I want to get remote post handler returned response inside hook_webform_handler_invoke_post_save_alter.
Please help me.
function hook_webform_handler_invoke_post_save_alter(\Drupal\webform\Plugin\WebformHandlerInterface $handler, array &$args) {
$webform = $handler->getWebform();
$webform_submission = $handler->getWebformSubmission();
$webform_id = $webform->id();
$handler_id = $handler->getHandlerId();
if ($webform_id == 'webform_id' && $handler_id == 'handler_id') {
// how to get here remote post returned response ??
}
}
Related
We have the following code snippet that processes eCheck charge via Authorize.net (using their SDK for .NET Framework). Every once in a while, the "response" stays null after all the retries. No error code is returned. Does anyone have an idea why this happens and how to fix it?
var request = new createTransactionRequest {transactionRequest = transactionRequest};
var controller = new createTransactionController(request);
controller.Execute();
var response = controller.GetApiResponse();
short retryCount = 2;
short i = 0;
while(response == null && i < retryCount)
{
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(2));
response = controller.GetApiResponse();
i++;
}
I cannot really find an example on how to use this.
Right now, I'm doing like this:
// Request 10 connections.
ListConnectionsResponse response = peopleService.people().connections()
.list("people/me")
.setRequestSyncToken(true)
.setPageSize(10)
.setPersonFields("names,emailAddresses")
.execute();
I make some changes to my contacts (adding, removing, updating), then I do this:
// Request 10 connections.
ListConnectionsResponse response2 = peopleService.people().connections()
.list("people/me")
.setSyncToken(response.getNextSyncToken())
.setPageSize(10)
.setPersonFields("names,emailAddresses")
.execute();
But it seems like I cannot get the changes I've done earlier, not even if I do them directly from the UI. I'm pretty sure I'm using the sync token in the wrong way.
Update (19/02/2020): In this example I call the API requesting the sync token in the first request (I successfully get the contacts), pause the execution (by breakpoint), delete a contact and update another one (from the web page), resume the execution and then I call the API again with the sync token that I extracted from the previous call. The result is that no change was made for some reason:
// Build a new authorized API client service.
final NetHttpTransport HTTP_TRANSPORT = GoogleNetHttpTransport.newTrustedTransport();
PeopleService peopleService = new PeopleService.Builder(HTTP_TRANSPORT, JSON_FACTORY, getCredentials(HTTP_TRANSPORT))
.setApplicationName(APPLICATION_NAME)
.build();
// Request 10 connections.
ListConnectionsResponse response = peopleService.people().connections()
.list("people/me")
.setPageSize(10)
.setPersonFields("names,emailAddresses")
.setRequestSyncToken(true)
.execute();
// Print display name of connections if available.
List<Person> connections = response.getConnections();
if (connections != null && connections.size() > 0) {
for (Person person : connections) {
List<Name> names = person.getNames();
if (names != null && names.size() > 0) {
System.out.println("Name: " + person.getNames().get(0)
.getDisplayName());
} else {
System.out.println("No names available for connection.");
}
}
} else {
System.out.println("No connections found.");
}
// CORRECT: 2 CONTACTS PRINTED
// CORRECT: THE SYNC TOKEN IS THERE
String syncToken = response.getNextSyncToken();
System.out.println("syncToken = "+syncToken);
// I SETUP A BREAKPOINT BELOW, I DELETE ONE CONTACT AND EDIT ANOTHER AND THEN I RESUME THE EXECUTING
// Request 10 connections.
response = peopleService.people().connections()
.list("people/me")
.setPageSize(10)
.setPersonFields("names,emailAddresses")
.setSyncToken(syncToken)
.execute();
// Print display name of connections if available.
connections = response.getConnections();
if (connections != null && connections.size() > 0) {
for (Person person : connections) {
List<Name> names = person.getNames();
if (names != null && names.size() > 0) {
System.out.println("Name: " + person.getNames().get(0)
.getDisplayName());
} else {
System.out.println("No names available for connection.");
}
}
} else {
System.out.println("No connections found.");
}
// WRONG: I GET "NO CONNECTIONS FOUND"
Something I've found out is that, when requesting or setting a sync token, you must iterate the entirety of the contacts for the nextSyncToken to be populated.
That means that as long as there is a nextPageToken (wink wink setPageSize(10)), the sync token will not be populated.
You could either:
A) Loop over all the contacts using your current
pagination, doing whatever you need to do at every
iteration, and after the last call retrieve the populated
sync token.
B) Iterate over all the contacts in one go, using the max
page size of 2000 and a single personField, retrieve the
token, and then do whatever you need to do. Note that if
you are expecting a user to have more than 2000
contacts, you will still need to call the next pages using
the nextPageToken.
Here is an exemple of a sync loop, adapted from Synchronize Resources Efficiently. Note that I usually use the Python client, so this Java code might not be 100% error free:
private static void run() throws IOException {
Request request = people_service.people().connections()
.list("people/me")
.setPageSize(10)
.setPersonFields("names,emailAddresses");
// Load the sync token stored from the last execution, if any.
// The syncSettingsDataStore is whatever you use for storage.
String syncToken = syncSettingsDataStore.get(SYNC_TOKEN_KEY);
String syncType = null;
// Perform the appropiate sync
if (syncToken == null) {
// Perform a full sync
request.setRequestSyncToken(true);
syncType = "FULL";
} else {
// Try to perform an incremental sync.
request.setSyncToken(syncToken);
syncType = "INCREMENTAL";
}
String pageToken = null;
ListConnectionsResponse response = null;
List<Person> contacts = null;
// Iterate over all the contacts, page by page.
do {
request.setPageToken(pageToken);
try {
response = request.execute();
} catch (GoogleJsonResponseException e) {
if (e.getStatusCode() == 410) {
// A 410 status code, "Gone", indicates that the sync token is
// invalid/expired.
// WARNING: The code is 400 in the Python client. I think the
// Java client uses the correct code, but be on the lookout.
// Clear the sync token.
syncSettingsDataStore.delete(SYNC_TOKEN_KEY);
// And anything else you need before re-syncing.
dataStore.clear();
// Restart
run();
} else {
throw e;
}
}
contacts = response.getItems();
if (contacts.size() == 0) {
System.out.println("No contacts to sync.");
} else if (syncType == "FULL"){
//do full sync for this page.
} else if (syncType == "INCREMENTAL") {
//do incremental sync for this page.
} else {
// What are you doing here???
}
pageToken = response.getNextPageToken();
} while (pageToken != null);
// Store the sync token from the last request for use at the next execution.
syncSettingsDataStore.set(SYNC_TOKEN_KEY, response.getNextSyncToken());
System.out.println("Sync complete.");
}
I am trying to use the CPPRESTSDK (a.k.a. Casablanca) to POST data to a RESTful server. To do this, I create a request, and assign a header:
// create request, and add header information
web::http::http_request req(methods::POST);
req.headers().add(header_names::authorization, authStr); // authStr is base64 representation of username & password
req.headers().add(header_names::content_type, http::details::mime_types::application_json);
Next, I make a web::json::value object that contains all the key-value pairs:
web::json::value obj = json::value::object();
obj[U("Key1")] = web::json::value::string(U("Val1")];
obj[U("Key2")] = web::json::value::string(U("Val2")];
obj[U("Key3")] = web::json::value::string(U("Val3")];
I then store this object in the request's body by calling:
req.set_body(obj);
Finally, I send the request to the server using an http_client:
// create http client
web::http::client::http_client client(addr); // addr is wstring
return client.request(req).then([](http_response response) {
return response;
});
The problem is that this doesn't do anything. If I place a breakpoint on this line, I get information about "400 Bad Request." I would assume that the request's body is somehow malformed, but it could also be that I am missing some information in the header. This error does not happen when I issue a GET request on the same URL, so it is definitely a problem with POSTs specifically. What do you think?
Here is a working example:
// create a new channel
pplx::task<web::http::http_response> postChannel(http_client client, std::wstring authStr, std::wstring cDesc, std::wstring cName, std::string cDiagCap, int cNormFloat, int cWriteDuty,
int cWriteMeth, std::string cItemPersist, std::wstring cItemPersistDat) {
// create request
http_request req(methods::POST);
req.headers().add(header_names::authorization, authStr);
std::wstring url = L"/config/v1/project/channels";
req.set_request_uri(url);
json::value obj = json::value::object();
obj[U("common.ALLTYPES_DESCRIPTION")] = json::value::string(cDesc);
obj[U("common.ALLTYPES_NAME")] = json::value::string(cName);
obj[U("servermain.CHANNEL_DIAGNOSTICS_CAPTURE")] = json::value(cDiagCap == "true" || cDiagCap == "t");
obj[U("servermain.CHANNEL_NON_NORMALIZED_FLOATING_POINT_HANDLING")] = json::value(cNormFloat);
obj[U("servermain.CHANNEL_WRITE_OPTIMIZATIONS_DUTY_CYCLE")] = json::value(cWriteDuty);
obj[U("servermain.CHANNEL_WRITE_OPTIMIZATIONS_METHOD")] = json::value(cWriteMeth);
obj[U("servermain.MULTIPLE_TYPES_DEVICE_DRIVER")] = json::value::string(U("Simulator")); // right now, Simulator channels are the only option
obj[U("simulator.CHANNEL_ITEM_PERSISTENCE")] = json::value(cItemPersist == "true" || cItemPersist == "t");
obj[U("simulator.CHANNEL_ITEM_PERSISTENCE_DATA_FILE")] = json::value::string(cItemPersistDat);
req.set_body(obj);
return client.request(req).then([](http_response response) {
return response;
});
}
I have a website where I am using selenium for integration testing.
I have link there that is generated using multiple variables from page.
I would like to verify the download pop up box is displaying if at all possible, when i am simulating click on link to download the file.
I know i can have JsUnit that will do that for me.
Any ideas?
Selenium is lousy when working with downloads. Clicking the link will get you into trouble.
You could, however, make a request using HttpURLConnection, Apache HttpComponents (or maybe just a file get through URL) for the link specified and assert a 200 OK response. Or try to get the file - this is my favourite tool for this with Selenium.
Thnx to Slanec i have took up your examples.
Ok after investigation I have decided that best solution will be
something along this line.
public int GetFileLenghtFromUrlLocation(string location)
{
int len = 0;
int timeoutInSeconds = 5;
// paranoid check for null value
if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(location)) return 0;
// Create a web request to the URL
HttpWebRequest myRequest = (HttpWebRequest)WebRequest.Create(location);
myRequest.Timeout = timeoutInSeconds * 1000;
myRequest.AddRange(1024);
try
{
// Get the web response
HttpWebResponse myResponse = (HttpWebResponse)myRequest.GetResponse();
// Make sure the response is valid
if (HttpStatusCode.OK == myResponse.StatusCode)
{
// Open the response stream
using (Stream myResponseStream = myResponse.GetResponseStream())
{
if (myResponseStream == null) return 0;
using (StreamReader rdr = new StreamReader(myResponseStream))
{
len = rdr.ReadToEnd().Length;
}
}
}
}
catch (Exception err)
{
throw new Exception("Error saving file from URL:" + err.Message, err);
}
return len;
}
Environment: C#, .Net 3.5, Sql Server 2005
I have a method that works in a stand-alone C# console application project. It creates an XMLElement from data in the database and uses a private method to send it to a web service on our local network. When run from VS in this test project, it runs in < 5 seconds.
I copied the class into a CLR project, built it, and installed it in SQL Server (WITH PERMISSION_SET = EXTERNAL_ACCESS). The only difference is the SqlContext.Pipe.Send() calls that I added for debugging.
I am testing it by using an EXECUTE command one stored procedure (in the CLR) from an SSMS query window. It never returns. When I stop execution of the call after a minute, the last thing displayed is "Calling GetResponse() using http://servername:53694/odata.svc/Customers/". Any ideas as to why the GetResponse() call doesn't return when executing within SQL Server?
private static string SendPost(XElement entry, SqlString url, SqlString entityName)
{
// Send the HTTP request
string serviceURL = url.ToString() + entityName.ToString() + "/";
HttpWebRequest request = (HttpWebRequest)HttpWebRequest.Create(serviceURL);
request.Method = "POST";
request.Accept = "application/atom+xml,application/xml";
request.ContentType = "application/atom+xml";
request.Timeout = 20000;
request.Proxy = null;
using (var writer = XmlWriter.Create(request.GetRequestStream()))
{
entry.WriteTo(writer);
}
try
{
SqlContext.Pipe.Send("Calling GetResponse() using " + request.RequestUri);
WebResponse response = request.GetResponse();
SqlContext.Pipe.Send("Back from GetResponse()");
/*
string feedData = string.Empty;
Stream stream = response.GetResponseStream();
using (StreamReader streamReader = new StreamReader(stream))
{
feedData = streamReader.ReadToEnd();
}
*/
HttpStatusCode StatusCode = ((HttpWebResponse)response).StatusCode;
response.Close();
if (StatusCode == HttpStatusCode.Created /* 201 */ )
{
return "Created # Location= " + response.Headers["Location"];
}
return "Creation failed; StatusCode=" + StatusCode.ToString();
}
catch (WebException ex)
{
return ex.Message.ToString();
}
finally
{
if (request != null)
request.Abort();
}
}
The problem turned out to be the creation of the request content from the XML. The original:
using (var writer = XmlWriter.Create(request.GetRequestStream()))
{
entry.WriteTo(writer);
}
The working replacement:
using (Stream requestStream = request.GetRequestStream())
{
using (var writer = XmlWriter.Create(requestStream))
{
entry.WriteTo(writer);
}
}
You need to dispose the WebResponse. Otherwise, after a few calls it goes to timeout.
You are asking for trouble doing this in the CLR. And you say you are calling this from a trigger? This belongs in the application tier.
Stuff like this is why when the CLR functionality came out, DBAs were very concerned about how it would be misused.