Synopsis
We have a web app that allows internal users and external users to login, we would like to split the 2 groups of users in Keycloak with different realms, for instance, internal realm and external realm. Our ideal authentication method is OpenID Connect.
Problem
Most Django OIDC libraries allows to specify one OIDC client configuration in Django settings. However given how OIDC works one client configuration only works with one realm, because a client is configured inside a realm.
I have come across this library django-keycloak which seems to be able to configure client configurations in a database and I need to implement my own middleware to dynamically route the request to a corresponding realm, see multi-tenancy section.
Unfortunately this library has not been updated for 2 years and seems not maintained anymore.
Question
Is there an up-to-date library that has similar functionality in django-keycloak? (I will raise an issue in the repo to enquire the project status)
Apart from the multi-client configuration approach, is there a better alternative?
I do not know about django, but from the Keycloak side what you can do is to configure the external realm as an identity provider for the internal realm. You can read about identity brokering here.
For that go to the Admin Console and:
select your Internal Realm, and click on Identity Providers
On the right side of the page select Keycloak OpenID Connect from the Add provider ... dropdown menu. It will popup the Add Identity Provider form, from there set:
the alias
the Authorization URL, Token URL, Logout URL, User Info URL and Issuer to the correspondent endpoints that can be found on the external realm .well-known endpoint (i.e., <KEYCLOAK_IP>/auth/realms/<External Realm Name>/.well-known/openid-configuration)
For the Client Authentication you can select Client secret send as post
For the Client ID and Client Secret first create a new client in your external realm and use its Client ID and Client Secret here. This client:
can have Access Type confidential
Standard Flow Enabled : ON
Valid Redirect URIs set it to your Keycloak IP followed by "*", for instance <KEYCLOAK_IP>*
Web Origins : +
Save
Bear in mind that some of those configurations might have to be adapted to your own needs.
Now if everything was set correctly, at the keycloak internal realm login page will show up a new button that the users stored on the external realm can click on to authenticate against the external realm.
Now you configure your app to lend at the Internal Realm Login page, the users from your internal realm authenticate immediately there, the users from the external realm click on the new button to explicitly authenticate against the external realm.
This setup is more or less like the use case that a user wants to login into your app but using his/her social media account.
Related
I'm attempting to use Postman to "Get User Access Token" with Microsoft Graph API; however, my org recently enabled multi-factor auth and this call is now failing, stating:
"error": "invalid_grant",
"error_description": "AADSTS50076: Due to a configuration change made by your administrator, or because you moved to a new location, you must use multi-factor authentication to access...
The Microsoft documentation for MS Graph API using Postman is very well written, but it is missing clear instructions how to pass in this second factor to the request.
The error points to https://login.microsoftonline.com/error?code=50076, but this just gives the same info.
I have the MS authenticator app which gives me this key/second factor; however, I don't know how to add this into the body/headers. I'm trying to find the specific key name for passing in the additional security token (I've tried things like 'token,' 'pcToken,' 'key,' etc.)
.
I was in the same predicament so here is what I did to solve it:
Firstly, I got the information from:
https://github.com/microsoftgraph/microsoftgraph-postman-collections/issues/4
You will need to use the OAuth 2.0 authorisation in Postman. Using the same GET request, go to Authorization -> Change the type to 'OAuth 2.0' then click 'Get New Access Token'.
From there, you can input your own details:
(replace [TenantID] with your own)
Callback URL: The redirect URL you stated in your app authentication.
Auth URL:
https://login.microsoftonline.com/[TenantID]/oauth2/v2.0/authorize
Access Token URL: https://login.microsoftonline.com/[TenantID]/oauth2/v2.0/token
Client ID: You're application's ID.
Client Secret: You're Applications secret that you set under the 'Certificates & secrets' section.
Screenshot
Username Password Authentication is not supported for MFA because MFA requires interaction. But there is no interaction if you need to use Username Password Authentication to sign in.
See Username Password Authentication:
users who need to do MFA won't be able to sign-in (as there is no
interaction)
The answers above do not describe anything related to MFA by-passing via code.
MFA auth you need to use broker authentication where MS Authenticator app behaves as a broker.
If you integrate the proper libraries (ADAL, MSAL) your code will be able to interact with broker properly.
On Android and iOS, brokers enable:
Single Sign On (SSO). Your users won't need to sign-in to each
application
Device identification (by accessing the device
certificate which was created on the device when it was workplace
joined). We use Intune-managed devices for this purpose.
Application identification verification (is it really outlook which
calls me?). The way it works is when an application calls the broker,
it passes its redirect url, and the broker verifies it:
On iOS, the redirect URL is, for instance, ms-word://com.msft.com, the broker
parses and gets the appId (after the //) and verifies it's the same
as the appId of the calling app, which it knows (by the OS).
On Android the redirect URLs have the following form msauth://com.msft.word/.
To enable one of these features, the application developers need to set the UseBroker Boolean to true in the platform parameters. They also need to implement a delegate to react to the broker calling back the application as described in Platform parameters properties specific to brokers on Android and iOS.
Please refer to the MS docs for broker auth examples:
https://github.com/AzureAD/azure-activedirectory-library-for-dotnet/wiki/leveraging-brokers-on-Android-and-iOS
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/develop/msal-net-use-brokers-with-xamarin-apps
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/develop/brokered-auth
I have my web application. Now i want to integrate salesforce into my web app so that i can push data from my app to any salesforce org after the authentication(OAuth).
I found 2 ways:
1. Connected Apps
2. via wsdl generation file and use
I created a connected app from my developer account and i authenticated using consumer key, cusumer secret key(from my connected app) and username of user and secret token of the user account.
I tried with another free trail account, It's validating and fetching the details and post data also working.
My question is, shall i deploy my connected app into app exchange, then only i caan use REST APIs ?
generating wsdl and coding around is the better option than the above ?
Is there a option, only one time authentication enough for any number of sessions and use the REST APIs?
Please suggest me a best way to proceed.
You're mixing up a couple of independent issues here.
If you're going to authenticate via OAuth, you must have a Connected App.
A SOAP API login() call requires you to store a username and password, which is undesirable.
There is no way to "permanently" authenticate, i.e., to get a session id that never expires. Your app must always be ready to get a new access token via the OAuth refresh token it obtains and stores (via, for example, the Web Server OAuth flow), or to reauthenticate via JWT flow.
Connected Apps are global metadata in most cases. You don't need to deploy a Connected App into a target org in order to authenticate using its Client Id and Secret into that org. The only exception I'm aware of is if you want to use the JWT flow with a certificate and preauthorized Profiles and Permission Sets.
Based on what you've shared, I don't see any reason for the AppExchange to be involved.
I am trying to figure out the best way to customize WSO2IS to perform the desired function.
We use a 3rd party tool (Tools4Ever) for the password recovery of our users. Our primary user store is Active Directory. After a user signs in to website and authenticates using WSO2's local user store as the Identity Provider I would like it to redirect to an external page, the third party tool, if a specific claim is found instead of back to the service provider. For the purpose of this lets just call it "userMustResetPassword".
I have tried testing a custom local authenticator, for proof of concept, that just will redirect the user to an external page to test but it just directs the user to https://localhost/samlsso, even after setting the response.redirecturl to http://someotherwebsite.com. Am I going about this the right way?
To clarify, the external page/website is not a service provider in WSO2 and would like to jump out of the normal flow of the authentication process if the claim exist and direct the user to website instead of back to the service provider.
I just have a question regarding to Identity Provider URL.Is it possible if i would like to modify|custom|extend the Identity Provider URL? (localhost:9443/samlsso)
I currently run two SSO (SAML2) enabled apps on my local tomcat on localhost and name app1 and app2. The behavior of the applications is to redirect to login panel when the user is trying to access the applications. Since it is SSO enabled, it redirect to WSO2IS login panel. If both application are not logged in and redirected to the SSO login page of WSO2IS. The first one to login works successfully. Because the first one already logged, the second one doesn't need to be sign on again. But i would like to make the second one must be sign on again because there are 2 different issue name and i intend to use the issue name for the filter or condition
I am using WSO2 identity server 4.6.0
Regards,
The question is bit unclear to me. Is it that you don't want SSO between webapps, but only between webapp and IDP? Then it seems, it's not complete SAML SSO scenario.
Still for the filtering, you may be able to write a 'custom authenticator', implementing the interface 'org.wso2.carbon.core.services.authentication.CarbonServerAuthenticator' and engage it in the flow.
I have a django application built for an organization. But, all the users have accounts in the organization's google apps. We have been keeping two separate user accounts for them (google apps and the django app), which is not very neat. Their django username is the same as their google apps username (the part before #domain.com).
I want to simply change the login page of my django app so that redirects to google apps for authentication (ie, openid type login). Additionally, when they are logged in I would like it to return the User with the same username, so that way existing users are logged into their original accounts (since they have stuff saved under those accounts). And new users will just have a new django account created with that username.
Not sure if anyone is familiar with googleappsauth. Its a django module to allow openid login to a google apps domain. This seems perfect for me. But, its telling me I need an openid endpoint defined. The documentation does not seem to indicate that that is required, but I'm not very familiar with OpenID so I'm kind of stuck??
GOOGLE_OPENID_ENDPOINT = 'https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/ud'
To get the Google OpenID endpoint, perform discovery by sending either a GET or HEAD HTTP request to https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id. When using a GET, we recommend setting the Accept header to application/xrds+xml. Google returns an XRDS document containing an OpenID provider endpoint URL.The endpoint address is annotated as:
<Service priority="0">
<Type>http://specs.openid.net/auth/2.0/server</Type>
<URI>{Google's login endpoint URI}</URI>
</Service>
from: code.google.com
You can also use:
https://google.com/accounts/o8/site-xrds?hd=<domain>
However, be aware that this causes some problems if you use python-openid. Patches are available.