I am using an online C++11 compiler, link found here: cpp.sh (C++ Shell).
In my current project, I would like to have a watchdog class, to be able to check somehow the status of a thread or FSM (for example).
After some work (I'm not a C++11 guru), I finally got the code below, that compiles ok.
I also did some basic/trivial tests, but it seems the test program doesn't want to exit.
It says "Program running" and the only way to (force) exit is to hit the "Stop" button... :(
Well, my question : What am I doing wrong?
Any ideas, suggestions you can provide are highly appreciated.
Here is the full code, including my test app:
Watchdog (as MCVE):
#include <thread>
#include <atomic>
#include <chrono>
#include <condition_variable>
#include <mutex>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std::chrono;
class Watchdog
{
public:
Watchdog();
~Watchdog();
void Start(unsigned int milliseconds, std::function<void()> callback = 0);
void Stop();
void Pet();
private:
unsigned int m_interval;
std::atomic<bool> m_running;
std::thread m_thread;
std::function<void()> m_callback;
std::mutex m_mutex;
steady_clock::time_point m_lastPetTime;
std::condition_variable m_stopCondition;
void Loop();
};
Watchdog::Watchdog()
{
m_running = false;
}
Watchdog::~Watchdog()
{
Stop();
}
void Watchdog::Start(unsigned int milliseconds, std::function<void()> callback)
{
std::unique_lock<std::mutex> locker(m_mutex);
if(m_running == false)
{
m_lastPetTime = steady_clock::now();
m_interval = milliseconds;
m_callback = callback;
m_running = true;
m_thread = std::thread(&Watchdog::Loop, this);
}
}
void Watchdog::Stop()
{
std::unique_lock<std::mutex> locker(m_mutex);
if(m_running == true)
{
m_running = false;
m_stopCondition.notify_all();
m_thread.join();
}
}
void Watchdog::Pet()
{
std::unique_lock<std::mutex> locker(m_mutex);
m_lastPetTime = steady_clock::now();
m_stopCondition.notify_all();
}
void Watchdog::Loop()
{
std::unique_lock<std::mutex> locker(m_mutex);
while(m_running == true)
{
if(m_stopCondition.wait_for(locker, milliseconds(m_interval)) == std::cv_status::timeout)
{
if(m_callback != nullptr)
m_callback();
}
}
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
Watchdog wdog;
wdog.Start(3000, [] { std::cout << " WDOG TRIGGERED!!! "; });
for(auto i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
std::cout << "[+]";
wdog.Pet();
std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::milliseconds(500));
}
}
-
You're doing a deadlock here.
void Watchdog::Stop()
{
std::unique_lock<std::mutex> locker(m_mutex);
if(m_running == true)
{
m_running = false;
m_stopCondition.notify_all();
m_thread.join();
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
m_mutex is locked; m_thread cannot continue execution
}
}
Some additional suggestion: use simple if conditions, do not compare with true or false.
Related
I have a simple program below where some long running process someFn works, sets a state, works sets a state, works and sets a state.
While someFn is running, I want the main thread to query the state it's setting for the lifetime of someFn.
Obviously this code is incorrect because T is joinable until it actually joins and this program does not halt.
How do I correctly get the main thread to loop for the lifetime of T and stop looping as soon as T has terminated?
#include <iostream>
#include <thread>
#include <chrono>
int STATE = 0;
static std::mutex mtx;
void setState(int newState) {
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lg(mtx);
STATE = newState;
}
int getState() {
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lg(mtx);
return STATE;
}
void someFn() {
std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::seconds(1));
setState(0);
std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::seconds(1));
setState(1);
std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::seconds(1));
setState(2);
}
int main()
{
std::thread T(someFn);
while (T.joinable()) {
std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::milliseconds(500));
std::cout << getState() << std::endl;
}
T.join();
return 0;
}
Thanks!
Just with std::thread you can't.
But you can easily craft your own signal. For example:
#include <atomic>
#include <chrono>
#include <iostream>
#include <mutex>
#include <thread>
int STATE = 0;
static std::mutex mtx;
void setState(int newState) {
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lg(mtx);
STATE = newState;
}
int getState() {
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lg(mtx);
return STATE;
}
void someFn(std::atomic<bool>& isDone) {
std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::seconds(1));
setState(0);
std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::seconds(1));
setState(1);
std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::seconds(1));
setState(2);
isDone.store(true);
}
int main() {
std::atomic<bool> isDone{false};
std::thread T(someFn, std::ref(isDone));
while(!isDone.load()) {
std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::milliseconds(500));
std::cout << getState() << std::endl;
}
T.join();
return 0;
}
You don't need a mutex or other synchronization for std::atomic because it is already thread safe.
i am trying to find a solution to start and stop multiple threads in a infinite loops.
Each thread should be a seperated task and should run parallel. The threads are starting in a infinite loop and the thread itself got also in a infinite loop. Each loop should stop with the "GetKeyState" so i should be able to toggle the threads. But i am not able to start e.g. 2 Threads (Functions of the program), because the .join() is blocking the execution, and without the .join() the threading does not work.
Do you guys have a possible solution for this problem? The toggle start of one Thread is equal to the toggle stop of the infinite loop of the thread.
Here is some code i tried
#include <iostream>
#include <thread>
#include <Windows.h>
class KeyToggle {
public:
KeyToggle(int key) :mKey(key), mActive(false) {}
operator bool() {
if (GetAsyncKeyState(mKey)) {
if (!mActive) {
mActive = true;
return true;
}
}
else
mActive = false;
return false;
}
private:
int mKey;
bool mActive;
};
KeyToggle toggle(VK_NUMPAD1);
KeyToggle toggle2(VK_NUMPAD2);
void threadFunc() {
while (!toggle) {
std::cout << "Thread_1\n";
}
}
void threadFunc2() {
while (!toggle2) {
std::cout << "Thread_2\n";
}
}
int main()
{
bool bToggle = false;
bool bToggle2 = false;
std::thread t1;
std::thread t2;
while (!GetKeyState(VK_NUMPAD0)) {
if (toggle) {
bToggle = !bToggle;
if (bToggle) {
std::thread t1(threadFunc);
t1.join();
}
}
if (toggle2) {
bToggle2 = !bToggle2;
if (bToggle2) {
std::thread t2(threadFunc2);
t2.join();
}
}
}
}
Solution with the idea of #Someprogrammerdude
#include <iostream>
#include <thread>
#include <Windows.h>
#include <atomic>
std::atomic<bool> aToggle1 = false;
std::atomic<bool> aToggle2 = false;
std::atomic<bool> aToggleStopAll = false;
class KeyToggle {
public:
KeyToggle(int key) :mKey(key), mActive(false) {}
operator bool() {
if (GetAsyncKeyState(mKey)) {
if (!mActive) {
mActive = true;
return true;
}
}
else
mActive = false;
return false;
}
private:
int mKey;
bool mActive;
};
KeyToggle toggle(VK_NUMPAD1);
KeyToggle toggle2(VK_NUMPAD2);
void threadFunc() {
while(aToggleStopAll==false)
{
if(aToggle1) { std::cout << "Thread_1\n"; }
}
}
void threadFunc2() {
while(aToggleStopAll==false)
{
if(aToggle2) { std::cout << "Thread_2\n"; }
}
}
int main()
{
std::thread t1(threadFunc);
std::thread t2(threadFunc2);
while (!GetKeyState(VK_NUMPAD0)) {
if (toggle) {
aToggle1 = !aToggle1;
}
if (toggle2) {
aToggle2 = !aToggle2;
}
}
aToggleStopAll = true;
t1.join();
t2.join();
}
I want this program run every start(call) 10min.
But I did not find a solution how-to call(start) Program every 10 minutes, on c++ code (man.exe).
I would like to use the code in visual studio 2013
int runevery() {
system("start man.exe");
return true;
}
Call:
#ifdef MAN_RUN
runevery();
#endif
Thank you for your help in advance!
You can create another thread that executes that function periodically until stopped. Example:
#include <mutex>
#include <chrono>
#include <thread>
#include <iostream>
#include <functional>
#include <condition_variable>
class PeriodicAction {
std::mutex m_;
std::condition_variable c_;
bool stop_ = false;
std::function<void()> const f_;
std::chrono::seconds const initial_delay_;
std::chrono::seconds const delay_;
std::thread thread_;
bool wait(std::chrono::seconds delay) {
std::unique_lock<std::mutex> lock(m_);
c_.wait_for(lock, delay, [this]() { return stop_; });
return !stop_;
}
void thread_fn() {
for(auto delay = initial_delay_; this->wait(delay); delay = delay_)
f_();
}
public:
PeriodicAction(std::chrono::seconds initial_delay,
std::chrono::seconds delay,
std::function<void()> f)
: f_(move(f))
, initial_delay_(initial_delay)
, delay_(delay)
, thread_(&PeriodicAction::thread_fn, this)
{}
~PeriodicAction() {
this->stop();
thread_.join();
}
void stop() {
{
std::unique_lock<std::mutex> lock(m_);
stop_ = true;
}
c_.notify_one();
}
};
char const* now_c_str() {
auto time_t = std::chrono::system_clock::to_time_t(std::chrono::system_clock::now());
return std::ctime(&time_t);
}
int main(int ac, char**) {
using namespace std::literals::chrono_literals;
// Print current time for the next 5 seconds and then terminate.
PeriodicAction a(0s, 1s, []() { std::cout << now_c_str(); });
std::this_thread::sleep_for(5s);
}
Applying to your case:
PeriodicAction a(0s, 600s, [](){ system("start man.exe"); });
I don't think this is a good idea, but it's easy to achieve like this:
#include <thread>
#include <chrono>
int main()
{
while (true)
{
std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::minutes(10));
system("man.exe");
}
}
I still think as per my earlier comment that a scheduled task on Windows would be better behaved and easier configurable.
I used the following code to create a timer object in my c++ application running on a debian 8.
class Timer
{
private:
std::condition_variable cond_;
std::mutex mutex_;
int duration;
void *params;
public:
Timer::Timer(void (*func)(void*))
{
this->handler = func;
this->duration = 0;
this->params = NULL;
};
Timer::~Timer(){};
void Timer::start(int duree, void* handlerParams)
{
this->duration = duree;
this->params = handlerParams;
/*
* Launch the timer thread and wait it
*/
std::thread([this]{
std::unique_lock<std::mutex> mlock(mutex_);
std::cv_status ret = cond_.wait_for(mlock,
std::chrono::seconds(duration));
if ( ret == std::cv_status::timeout )
{
handler(params);
}
}).detach();
};
void Timer::stop()
{
cond_.notify_all();
}
};
It works correctly under gdb and under normal conditions, but in a load test of 30 requests or more, it crashes with the assertion :
nptl/pthread_mutex_lock.c:350: __pthread_mutex_cond_lock_full: Assertion `(-(e)) != 3 || !robust' failed.
I don't understand the cause of this assertion. Can anyone help me please ??
Thank you
Basically you have a detached thread that accesses the timer object, so it's likely that you destroyed the Timer object but the thread is still running and accessing it's member(mutex, conditional variable).
The assert itself says, from glibc source code, that the owner of the mutex has died.
Thanks a lot for your comments ! I'll try to change the thread detach, and do the load tests.
This is a MVCE of my problem, which is a part of a huge application.
/**
* \file Timer.hxx
* \brief Definition of Timer class.
*/
#include <chrono>
#include <thread>
#include <mutex>
#include <condition_variable>
class Timer
{
private:
std::condition_variable cond_;
std::mutex mutex_;
int duration;
void *params;
public:
Timer(void (*func)(void*));
~Timer();
void (*handler)(void*);
void start(int duree, void* handlerParams);
void stop();
};
/*
* Timer.cxx
*/
#include "Timer.hxx"
Timer::Timer(void (*func)(void*))
{
//this->set_handler(func, params);
this->handler = func;
this->duration = 0;
this->params = NULL;
}
Timer::~Timer()
{
}
void Timer::start(int duree, void* handlerParams)
{
this->duration = duree;
this->params = handlerParams;
/*
* Launch the timer thread and wait it
*/
std::thread([this]{
std::unique_lock<std::mutex> mlock(mutex_);
std::cv_status ret = cond_.wait_for(mlock, std::chrono::seconds(duration));
if ( ret == std::cv_status::timeout )
{
handler(params);
}
}).detach();
}
void Timer::stop()
{
cond_.notify_all();
}
/*
* MAIN
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <iostream>
#include <unistd.h>
#include "Timer.hxx"
using namespace std;
void timeoutHandler(void* params)
{
char* data= (char*)params;
cout << "Timeout triggered !! Received data is: " ;
if (data!=NULL)
cout << data << endl;
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int delay=5;
char data[20] ="This is a test" ;
Timer *t= new Timer(&timeoutHandler) ;
t->start(delay, data);
cout << "Timer started !! " << endl;
sleep(1000);
t->stop();
delete t;
cout << "Timer deleted !! " << endl;
return 0;
}
I'm wanting a reasonably reliable threaded timer, so I've written a timer object that fires a std::function on a thread. I would like to give this timer the ability to stop before it gets to the next tick; something you can't do with ::sleep (at least I don't think you can).
So what I've done is put a condition variable on a mutex. If the condition times out, I fire the event. If the condition is signalled the thread is exited. So the Stop method needs to be able to get the thread to stop and/or interrupt its wait, which I think is what it's doing right now.
There are problems with this however. Sometimes the thread isn't joinable() and sometimes the condition is signalled after its timeout but before it's put into its wait state.
How can I improve this and make it robust?
The following is a full repo. The wait is 10 seconds here but the program should terminate immediately as the Foo is created and then immediately destroyed. It does sometimes but mostly it does not.
#include <atomic>
#include <thread>
#include <future>
#include <sstream>
#include <chrono>
#include <iostream>
class Timer
{
public:
Timer() {}
~Timer()
{
Stop();
}
void Start(std::chrono::milliseconds const & interval, std::function<void(void)> const & callback)
{
Stop();
thread = std::thread([=]()
{
for(;;)
{
auto locked = std::unique_lock<std::mutex>(mutex);
auto result = terminate.wait_for(locked, interval);
if (result == std::cv_status::timeout)
{
callback();
}
else
{
return;
}
}
});
}
void Stop()
{
terminate.notify_one();
if(thread.joinable())
{
thread.join();
}
}
private:
std::thread thread;
std::mutex mutex;
std::condition_variable terminate;
};
class Foo
{
public:
Foo()
{
timer = std::make_unique<Timer>();
timer->Start(std::chrono::milliseconds(10000), std::bind(&Foo::Callback, this));
}
~Foo()
{
}
void Callback()
{
static int count = 0;
std::ostringstream o;
std::cout << count++ << std::endl;
}
std::unique_ptr<Timer> timer;
};
int main(void)
{
{
Foo foo;
}
return 0;
}
See my comment. You forgot to implement the state of the thing the thread is waiting for, leaving the mutex nothing to protect and the thread nothing to wait for. Condition variables are stateless -- your code must track the state of the thing whose change you're notifying the thread about.
Here's the code fixed. Notice that the mutex protects stop, and stop is the thing the thread is waiting for.
class Timer
{
public:
Timer() {}
~Timer()
{
Stop();
}
void Start(std::chrono::milliseconds const & interval,
std::function<void(void)> const & callback)
{
Stop();
{
auto locked = std::unique_lock<std::mutex>(mutex);
stop = false;
}
thread = std::thread([=]()
{
auto locked = std::unique_lock<std::mutex>(mutex);
while (! stop) // We hold the mutex that protects stop
{
auto result = terminate.wait_for(locked, interval);
if (result == std::cv_status::timeout)
{
callback();
}
}
});
}
void Stop()
{
{
// Set the predicate
auto locked = std::unique_lock<std::mutex>(mutex);
stop = true;
}
// Tell the thread the predicate has changed
terminate.notify_one();
if(thread.joinable())
{
thread.join();
}
}
private:
bool stop; // This is the thing the thread is waiting for
std::thread thread;
std::mutex mutex;
std::condition_variable terminate;
};