Several of GCP accounts I use display a message after logging in:
Refresh the page?
Now that you’ve upgraded, we need to refresh the page so you can take advantage of the new capabilities of your account. Do you want to refresh the page now, or do it yourself later?
Does anyone else see similar message? Wonder what kind of upgrade it relates to, I don't remember making any changes to the account recently. Hitting OK, refresh now doesn't produce any visible changes. Also it seems there is no way of making this message disappear - acknowledging or rejecting will still trigger a popup on next login.
popup screenshot
I guess the developers/engineers the project is shared with are making some changes. Well as per my observation, whenever one makes a change in GCP, it automatically gets reloaded or the necessary changes take place in background, but when others are working at same project at the same time, then if one user makes any changes in a shared access resource, then other users might need to reload the site for the necessary changes to take place.
I would highly suggest you contact other developers/engineers you are sharing the project with to check if they made changes in the project or not.
Hope this helps. Cheers :)
Related
I have a Sitecore website deployed in multi server environment. When I make some changes to Sitecore items sometimes they are shown correctly, but sometimes it shows old data.
I understand that sitecore caches items, but it sometimes showing wrong data and sometime its fine. If its caching it should always be same data at least.
For example:
Sitecore.Globalization.Translate.TextByDomain("MyDictionary", "Category");
Sometimes it returns correct data sometimes it shows wrong data i.e. the one before I changed to item.
I am using Sitecore 8.0
Items get cached on the individual servers in memory, and these are not cleared unless you activate event queues. Further content might be cached in the output cache, which needs to be cleared after you publish.
Here is a guide on how to activate event queues and here is also a good description
Here is how to make your sites clear output cache after publish
Thanks Jens for your help. The links really helped me with my understanding of Sitecore farm.
But the issue turned out to be rather silly. For some reason on one content delivery server Application Pool account didn't had permission on the virtual directory.
I use this method
soomla::CCStoreInventory::sharedStoreInventory()->giveItem(REMOVE_ADS_ITEM_ID, 1);
to give player one remove-ads item. After that, player remove and reinstall app again and click on Restore Purchase button but no remove-ads item is restored.
I'm so confused that given item cannot restore or there are somethings I missed? Please help.
The restore functionality works by looking up what IAPs the user owns (on the App Store/Google Play/etc.), and gives each non-consumable locally so that Soomla knows about it.
Since you're just giving the item locally directly, restore items has no idea that the item was granted (since you're wiping the data that says it was). It's still only looking at the official stores.
What you can do is sync what items the user owns to the cloud, and restore from that, using a UID. If you want complete control, this is the best bet, but that involves your own servers and coming up with a way of generating UID purely from device information, and not one-size-fits-all. Then you'd give the items locally when you can verify that the same user owns it on your server.
But there is an easier way. Soomla has an official implementation where they do all of this for you: Grow Sync.
Update (May 2016): Soomla is now shutting down Grow Sync, Highway, etc. so you can no longer rely on those services.
Ok, this is a bit far fetched but here is the idea and question: is it possible to get any kind of 'reference' (memory pointer, function identifier or whatever data) from a running Windows application on an event trigger basis?
Why? just like screen scraper are trying to make legacy application translatable to some programatic api call, I'm looking for ways to identify button clicks in a legacy window application: I don't need to know what the button is or does at first, but I need to be able to record a unique ID for a button click.
Screen scrapers record clicks to 'replay' later but this is not the goal: the goal is to record clicks as they happen and build the user 'journey' through the app like Web site record browsing journey.
Any idea of what technology would allow this?
I'm thinking debugger like tracing of the pointer location associated with a click event, but not sure how that's applicable to a compiled packaged app.
Maybe it's just not possible; I can see how that may be a security issue, but if it is, I'd love to hear your thoughts.
Thanks
I have no other choice but to adopt iCloud right now. In the near future i would like to build my own cloud service. Is there any problem if the app transfers all the data from iCloud to my own cloud?
Only the data related to my app of course.
After user's permission.
Is Apple positive about this?
If you mean, would Apple approve an app for the store that was going to transfer the user's iCloud data to some other online service, as usual all we can do is try and gauge the odds.
None of Apple's guidelines even hint that apps may not use non-iCloud services.
Neither do they hint that there's any issue with moving data from one service to another, even if one of them is iCloud.
Apple does not look kindly on apps that transfer user data to online storage without the user's knowledge. Assuming you make it clear to users what you're doing, this is probably not an issue, but users should have the chance to opt out of your service.
Based on information available right now, what you suggest is probably OK so long as your app makes clear what's happening. It's unwise to try and predict Apple's app-approval actions too closely. They might change their policies tomorrow, or they might decide to reject your app for reasons that had not previously been stated. At the moment though, switching services like that seems likely to be accepted.
I am in the process of adding timeline integration in an app by defining a couple custom actions, but there is a chance that we may change these later on (adding optional parameters, changing the box visualization, wording etc).
Is this possible to do after we have submitted the actions for approval, and after they are eventually approved? I expect them to need to go through approval again but I am not sure.
What happens to already published actions?
What happens during the eventual re-approval process?
Of course your actions have to go through approval again if you change them.
For existing and approved actions, those should stay in place as they are when you change them and submit them for approval again, they will show their “old” behavior until the changes are approved.