s3_out: unable to sign request without credentials set - amazon-web-services

I try to use "instance_profile_credentials" at ec2 instance as credentials. However I get
2021-09-16 14:16:50 +0000 [error]: #0 unexpected error error_class=RuntimeError error="can't call S3 API. Please check your credentials or s3_region configuration. error = #<Aws::Errors::MissingCredentialsError: unable to sign request without credentials set>"
I pretty sure my s3_region is correct, and I can use cli "aws s3 cp " to copy object at command line, not sure what going wrong.
I wonder if that because I am under a http proxy. However, I already setup "proxy_uri" parameter. Not sure what else I can do to check what going wrong?

Related

Can I set AWS credentials on a Spring Boot/Cloud #SqsListener? (Java)

Double newbie here, to both SQS and Spring Cloud. I've created (using the console) an SQS queue. The company wiki I'm working from says then to generate temporary credentials, which come out looking like this:
aws_access_key_id = <secret>
aws_secret_access_key = <secret>
region = us-west-2
aws_session_token = <secret and VERY LONG, like 240 characters>
NOTE: more on that "aws_session_token" later.
So, once I have done that, I can send a message from the CLI, like this.
`aws --endpoint-url https://sqs.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/99999999999999/<queue name>.fifo sqs send-message --queue-url https://sqs.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/99999999999999/<queue name>.fifo --message-body "cli test msg 2" --message-group-id "azgroup"`
So far so good. But now, I want to implement an SqsListener to listen continuously. So, I checked out the code here https://github.com/sixthpoint/spring-boot-sqs-fifo-tutorial, which is a minimal Spring Cloud SQS application, and set all the configs as shown in the readme. My listener, right now, looks simply like this:
#SqsListener(value=SQSURL)
public void process(String json) throws IOException {
System.out.println("here");
System.out.println(json);
}
But, when I try to start the application up, I get this error:
com.amazonaws.services.sqs.model.AmazonSQSException: The security token included in the request is invalid. (Service: AmazonSQS; Status Code: 403; Error Code: InvalidClientTokenId; Request ID:....)
I think what's going on is that at startup, the listener is trying to contact my queue, and is being rejected because it's not sending that aws_session_token. (The company wiki, again, says this: "You will see aws_session_token. This is something you have not had before. It is required for your key to work!")
So, is there a way to explicitly set my AWS parameters, either in the Java code where the #SqsListener is defined, or somewhere in configs, such that the aws_session_token gets passed? It doesn't seem possible to pass an AwsCredentials object. (edit) And it doesn't seem that that would help me anyway, since AwsCredentials doesn't contain that field.
Or . . . is there some other way of solving this?
Answering, or at least partially answering, my own question: It turns out that the aws_session_token is required when, and only when, using temporary aws credentials, which as I noted is what I've been given to work with. It has to be added to any CLI operations, but there is no way to set it the AwsCredentials object in Java code. So that's not going to help me. It may just not be possible to connect from Java code when using temporary credentials. If I'm wrong and there is a way, please let me know.

while installing aws amplify init on terminal .gives error

i am getting this while doing amplify init , so main agenda is to develop authentication through aws-cognito , which is using aws-amplify,
? Do you want to use an AWS profile? Yes
? Please choose the profile you want to use default
init failed
Error: read ECONNRESET
at TLSWrap.onStreamRead (internal/stream_base_commons.js:205:27) {
message: 'read ECONNRESET',
errno: 'ECONNRESET',
code: 'NetworkingError',
syscall: 'read',
region: 'us-east-1',
hostname: 'amplify.us-east-1.amazonaws.com',
retryable: true,
time: 2020-04-16T12:09:59.975Z
You may try the following strategies to eliminate the problem you are facing,
This more of looks like a Network problem as per the logs from your
Terminal, therefore if you have a jittery connection, I would
recommend that you try the same on a stable internet connection.
I will recommend to do an amplify delete in case there is some mis-configuration from the last time you did an amplify init, but the chances of this are very less.
Check your aws environment variables or configuration file maybe the credentials of your aws account are missing. Try doing an aws configure and reset the values of your key,secret, and region.
I hope the above suggestions help you somehow.

aws pinpoint update-apns-sandbox-channel command results in: missing credentials

aws --version
aws-cli/1.16.76 Python/2.7.10 Darwin/16.7.0 botocore/1.12.66
I'm trying to programmatically add an APNS_SANDBOX channel to a pinpoint app. I'm able to do this successfully via the pinpoint console, but not with aws cli or a lambda function which is the end goal. Changes to our Test/Prod environments can only be made via the CodePipeline, but for testing purposes I'm trying to achieve this with the aws cli.
I've tried both aws cli (using the root credentials) and a lambda function -- both result in the following error:
An error occurred (BadRequestException) when calling the UpdateApnsSandboxChannel operation: Missing credentials
I have tried setting the Certificate field in the UpdateApnsSandboxChannel json object as the path to the .p12 certificate file as well as using a string value retrieved from the openssl tool.
Today I worked with someone from aws support, and they were not able to figure out the issue after trying to debug for a couple of hours. They said they would send an email to the pinpoint team, but they did not have an ETA on when they might respond.
Thanks
I ended up getting this to work successfully -- This is why it was failing:
I was originally making the cli call with the following request object as this is what is including in the documentation:
aws pinpoint update-apns-sandbox-channel --application-id [physicalID] --cli-input-json file:///path-to-requestObject.json
{
"APNSSandboxChannelRequest": {
"BundleId": "com.bundleId.value",
"Certificate":"P12_FILE_PATH_OR_CERT_AS_STRING",
"DefaultAuthenticationMethod": "CERTIFICATE",
"Enabled": true,
"PrivateKey":"PRIVATEKEY_FILE_PATH_OR_AS_STRING",
"TeamId": "",
"TokenKey": "",
"TokenKeyId": ""
},
"ApplicationId": "Pinpoint_PhysicalId"
}
After playing around with it some more I got it to work by removing BundleId, TeamId, TokenKey, and TokenKeyId. I believe these fields are needed when using a p8 certificate.
{
"APNSSandboxChannelRequest": {
"Certificate":"P12_FILE_PATH_OR_CERT_AS_STRING",
"DefaultAuthenticationMethod": "CERTIFICATE",
"Enabled": true,
"PrivateKey":"PRIVATEKEY_FILE_PATH_OR_AS_STRING"
},
"ApplicationId": "Pinpoint_PhysicalId"
}

Spark is inventing his own AWS secretKey

I'm trying to read a s3 bucket from Spark and up until today Spark always complain that the request return 403
hadoopConf = spark_context._jsc.hadoopConfiguration()
hadoopConf.set("fs.s3a.access.key", "ACCESSKEY")
hadoopConf.set("fs.s3a.secret.key", "SECRETKEY")
hadoopConf.set("fs.s3a.impl", "org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.S3AFileSystem")
logs = spark_context.textFile("s3a://mybucket/logs/*)
Spark was saying .... Invalid Access key [ACCESSKEY]
However with the same ACCESSKEY and SECRETKEY this was working with aws-cli
aws s3 ls mybucket/logs/
and in python boto3 this was working
resource = boto3.resource("s3", region_name="us-east-1")
resource.Object("mybucket", "logs/text.py") \
.put(Body=open("text.py", "rb"),ContentType="text/x-py")
so my credentials ARE invalid and the problem is definitely something with Spark..
Today I decided to turn on the "DEBUG" log for the entire spark and to my suprise... Spark is NOT using the [SECRETKEY] I have provided but instead... add a random one???
17/03/08 10:40:04 DEBUG request: Sending Request: HEAD https://mybucket.s3.amazonaws.com / Headers: (Authorization: AWS ACCESSKEY:[RANDON-SECRET-KEY], User-Agent: aws-sdk-java/1.7.4 Mac_OS_X/10.11.6 Java_HotSpot(TM)_64-Bit_Server_VM/25.65-b01/1.8.0_65, Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 10:40:04 GMT, Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded; charset=utf-8, )
This is why it still return 403! Spark is not using the key I provide with fs.s3a.secret.key but instead invent a random one??
For the record I'm running this locally on my machine (OSX) with this command
spark-submit --packages com.amazonaws:aws-java-sdk-pom:1.11.98,org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-aws:2.7.3 test.py
Could some one enlighten me on this?
(updated as my original one was downvoted as clearly considered unacceptable)
The AWS auth protocol doesn't send your secret over the wire. It signs the message. That's why what you see isn't what you passed in.
For further information, please reread.
I ran into a similar issue. Requests that were using valid AWS credentials returned a 403 Forbidden, but only on certain machines. Eventually I found out that the system time on those particular machines were 10 minutes behind. Synchronizing the system clock solved the problem.
Hope this helps!
It is very intriguing this random passkey. Maybe AWS SDK is getting the password from OS environment.
In hadoop 2.8, the default AWS provider chain shows the following list of providers:
BasicAWSCredentialsProvider EnvironmentVariableCredentialsProvider SharedInstanceProfileCredentialsProvider
Order, of course, matters! the AWSCredentialProviderChain, get the first keys from the first provider that provides that information.
if (credentials.getAWSAccessKeyId() != null &&
credentials.getAWSSecretKey() != null) {
log.debug("Loading credentials from " + provider.toString());
lastUsedProvider = provider;
return credentials;
}
See the code in "GrepCode for AWSCredentialProviderChain".
I face similar problem using profile credentials. SDK was ignoring the credentials inside ~/.aws/credentials (as good practice, I encourage you to not store credentials inside the program in any way).
My solution...
Set the credentials provider to use ProfileCredentialsProvider
sc._jsc.hadoopConfiguration().set("fs.s3a.endpoint", "s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com") # yes, I am using central eu server.
sc._jsc.hadoopConfiguration().set('fs.s3a.aws.credentials.provider', 'com.amazonaws.auth.profile.ProfileCredentialsProvider')
Folks, go for the IAM configuration based on Roles ... that will open up S3 access policies that should be added to the EMR default one.

AuthFailure AWS was not able to authenticate the request: access credentials are missing

I'm trying to submit the Pay step in an Amazon Flexible Payments request...
I get the following error
AuthFailure AWS was not able to authenticate the request: access
credentials are missing
However, I believe I am following the instructions to the letter:
The documentation gives the following example:
https://fps.sandbox.amazonaws.com?
Action=Pay
&AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIOSFODNN7EXAMPLE
&CallerDescription=MyWish
&CallerReference=CallerReference02
&SenderTokenId=553ILMLCG6Z8J431H7BX3UMN3FFQU8VSNTSRNCTAASDJNX66LNZLKSZU3PI7TXIH
&Signature=0AgvXMwJmLxwdMaiE7lMHZxc6384h%2FjBkiTserQFpBQ%3D
&SignatureMethod=HmacSHA256
&SignatureVersion=2
&Timestamp=2009-10-06T05%3A49%3A52.843Z
&TransactionAmount.CurrencyCode=USD
&TransactionAmount.Value=1
&Version=2008-09-17
Here is what I generate:
https://fps.sandbox.amazonaws.com?
AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAI3...EXAMPLE
&Action=Pay
&CallerDescription=MyWebsite.com
&CallerReference=0.557658069068566
&SenderTokenId=25R743FUFUSUVPMZZ5Z83SWP1YPNX8YDPFR8XCDEMLH4L1PPMEZ65VLT8LE6UXPR
&SignatureMethod=HmacSHA256
&SignatureVersion=2&Timestamp=2013-07-06T13%3A56%3A03-07%3A00
&TransactionAmount.currencyCode=USD
&TransactionAmount.value=3
&Version=2008-09-17
&signature=9k%2B4Txi2ZzUj62QBK3TwV6x0KWfkNY9YWpqty8%2B3XKk%3D
I know that my AWS credentials are good because I have to use them in the immediately preceding step of getting the SenderTokenID. I'm just trying to finish up the transaction.
Any ideas? This has be totally baffled and has been a tragic waste of human life so far.
Ok, so the solution is
1) Although the opposite is documented for the antecedent step (getting a token ID), for this specific request, FPS cares about the case of the parameters - they should all be camel case.
2) I was missing a default '/' to cover the case of a blank path in my message signing function (the endpoint here has nothing after the host name)
Here's the HTTP GET that worked (obfuscating AWS credentials)
https://fps.sandbox.amazonaws.com/?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIEXAMPLE
&Action=Pay
&CallerDescription=MyWebsite
&CallerReference=0.7753969375044107
&SenderTokenId=25R7R3NUFBS6VPRZV5Z53AWP2YLNXAYEPFJ8BCDGMXH4V1FPMZZ95VATZLEFUCPG
&SignatureMethod=HmacSHA256
&SignatureVersion=2
&Timestamp=2013-07-06T14%3A38%3A41-07%3A00
&TransactionAmount.CurrencyCode=USD
&TransactionAmount.Value=3
&Version=2008-09-17
&Signature=Ijf0hqQuSi5zU%2BF1PUK1LBYvsK9AVHacrqK1hJVzffk%3D
And here is the message as it was actually signed with Hmac SHA256 (AWS Secret key as password):
GET
fps.sandbox.amazonaws.com
/
AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIEXAMPLE&Action=Pay&CallerDescription=MyWebsite&CallerReference=0.7753969375044107&SenderTokenId=25R7R3NUFBS6VPRZV5Z53AWP2YLNXAYEPFJ8BCDGMXH4V1FPMZZ95VATZLEFUCPG&SignatureMethod=HmacSHA256&SignatureVersion=2&Timestamp=2013-07-06T14%3A38%3A41-07%3A00&TransactionAmount.CurrencyCode=USD&TransactionAmount.Value=3&Version=2008-09-17