I am building a project with Keil uV5.17. The build stops when it detects an error, however I would like to have the same behavior with a warning.
Currently I am using an Option for Target >> User >> Stop on Exit Code. However it seems to ignore warnings, any options on how to stop the build, when a warning appears?
If you want all the warnings to be treated as error, go to the Options for target>>C/C++. In the Misc controls add:
--diag_error=warning
Related
I recently discovered the Failures into Break-Points - option from googletest using the command line option gtest_break_on_failure or by defining the GTEST_BREAK_ON_FAILURE environment variable.
I gave it a try using gtest_break_on_failure. From command line, I saw no effect (to be honest I had the glimpse of hope that VS2010 would be registered as debugger and somehow magically would pop up and point to the error source).
Using it in the VS environment as command line argument a failed assertion triggered a break but the call stack did not include the test method that caused the failure. I found the work around to step (F10) until I reached my test code, but that does not really seem to be convenient.
Is it somehow possible to use the option from command line ?
Has anybody a recommendation how to get the correct call stack in the environment?
From VS, you can add --gtest_break_on_failure to the Command Args in the target's Property Pages, then just run the exe without stepping over.
From the command line, you should be able to run the Debug executable with the flags --gtest_break_on_failure --gtest_catch_exceptions=0 and this should allow you to break into the MSVC debugger when the test fails.
I'm not sure whether or not this question has a causality with my previous question.
So, I compiled Qt 5.3.1 from source with MinGW 4.8.2. The build stopped at qtbase/src/printsupport directory, as you can see the image below:
Is it a bug or something at qtbase/src/printsupport/kernel/qprintengine_win.cpp file? Then, should I just report it to the developer?
Look here it give you a hint. Probably somewhere you use this key -Werror in make files implicitly or explicitly when start compilation with gcc. If I correct understand error in that switch operation must be default: statement or case PPK_CustomBase: statement.
miraiE,
If you will notice in your output: cc1plus.exe: all warnings being treated as errors
This is, as was mentioned before, a warning that is stopping the compile process as an error.
You should be able to run you configure.bat script again, with the option -no-warnings-are-errors.
Then re-run your make.exe to get past this, and other warnings, from stopping the build.
Details of the specific configure options below:
../qtbase-opensource-src-5.3.1/configure --help |grep -i warn
-silent ............ Reduce the build output so that warnings and errors
-no-warnings-are-errors Make warnings be treated normally
-warnings-are-errors Make warnings be treated as errors
I hope this helps!
I recently discovered the Failures into Break-Points - option from googletest using the command line option gtest_break_on_failure or by defining the GTEST_BREAK_ON_FAILURE environment variable.
I gave it a try using gtest_break_on_failure. From command line, I saw no effect (to be honest I had the glimpse of hope that VS2010 would be registered as debugger and somehow magically would pop up and point to the error source).
Using it in the VS environment as command line argument a failed assertion triggered a break but the call stack did not include the test method that caused the failure. I found the work around to step (F10) until I reached my test code, but that does not really seem to be convenient.
Is it somehow possible to use the option from command line ?
Has anybody a recommendation how to get the correct call stack in the environment?
From VS, you can add --gtest_break_on_failure to the Command Args in the target's Property Pages, then just run the exe without stepping over.
From the command line, you should be able to run the Debug executable with the flags --gtest_break_on_failure --gtest_catch_exceptions=0 and this should allow you to break into the MSVC debugger when the test fails.
As mentioned in the title, I am using NetBeans IDE 7.0.1 for C++ (for the assignments at the university). I was using gedit and terminal, but I would like to try my hand at IDEs.
I tried Eclipse but I seem to prefer Netbeans interface.
(All the above->with my laptop, running Ubuntu 11.10).
Well, I have some questions,
Is there any way to "enrich" the "RUN FAILED (exit value 1, total time: 470ms)" message with a "Segmentation fault", as well? (or this is how the IDEs work, run and if you get a "run failed" go to debug mode?)
Also, at debug mode, when I get a segmentation fault I get a new window saying "Signal Caught" and then this:
Signal received: SIGSEGV (?) with sigcode ? (?)
From process: ?
For program testing_netbeans, pid 15,211
You may discard the signal or forward it and you may continue or pause the process
To control which signals are caught or ignored use Debug->Dbx Configure
with three options available ("Discard and Pause", "Discard and Continue", "Forward and Continue"). What do each of the above options do?
How is it possible to get the line where the error occurs? (in example with gdb I would compile with -g3 option and then run with gdb. But now how can I do that by default?
What I did like about eclipse is the fact that it would have a default breakpoint at the 1st line of the main function, is there any way to do that by default?
Thank you for your time!
The compiler flag is -ggdb. It allows you to use breakpoints, know the values of variables and etc.
If you are just building in "debug mode", you will get minimal information, such as line of crash by opening the "call stack" page.
Eclipse is a bit better for debugging, but as an editor, I much prefer Netbeans over it for C++, while I prefer Eclipse for Java
EDIT: Also, you have to have setupped GDB as the debugger in Netbeans, but I'm pretty that's done by default.
Command /Developer/usr/bin/g++-4.2 failed with exit code 1
build error
My project was working fine with no errors, and I went to run it again without changing anything and received this error (only this). Any ideas on how to fix it?
I had this error when certain .cpp files didn't exist, but it could be caused by any number of things. Clearly in your case it's something different, if you're sure you haven't changed anything in the project.
On the right of the build results list there should be a (well hidden) button with lines - that shows the raw build output, which should give you some idea about what went wrong. What does that say?