I am trying to load a Nib from a C++ constructor with Objective C++. I have searched and found enough examples to get some code together but it doesn't display the window. Or any windows for that matter.
Here is an example of the contructor:
JokeSystem::JokeSystem() : fileSystem("/Library/Application Support/Jokes/")
{
try
{
randSystem = new RandSelect<std::string>
(fileSystem.getAllFileContents("%\n"));
}
catch (std::ifstream::failure)
{
NSWindowController * errorWindowControl = [[NSWindowController alloc]
initWithWindowNibName:#"ErrorWindow"];
[errorWindowControl showWindow: nil];
}
}
The purpose of the contructor is to load the contents of a directory into a string. What I am try to do is display the error window when the files fail to open.
ErrorWindow.nib has a single window with an OK button and a NSTextView for the error, I set up a NSWindowController in the nib and connected it to the window.
My only link has been that most examples show this [errorWindowControl showWindow: self];
rather than showWindow: nil but because this is a C++ constructor I it doesn't have self and this doesn't work.
If it matters this contructor is called from the awakeFromNib method of the MainMenu.nib's primary NSObject.
Thanks
A bit of an odd way to approach Cocoa. I would encourage you to step back, learn Objective-C and then write your application with an Objective-C based Cocoa UI layer on top of whatever backing store or model layer you have.
In any case, there isn't anything particularly wrong with that code (save for the odd design).
The first thing to check is the return value of -initWithWindowNibName:. Is errorWindowControl actually non-nil? If it is nil, then the NIB failed to load.
How are you writing the Cocoa application itself? Standard app bundle using Xcode, I hope?
Also, you shouldn't be hardcoding the path to /Library/Application Support/. Actually, your application shouldn't use that directory as the only storage location; many users won't have write access to that directory and won't be able to install your app without administrator access.
Related
Coming from making single-page applications with the visual WYSISWYG editor in JUCE, I'm having a bit of trouble figuring out how to invoke new windows (outside of the main GUI window). I made a test application that just has a small minimal main GUI that I created with the visual editor. It has a button "Make New Window." My goal is to be able to click that button and have a new window pop up and that this new window is a JUCE "GUI component," (AKA, the graphical / visual GUI editor file). Now, I actually have sort of achieved this, however, its throwing errors and assertions, so it would be great to get a very simple, step-by-step tutorial.
I studied the main.cpp file that the Projucer automatically created in order to get a feel for how they are creating a window. Here's what I did.
1) In my project, I added a new GUI Component (which becomes a class) and called it "InvokedWindow."
2) In my main GUI component class header, I added a new scoped pointer of type InvokedWindow: ScopedPointer<InvokedWindow> invokedWindow;
3) I created a new button in the main GUI editor called "Make New Window" and added this to the handler code:
newWindowPtr = new InvokedWindow; so that any time the button is hit, a new object of type InvokedWindow is created.
4) In the InvokedWindow class, in the constructor, on top of the automatically generated code, I added:
setUsingNativeTitleBar (true);
setCentrePosition(400, 400);
setVisible (true);
setResizable(false, false);
Which I sort of got from the main file of the JUCE application.
I also added a slider to this new window just to add functionality to it.
5) I added an overloaded function to let me close the window:
void InvokedWindow::closeButtonPressed()
{
delete this;
}
So, now when I run the app and click the make new window button, a new window does pop up, but I get an assertion:
/* Agh! You shouldn't add components directly to a ResizableWindow - this class
manages its child components automatically, and if you add your own it'll cause
trouble. Instead, use setContentComponent() to give it a component which
will be automatically resized and kept in the right place - then you can add
subcomponents to the content comp. See the notes for the ResizableWindow class
for more info.
If you really know what you're doing and want to avoid this assertion, just call
Component::addAndMakeVisible directly.
*/
Also, I'm able to close the window once and hit the button in the main GUI to create another instance of a newWindow, but closing it a second time leads to an error:
template <typename ObjectType>
struct ContainerDeletePolicy
{
static void destroy (ObjectType* object)
{
// If the line below triggers a compiler error, it means that you are using
// an incomplete type for ObjectType (for example, a type that is declared
// but not defined). This is a problem because then the following delete is
// undefined behaviour. The purpose of the sizeof is to capture this situation.
// If this was caused by a ScopedPointer to a forward-declared type, move the
// implementation of all methods trying to use the ScopedPointer (e.g. the destructor
// of the class owning it) into cpp files where they can see to the definition
// of ObjectType. This should fix the error.
ignoreUnused (sizeof (ObjectType));
delete object;
}
};
This is all a bit over my head. I was figuring it wouldn't be too bad to be able to create a new window, via a button. A new window that I could edit with the graphical GUI editor, but I'm not able to fully figure it out all on my own, through I did try. Could anyone post a step-by-step guide to doing this the correct way? I did post this at the JUCE forums, but due to my lack of GUI programming, I was unable to understand the solutions posted (my own fault), so I'm hoping to get a very simple guide to this. It would be very much appreciated. Thank you.
I figured it out. I needed to create:
A new GUI component (Remember, this is the visual editor in JUCE)
A class (I called it BasicWindow, based on the JUCE demo code) that acts as a shell to run this new window and holds the GUI component.
A JUCE SafePointer that makes a new object of type BasicWindow whenever the button is clicked and sets the attributes to that window.
Here is my code:
Referring to line 3) Inside the handler section of the button to create the new window:
basicWindow = new BasicWindow("Information", Colours::grey, DocumentWindow::allButtons);
basicWindow->setUsingNativeTitleBar(true);
basicWindow->setContentOwned(new InformationComponent(), true);// InformationComponent is my GUI editor component (the visual editor of JUCE)
basicWindow->centreWithSize(basicWindow->getWidth(), basicWindow->getHeight());
basicWindow->setVisible(true);
Referring to line 2) A .cpp file that defines what the BasicWindow is:
#include "../JuceLibraryCode/JuceHeader.h"
class BasicWindow : public DocumentWindow
{
private:
JUCE_DECLARE_NON_COPYABLE_WITH_LEAK_DETECTOR (BasicWindow)
public:
BasicWindow (const String& name, Colour backgroundColour, int buttonsNeeded)
: DocumentWindow (name, backgroundColour, buttonsNeeded)
{
}
void closeButtonPressed() override
{
delete this;
}
};
And referring to line 1) Make the GUI editor component, which this is easy to do. You just right add a new file in the JUCE file manager. "Add New GUI Component," then visually add all your elements and handler code.
My biggest issue was that I was using a JUCE ScopedPointer, so after deleting the object, the pointer pointing to it wasn't being set back to NULL. The SafePointer does this. If any more explanation is needed, I'm happy to help, as this was terrible for someone with not much GUI development "under his belt."
I am currently programming an application using glfw in MacOS X. My only problem is that the application doesn't use an AppDelegate, but does all the initialization in the main.cpp file like a command line utility. I specifically want to implement the function
- (BOOL)application:(NSApplication *)sender openFile:(NSString *)filename;
and I already registered the file extensions in the plist file and when I try to open them I get an error message saying "The document "Doc.xxx" could not be opened. MyApp cannot open files in the "xxx" format.
I attempted to create a singleton that sets itself as the delegate but it just doesn't call the function. Can anyone comment on the possibility of creating a class and implementing the NSApplicationDelegate functions?
Basically there is nothing in your code to receive events from the OS and to pump the events received.
The solution, according to another stack overflow Q/A, appears to be to invoke NSApplication manually. You still need to decide where to hook your OpenGL render loop into as [NSApp run] doesn't return until the app finishes. Another solution could be to make a custom NSApplication replacement. http://www.cocoawithlove.com/2009/01/demystifying-nsapplication-by.html
Copied pretty much verbatim from this answer taking into account the modifications for ARC: https://stackoverflow.com/a/2154666/1874323
#autoreleasepool {
AppDelegate * delegate = [[AppDelegate alloc] init];
NSApplication * application = [NSApplication sharedApplication];
[application setDelegate:delegate];
[NSApp run]; // Note this never returns until the app finishes, so you need to decide where to hook your code into
}
As always you can find documentation from the Apple website:
https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Cocoa/Reference/ApplicationKit/Classes/NSApplication_Class/Reference/Reference.html
Does anyone know which relation may exist between registration-free COM and drag/drop functionality?
Specifically, we have a huge C++ CAD/CAM application comprising a number of EXEs and several hundreds DLLs. Many of them serve as COM servers (both in-proc and out-of-proc) and/or clients, and also implement ActiveX controls.
The most of ActiveX controls and the main CMDIFrameWnd-based window of one of EXEs implement drag/drop functionality. ActiveX controls implement the both drop source and drop target, and the main window is only drop target, in particular, for files from Windows Explorer.
The drag/drop implementation is pretty standard and based on two data members derived from COleDataSource and COleDropTarget for drop source and drop target respectively. The COleDropTarget-derived member is registered with respective window in the window's OnCreate method. It also overrides OnDragEnter, OnDragOver and OnDrop methods in a similar way. Namely, the system-supplied COleDataObject parameter is asked for specific format (in particular, CF_HDROP), and in the case of positive answer, the data (e.g., file path) is extracted from the clipboard. The code looks like the following:
static FORMATETC g_FileFmt = {CF_HDROP, 0, DVASPECT_CONTENT, 0, TYMED_HGLOBAL};
....
// Inside OnDragEnter, OnDragOver or OnDrop method
STGMEDIUM stgmedium = {0,0,0};
if (pDataObject->IsDataAvailable(g_FileFmt.cfFormat))
{
HRESULT hr = pDataObject->GetData(g_FileFmt.cfFormat, &stgmedium);
HDROP hdrop = (HDROP)GlobalLock(stgmedium.hGlobal);
if (hdrop != 0)
{
int FilesCount = DragQueryFile(hdrop, (UINT)-1, 0, 0);
if (FilesCount != 0)
{
TCHAR FileName[_MAX_PATH];
DragQueryFile(hdrop, 0, FileName, _MAX_PATH);
// Check file extension and store the file name for farther use.
}
GlobalUnlock(hdrop);
}
}
The drop source implementation is also straightforward and looks like the following:
void CDmDocListCtrl::OnBeginDrag(NMHDR* pNMHDR, LRESULT* pResult)
{
NM_LISTVIEW* pNMListView = (NM_LISTVIEW*)pNMHDR;
if (pNMListView->iItem != -1 && m_pOleDataSource && prv_BeginDrag())
{
DROPEFFECT DE = m_pOleDataSource->DoDragDrop(
DROPEFFECT_COPY | DROPEFFECT_MOVE | DROPEFFECT_LINK, 0);
}
*pResult = 0;
}
where prv_BeginDrag() function collects dragged data, packs it and puts on the clipboard by calling SetData method from the m_pOleDataSource object's IDataObject interface.
The all this stuff worked perfectly until it was decided to make the whole application registration-free. It took me three months to force the application run isolated (without registration of COM components) by embedding manifests, launching out-of-proc COM servers on demand and altering CLSID of some classes in order to separate instances of the same server launched from different folders. At last it begins to work - but without drag/drop functionality, despite it wasn't even touched by my changes.
On the drop target side, when I drag file from Windows Explorer, depicted above call to COleDataObject::IsDataAvailable returns false, although before my changes returned true. At the same time, if I add a single line of code "DragAcceptFiles();" to the main window's OnCreate method, drag/drop begins working via the standard CFrameWnd's WM_DROPFILE message handler.
On the drop source side, the dragged data are successfully packed and placed on the clipboard, but COleDataSource::DoDragDrop method fails, because a call to ::DoDragDrop API inside MFC implementation returns REGDB_E_CLASSNOTREG "Class not registered" result.
It means, that COM activation changes somehow influence drag/drop behavior. How?
P.S. 1) The EXE, to which I drag files from Windows Explorer, has in its project properties "UAC Execution Level = asInvoker". As far as I understand, it tells that the EXE will run at the same UAC level as Windows Explorer when launched by double-click on the file.
2) Quite surprisingly, although drag/drop stopped working with symptoms described above, Copy/Paste continues work well, despite the both technologies have similar implementation.
3) I believe, that if find out when ::DoDragDrop API returns "Class not registered" error, and which class it is looking for, it would be possible to solve the problem.
Thanks for help,
Ilia.
Following to MartinBa advice, I solved the problem with the help of Process Monitor. The Process Monitor showed me that while I drag an item in the ActiveX control (mentioned in the question), the system unsuccessfully tries get access to a class ID in the Registry. Looking for that ID, I found that it is really not class ID, but IDataObject interface ID. It was referenced in one of my manifest files.
The most of manifests I have written by hand, but a few, especially at the beginning of the project having no experience in the area, I generated automatically by Visual Studio from existing type library. In one of them Studio included the comInterfaceExternalProxyStub statement for a couple of system interfaces, in which proxyStubClsid32 element was (erroneously) equal to the interface ID.
I'm still not sure whether those system interfaces should present in the manifest; for example, the IDataObject is only mentioned as a method's parameter in one of IDL definitions. Anyway, I corrected only the proxyStubClsid32 value, and the problem disappeared...
The moral of this very painful for me story is to always check output of automatic tools...
Update: Answer: Two normal lines of code required. Thanks Noseratio!
I banged my head on the keyboard for more hours than I would have cared to trying to simulate IEs Ctrl+N behavior in my hosted Browser control app. Unfortunately, due to complications which I've abstracted out of my code examples below, I can't just let IE do Ctlr+N itself. So I have to do it manually.
Keep in mind that I am running a hosted browser. So typically, opening links in new windows will actuall open it within a new "tab" within my application (it's not really a tab, but another window... but appearance-wise it's a tab). However, Ctrl+N is different -- here, it is expected a fully-fledged IE window will launch when pressed.
I think my problem is that of framing the questions -- admittedly I am new to WebBrowser control and I find it to be a lot of yucky. Regardless, I've scoured the Internet for the past day and couldn't come up with an elegant solution.
Basically, the ideal solution would be to call a "NewWindow" function within WebBrowser control or its affiliate libraries; however, all I was able to find where the *On*NewWindow methods, which were event handlers, not event signallers. Which I understand that most of the time, the user will be creating the events... but what about programmatic simulation?
I tried looking into an SENDMESSAGE approach where I could use the IDs that the OnNewWindow events use... that ended up in nothing than crashes. Perhaps I could go back to get it work, but I'd like confirmation is that approach is even worth my time.
The next approach, which should have been the most elegeant, but sadly didn't pan out, was like the following:
Navigate2(GetLocationURL().GetBuffer(), BrowserNavConstants::navOpenInNewWindow);
It would have worked marvelously if it weren't for the fact that the new window would open in the background, blinking in the taskbar. needing clicking to bring it to the front.
I tried to get around the limitation in a myriad of ways, including getting the dispatcher of the current context, then calling OnNewWindow2 with that IDispatch object. Then I would invoke QueryInterface on the dispatch object for an IWebBrowser control. The webBrowser control (presumably under the control of the new window) could then navigate to the page of the original context. However... this too was a pretty messy solution and in the end would cause crashes.
Finally, I resorted to manually invoking JavaScript to get the desired behavior. Really?? Was there really no more elegant a solution to my problem than the below mess of code?
if ((pMsg->wParam == 'N') && (GetKeyState(VK_CONTROL) & 0x8000) && !(GetKeyState(VK_SHIFT) & 0x8000) && !(GetKeyState(VK_MENU) & 0x8000))
{
LPDISPATCH pDisp = CHtmlView::GetHtmlDocument();
IHTMLDocument2 *pDoc;
if (SUCCEEDED(pDisp->QueryInterface(IID_IHTMLDocument2, (void **)&pDoc)))
{
IHTMLWindow2* pWnd;
pDoc->get_parentWindow(&pWnd);
BSTR bStrLang = ::SysAllocString(L"JavaScript");
CString sCode(L"window.open(\"");
sCode.Append(GetLocationURL().GetBuffer());
sCode.Append(L"\");");
BSTR bStrCode = sCode.AllocSysString();
COleVariant retVal;
pWnd->execScript(bStrCode, bStrLang, retVal);
::SysFreeString(bStrLang);
::SysFreeString(bStrCode);
pDoc->Release();
}
pDisp->Release();
I find it hard to believe that I must resort to such hackery as this to get something as simple as opening a new window when the user presses Ctrl+N.
Please stackoverflow, please point out the clearly obvious thing I overlooked.
Ctrl-N in IE starts a new window on the same session. In your case, window.open or webBrowser.Navigate2 will create a window on a new session, because it will be run by iexplore.exe process which is separate from your app. The session is shared per-process, this is how the underlying UrlMon library works. So you'll loose all cookies and authentication cache for the new window. On the other hand, when you create a new window which hosts WebBrowser control within your own app process, you'll keep the session.
If such behavior is OK for your needs, try first your initial Navigate2 approach, precededing it with AllowSetForegroundWindow(ASFW_ANY) call. If the new window still doesn't receive the focus correctly, you can try creating an instance of InternetExplorer.Application out-of-proc COM object, and use the same IWebBrowser2 interface to automate it. Below is a simple C# app which works OK for me, the new window is correctly brought to the foreground, no focus issues. It should not be a problem to do the same with MFC.
using System;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;
using System.Windows.Forms;
namespace IeApp
{
public partial class MainForm : Form
{
// get the underlying WebBrowser ActiveX object;
// this code depends on SHDocVw.dll COM interop assembly,
// generate SHDocVw.dll: "tlbimp.exe ieframe.dll",
// and add as a reference to the project
public MainForm()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void NewWindow_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
AllowSetForegroundWindow(ASFW_ANY);
// could do: var ie = new SHDocVw.InternetExplorer()
var ie = (SHDocVw.InternetExplorer)Activator.CreateInstance(Type.GetTypeFromProgID("InternetExplorer.Application"));
ie.Visible = true;
ie.Navigate("http://www.example.com");
}
const int ASFW_ANY = -1;
[DllImport("user32.dll")]
static extern bool AllowSetForegroundWindow(int dwProcessId);
}
}
I have some code which shows a simple dialog box and handles user action (written using plain WinAPI).
// Display dialog and handle user action
LRESULT choice = DialogBoxParam(NULL, MAKEINTRESOURCE(AP_IDD_DIALOG), NULL, (DLGPROC)DialogCallback, NULL);
Is there any way to hardcode the resource file dialog.rc, which is used to build the dialog ?(I would like to get rid of .rc files and I'm pretty sure there is a way, yet I don't know what it is :)
Edit
Also, does someone have any ideas on converting existing .rc files into hardcoded resources? Is this possible?
*.rc (resource) files are source code, they are compiled with the resource compiler and linked into your object (.exe/.dll)
You don't need to ship the resource file or have it present with your app to run it.
If you want to move to programmatically defined windows rather than templates then you might want to be looking at QT/wxWidgets. But thats a fair chunk of overhead for 1 dialog!
I'm surprised I couldn't find an existing app to do this sort of thing, enough hits on google with people trying to do this.
Ok, so the DLGTEMPLATE is a variable length blob of data, normally you let the dialog function pull it from the resource bundle for you, but instead you want to store it in your program.
You need to change your static lib to have a new function to decode some 'blob' back into the dlgtemplate, and you need to generate the blob. (or add the blob in your code without decoding which I don't want to think about right now)
The following code will give you the DLGTemplate data you need to imbed in your app. (cut from larger project)
HGLOBAL LoadResourceImpl(wchar_t *resource, wchar_t *type)
{
HRSRC handle = FindResource(hInstance, resource,type);
if (handle)
{
HGLOBAL hResource = LoadResource(hInstance, handle);
if (hResource)
return LockResource(hResource);
}
return 0;
}
DLGTEMPLATE * LoadDialog(wchar_t *resource)
{
return (DLGTEMPLATE *) LoadResourceImpl(resource,RT_DIALOG);
}
DLGTEMPLATE * LoadDialog(int resource)
{
return (DLGTEMPLATE *) LoadResourceImpl(MAKEINTRESOURCE(resource),RT_DIALOG);
}
Make an app that includes your resource - use the appropriate LoadDialog to get the data.
Now "write out" that blob in a format to include in your app -
step 1 - find out how much data there is by traversing the structure to find the total size including all the controls (control count is in DLGTEMPLATE::cdit)
step 2 - convert the data to something you can compile into your code - like HEX
Add to your static library a new 'HEX' to DLGTEMPLATE method and the hex string you made using the other app.
Can we hard code the .res file into the program?
the resource compiler converts .rc into .res
use a hex dump tool (eg. winhex) to translate the .res into bytes array
(represented in C source code).
add the source code file in the project and compile in the executable.
locate the dialog resource position from the array and use DialogBoxIndirect.
DialogBoxParamIndirect can be used instead. It takes as a parameter the dialog template. Raymond Chen's blog has an example of building a dialog box at runtime rather than from a resource using the DialogBox*Indirect API's.
Per MSDN, dialog box resources are basically composed of the DLGTEMPLATE and DLGITEMTEMPLATE structures. So you should be able to use the resource API's (FindResource, LoadResource, and LockResource) to get at the underlying bits of an existing dialog resource, and embed that within your code.
Note that this is a lot more painful than using the .rc file. It's much more difficult to make changes to your layout, and it's also much less localizable, since localization would now require a code change to update the template in code.
If it's a simple dialog, why use the DLGTEMPLATE at all?
Nothing stops you from simply doing ::CreateWindow'ing those controls directly. If it's a simple dialog with 2-3 buttons and a couple text fields, simply call ::CreateWindow, passing in the window class of whatever common control you're using.
This is essentially what the DialogXxxxx functions do anyway. DLGTEMPLATE is a convenience for declaratively laying out your forms, and having the boilerplate make the appropriate CreateWindow calls, etc.