << std::endl;
xs.erase( std::remove_if( std::begin( xs ), std::end( xs ), pred ), std::end( xs ) );
return std::move( xs );
}
template <typename Pred, typename Container>
Container drop_if( Pred pred, const Container& xs )
{
std::cout << "l-value" << std::endl;
Container result;
auto it = std::back_inserter( result );
std::remove_copy_if( std::begin( xs ), std::end( xs ), it, pred );
return result;
}
} // namespace internal
template <typename Pred, typename Container,
typename Out = typename std::remove_reference<Container>::type>
Out drop_if( Pred pred, Container&& xs )
{
return std::move( internal::drop_if( pred, std::forward<decltype(xs)>( xs ) ) );
}
typedef std::pair<int, int> pair_t;
typedef std::vector<pair_t> vec_t;
bool sum_is_even( pair_t p )
{
return (p.first + p.second) % 2 == 0;
}
typedef std::pair<const int, int> pair_c_t;
typedef std::vector<pair_c_t> vec_c_t;
bool sum_is_even_c( pair_c_t p)
{
return (p.first + p.second) % 2 == 0;
}
int main()
{
vec_c_t v_c;
drop_if( sum_is_even_c, v_c ); // l-value
drop_if( sum_is_even_c, vec_c_t() ); // l-value
vec_t v;
drop_if( sum_is_even, v ); // l-value
drop_if( sum_is_even, vec_t() ); // r-value
}
However it does not compile on MSVC++ and GCC 6.2, because they behave incorrectly for std::is_assignable:
using T = std::pair<const int, int>;
const auto ok = std::is_assignable<T&, T>::value;
// ok == true on GCC 6.2 and MSVC++
See answer to this question and Library Defect Report 2729.
I would like it to work with different containers and with different kinds of objects, e.g. std::vector<double>, std::map<int, std::string> etc. The std::map case (using a different inserter) is the situation in which I encountered the problem with value_types of std::pair<const T, U>.
Do you have any ideas how the dispatch / sfinae could be changed to also work for MSVC++ (ver. MSVC++ 2017 15.2 26430.6 in my case) and for GCC 6.2 downwards?
The problem appears to be that MSVC's std::pair<const T, U>::operator= is not SFINAE disabled. It exists even if instantiating it does not work.
So when you detect if it exists, it exists. If you execute it, it fails to compile.
We can work around this. But it is a workaround.
namespace internal
{
template <typename Pred, typename Container>
Container drop_if( std::true_type reuse_container, Pred pred, Container&& xs )
{
std::cout << "r-value" << std::endl;
xs.erase( std::remove_if( std::begin( xs ), std::end( xs ), pred ), std::end( xs ) );
return std::forward<Container>( xs );
}
template <typename Pred, typename Container>
Container drop_if( std::false_type reuse_container, Pred pred, const Container& xs )
{
std::cout << "l-value" << std::endl;
Container result;
auto it = std::back_inserter( result );
std::remove_copy_if( std::begin( xs ), std::end( xs ), it, pred );
return result;
}
} // namespace internal
template<bool b>
using bool_k = std::integral_constant<bool, b>;
template<class T>
struct can_self_assign {
using type = std::is_assignable<T&, T>;
};
template<class T>
using can_self_assign_t = typename can_self_assign<T>::type;
template<class T0, class T1>
struct can_self_assign<std::pair<T0, T1>>
{
enum { t0 = can_self_assign_t<T0>::value, t1 = can_self_assign_t<T1>::value, x = t0&&t1 };
using type = bool_k< x >;
};
template<>
struct can_self_assign<std::tuple<>>
{
using type = bool_k< true >;
};
template<class T0, class...Ts>
struct can_self_assign<std::tuple<T0, Ts...>>
{
using type = bool_k< can_self_assign_t<T0>::value && can_self_assign_t<std::tuple<Ts...>>::value >;
};
template <typename Pred, typename Container,
typename Out = typename std::remove_reference<Container>::type>
Out drop_if( Pred pred, Container&& xs )
{
using dContainer = typename std::decay<Container>::type;
using can_assign = can_self_assign_t<typename dContainer::value_type>;
using cannot_reuse = std::is_lvalue_reference<Container>;
using reuse = std::integral_constant<bool, can_assign::value && !cannot_reuse::value >;
return internal::drop_if( reuse{}, pred, std::forward<Container>( xs ) );
}
live example and other live example.
I also changed your SFINAE dispatching to tag based dispatching.
Other types with defective operator= disabling may also need can_self_assign specializations. Notable examples may include tuple<Ts...> and vector<T,A> and similar.
I don't know when and if compilers where required to have operator= "not exist" if it wouldn't work in std types; I remember it was not required at one point for std::vector, but I also remember a proposal adding such requirements.
You don't say what version of the Visual C++ compiler you are using but have you tried using trailing return syntax?
In other words, replacing this:
template <typename Pred, typename Container,
typename Out = typename std::remove_reference<Container>::type>
Out drop_if( Pred pred, Container&& xs )
with something like this?
template <typename Pred,
typename Container>
auto drop_if(Pred pred, Container&& xs) -> std::remove_reference<Container>::type
The Visual C++ compiler has gradually added in C++ 11/14/17 features. I've struggled with making the template MPL work and have had to work-around a few things that "should" work but don't.
I will admit this is a bit of a guess but you might give it a try.
If you want your code to be dedicated specifically to containers of tuple like objects you could do it like this (brutal but working on older versions of gcc as well as on MSVC):
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <iterator>
#include <type_traits>
#include <utility>
#include <vector>
namespace internal
{
template <class... Ts>
int foo(Ts&&... ts);
template <typename Pred, typename Container, std::size_t... Is>
auto drop_if( Pred pred, Container&& xs, std::index_sequence<Is...>) -> decltype(foo(std::declval<typename std::tuple_element<Is, typename std::remove_reference<typename Container::value_type>::type>::type&>() = std::declval<typename std::tuple_element<Is, typename std::remove_reference<typename Container::value_type>::type>::type>()...), xs)
{
std::cout << "r-value" << std::endl;
xs.erase( std::remove_if( std::begin( xs ), std::end( xs ), pred ), std::end( xs ) );
return xs;
}
template <typename Pred, typename Container, class I>
Container drop_if( Pred pred, const Container& xs, I )
{
std::cout << "l-value" << std::endl;
Container result;
auto it = std::back_inserter( result );
std::remove_copy_if( std::begin( xs ), std::end( xs ), it, pred );
return result;
}
} // namespace internal
template <typename Pred, typename Container,
typename Out = typename std::remove_reference<Container>::type>
Out drop_if( Pred pred, Container&& xs )
{
return internal::drop_if( pred, std::forward<decltype(xs)>( xs ), std::make_index_sequence<std::tuple_size<typename Out::value_type>::value>{} );
}
typedef std::pair<int, int> pair_t;
typedef std::vector<pair_t> vec_t;
bool sum_is_even( pair_t p )
{
return (p.first + p.second) % 2 == 0;
}
typedef std::pair<const int, int> pair_c_t;
typedef std::vector<pair_c_t> vec_c_t;
bool sum_is_even_c( pair_c_t p)
{
return (p.first + p.second) % 2 == 0;
}
int main()
{
vec_c_t v_c;
drop_if( sum_is_even_c, v_c ); // l-value
drop_if( sum_is_even_c, vec_c_t() ); // l-value
vec_t v;
drop_if( sum_is_even, v ); // l-value
drop_if( sum_is_even, vec_t() ); // r-value
}
[live demo]
Nice finding, until those changes go to be fixed, I offer my solution for this corner case.
namespace internal {
template <typename T>
struct my_is_pair {
static constexpr bool value = false;
};
template <typename K, typename V>
struct my_is_pair<std::pair<K, V>> {
static constexpr bool value = true;
};
template <typename T, typename U, typename TIsPair = void>
struct my_is_assignable : std::is_assignable<T, U> {
using is_pair_type = std::false_type;
};
template <typename T, typename U>
struct my_is_assignable<T,
U,
typename std::
enable_if<my_is_pair<typename std::decay<T>::type>::value
&& my_is_pair<typename std::decay<U>::type>::value>::
type>
: std::integral_constant<bool,
std::is_assignable<
typename std::remove_reference<T>::type::first_type&,
const typename std::remove_reference<U>::type::first_type&>::
value
&& std::is_assignable<
typename std::remove_reference<T>::type::second_type&,
const typename std::remove_reference<U>::type::
second_type&>::value> {
using is_pair_type = std::true_type;
};
template <
typename Pred,
typename Container,
typename = typename std::
enable_if<my_is_assignable<
typename std::remove_reference<Container>::type::value_type,
typename std::remove_reference<Container>::type::value_type>::value
&& std::is_rvalue_reference<Container&&>::value>::type>
Container drop_if(Pred pred, Container&& xs) {
std::cout << "r-value" << std::endl;
xs.erase(std::remove_if(std::begin(xs), std::end(xs), pred), std::end(xs));
return xs;
}
template <typename Pred, typename Container>
Container drop_if(Pred pred, const Container& xs) {
std::cout << "l-value" << std::endl;
Container result;
auto it = std::back_inserter(result);
std::remove_copy_if(std::begin(xs), std::end(xs), it, pred);
return result;
}
} // namespace internal
template <typename Pred,
typename Container,
typename Out = typename std::remove_reference<Container>::type>
Out drop_if(Pred pred, Container&& xs) {
return internal::drop_if(pred, std::forward<decltype(xs)>(xs));
}
typedef std::pair<int, int> pair_t;
typedef std::vector<pair_t> vec_t;
bool sum_is_even(pair_t p) { return (p.first + p.second) % 2 == 0; }
typedef std::pair<const int, int> pair_c_t;
typedef std::vector<pair_c_t> vec_c_t;
bool sum_is_even_c(pair_c_t p) { return (p.first + p.second) % 2 == 0; }
int main() {
vec_c_t v_c;
drop_if(sum_is_even_c, v_c); // l-value
drop_if(sum_is_even_c, vec_c_t()); // r-value
vec_t v;
drop_if(sum_is_even, v); // l-value
drop_if(sum_is_even, vec_t()); // r-value
}
This just introduces an is_assignable specialization for the pair type as it is suggested in the defect report. The other thing I added is std::is_rvalue_reference to prevent if from the calls on lvalue references (in your solution it was disabled by a failure substitution in Container::value_type, that fails when Container is vector<...>&.

Generic for_eaches template [duplicate]

With the new range-based for-loop we can write code like:
for(auto x: Y) {}
Which IMO is a huge improvement from (for ex.)
for(std::vector<int>::iterator x=Y.begin(); x!=Y.end(); ++x) {}
Can it be used to loop over two simultaneous loops, like Python's zip function? For those unfamiliar with Python, the code:
Y1 = [1, 2, 3]
Y2 = [4, 5, 6, 7]
for x1,x2 in zip(Y1, Y2):
print(x1, x2)
Gives as output (1,4) (2,5) (3,6)
Warning: boost::zip_iterator and boost::combine as of Boost 1.63.0 (2016 Dec 26) will cause undefined behavior if the length of the input containers are not the same (it may crash or iterate beyond the end).
Starting from Boost 1.56.0 (2014 Aug 7) you could use boost::combine (the function exists in earlier versions but undocumented):
#include <boost/range/combine.hpp>
#include <vector>
#include <list>
#include <string>
int main() {
std::vector<int> a {4, 5, 6};
double b[] = {7, 8, 9};
std::list<std::string> c {"a", "b", "c"};
for (auto tup : boost::combine(a, b, c, a)) { // <---
int x, w;
double y;
std::string z;
boost::tie(x, y, z, w) = tup;
printf("%d %g %s %d\n", x, y, z.c_str(), w);
}
}
This would print
4 7 a 4
5 8 b 5
6 9 c 6
In earlier versions, you could define a range yourself like this:
#include <boost/iterator/zip_iterator.hpp>
#include <boost/range.hpp>
template <typename... T>
auto zip(T&&... containers) -> boost::iterator_range<boost::zip_iterator<decltype(boost::make_tuple(std::begin(containers)...))>>
{
auto zip_begin = boost::make_zip_iterator(boost::make_tuple(std::begin(containers)...));
auto zip_end = boost::make_zip_iterator(boost::make_tuple(std::end(containers)...));
return boost::make_iterator_range(zip_begin, zip_end);
}
The usage is the same.
std::transform can do this trivially:
std::vector<int> a = {1,2,3,4,5};
std::vector<int> b = {1,2,3,4,5};
std::vector<int>c;
std::transform(a.begin(),a.end(), b.begin(),
std::back_inserter(c),
[](const auto& aa, const auto& bb)
{
return aa*bb;
});
for(auto cc:c)
std::cout<<cc<<std::endl;
If the second sequence is shorter, my implementation seems to be giving default initialized values.
So I wrote this zip before when I was bored, I decided to post it because it's different than the others in that it doesn't use boost and looks more like the c++ stdlib.
template <typename Iterator>
void advance_all (Iterator & iterator) {
++iterator;
}
template <typename Iterator, typename ... Iterators>
void advance_all (Iterator & iterator, Iterators& ... iterators) {
++iterator;
advance_all(iterators...);
}
template <typename Function, typename Iterator, typename ... Iterators>
Function zip (Function func, Iterator begin,
Iterator end,
Iterators ... iterators)
{
for(;begin != end; ++begin, advance_all(iterators...))
func(*begin, *(iterators)... );
//could also make this a tuple
return func;
}
Example use:
int main () {
std::vector<int> v1{1,2,3};
std::vector<int> v2{3,2,1};
std::vector<float> v3{1.2,2.4,9.0};
std::vector<float> v4{1.2,2.4,9.0};
zip (
[](int i,int j,float k,float l){
std::cout << i << " " << j << " " << k << " " << l << std::endl;
},
v1.begin(),v1.end(),v2.begin(),v3.begin(),v4.begin());
}
With range-v3:
#include <range/v3/all.hpp>
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
namespace ranges {
template <class T, class U>
std::ostream& operator << (std::ostream& os, common_pair<T, U> const& p)
{
return os << '(' << p.first << ", " << p.second << ')';
}
}
using namespace ranges::v3;
int main()
{
std::vector<int> a {4, 5, 6};
double b[] = {7, 8, 9};
std::cout << view::zip(a, b) << std::endl;
}
The output:
[(4, 7),(5, 8),(6, 9)]
See <redi/zip.h> for a zip function which works with range-base for and accepts any number of ranges, which can be rvalues or lvalues and can be different lengths (iteration will stop at the end of the shortest range).
std::vector<int> vi{ 0, 2, 4 };
std::vector<std::string> vs{ "1", "3", "5", "7" };
for (auto i : redi::zip(vi, vs))
std::cout << i.get<0>() << ' ' << i.get<1>() << ' ';
Prints 0 1 2 3 4 5
You can use a solution based on boost::zip_iterator. Make a phony container class maintaining references to your containers, and which return zip_iterator from the begin and end member functions. Now you can write
for (auto p: zip(c1, c2)) { ... }
Example implementation (please test):
#include <iterator>
#include <boost/iterator/zip_iterator.hpp>
template <typename C1, typename C2>
class zip_container
{
C1* c1; C2* c2;
typedef boost::tuple<
decltype(std::begin(*c1)),
decltype(std::begin(*c2))
> tuple;
public:
zip_container(C1& c1, C2& c2) : c1(&c1), c2(&c2) {}
typedef boost::zip_iterator<tuple> iterator;
iterator begin() const
{
return iterator(std::begin(*c1), std::begin(*c2));
}
iterator end() const
{
return iterator(std::end(*c1), std::end(*c2));
}
};
template <typename C1, typename C2>
zip_container<C1, C2> zip(C1& c1, C2& c2)
{
return zip_container<C1, C2>(c1, c2);
}
I leave the variadic version as an excellent exercise to the reader.
If you like operator overloading, here are three possibilities. The first two are using std::pair<> and std::tuple<>, respectively, as iterators; the third extends this to range-based for. Note that not everyone will like these definitions of the operators, so it's best to keep them in a separate namespace and have a using namespace in the functions (not files!) where you'd like to use these.
#include <iostream>
#include <utility>
#include <vector>
#include <tuple>
// put these in namespaces so we don't pollute global
namespace pair_iterators
{
template<typename T1, typename T2>
std::pair<T1, T2> operator++(std::pair<T1, T2>& it)
{
++it.first;
++it.second;
return it;
}
}
namespace tuple_iterators
{
// you might want to make this generic (via param pack)
template<typename T1, typename T2, typename T3>
auto operator++(std::tuple<T1, T2, T3>& it)
{
++( std::get<0>( it ) );
++( std::get<1>( it ) );
++( std::get<2>( it ) );
return it;
}
template<typename T1, typename T2, typename T3>
auto operator*(const std::tuple<T1, T2, T3>& it)
{
return std::tie( *( std::get<0>( it ) ),
*( std::get<1>( it ) ),
*( std::get<2>( it ) ) );
}
// needed due to ADL-only lookup
template<typename... Args>
struct tuple_c
{
std::tuple<Args...> containers;
};
template<typename... Args>
auto tie_c( const Args&... args )
{
tuple_c<Args...> ret = { std::tie(args...) };
return ret;
}
template<typename T1, typename T2, typename T3>
auto begin( const tuple_c<T1, T2, T3>& c )
{
return std::make_tuple( std::get<0>( c.containers ).begin(),
std::get<1>( c.containers ).begin(),
std::get<2>( c.containers ).begin() );
}
template<typename T1, typename T2, typename T3>
auto end( const tuple_c<T1, T2, T3>& c )
{
return std::make_tuple( std::get<0>( c.containers ).end(),
std::get<1>( c.containers ).end(),
std::get<2>( c.containers ).end() );
}
// implement cbegin(), cend() as needed
}
int main()
{
using namespace pair_iterators;
using namespace tuple_iterators;
std::vector<double> ds = { 0.0, 0.1, 0.2 };
std::vector<int > is = { 1, 2, 3 };
std::vector<char > cs = { 'a', 'b', 'c' };
// classical, iterator-style using pairs
for( auto its = std::make_pair(ds.begin(), is.begin()),
end = std::make_pair(ds.end(), is.end() ); its != end; ++its )
{
std::cout << "1. " << *(its.first ) + *(its.second) << " " << std::endl;
}
// classical, iterator-style using tuples
for( auto its = std::make_tuple(ds.begin(), is.begin(), cs.begin()),
end = std::make_tuple(ds.end(), is.end(), cs.end() ); its != end; ++its )
{
std::cout << "2. " << *(std::get<0>(its)) + *(std::get<1>(its)) << " "
<< *(std::get<2>(its)) << " " << std::endl;
}
// range for using tuples
for( const auto& d_i_c : tie_c( ds, is, cs ) )
{
std::cout << "3. " << std::get<0>(d_i_c) + std::get<1>(d_i_c) << " "
<< std::get<2>(d_i_c) << " " << std::endl;
}
}
// declare a, b
BOOST_FOREACH(boost::tie(a, b), boost::combine(list_of_a, list_of_b)){
// your code here.
}
I ran into this same question independently and didn't like the syntax of any of the above. So, I have a short header file that essentially does the same as the boost zip_iterator but has a few macros to make the syntax more palatable to me:
https://github.com/cshelton/zipfor
For example you can do
vector<int> a {1,2,3};
array<string,3> b {"hello","there","coders"};
zipfor(i,s eachin a,b)
cout << i << " => " << s << endl;
The main syntactic sugar is that I can name the elements from each container. I also include a "mapfor" that does the same, but for maps (to name the ".first" and ".second" of the element).
If you have a C++14 compliant compiler (e.g. gcc5) you can use zip provided in the cppitertools library by Ryan Haining, which looks really promising:
array<int,4> i{{1,2,3,4}};
vector<float> f{1.2,1.4,12.3,4.5,9.9};
vector<string> s{"i","like","apples","alot","dude"};
array<double,5> d{{1.2,1.2,1.2,1.2,1.2}};
for (auto&& e : zip(i,f,s,d)) {
cout << std::get<0>(e) << ' '
<< std::get<1>(e) << ' '
<< std::get<2>(e) << ' '
<< std::get<3>(e) << '\n';
std::get<1>(e)=2.2f; // modifies the underlying 'f' array
}
For a C++ stream processing library I'm writing I was looking for a solution that doesn't rely on third party libraries and works with an arbitrary number of containers. I ended up with this solution. It's similar to the accepted solution which uses boost (and also results in undefined behavior if the container lengths are not equal)
#include <utility>
namespace impl {
template <typename Iter, typename... Iters>
class zip_iterator {
public:
using value_type = std::tuple<const typename Iter::value_type&,
const typename Iters::value_type&...>;
zip_iterator(const Iter &head, const Iters&... tail)
: head_(head), tail_(tail...) { }
value_type operator*() const {
return std::tuple_cat(std::tuple<const typename Iter::value_type&>(*head_), *tail_);
}
zip_iterator& operator++() {
++head_; ++tail_;
return *this;
}
bool operator==(const zip_iterator &rhs) const {
return head_ == rhs.head_ && tail_ == rhs.tail_;
}
bool operator!=(const zip_iterator &rhs) const {
return !(*this == rhs);
}
private:
Iter head_;
zip_iterator<Iters...> tail_;
};
template <typename Iter>
class zip_iterator<Iter> {
public:
using value_type = std::tuple<const typename Iter::value_type&>;
zip_iterator(const Iter &head) : head_(head) { }
value_type operator*() const {
return value_type(*head_);
}
zip_iterator& operator++() { ++head_; return *this; }
bool operator==(const zip_iterator &rhs) const { return head_ == rhs.head_; }
bool operator!=(const zip_iterator &rhs) const { return !(*this == rhs); }
private:
Iter head_;
};
} // namespace impl
template <typename Iter>
class seq {
public:
using iterator = Iter;
seq(const Iter &begin, const Iter &end) : begin_(begin), end_(end) { }
iterator begin() const { return begin_; }
iterator end() const { return end_; }
private:
Iter begin_, end_;
};
/* WARNING: Undefined behavior if iterator lengths are different.
*/
template <typename... Seqs>
seq<impl::zip_iterator<typename Seqs::iterator...>>
zip(const Seqs&... seqs) {
return seq<impl::zip_iterator<typename Seqs::iterator...>>(
impl::zip_iterator<typename Seqs::iterator...>(std::begin(seqs)...),
impl::zip_iterator<typename Seqs::iterator...>(std::end(seqs)...));
}
From C++23, we can iterate on std::views::zip.
Below is simple example.
#include <iostream>
#include <ranges>
#include <vector>
int main() {
std::vector<int> x {4, 5, 6};
double y[] = {7, 8, 9};
for (auto [elem1,elem2] : std::views::zip(x, y))
std::cout << "[" << elem1 << "," << elem2 << "]" << " ";
}
The output can be verified below (an online compiler). Not sure how many days the link exists.
https://godbolt.org/z/KjjE4eeGY
An improvement on aaronman's solution:
Still C++11.
No recursive template expansion.
Support for container zipping.
Utilizes the approach of Sean Parent's famed for_each_arg().
// Includes only required for the example main() below!
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
namespace detail {
struct advance {
template <typename T> void operator()(T& t) const { ++t; }
};
// Adaptation of for_each_arg, see:
// https://isocpp.org/blog/2015/01/for-each-argument-sean-parent
template <class... Iterators>
void advance_all(Iterators&... iterators) {
[](...){}((advance{}(iterators), 0)...);
}
} // namespace detail
template <typename F, typename Iterator, typename ... ExtraIterators>
F for_each_zipped(
F func,
Iterator begin,
Iterator end,
ExtraIterators ... extra_iterators)
{
for(;begin != end; ++begin, detail::advance_all(extra_iterators...))
func(*begin, *(extra_iterators)... );
return func;
}
template <typename F, typename Container, typename... ExtraContainers>
F for_each_zipped_containers(
F func,
Container& container,
ExtraContainers& ... extra_containers)
{
return for_each_zipped(
func, std::begin(container), std::end(container), std::begin(extra_containers)...);
}
int main () {
std::vector<int> v1 { 1, 2, 3};
std::vector<int> v2 { 3, 2, 1};
std::vector<float> v3 {1.2, 2.4, 9.0};
std::vector<float> v4 {1.2, 2.4, 9.0};
auto print_quartet =
[](int i,int j,float k,float l) {
std::cout << i << " " << j << " " << k << " " << l << '\n';
};
std::cout << "Using zipped iterators:\n";
for_each_zipped(print_quartet, v1.begin(), v1.end(), v2.begin(), v3.begin(), v4.begin());
std::cout << "\nUsing zipped containers:\n";
for_each_zipped_containers(print_quartet, v1, v2, v3, v4);
}
See it working on GodBolt.
I would propose this one. I found it to be quite elegant, and exactly what I (and you) needed.
https://github.com/CommitThis/zip-iterator
Just in case here's a code copy. Note, it is distributed under MIT License, also don't forget to put name of author.
zip.hpp
/***
* MIT License
* Author: G Davey
*/
#pragma once
#include <cassert>
#include <functional>
#include <iomanip>
#include <iostream>
#include <list>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include <typeinfo>
namespace c9 {
template <typename Iter>
using select_access_type_for = std::conditional_t<
std::is_same_v<Iter, std::vector<bool>::iterator> ||
std::is_same_v<Iter, std::vector<bool>::const_iterator>,
typename Iter::value_type,
typename Iter::reference
>;
template <typename ... Args, std::size_t ... Index>
auto any_match_impl(std::tuple<Args...> const & lhs,
std::tuple<Args...> const & rhs,
std::index_sequence<Index...>) -> bool
{
auto result = false;
result = (... | (std::get<Index>(lhs) == std::get<Index>(rhs)));
return result;
}
template <typename ... Args>
auto any_match(std::tuple<Args...> const & lhs, std::tuple<Args...> const & rhs)
-> bool
{
return any_match_impl(lhs, rhs, std::index_sequence_for<Args...>{});
}
template <typename ... Iters>
class zip_iterator
{
public:
using value_type = std::tuple<
select_access_type_for<Iters>...
>;
zip_iterator() = delete;
zip_iterator(Iters && ... iters)
: m_iters {std::forward<Iters>(iters)...}
{
}
auto operator++() -> zip_iterator&
{
std::apply([](auto && ... args){ ((args += 1), ...); }, m_iters);
return *this;
}
auto operator++(int) -> zip_iterator
{
auto tmp = *this;
++*this;
return tmp;
}
auto operator!=(zip_iterator const & other)
{
return !(*this == other);
}
auto operator==(zip_iterator const & other)
{
auto result = false;
return any_match(m_iters, other.m_iters);
}
auto operator*() -> value_type
{
return std::apply([](auto && ... args){
return value_type(*args...);
}, m_iters);
}
private:
std::tuple<Iters...> m_iters;
};
/* std::decay needed because T is a reference, and is not a complete type */
template <typename T>
using select_iterator_for = std::conditional_t<
std::is_const_v<std::remove_reference_t<T>>,
typename std::decay_t<T>::const_iterator,
typename std::decay_t<T>::iterator>;
template <typename ... T>
class zipper
{
public:
using zip_type = zip_iterator<select_iterator_for<T> ...>;
template <typename ... Args>
zipper(Args && ... args)
: m_args{std::forward<Args>(args)...}
{
}
auto begin() -> zip_type
{
return std::apply([](auto && ... args){
return zip_type(std::begin(args)...);
}, m_args);
}
auto end() -> zip_type
{
return std::apply([](auto && ... args){
return zip_type(std::end(args)...);
}, m_args);
}
private:
std::tuple<T ...> m_args;
};
template <typename ... T>
auto zip(T && ... t)
{
return zipper<T ...>{std::forward<T>(t)...};
}
}
Example
#include "zip.hpp"
#include <vector>
std::vector<int> a, b, c;
void foo() {
for (auto && [x, y] : zip(a, b))
c.push_back(x + z);
}
Boost.Iterators has zip_iterator you can use (example's in the docs). It won't work with range for, but you can use std::for_each and a lambda.
Here is a simple version that does not require boost. It won't be particularly efficient as it creates temporary values, and it does not generalise over containers other than lists, but it has no dependencies and it solves the most common case for zipping.
template<class L, class R>
std::list< std::pair<L,R> > zip(std::list<L> left, std::list<R> right)
{
auto l = left.begin();
auto r = right.begin();
std::list< std::pair<L,R> > result;
while( l!=left.end() && r!=right.end() )
result.push_back( std::pair<L,R>( *(l++), *(r++) ) );
return result;
}
Although the other versions are more flexible, often the point of using a list operator is make a simple one-liner. This version has the benefit that the common-case is simple.

non-void function template recursive over tuples and vectors

I've made a function that calculates the sine of a number. It returns the input type if it is std::is_floating_point. But for std::is_integral, it returns a double.
template<class T , typename std::enable_if<std::is_integral<T>::value>::type* = nullptr >
double mysin(const T& t) // note, function signature is unmodified
{
double a = t;
return std::sin(a);
}
template<class T , typename std::enable_if<std::is_floating_point<T>::value>::type* = nullptr >
T mysin(const T& t) // note, function signature is unmodified
{
return std::sin(t);
}
Easy enough. Now I'd like this to work for vectors (or arrays) and tuples (or clusters). So that:
(pseudo code:)
std::vector<std::double> a = mysin(std::vector<std::int>);
std::tuple<std::double, std::float> b = mysin(std::tuple<std::int, std::float>);
std::vector<std::tuple<std::double, std::float>> c = mysin(std::vector<std::tuple<std::int, std::float>>);
std::tuple<std::vector<std::double>, std::float> d = mysin(std::tuple<std::vector<std::int>, std::float>);
std::tuple<std::tuple<std::double, std::vector<std::double>>, std::float>> e = mysin(std::tuple<std::tuple<std::int, std::vector<std::int>>, std::float>>);
and so on...
In most examples about tuple templates, the function either has no return value, returns an accumulated value, or has the same return type as the input.
I've experimented a lot with these topics (among others):
Traversing nested C++11 tuple , c++11: building a std::tuple from a template function , How to make a function that zips two tuples in C++11 (STL)?
The last one has been especially useful. I've got this working for tuples, but not for recursive tuples (tuples in tuples).
Eventually (if this is possible at all), I'll have to make a mycos, mytan, myasin, etc. Using gcc 4.9.2.
**EDIT:**So this is what I came up with after Yakk's suggestions, and a little tweaking:
#include <utility>
#include <vector>
#include <memory>
#include <typeinfo> // used for typeid
#include <tuple>
#include <cstdlib> // for math functions?
#include <cmath> // for math functions
#include <type_traits> // for std::enable_if
template<class T , typename std::enable_if<std::is_integral<T>::value>::type* = nullptr >
double mysin(const T& t) { // note, function signature is unmodified
double a = t;
return std::sin(a);
// printing a debug string here will
// print tuple elements reversed!!
}
template<class T , typename std::enable_if<std::is_floating_point<T>::value>::type* = nullptr >
T mysin(const T& t) {// note, function signature is unmodified
// printing a debug string here will
// print tuple elements reversed!!
return std::sin(t);
}
struct sine_t {
template<class T>
auto operator()(T&&t)const->
decltype(mysin(std::declval<T>())) {
return mysin(std::forward<T>(t));
}
};
template<class F>
struct vectorize {
template<class T,
class R=std::vector< std::result_of_t< vectorize<F>(T const&) > >
>
R operator()( std::vector<T> const& v ) const {
R ret;
ret.reserve(v.size());
for( auto const& e : v ) {
ret.push_back( vectorize<F>{}(e) );
}
return ret;
}
template<
class X,
class R=std::result_of_t< F(X const&) >
>
R operator()( X const& x ) const {
return F{}(x);
}
template<
class R,
class... Ts,
size_t... Is
>
R tup_help( std::index_sequence<Is...>, std::tuple<Ts...> const& t ) const {
return std::make_tuple( vectorize<F>{}(std::get<Is>(t))... );
}
template<
class... Ts,
class R=std::tuple< std::result_of_t< vectorize<F>(Ts const&) >... >
>
R operator()( std::tuple<Ts...> const& t ) const {
return tup_help<R>( std::index_sequence_for<Ts...>{}, t );
}
};
//+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
int main() {
std::vector<int> a = {1 ,2};
std::tuple<int, double, int, double> b (42, -3.14, 42, -3.14);
auto c = vectorize<sine_t>()(a);
auto d = vectorize<sine_t>()(b);
std::vector<std::tuple<int, int> > e {std::make_tuple(1 ,2)};
//This does not not work:
//auto f = vectorize<sine_t>()(e);
//This works:
std::tuple<std::vector<int> > g ( a );
auto f = vectorize<sine_t>()(g);
return 0;
}
This works. Needs c++14.
First an overload set object. This is useful because it lets us pass around the entire overload set as a single object:
struct sine_t {
template<class T>
auto operator()(T&&t)const->
decltype(mysin(std::declval<T>()))
{ return mysin(std::forward<T>(t)); }
};
next, we want to "vectorize" a given function object.
We'll start simple:
template<class F>
struct vectorize {
template<class T, class R=std::vector< std::result_of_t< F(T const&) > >>
R operator()( std::vector<T> const& v ) const {
R ret;
ret.reserve(v.size());
for( auto const& e : v ) {
ret.push_back( F{}(e) );
}
return ret;
}
template<class X, class R=std::result_of_t< F(X const&) >>
R operator()( X const& x ) const {
return F{}(x);
}
};
this supports 1 level recursion, and only on std::vector.
To allow infinite recursion of nested std::vectors, we modify the operator() overload for std::vector:
template<
class T,
class R=std::vector< std::result_of_t< vectorize<F>(T const&) > >
>
R operator()( std::vector<T> const& v ) const {
R ret;
ret.reserve(v.size());
for( auto const& e : v ) {
ret.push_back( vectorize<F>{}(e) );
}
return ret;
}
and now we support std::vector<std::vector<int>>.
For tuple support, we add 2 functions. The first one has this signature:
template<
class... Ts,
class R=std::tuple< std::result_of_t< vectorize<F>(Ts const&) >... >
>
R operator()( std::tuple<Ts...> const& t ) const
which gets us our return value (half the battle). To actually do the mapping, use the indexes trick:
template<
class R,
class... Ts,
size_t... Is
>
R tup_help( std::index_sequence<Is...>, std::tuple<Ts...> const& t ) const
{
return std::make_tuple( vectorize<F>{}(std::get<Is>(t))... );
}
template<
class... Ts,
class R=std::tuple< std::result_of_t< vectorize<F>(Ts const&) >... >
>
R operator()( std::tuple<Ts...> const& t ) const {
return tup_help<R>( std::index_sequence_for<Ts...>{}, t );
}
similar code for std::array and raw C arrays should work (converting the raw C array to a std::array naturally).
std::index_sequence etc is C++14, but easy to write a version that supports 100s of elements in C++11. (A version that supports large arrays takes more work). The result_of_t alias (and any similar) are also C++14, but the aliases are easy to write in C++11, or you can just typename std::result_of<?>::type verbose explosion.
In the end, you vectorize<sine_t>{} and pass in whatever.
If you want a function instead of a function object, simply have it delegate the work to vectorize<sine_t>.

Overloading std::transform algorithm

Consider this standard use of std::transform algorithm:
vector<int> in = { 1, 2, 3 };
auto f0 = [](int val) { return val + 1; };
auto f1 = [](int val) { return val > 1; };
vector<int> out0(in.size());
std::transform(in.begin(), in.end(), out0.begin(), f0);
vector<bool> out1(in.size());
std::transform(in.begin(), in.end(), out1.begin(), f1);
This works fine but is long to write. I would like to write something like this:
auto out0 = tranform(in, f0);
auto out1 = tranform(in, f1);
How to overload the transform algorithm to allow this syntax?
The following should do what you want
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <type_traits>
#include <vector>
template<typename T, typename F>
std::vector<typename std::result_of<F(T)>::type>
transform(const std::vector<T>& l, F func)
{
typedef typename std::result_of<F(T)>::type FunctorReturnType;
std::vector<FunctorReturnType> out(l.size());
std::transform(l.begin(), l.end(), out.begin(), func);
return out;
}
int main ()
{
const std::vector<int> in{ 1, 2, 3 };
auto f0 = [](int val) { return val + 1; };
auto f1 = [](int val) { return val > 1; };
auto out0 = transform(in, f0);
auto out1 = transform(in, f1);
for (const auto& m: out0) std::cout << m << std::endl;
for (const auto& m: out1) std::cout << m << std::endl;
}
Do you like template template arguments? This works with more containers than vectors.
template<template<class...> class C, class F, class T, class... Tail>
C<typename result_of<F(T)>::type>
transform(const C<T, Tail...>& in, F func)
{
C<typename result_of<F(T)>::type> out(in.size());
std::transform(in.begin(), in.end(), out.begin(), func);
return out;
}
Can be seen working at http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/767adb662d7cbe42
EDIT: changed to not use the source's allocator in the resulting container.
Why aren't you ok with the following, which doesn't use any C++11 magic such as decltype ?
#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>
template<class T, class F>
std::vector<T> transform(const std::vector<T>& l, F func)
{
std::vector<T> out(l.size());
std::transform(l.begin(), l.end(), out.begin(), func);
return out;
}

boost::range::join for multiple ranges

I want to do the following:
std::vector<int> a = {1,2,3}, b = {4,5,6}, c = {7,8,9};
for(auto&& i : join(a,b,c)) {
i += 1
std::cout << i; // -> 2345678910
}
I tried using boost::range::join, this works fine:
auto r = boost::join(a,b);
for(auto&& i : boost::join(r,c)) {
i += 1;
std::cout << i; // -> 2345678910
}
Chaining joins, reading operations work:
for(auto&& i : boost::join(boost::join(a,b),c))
std::cout << i; // -> 123456789
However, writing doesn't work:
for(auto&& i : boost::join(boost::join(a,b),c)) {
i += 1; // Fails :(
std::cout << i;
}
My variadic join has the same problem, i.e. works for reading but not for writing:
template<class C> C&& join(C&& c) { return c; }
template<class C, class D, class... Args>
auto join(C&& c, D&& d, Args&&... args)
-> decltype(boost::join(boost::join(std::forward<C>(c), std::forward<D>(d)),
join(std::forward<Args>(args)...))) {
return boost::join(boost::join(std::forward<C>(c), std::forward<D>(d)),
join(std::forward<Args>(args)...));
}
Mehrdad gave the solution in the comments
template<class C>
auto join(C&& c)
-> decltype(boost::make_iterator_range(std::begin(c),std::end(c))) {
return boost::make_iterator_range(std::begin(c),std::end(c));
}
template<class C, class D, class... Args>
auto join(C&& c, D&& d, Args&&... args)
-> decltype(boost::join(boost::join(boost::make_iterator_range(std::begin(c),std::end(c)),
boost::make_iterator_range(std::begin(d),std::end(d))),
join(std::forward<Args>(args)...))) {
return boost::join(boost::join(boost::make_iterator_range(std::begin(c),std::end(c)),
boost::make_iterator_range(std::begin(d),std::end(d))),
join(std::forward<Args>(args)...));
}
There are two overloads of boost::join
template<typename SinglePassRange1, typename SinglePassRange2>
joined_range<const SinglePassRange1, const SinglePassRange2>
join(const SinglePassRange1& rng1, const SinglePassRange2& rng2)
template<typename SinglePassRange1, typename SinglePassRange2>
joined_range<SinglePassRange1, SinglePassRange2>
join(SinglePassRange1& rng1, SinglePassRange2& rng2);
When you do this
for(auto&& i : boost::join(boost::join(a,b), c)) {
// ^^^^ ^^^^ temporary here
// ||
// calls the const ref overload
You get a temporary joined_range and as those can only bind to const references, the first overload is selected which returns a range that doesn't allow modifying.
You can work around this if you avoid temporaries:
#include <boost/range.hpp>
#include <boost/range/join.hpp>
int main()
{
std::vector<int> a = {1,2,3}, b = {4,5,6}, c = {7,8,9};
auto range = boost::join(a,b);
for(int& i : boost::join(range,c)) {
i += 1;
std::cout << i;
}
}
Live demo.
I haven't looked into your variadic functions, but the problem is likely similar.
Here's a complete solution, which works correctly on GCC 12. For GCC 10 & 11, the subranges function can be used to obtain an array of subranges, which can then be used as the lhs argument to | std::views::join.
EDIT: These functions only return on ranges that have a common iterator type. If you don't have a common iterator type, one option is to create a new container from the ranges (which is probably not what you want), or to create a custom type with different sub-ranges (which can't be used with std::views::join).
#include <ranges>
#include <vector>
#include <iostream>
#include <tuple>
#include <array>
#include <algorithm>
namespace detail {
template<std::size_t N, typename... Ts>
struct has_common_type_helper {
using T1 = std::decay_t<std::tuple_element_t<N-1, std::tuple<Ts...>>>;
using T2 = std::decay_t<std::tuple_element_t<N-2, std::tuple<Ts...>>>;
static constexpr bool value = std::same_as<T1, T2> && has_common_type_helper<N-1, Ts...>::value;
};
template<typename... Ts>
struct has_common_type_helper<0, Ts...> : std::false_type {
static_assert(std::is_void_v<Ts...>, "Undefined for an empty parameter pack");
};
template<typename... Ts>
struct has_common_type_helper<1, Ts...> : std::true_type {};
template<typename T> struct iterator_types;
template<std::ranges::range... Ts>
struct iterator_types<std::tuple<Ts...>> {
using type = std::tuple<std::ranges::iterator_t<Ts>...>;
};
}
template<typename T>
struct has_common_type;
template<typename T1, typename T2>
struct has_common_type<std::pair<T1,T2>> {
static constexpr bool value = std::same_as<std::decay_t<T1>, std::decay_t<T2>>;
};
template <typename... Ts>
struct has_common_type<std::tuple<Ts...>> : detail::has_common_type_helper<sizeof...(Ts), Ts...> {};
template <typename T>
inline constexpr bool has_common_type_v = has_common_type<T>::value;
template<std::size_t I = 0, typename Array, typename... Ts, typename Func> requires (I == sizeof...(Ts))
void init_array_from_tuple(Array& a, const std::tuple<Ts...>& t, Func fn)
{
}
template<std::size_t I = 0, typename Array, typename... Ts, typename Func> requires (I < sizeof...(Ts))
void init_array_from_tuple(Array& a, const std::tuple<Ts...>& t, Func fn)
{
a[I] = fn(std::get<I>(t));
init_array_from_tuple<I+1>(a, t, fn);
}
template<std::ranges::range... Ranges>
auto subranges(Ranges&&... rngs)
{
using IteratorTypes = detail::iterator_types<std::tuple<Ranges...>>::type;
static_assert(has_common_type_v<IteratorTypes>);
using SubrangeT = std::ranges::subrange<std::tuple_element_t<0, IteratorTypes>>;
auto subrngs = std::array<SubrangeT, sizeof...(Ranges)>{};
auto t = std::tuple<Ranges&&...>{std::forward<Ranges>(rngs)...};
auto fn = [](auto&& rng) {
return std::ranges::subrange{rng.begin(), rng.end()};
};
init_array_from_tuple(subrngs, t, fn);
return subrngs;
}
#if __GNUC__ >= 12
template<std::ranges::range... Ranges>
auto join(Ranges&&... rngs)
{
return std::ranges::owning_view{subranges(std::forward<Ranges>(rngs)...) | std::views::join};
}
#endif
int main()
{
std::vector<int> v1{1,2,3};
std::vector<int> v2{4};
std::vector<int> v3{5,6};
#if __GNUC__ >= 12
std::ranges::copy(join(v1,v2,v3,v1), std::ostream_iterator<int>(std::cout, " "));
#else
auto subrngs = subranges(v1,v2,v3,v1);
std::ranges::copy(subrngs | std::views::join, std::ostream_iterator<int>(std::cout, " "));
#endif
std::cout << '\n';
return 0;
}
Here's an implementation that works for two different ranges with a common reference type. You can extend it to 3 ranges using a brute-force approach.
#include <ranges>
#include <vector>
#include <list>
#include <iostream>
#include <algorithm>
template<std::ranges::range Range1, std::ranges::range Range2>
auto join2(Range1&& rng1, Range2&& rng2)
{
using Ref1 = std::ranges::range_reference_t<Range1>;
using Ref2 = std::ranges::range_reference_t<Range2>;
using Ref = std::common_reference_t<Ref1, Ref2>;
class Iter {
public:
using value_type = std::remove_cv_t<std::remove_reference_t<Ref>>;
using difference_type = std::ptrdiff_t;
Iter() = default;
Iter(Range1&& rng1_, Range2&& rng2_, bool begin)
: m_it1{begin ? rng1_.begin() : rng1_.end()}
, m_it2{begin ? rng2_.begin() : rng2_.end()}
, m_e1{rng1_.end()} {}
bool operator==(const Iter& rhs) const {
return m_it1 == rhs.m_it1 && m_it2 == rhs.m_it2;
}
Ref operator*() const {
return m_it1 != m_e1 ? *m_it1 : *m_it2;
}
Iter& operator++() {
(m_it1 != m_e1) ? (void)++m_it1 : (void)++m_it2;
return *this;
}
Iter operator++(int) {
Iter ret = *this;
++(*this);
return ret;
}
private:
std::ranges::iterator_t<Range1> m_it1;
std::ranges::iterator_t<Range2> m_it2;
std::ranges::iterator_t<Range1> m_e1;
};
static_assert(std::forward_iterator<Iter>);
auto b = Iter{std::forward<Range1>(rng1), std::forward<Range2>(rng2), true};
auto e = Iter{std::forward<Range1>(rng1), std::forward<Range2>(rng2), false};
return std::ranges::subrange<Iter>{b, e};
}
int main()
{
std::vector<int> v{1,2,3};
std::list<int> l{4,5,6};
std::ranges::copy(join2(v,l), std::ostream_iterator<int>(std::cout, " "));
std::cout << '\n';
return 0;
}
P.S. I am not optimistic about a variadic implementation, although I'm sure someone smarter than me would be able to figure it out.