So, I'm experimenting with apps.groups.migration, and I took my mbox and successfully inserted it into a test group. Then I took another mbox from a list archive, and inserted that. I got nothing but SUCCESS returns, but nothing ever appeared in the group. Is there an age limit? Some of these notes are years old, but we're trying to migrate from our existing listserv to groups, and would like to bring the archives.
Ok, turns out the messages in the list archive had had their message-id's stripped out. This causes the message to not be posted to the archive, but still returns a "SUCCESS" result.
Related
I have a postman collection with 3 requests in it. When I click on "Run Collection" normally all 3 requests are sent. Yesterday I figured out that only the first one is triggered, the others are ignored. I have cloned the collection, I have re-created the collection, I've updated postman... don't know what else to do..
I am on version 9.4.1 - maybe someone has an idea, thanks.
If someone wants to see my collection, here is the JSON-link: https://www.getpostman.com/collections/d8558e74dc154975151e
I've removed the API key for the requests.
Solution:
I had to remove the postman.setNextRequest in my first request - this somehow broke it.
Ok, I've been using Google Cloud Platform for some video files
that are are viewable from a few web pages I built. I started this two or three years ago, and I have loved it.
But, now it appears they broke it, without warning/telling us.
So, in the platform's console, yesterday (for first time since a month or two ago), I uploaded another video...that part went fine. But, when it came time to click on the checkbox to grant public access, the checkbox is now GONE. (The only part of the UI that looks NEW,
is the column labeled 'public access'. Instead of just a check-box to toggle on or off, now there's a yellow-triangle and an oval-shaped symbol. Once or twice, I was able to get a popup to appear saying 'edit permission', but that quickly led into the weeds.)
After half an hour or so, I finally thought to call platform support, and explained my problem to a guy (with just enough Australian accent to cause me to have to ask for repeats quite a bit...sigh).
So, they logged me a case# and I suggested I was headed to bed, and asked that we now use email (rather than the phone) to continue. Just before bed, I got the case#, and a query about whether it was ok for them to 'change my console'. I replied to the email, saying yes, and went to bed.)
So that was last nite. This morning, re-reading their email, it seems to say that it could be 3 or 4 days, before a more technical person will contact me.
Some re-reading their platform-console docs, I'm now GUESSING that maybe they just nuked the public-access checkbox, and that now I'm supposed to spend hours (days?) taking a short-course on IAM-permmissions, and learn some new long-winded method.
(This whole mess could have been avoided, if they'd just emailed us an informational warning of this UI-change, with some new 5-step short list or tutorial of how to learn to use their 'new, much more complicated,
way to specify public-access'. From where I sit, this change is equivalent to Microsoft saying 'instead of that checkbox, you'll need to learn to make registry edits...see our platform docs on how to do that.)
Right now, I have more than half-a-mind, to seriously consider bailing out of Google's cloud storage, and consider switching to one of the others. But, I'm not quite ready yet, to make that jump (from the frying-pan into the fire?). :^)
Anyone else been down this road? What meeting did I miss? Is there a quicker way out of my dilemma, than just waiting for Google-support to get back to me?
It looks like the change you mention was introduced on July 18th. I’m not sure why, but judging by the change description, it looks like it is aimed to avoid accidentally making sensitive information public: “Objects can no longer be made public through one-click actions”.
You can find the procedure to make a single object public here. It can be achieved through the Console and won't take you more than a few minutes. Once the object is shared publicly, you can use the icon in the “public access” column to get the URL for the object.
You can also make all the content of a bucket public using a similar approach.
When you upload your objects into a bucket, you can upload with ACL as publicRead
and all your objects will have public URL.
public async Task UploadObjectAsync(string bucketName, string objectName, Stream source, string contentType = "image/jpeg")
{
var storage = StorageClient.Create();
await storage.UploadObjectAsync(bucketName, objectName, contentType, source, new UploadObjectOptions()
{
PredefinedAcl = PredefinedObjectAcl.PublicRead
});
}
As I suspected. (I still wonder if they even considered sending an email to each registered/existing customer.)
Ok, yes, (finally, after some practices), this solves it! Thx for those two answers.
(But in my view, their UI-change is still a work-in-progress) So, I have a SUGGESTION for ya, Google. Once one is into the permissions-edit-dialog, and remembers to do an 'add', there's are the 3 fields. The first and third are fine...drop-downs with choices. But that middle entry needs work...how about doing something like an auto-guess-ahead...initialize the field to a suggested value of 'allUsers', so we don't have to remember what to type and how to spell it, or something along those lines.
EDIT: [Actually, it ought to be possible to make that field a drop-down-list choice, with 'allUsers' as one suggested value, and a second value as a text-entry (for specific user-names, etc).]
Unfortunately, 8 Ball Pool it is not possible to list files Google Hangouts without access to the Omegle bucket that contains them. This is due to the current design of the library, which requires that the bucket is loaded before listing its files.
I am having no joy with the RavenDb profiler. There's output rendered in the browser, but the profiler always claims there are no requests and no sessions.
When the document store is created I make the following call:
RavenProfiler.InitializeFor(docStore);
And in my master layout I have this, just before the closing body tag:
#Raven.Client.MvcIntegration.RavenProfiler.CurrentRequestSessions()
As far as I can tell there's nothing more required in order for this to work (of course, I may be wrong) yet the output of the profiler is always as above.
I'm using version 3.0.0.0 of Raven.Client.MvcIntegration.
Any ideas?
I figured it out. It was an issue with how I resolved the DocumentStore via my Windsor Container. It turned out that I ended up with two instances of the DocumentStore, and the wrong one was registered with RavenProfiler. Once I ensured that only one DocumentStore was created, everything started working as expected.
I have a problem deleting documents from Amazon CloudSearch.
When I send document for deletion I receive response
{"status": "success", "adds": 0, "deletes": 5}
And then the video stays in the index with all fields reset to their default values and not deleted.
The documentation is not clear if this is the normal behaviour or a bug.
Any one else experienced this?
This surprised me too but appears to be normal behavior. The 'deleted' documents aren't searchable anymore since their fields are all null so they shouldn't cause any problems.
The problem I have with this is that they can be returned if you search for something like "-zomgwtfbbq", since they don't contain the term "zomgwtfbbq".
It is also confusing since it makes your dashboard show one count (the "searchable" documents) but if you run a test search for -zomgwtfbbq (what I have been using as a proxy for "get all documents"), you get a different number. Took me a while to figure out why.
Despite what they say about setting the version to max uint32 "permanently removing" the document, it will still be there. The problem is that they consider these documents unsearchable, but they're not.
Are you specifying the version number when you delete the document?
When deleting documents, note that deleting version max(uint32_t) will permanently remove the document from your domain. Because it is not possible to specify a higher version number, there is no way to add a later version of the document.
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/cloudsearch/latest/developerguide/versioning.html
If I got to calendar, click on To Do, then try to add an event, the form pops up, I fill it out, press save, but no Event gets added.
In the SQL error log's I see an error like this:
2011-09-29 14:57:07 EDT ERROR: null value in column "visibility" violates not-null constraint
2011-09-29 14:57:07 EDT STATEMENT: insert into
vtiger_activity(activityid,subject,date_start,time_start,time_end,due_date,status,eventstatus,priority,sendnotification,activitytype,visibility,duration_hours,duration_minutes,location,recurringtype,notime)
values('235','Testing','2011-09-29','19:50',NULL,'2011-09-29','Not Started',NULL,'High','0','Task',NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,'0')
So, for some reason, it is trying to add a To-Do while inserting null values. My biggest problem is that I cannot locate the origin of the query. So, basically, the most important thing I am asking is what file takes the data that was input into the todosave form and turns it into a query.
I don't know if many people on here use Vtiger, but I couldn't figure this out so I went ahead and posted anyway. The official documentation is not very helpful in my opinion.
Thanks for everything, have a good day.
This might be an isolated case, but was any of the modules modified recently? In this case, I would assume that it would be the Calendar module. I've tested this on the demo website and on my vTiger installation and it works fine..
Perhaps you can download a fresh copy of vTiger and replace the modules/Calendar all its content.
By the way, another place to ask if you have any questions, is the vTiger forums.
http://forums.vtiger.com/index.php
Usually you can ask it in the Help - 5.2.1 section. Hope this helps!